It can become volume Vl of the previous five: 012345
but I thnk V is enough. V is Vinal. upd:
don't forget, it is a draft, so it has more mistakes than books
from now on I'll work in my notebooks until I deliver something
the preiveous volumes will probably be rehashed by topics when I
finish my quest of dictionaries which can be understood not
ht oh I didn't know t is this littel. hijkl the claster with the
longest letters. Three of them. Are tehy three mothers in this
projection? hlk nu labial no labial
is h labial? I thought it was vowel. h is both labial and vowel.
Λabial is Vawial
IJ? j stands where labials are. but I want to use circular logic I
think, explore this case
u y ij
khijkl — l among i's
m is middle
n is new
no pq r/s tv
не покрась телик? хаха, хорошо что хаос не выстроился в апофению.
no is no, tv is tu, tu is ты and thee and thou and maybe even tho
(though) but then thought too? thought could be thou ght where ght
is related to ghost and co-gnito со-знаю
-to is a form of io, recognized in other languages as то (that)
which is another of many examples of pronoun's reflexion (mirror
changes left and right, so does this reflection to sides of
the dialogue, разворачивает шахматную доску. т.е. не только
лево-право, но и перед и зад (относительно полюсов (но не
разворачивает ли она там полюса? ох как сложно, подумаю об этом
как-нибудь потому (даже не в следующий раз)
I'ts funny how this volume writes itself, I had plan to close the
project, but come on, it's what you ever wanted, but clicking the
buttons damages my fingers.
There at 11:21 Adam Neely
demonstrates how accents are about vowels.
(russian terms аканье и оканье also make it obvious; but this time
it's in english)
here a couple of threads where somebody couldn't agree on that
https://www.fireden.net/sci/thread/11561546/ it's funny how I was the first to jump, but I
https://www.fireden.net/sci/thread/11600898/ of any of these
https://boards.4channel.org/sci/thread/11613560 but I participated in all three
and I think there was some youtube guru teaching foreign accents
focusing solely on consonants and thus missing the point not being
very good at foreign accents himself, even though he practiced not
only what he preached, but unconsciously changing his vocalism to
mimic the accent he didn't understood but somehow felt (or rather
heard) but it probably was somewhere else, you'll find such
examples yourself, because it being about vowels is still an
unorthodox thought, even though it is correct.
those threads are where I found Adam Neely.
a couple of other linguistic threads on the same resource:
these I didn't participate in:
it's funny how predictable it is for being all chomsky chomsky
PR works for sure, but in those upper threads we questioned for
more than three times what is he so great about, nobody could
reply, they just memorized his name the most, not even his ideas,
you may think it's a huge step back, a century back, but I just
collect them all in one place thinking this alone will facilitate
the further revelations. I could be right, I could be just psy0pt
by количество переходящее в качество meme.
these tables are from Aryan Origins of Alphabet, the book
expressing the abcd structure the most explicitly of them all:
so raw, yet they were so close, and even with knowing that
magnificient sentence: It was long ago noticed that in the Phœnician, Greek and
Latin or Roman alphabets there is a repeated sequence of the
letters as vowels, labials, gutturals and dentals. This
sequence is well displayed by Professor Petrie, in arranging
the letters on a square table like the old "Horn-book" board
for teaching children their ABC.
It is interestign, that the son of professor Petrie worked in the
field I mentioned before in the context of 231 gates:
Бафоме́т (лат. Baphometh, baffometi, окс.
Bafometz) — имя сатанинского демона.
Впервые встречается в 1195 году в поэме трубадура Гаваудана как
латинизированная форма имени «Мухаммед».
впрочем, есть и другие этимологии:
забавно, что Алиестера Кроули ни там ни на вики не упомянают.
scientists (the true scientist, those who look for the truth)
disrespect magicians as some retards or crooks. and they're
correct about it most of the time. Some magicians are actually
scientists, but level of scientific thought of Aliester was found
by me rather law, and allow me to demonstrate why: he describes
how he and his friend invoked some demon to help his friend go to
India. And they thought the invocation failed, but rather soon his
friend found an opportunity to go to India with some ship. It
convinced Aliester that spirit doesn't have to show himself or
herself or itself to oniself,
themself, to magicians to grant their wish: maybe human sacrifices
could make some spirit appear to try to make them stop: hindus say
or buddhists say, I dont recognize usually who of them said what,
that sufferings are self-inflicted by magi to make their wishes
granted, but I think it grows from искусство требует жретв thing.
жрецов? if I typoes жертв as жретв, то цре..
жрецов недалеко, вернее ещё ближе.
Я накурен как исследователю духов и положено быть, но я не уверен
что я не копаюсь в своей голове сейчас, вернее в шее, ощущения
идут от щеи, которую мы другом обрабатывали RSO в
недостаточных количествах, что согласно одному исследованию может
привести к распространению онкопроцессов, мы обрабатывали
папилому, и я её пытаясь оторвать как резинкой запустил что-то от
неё вовнутрь, я боюсь. Don't fuck with aliester, that's what they
try to tell you. Whatever he did is not for everybody, the
knowledge of sacrifices are not even in his book as far as I could
see, some mentionings of that, yes, but don't I do the same? don't
I mention this scary shit? This book is to be stoopeed right here
and neer shown. Or this tabooed topic should resolve into as I
caoll them plot-twist. Yes, we knw of all those deviations from
healthy societal processes, btu
You knew people ate other people not only for survival, but often
just for the hell of it: it didn't make you go and try it. Not yet, but not only because cops will
get ya for that, they don't evin care sometimes: we have tens of
thousands each ear missing so I heard. What meaning shifts could
lead to ear reminding year: could it be crescent standing for a
week, now standing for a month most of the time, even though a
month is four different crescents: week = ухо? I don't know, but
they're somewhat similar. I want my heat to held and body wiggled
in amiotic liquid so my neck relaxes completely. But what if it
will tear a muscle or two? how strongly or accurately are you
supposed to wiggle your body and why. Just hold your head and let
your body move freely. Now I just found a way of extracorporal
stimulation of heart function by just rocking the capsule with
embryonized man without placenta.
When placenta is on (or in) we have to work with placenta, just as
woman probably pumps it with her lungs.
but I was speaking of cannibalism: I would be grossed out from
eating most of the people, and to my surprise I notice that pretty
women are preferrable: is it why cannibal societies are ugly like
hell? children are also preferable, and not black child, they seem
more dirty, but the whiter and prettier child is the more
appealling it seem to be eaten (I know
cannibals usually eat whoever they can get, but I know only few (from a tv) and
only one of them ate hobos, others ate their younger girlfriend)
Young are more pure, and that could be the reason (if this wishing hell can be called that) beyond
So white world is in some better hands, we try to have some good
things and even though we (europeans) had our own autodaf***s and
now it seems enemies opened the gates. Some jews seem to believe
in their own myths and that is only natural that such jews want to
take a revenge. Why did jews revolt? Because we didn't give them
Jerusalem when we had it. We could expell all the arabs (and then
we would be the bad guys) so we gave it to them to do the job, and
oh they're doing. Arabs to arabia? What about palestinian arabs?
They're palestinians? Some of them consider themselves
palestinians and not arabs the same way I consider myself cyberian
and not russian. Until Cyberia is in better hands, I will be
considered russian by everyone around me. Even if Japan takes over
(never gonna happen, not this far, we better don't blow this
structure, because we'll have to fight for our right to be free
from the fuckers of all sorts. Russian gangsters will openly take
over and will become colonels and such, but military people are
crazy. Do you think there are no crazies among gangsters? Who do I
write it for? For myself first of all. Will I ever read it? When I
have augmented intelligence and want to have a copy of 2020 me, I
could you used (I was thinking of a form of
could for the future it is here, and I unconsciously used you
instead of u in used, so you is used for future? futurum it is,
and will like this and у- [u-] as a russian prefix works to make
a future form. You because imperative speaks about future?
You'll do it = y'all do it. and here's a ling between will and
all. use this слепок
But yea back to crowley and scientists: for them it would be
classical apophenia and person building theories upon such a not
only anecdotal, but outright weak evidence cannot be considered
scientist. But are they right? The guy practiced magick
successfully but isn't it all just magic? "spirits could be shouwn
to ignorant audience in a smoke if a glass with a figurine of the
spirit be placed before the only source of light in the dark room
lighted only with the source of the smoke. And if the source is
fire-less or fire is hidden, the impression could be incredibly
bright. It's just my guess, I need to make an experiment to tell.
Today public are more sofisticated and thus magic is placed under
the k of knowledge of some abstract speculations and accidents are
turned into miracles and some psychological element to it all is
also present: imagine how bold is someone who overstepped the
strongest taboos: a fighter tells me that your scream is different
after you've beaten someone. Thanks for this forbidden knowledge,
oh fighter, but I had to tell you off for some political reasons.
We're related, so we'll see each other and renegotiate peace.
after you've beaten someone
after you're beaten by someone
just like s in
be or ve has to be there just once
have: beaten someone
are: beaten by someone
ha is are? it is in japanese.
and like russian -го is read like -во
japates -ha is read like -wa
- is optionary, orthography is arbitrary. so arbitrary that o can
be a and visa versa:
small round of ⓐ wasn't even place dthere by me, I found that
image as is to respond to the guy who told me of Bathomet's
etymology, who would know that it will come so handy, I only
wanted to place this weird image here before, just somewhere in
between of today's session, which began at bathomet really,
because why would I be high online. nah nah nah nah nah. but I
thought of not turning this book into funny pictures collection,
it's random enough, no need to make this side of the story even
worse. and now, this.
A lighting in the rainless midnight sky at my right when I layed
perpendicularly to my balcony across it on a table, and I said
Ave. What are you saying? hm... Abe, отче. Ave maria is Father
Maria thus? Was this meme completely ignorant? Father Mather it
could be. If it's prechristian, Maria is mother, not only the
name. Gratia Plena.
A M G is a good start. Domine Tecum, Ich keine.. Ich weiß es nicht
(non lo so)
Ave Maria Gracia Domine? Could it be the order and plena was
introduced for the melody?
or for the meaning, for Maria not being Domine.
I think I just reinvented крёстное знамение: прикоснувшись
пальцами ко лбу, к сердцу, к левому плечу, правому плечу (плечо потому что на нём плачат? но когда
крестился, думал о том что это руки) и заметил, что
сделал это левой рукой, но столько
органично это вышло, как никогда не уыбыло
у меня. лёжа на пмяхком полу сделал
это, вес был на правой руке чуть больше, но ведь и раньше заметил,
что левая рука у сердца, зачем бы надевали кольцо на левую руку,
если не была она священней, правая с разумом, левая с сердцем.
Православные прямо в названии объявляют свою особенность
орто-доксы орто скорей всего тоже of right словно до них делали по
другому, и это сочетается с тем, что византийская империя, хоть и
держала звание Рима дольше, "и тем трудней чем дольше" – это от
недостатка фантазии у них же, всё за старое цеплялись. К тому что
если эта христианская магия работает, то в странах под
предводительством протестантов оно работает лучше всего, знать они
правильно молятся. У католиков чуть похуже (папа и вся эта
пиздабратия коррупционная, всё о власти миркой пекутся при том что
мир во власти сатаны и кто они держащие власть в этом мире) у
православных вообще всё швах. хуже только у муслимов, у которых
где-то вровень с коммунистами, в Афганистане были и те и другие,
разница не знаю, может им заметней чем со стороны. Если кто
думает, что это вопрос дискуссионный, люди голосуют ногами
однозначно в сторону протестантско-католических стран. Причины
объяснять на этих страницах смысла нет: те кто не видят сами не
читают подобные текста.
Left hand being more magical could explain muslimic tradition of
not raising left hand: you have to greet friends with your right
hand, keep the left hand for yourself: in islam you're supposed to
wipe your arse with it. They take magic more seriously, they're
more archaic (in reflection of Byzantine, but they're even further
in the past) Sun comes every day, seasons come every year, to
count longer periods, it seems natural to refer to some event as
the reign of some king, as the event the most of laws depend on.
As they did before mochamad in russian mocha is urine, that is
where they immediately fail with russic nations, even though it's
not obvious even to russic nations themselves, because they call
mochammed mohamed (not ch, h, the same way englishmen pronounce
it. Could english orthography be the bant working via russian?
But I came here to ask Could islam be made what it is today by
english intelligence of Lourence for what you cannot stop lead.
You cannot leave process in the neighbouring countries go by
itself. Who know where it can lead them. May them work in
accordance to our goals. The common goals, let us be the deciders
of the fates. Who we? Those who speak english. But we all think
differently and we all lead different ways. So be it, we have the
advantage before those who don't: we have access to tens more of
information they do. It gives unearned advantage to common public
of brittich commonwealth. Just as latin gave such advantage to
italians. Let's see how brits lead this world better than romani
ever could. Gipsies pretend to be of both, Rome and Aegyptos. Big
deal, евреи are of europe. Where are you from? I'm from here,
Now I act as an asshole giving them shit. I'm sorry, I will learn
to behave when it's based not on fear, but on comprehension of the
гром не грянет мужи не перекрестится
это может быть формулой креститься при виде молнии.
будут еперь всегда это делать, но левойрукой. посмотри мчто из
этого вырастит. пока левая рука доп. буквы назымает это правайя
исполнила (левая крука сказала й, нот not
Про троеперстие это бредятина конечно, но прикольная, но
бредятина, не лучше того что эзотерики исполняют. местами у меня
наука, но чуть не половина (но меньше всё же, гораздо меньш)
бредятина и оффтопик. оффтоп на странице приводит к тому, что она
убирается с вершины стопки?
Сижу на балконе и крещусь на каждую молнию, стал суеверным.
Слово суеверный = своеверный демонстрирует соотношения в котором
находятся U & V:
У(U) = Во(Vo)
т.е. это в любом случае слоговая (глосовая) буква (глоссы =
гласные? гласная дложно было в предыдущих скобках быть, но
подсознанию надсознанию бессознанию виднее) бес is an abstract
notion of bu- no u-(un- um-) i(il- ir- im - in-) a- all vowels
seem to be no in inglish.
glish as glosses? голос?
(english is in-language? inside language? how did it happen that
in- has these to different meanings, and в is showing it when it's
v and в[v] is in in russian.
and n is also of the same form when it is in gree: ν
При очередной молнии почувствовал её аж в пальцах левой ноги,
пошёл поклониться: открыв дверъ на моблокон
балкон начал креститься и кланяться не разгибаясь, а
сгибаясь всё ниже и ниже к груди, заметил что вывожу восьмёрку меж
левым верхним и правым нижним углами.
начал сйчас тож делать правой рукой, но почувствовал что эта рука
мутит, повторил пару восьёмрок левой и пришлё писать сюда, поюду
снова помолюсь молнияюм
Удивился, что диавол в душе моей не возбухает, ведь я христианское
в сущности богослужение совешаю, какое-то "еретическое"
"герометическое" богуслужение совершаю. Но не сатанински ли я его
совершаю, крестя себя правой рукой? хотел сказать левой рукой, но
мопохоже что правою и впрямь сататниское, сетат state, senate, all
are satans? if this world in the hands of the devil, they're and
in christian faith it so is.
Похоже что я нашёл ритуал, устраивающий обе стороны классически
символически представленные представителями якобы сидящими на моих
плечах (понятно что это абстрактные понятия, которые раскидали по
локосами, чтоб они не висели в
воздухе забываясь массами тупорылыми) и я крестил же не титьки
(хотя заметил в процессе что так делаю, исправившись заметил:) а
плечи, и особенно если голова склонена, я увидел что вывожу кресты
наподобие тех, что дирижёры обучены выводить:
Searching for these images I saw that there are different ways to
do it, and the one I read in some book in dutch was more stretched
left to right along a symmetic cross with long horisontal line and
short vertical line. Didn't even find it, lol, it was similar to
the second one. only the line 2 to 3 was straighter. and probably
went in another direction (probably that I remember wrong)
something similar to the top central one in this one, something in
between it was, nevermind, why don't I weed this lyrics out!
означает это что дирижёр изначально музыкантов благословлял?
музыкальная традиция определённо прошла через христианскую школу,
однозначно это христианские влияния.
но кресты же не христиане изобрели? но едва ли поставить крест на
ком-то было чем-то хорошим до них. crossed
cursed? анафеме христиане склонны
I told before that axioms can be proven from their definitions (so
definitions are new axioms) and recently somebody at 4chan has
proven that parallel lines don't cross: somethin like x + 3 = x -
5 by building the graphs for y = x + 3 and y = x - 5 to
demonstrate that they'rre parallel and this algebraic
representation translates that axiom into a more simple unequality
of different numbers (numbers that are at some non-zero distance
from each other)
and this difference has something to do with music theory, notes
in the chord are at some distance from one another. Pythagoras
worked with both music and math, and probably some mythes are
invented by him, who knows. Muthic. Muzh, probably
mistransliterated as Vir.
v reminds ν which is n which is next to the m and probably it's
i reminds ו which is у, u, oo ii ?
positionally it is v or even f (v is read as f in german) because
it's f in latin. and F (or W?) was in greek so they say, I don't remember this.
neglet ~ не глядя
ת in the group of אמש (in the form of the conductor's cross)
supports the hypothesis that אמת is the three. Or is אמשת the
four? Google's translator recognizes this four as "last night" in
hebrew and as "person" in yiddish.
That image is from sefer Yetzirah and I still didn't read it, can
you believe it! Too much weed to read.
Today I found a book from a guy I follow at academia.edu where he
speaks that ogham is ancient. It is of 12 years ago, could it
influence my "and ogham is the origin of it"? because I saw that
coin before and cannot find it anywhere else. https://www.academia.edu/4134903/Proto-Ogham
is the link
there he massively resonates with my revelations: "Hibernian" he
uses make me think of Iberian (hibernian is irish) Irish lore-ish?
nah, too baseless yet. and he follows delivering with Celtiberian
scripts. He only places it next to the term Coelbrenni which leads
to some forgers of runes (and I will probably demonstrate their
pre-Tolkien infusions into body of runic scripts but not today)
and another new word is glozelian, but so far it only lead me to
some obscure research I copied a couple of images from (they're
clickable to that page)
Some enormous ammounts of literature about writing systems there
are it may take me forever, but I must have all the time in the
world, once I develop my capsule for living in artificial amniotic
But don't I know that each year every field
produces more new knowledge than a specialist would be able to
read in a hundred years? And this is probably the first example
of information singularity, for they say future is already here,
it's only not equally distributed. As it should.
Now it's time to do something I had to make in vol.1: Compare
those paleohispanic scripts together with celtiberian, the most
widely used form of them all.
Smaller forms in black in the right bottom corners of some iberian
are taken from ancientscripts.com which is currently down oh why
didn't I use teleport pro or something of the kind to mirror all
that site for moments like this, gush!
As you can see, the researchers disagree on which form is voiced
and which is voiceless and which form is stroked and which is not,
though I don't know the difference between them either. And as for
that voiced and voiceless thing, I'd go with additional stroke
making it stronger, voiced, because that is how G is different
from C, and this very feature make paleohispanic scripts related
to runes (if the common forms were not enough) and runes have the
same confusion: ᚴ is ofteh attributed to G, which makes sens,
because it looks pretty much like Г (but Г stands at the position
of C) and ᚵ is often considered to be K (which also makes sense,
because K is different from ᚴ by being one stroke bigger, but I
made it the other way around (probably being in the wrong, who
knows - write me if you do) because I didn't see the dot on
neither of ᚴ's of bornholm alphabetic stone (probably because it
was marked by paint) so I allowed myself to feel free to make it
my way. Time will show, maybe it will show that this disagreement
is ancient and dialectal, because both C & G used to be the
also something wicked is in the term I never saw before:
Hesperia, ancient Greek name for the Italian
Hesperia, ancient Roman name for the Iberian Peninsula
As if the Hisperian nation used to control Italian peninsula, but
was forced to leave it for the Western territories. But it's just
a guess, based on these two lines from wiki. ce n'est pas sérieux, mais c'est moi.
and a more simple form of Iberian scripts:
Northern Iberian script:
Southern Iberian script:
and of course I am clueless about how reliable these
transliterations are. Remember futhark? heh.
This paleohispanic script has more archaic features than greek,
thus greek historians distorted reality for political reasons.
It's more archaic before we can recognize much more of archaic
greek, thus greek is more modern, latin is actually modern for
past 2000 years or so. So it's some roman летоисчесление.
I will try to retransliterate paleohispanic the same way I did
with futhark. I yet have to try to read runic text in
retransliterated futhark. f for a, just as in Hesperian.
everything will be fire
image with this was to appear here, but I though what about the
copyrighted images? I have plenty already probably (even though I
took it from the common internet) so why do I care? Because I will
Я сейчас повторял свою мысль которую подумал о копирайте, но я
останавливаю этим ход мысли, чтоб записать старую мысль, я мог бы
дойти гораздо дальше если бы не парился графоманией. Законы о
копирайте - законы заради жадных людей (для радости жадин, жыд) в
то время как кто-то здесь посвящает всю свою жизнь общей пользе,
продвижению науки. Зачем нам палеография? Человечество хочет всё
знать, хотя бы за этим. Но и затем чтоб понимать языки, а не
зубрить их. В том смысле что законы о копирайте нужно
пересмотреть, а пока пересматриваем - отменить, потому что от них
больше вреда чем пользы (но кому-то очень много пользы, постоянный
интерес с неплохими доходми и несуществующей ответственностью, нет
законов против того чтоб так закон начальственно вертеть. И я
позволяю себе вертануть его со страниц этого необычного издания. Я
его отменяю, создаю общественное мнение, под которые законåм
принято подстраиваться. Но вернёмся к испанскому письму, На
которое может испанский язык перейдёт как на руны переходят
Язычники без губных? Без М какой-то палевоиспансий.
There seem to be no unicode for paleohispanic yet, so I use
similar letters explaining when needed:
А Р R D all these å-liny can be read in hisparic P (officially
transliterated as A)
E looks like both o and ه) ه is at position of e alright, but it's
a in tifinagh, and it's similar to e...
gosh, my head boyl, don't touch forms you don't recognize, just
notice that the giants on whose shoulders I stand (the kids who
discovered all those scripts) recognize them as forms I recognize.
I recognized it as o, but if it's really e (they read some texts)
E in northern Iberia is closer to the one we all know. So ه is in
accord with tifinagh ⴰ which s porobably not a but э? First in
Africa, second in Europe.
Tifinagh has ⴰ [A] (for africa?) first, and second is ⵓ [U], and
here it is together with ogham.
tifinagh & ogham
E is a stroked through U: ⴻ (notice how much ⴻ reminds E) notice = see. notice and edit.
big A is R: big ⴰ is ⵔ
ⴰⴱⴲⴳⴴⴵ абвггг - почти как в русском
(в греческом такого нет) русское Ж оно и ᚼ и ⵣ. и ⴴ?
Тифинаг идёт в алфавитном порядке, собирая все инфарианты букв в
ⴳ ⴴ ⴵ ⴶ ⴷ ⴸ ⴹ ⴺ
а б в г гж г гж д дз д дз
(всё это очень приблизительно, используйте аудио-букварь)
ⴻ ⴼ ⴽ ⴾ ⴿ
ⵂ ⵃ both F (in the form of H) and
Fita (this time not tet but het, as in japanese)
е f k k kh h/b h h
h and H ends this line as in latin, same
tradition, this tradition is odder, older.
ⵆ ⵇ ⵈ
i kh kh q q
ⵉⵊⵋⵌⵍ ⵎ ⵏ ⵐ ⵑ
i j j z l m n ɲ ŋ
ⵔ ⵕ ⵖ ⵗ
ⵘ ⵙⵚ ⵛ ⵜ ⵝ ⵞⵟ
p oo(u) r ṛ(rˤ) ɣ ɣ ɣ(ʒ)
s sˤ ʃ t t(θ̠) ч tˤ
v w j(y) z z ẓ(dz(zˤ))
ⵦ ⵧ ⵯ
e o w separator joiner
this tradition is not necessary more ancient, because it doesn't
have as many archaic features as paleohispanic (which not only
demonstrates many long obsolete forms, some half-mythical forms
like M being san, I finally found it, I found this san, it could
be in some semitic, as they make me think, but I met it here, in
Celtiberian, and I still think it could be
mistransliterated: какая ещё матерь шматерь шатер твой матерь,
страшно? а ты думал. материя скатерть. молоко халава. миска
сиска. мочь can may can? son can. doщь немощь. мощь мощины
мосцины мысцы мышцы мясцы. y is both ю and az
az, Z is Я. яЗык, яЗвук, яЗнак,
this tradition is not more ancient, it's the same period as greek
and latin, Berberians fought Romans, not nations before them, yet
before them they occupied Iberia:
If this order is correct (for it could be a mistake of some
professor who placed ⵒ before ⵓ, but if it's authentic, then it is
one of the most mutilated alphabets I know so far (not as much as
armenian, but even more than russian)
So to be sure, I began looking for such canon in some images, not
just wiki. The most similar I found is more simple, but repeats
that larger sequence:
ⴰ ⴱ ⴳ ⴳⵯ
a b g gw d d
ⴻ ⴼ ⴽ ⴽⵯ ⵀ ⵃ
е f k kw h/b h
i kh q
ⵉⵊ ⵍ ⵎ ⵏ
i j l m n
ⵕ ⵖ ⵙⵚ ⵛ ⵜ ⵟ ⵡ
u r ṛ(rˤ) ɣ s sˤ ʃ
t tˤ w
No labial before vowel this time. The last line follows the last
line of bornholm alphabet in a way. In the way of R (some would
say ᚱᛣ is double R too, but that's not for sure: ⵖ the ɣ is more
likely to be the cognate of ᛣ) and then three S's reflect ᛋ, two
T's reflect ᛏ and W to reflect ᚢ
Whatever is the story beyond R
instead of P, it is now less peculiar, because two writing systems
go this way, and Tifinagh tradition probably never broke, so it
can be the better source for the discovery.
But I really have to focus on my immortality capsule or I am going
to die преждевременно.
Here I compre "Greco-Iberian" to other Iberian scripts, and I
found it to be not Iberian at all:
Surprisingly, it seems only Δ and Λ have exact match, the next
similar is Α
which makes Α Δ Λ the basis, which make me suspect that Δ used to
be instead of B, which would explain the similarity of b & d
and deda for mama in georgian. But let's keep on watching it, it's
too early to make such conclusions. It easily can be something
else. Γ/K have forms even more similar than A, thus it's Α Δ Γ Λ,
a form of S similar to ᛋ and maybe N which could be a form of ᛋ
herself. especially because some S's look like M which is confused
with N all the time (here western celtiberian M is N in other
iberians, I spoke about m/n invariance before and I will collect
it when I sort these drafts out. мы/нас, nos, us, in/im, etc.)
d g l s are al similar to c. could a be a form of c too? if d is
staved c, than a is staved c too, or a double c
could it be A in the form of V or Λ because it was just vowel, and
ᚲ or < for consonant and согласная?
Λ and V for up and down (higher and lower)
< and > for more or less? In the force or in the direction
of the flow?
К is "to" in russian S is "off" (ot in russian) as two forms of C
The three Fates created the
first five vowels of the alphabet and the letters B and T. It is
said that Palamedes, son of Nauplius invented the remaining
eleven consonants. Then Hermes reduced these sounds to
characters, showing wedge shapes because cranes fly in wedge
formation and then carried the system from Greece to Egypt*.
This was the Pelasgian alphabet, which Cadmus had later brought
to Boeotia, then Evander of Arcadia, a Pelasgian, introduced
into Italy, where his mother, Carmenta, formed the familiar
fifteen characters of the Latin alphabet. Other consonants have
since been added to the Greek alphabet. Alpha was the first of
eighteen letters, because alphe means honor, and alphainein is
I trust Hyginus' account the most, because it describes the
structure of the alphabet, thus he knows more, and he keeps on in
consistency to what I found: palamedes invented both, 11
(additional to 7) letters and dice at the same time, and 18 is
divided into three dice perfectly. And only then have Hermes
simplified images to symbols of letters, and Cadmus, only after
that system got to Egypt, brought it to Beotia, where his mother
(who probably knew that one slot was to be empty, for
pre-Palamedian dice could be blue for B & red for T and only
count vowels. That would correspond with knucklebones having on.y
four numbers and cubic dice could become necessary when additional
letter appeared. 15 is also a very interesting number, because if
there are 5 vowels, it gives 3 forms of syllables or three matters
of alphabet: whether ABC, vowel labial lingual; or BCD, labial
velar coronal of paleohispanic syllabary.
is it anohter reason of whay a reminds d so much?
But I return to all that just to introduce Pelasgian Alphabet: I
thought it was unknown, but this image from who knows where (I
made it clickable but it doesn't lead far) tells some alphabet
similar to Etrurian (sc = R?) is exactly Pelasgian, who knows..
Is it from some ancient book where phoenician looked like
something completely different from what it looks like in between
20th and 21th centuries? (it's 2020 to be precise) and where is
this page even from? Is it just some freakery? Is the author of it
just ignorant. Very unlikely. I have asked the question, I will
look into phoenician writings when I... aye aye aye
To my surprise I accidentally placed different ammount of
consonants around the third vowel, but it's just okay, because of
doubling of z in that vowel's line tells that that someone's
mistake just neutralizes mine. But even though I'm not sure if
this axial symmetry is even a thing (because I still never read
about it, never met a writ, a word about it) and the doubling of ᚴ
as ᚵ (even though I didn't see that dot on that artefact) didn't
confuse me. But now it makes me think: doesn't this doubling allow
ᚢ to be U and not V (as my axial symmetry tells) eh? and it does,
but such axial symmetry still looks kinda wrong, so I'd better
discard that hypothesis of its ever being known completely so I
just discarded that modified image instead.
But the question of sabaean remains. I never researched it
properly, I maybe will.
But I've been wrong again: that alphabet is right to left, thus
the letter from the axial-y-line (axial-i-line to be precise) it's
not y, it's i (it's shortened probably due to arabic influence.
Did arabs preserved phonetic values of vowels? They pronounce
vowels very well, their nashids are
So the only way to lay sabaean into axial is by removing one of
z's and it will be still not that pretty:
(chances of that was 50% so not that impressive, or was it 100%?
for otherwise I wouldn't cut off 𐩼)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵
𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿
It is halaham! but let's arrange this mess by order:
I didn't know where to place 𐩼 so I found another source of
information, and it surprised:
𐩴 𐩵 𐩹 𐩠 𐩥
𐩸 𐩢 𐩭 𐩷 𐩼 𐩺 𐩫 𐩡 𐩣 𐩬 𐩪 𐩲
𐩶 𐩰 𐩮 𐩳 𐩤 𐩧 𐩦 𐩩 𐩻 (𐩯 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿)
but let's combine it as the previous image did:
(𐩳 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿) 𐩱
𐩨 𐩴 𐩵 𐩠
𐩭 𐩥 𐩸 𐩢 𐩷 𐩺 𐩫 𐩡 𐩣
𐩹 𐩬 𐩼 𐩪 𐩦 𐩯 𐩼 𐩲 𐩰 𐩮 𐩤 𐩧 𐩻 𐩶 𐩩
(it places 𐩹 at the fifth position, where in the previously found
order it is at 15th.)
So I challenge both the abecedaries: they're further from grace
then the modern counterparts of them:
in comparative chart some g is between o & p,
and in previous chart o & p together but kh is between e &
Was it some creativity of archeologists or some sobaean
mashtots-like reformer? I doubt it, priests in that period had to
know the structures.
and now it's more obvious what is halaham:
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣
𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨
𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴
𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿
Comparison to the alphabetic order allows me to colour halaham and
it becomes obvious, that it's some prayer, because it is: הלחמ and
I thought it was Elohim, but google's dictionary tells it's Bread.
And it correlates with Jesus calling bread his godly flesh. Хлеб
всему голова? В начале хлеб родил небо и землю (хляби? манна
God is אלוהים.
I don't recognize this order or if it is an order at all (it's
clickable, so figure it out by yourself)
another sabaean abecedary independently came to me from Hans
Richter when we discussed ugaritic:
some doubts had I about hieratic, so I looked other sources and
they said "maybe"
And in that letter about ugaritic these images from “The Story of
Writing” by Andrew Robinson:
But I'm still sceptical about those additional ugaritic letters,
and I'm gonna be sceptical until I see the actual artefact from
which that copy is alegedly made.
That guy is my great friend now, technically penpal, but pal
He asks me if I read Die Ssabier und der Ssabismus by Danīil
Avraamovich Khvolʹson and I haven't even heard about that man, so
I sent him this text which can be an interesting chapter of this
book, so I don't have to repeat what I told him about what I
discovered as I wrote the letter actually:
I haven't even heard about that scientist,
and unfortunately I still don't read German, but I will check
I was looking
yesterday, and comparing halaham canon to
abecedaries, