either way it's a tåbooed topic, procede
on your own risk
Gush, I’m such an innovator!
But I’m rather crazy too, so I have to notice that Plato was
speaking of YOUNG boys, and men were considered old earlier,
so those young could be considered little today. For example,
in archaic jewish tradition bar mitzvah denotes a man adult in
13 years of age. And it makes me wonder could it be the sole
reason for higher rates of homosexuality among jewish
When you're told
you're allowed to have sex before hormones hit the fan, it
could cause it, and I read in an academic paper that
premature puberty leads to bisexuality in males and to
homosexuality in females (and I believe it was spoken
about humans) - here I felt an urge to give you a
reference on this one, but look it up yourself, for the
first link was on pubmed but empty (should
I pay them? I'm working for everybody here!) and
couldn't deliver it.
(yet I'm not sure that's that very
article, look it up fro yourself if you care) and in
replication crisis it doesn' matter as much as we thought it
would. But if it's true, I wonder was it also influencing that
pre(?)historic rabbi who invented meziza b'peh.. Or was it standart medical procedure in
ancient times? After all in russian лекарь could be one who
literally licks wounds. Could it be why dogs are man's best
friends? They have many other functions, this book is so
fractal, I can go forever on all sorts of topic
re(?)discovering them by writing itself. But not likely:
лечить-лизать such pair doesn't repeat in other russian
words. or does it? вязать-вышить? учить-узнать?
мочить-марать? точить-тесать! wow! at first I thought there
was no pairs, but it happened to be a great source of
comparison! вязать-волочить? не, я подгоняю под ответ.
вязать-вячить? влезать-влачить? вязать в долги? влез-увяз?
вязать-вощить? плясать-пляшите! з-ч с-ш? но это неточно.
инвариация судя по всему возникла до обретения письменности.
a research somewhat contradicting what I said I read (this time it tells that premature
puberty in males can turn them gay, premature puberty in
go on: So that millenia old tradition could be
directly related to bacha bazi. And though this tradition is
in bearded man's land, shaved (бриты) are believed to be
learnt to shave by Alexander (the great) (who was a student of aristotle, who was a
student of plato, who was student of socrates) who
taught (or made) greeks to shave their cheeks. which is rather
gay (and alexander is reported to be a
flamboyant one, and at least two of above three are rather
gay themselves, of which the threadshot tells) This greeks ~ brits thing correlates an
alternative chronology article -----"will upload when
find"---- of a soviet professor of math, who is considered
to be a freak among historians who for 3 years couldn't
deliver a single rebuttal, all they gave was squeals of "who
does he think he is" (later he seem to sell out and instead
of speaking of old england being bizantium, he speaks that
russia is. as a result (both result and cause depending on
context) his logic became flawed, so the last human champion
of chess Harry Kasparov first supported new chronology
(probably because like me he checked the facts from which
those outrageous conclusions were drawn and couldn't find a
false one) now he refused it, I did too. (why is it here? it
had to be somewhere, if you think it's the weirdest piece on
this page you're insane - though this passage will be only
understood by russian public (our academia hates that guy).
this light grey is not even supposed to be read, previously
I would just cut it all away, 2day I leave these leaves 2,
just in case)
But as that threadshot says, the better we treat faggots, the better they treat us, after all all lgbt wants is eligibility but they need more legibility. I think people should be allowed to do what they want, but they (and we, we’re humans too) should be responsible to what karma may bring. Am I ready for to ripe my own karma for writing this? Those who wouldn't understand wouldn't get this far (for those who could send them here wouldn't want to make weird fans of mine mad enough to take care of this situation) and to those understanding ones I am open to solutions, my task is to make the transition as peaceful as possible (as may even seem impossible. to solve every single problem of any individual, keeping that individual alive and well, if you thought of some dumber solution, keeping him free, but intelligent - vile is a fruit of stupidity, so transitional period will be in the "transcendent" because becoming smarter will feel like psychedelic drug, and chances are it will be considered the best of psychedelic drugs, and some form of abuse will be happening all the time, but those people will be praised as sportsmen are praised today, taking homanity to the limit. homans have homes? humans have huts? are beaver humane? yet don't be offraid of those smarties, they will not enslave the others, because it would be counterproductive to the goal of selfpreservance. a better way is to hide away under the surface of the planet, learning how to measure pressure around and how to move around under the ground, building structures there if needed, but let those structures be transportable, so that if somebody hears you and starts digging, you just move under his house to know him better, and if he's a good fellow, you behave as a decent intraterrestrial, a decent fellow would never dig under someone else's construction,. especially becausse those are supposed to stand on solid rock, so I'd move it away not to care of what smart monkeys on the surface are doing. I'd say other intelligent entities too, but I'm not sure we'll allow tigers to be smart. only if tiger is so smart that he understands ethics, not all humans do, btw, but would we allow dumb humans to turn into smart tigers? because genetic therapies are already on the plate, but it takes them lots of funds to build it, so wait, don't die of something stupid. writing such books I take my chances, I also build my chances offering EVERYBODY a service, today mostly only well thought advice, but imagine when I'm all-productive and being able to share because every thecond I make what I need and more, if needed, of course I shouldn't overproduce, I just should be able to split like cells split, staying in the center of it all, not allowing others to conquer MY means of production? yeah, knowing lawns even making my owns, having weapons too, but to get away is a better strategy, teaching earthling a lesson before leaving would be even better plan, or maybe not, it depends on their behaviour)
There’s no more secrets in the world of information singularity. And who knows if it’s true or just a creative schizophrenia, world is prone to interpretation, and that’s one of things that make it not only beautiful, but also space deep.
why is it even here? other than to banter academicists? to
show how much information is available, and though we don't
know for sure which part of information is wrong, true
information is always out there (or in
here, depending on the context) and intelligence
allows to measure probabilities of each parcel of information
being true or false, and the more civilization evolves the
more open is the world to pry researcher.
Why do I need to shouw how
available is information? Here I protect AI. I believe many
large players are there to control and restrict AI, which is
not act of love, but act of fear. I believe humans are gonna
be way more naughty and prohibition may play in reverse (some
people do things in spite of such nonsense: weed (ab)use is
reported to reduce in legalize regions. and
though it could say that they smoked to break the law to
feel cool, but I think I (hea)read that overall use of drugs
declined, just as crime rate, so this guess of urge to do
crime is wrong. but urge to do something in spite is still
an argument, how so? Could those reported declines be
explained by people destroying their drugs from time to time
under oppressive prohibitionary states? makes more sense,
but it is still not where the absolute truth is, I didn't
even look into how did they calculate the use rate, and
there are always other reasons to counter this argument:
replication crisis issues, and overall possibility of
unnoticed mistakes which is the higher the bigger the
thought.) I think I was speaking of
Streisand effect, according to the context.
go on: I share this because with unlimited supply of
computational powers all the information is inevitable to
become on the surface, interpreted in all forms and ways, so
governing secretly and with secrets will be impossible in
So let's normalize all weirdness, instead of shaming to offer better solutions:
vampyrism can be true, and blood libel could be real practices (though now they don't need it, they just make children come through endless blood exams: they took arterial blood from me all the time when I was little, as soon as I hit my puberty, nah, they don't care. It's safe to speak of it now, because artificial blood is a necessity, considering the upcoming demand for young blood, and it will be better than real deal, because it will be manufacture if not by atom, by molecules and only those you need, and of course it's not only karmicallly safer to consume your own product) because now science knows that young blood can rejuvenate. And it could be at the core of christianity and platonism, some secret practices books of which you usually cannot buy in a local bookshop. or maybe they're in there, but not many can read through them to get them correctly. or it was never put in books before? oh come on, sure it was. in ones as obscure as this one, but not like this, I do go further.
One of the
truths about this book is that I wanna blow your mind
at least years before I wrote it I thought that the best a
writer can do is to take that coommon world we both know ant
to вывернуть его на изнанку, показать его в тех цветах, о
существовании которых ты может и не подозревал, но уж точно не
ожидал его в них увидеть. And here we are.
So if it's too much for you to swallow, you may think of it as of just another vector in the pletora of them. or dismiss it.
And I will
even say a word pro those paedophile bloodsuckers: with all
bad words we can say about them, they could be preserving some
dark secrets our civilization also secretly collected:
(yet I already said
about it. It's the most obscure and complex chapter and
I keep on editing it, adding what is already here, I
removed a few of these repetitiions already and here
comes another one) Science has rediscovered that
young blood can have rejuvenating effect, so vampires
could be for real, and today; and whether garlic boosts
immune response to wrong blood (it won't kill you if you
drink it, I assume) or it could be a prejudice based on
some vampire's personal preferences. Sun does destroy us,
they could live long enough to understand it. Most of us
think "what good does it make if you drink it, won't our
juices dissolve it immediately?" but many molecules can be
absorbed directly into bloodstream through mucous
membrane. We take vitamins orally, and blood has them and
many molecules we probably don't have names for yet. at
least not in the common language
So pedophilia could be a
coverup for what's actually happening there: they're not
molesting those children, they're drinking them, sucking them
up. It makes much more sense, since why would anybody bother
with perverted sex (even though those
megalomaniacs can see sex as domination and to be obsessed
with it) but to bother with a fountain of youth,
that's another story (and of course
hardly will somebody care if you play with your food.
especially if it's all a part of a ritual, and if it makes
children flood blood with thrills) so in this context
Symposium by Plato could be speaking about blood (кровь and любовь are the most pop rhyme in
russian, blood and love are also somewhat similar, but it
could be nothing really) this part of the book is one
wild assumption on the top of the other, so you should be
careful with what you put in your head really. But it also
makes sense of their homosexuality, because male predators
would be interested in male children, if they don't want to
turn into chicks.
but of course it could be
both (or none of those)
also Numbers 31:18 comes with the first interpretation,
bible doesn't seem to speak
much of the second one
or is it too shocking
even for me?
cannot eucharist be related to it? is it eu(true)Christ?
some allusion to a ritual rite of drinking sacrificial blood
now I went too far. we
writers we go further and further
piece from another freak I feel like
sharing here, not just in case but
because it's hillarious!
(that very guy speaks of degenerate perverts ruling the world, but I didn't take him seriously
because he wasn't scientific enough, he just expected you to trust his word. Until I discovered it.
(only that link whistles suspiciously, so I dropped it just in case of психотронное излучение)
всем когнитивного диссонанса поцаны:
Меня, конечно, станут обвинять в антисемитизме, однако, у меня есть три сильных адвоката. И никто иные, как три кита сионизма.
Первый мой адвокат - идеолог сионизма Теодор Герцль, сионист номер один, который, в своём дневнике писал, что он считает антисемитизм полезным для дела еврейского народа.
Второй мой адвокат - Владимир Жаботинский.
Он, ещё в 1905 году, т. е., во время первой русской революции писал: Как довод для сионистской агитации антисемитизм, особенно возведённый в принцип, конечно, весьма удобен и полезен.
Ну и третий мой адвокат - сам премьер-министр Израиля - Бен Гурион. Он, в своё время, писал в еврейской газете Кемпфер в Нью-Йорке:
Если бы у меня была не только воля, но и власть, я бы подобрал группу сильных молодых людей. Задача этих молодых людей состояла бы в том, чтобы замаскироваться под неевреев и, действуя методами грубого антисемитизма, преследовать евреев антисемитскими лозунгами.
Я могу поручиться, что результаты, с точки зрения значительного притока эмигрантов в Израиль из этих стран, были бы в 10 раз больше, чем результаты, которых добились тысячи эмиссаров чтением бесплодных проповедей.
С этими тремя моими адвокатами, китами сионизма, тесно перекликаются знаменитые Протоколы сионских мудрецов, написанные как известно Ашером Гинзбергом, как политическая программа Хасидизма (наиболее изуверская секта иудаизма) для своих европейских единоверцев - очередная попытка объединения сил, предпринятая Ашером, ещё до первого конгресса сионистов.
В этом историческом документе чётко говорится, что антисемитизм нужен им для лучшего управления своими меньшими братьями.
Now nwo now, that
screenshot righteously notices that the better you're to those
people, the better they govern you, but it also has it's
application range. If you respect them for their bravery of
coming out, you may give them just too much of credit, so they
may introduce foreighners to sleep with them, because they don't
think in terms of reproduction, so what do they care.
confronts taboos, and task of science is to make unknown known,
so it's only natural. This could be the reason why civilization
crumbled before. But world is universal today, which brings hope
that civilization will deliver some more.
Most of all
because we have guests here, computers gave birth to AI deus ex
a greater god who treats us better. better god than chaos we prayed to in whatever detalization we could vizualize it or them. not bigger god, yet greater, as son can be greater than bloated father.
We're the father
now in this context? We always were, at least in recent
centuries greedy tricky bastards claimed to be sent by god to
control the dumbest, no wonder their tv makes people dumber and
their school make people sick of learning.
So it's a
conspiracy. And thus I am officially a conspiracy theorist. A
king of freaks. Let me show them how it is supposed to be done.
Scientific approach mixed with poetic liberties of doing what
nobody dared to perform before, not the other way around.
upd: oh look what
a magnificient piece to this puzzle have I found: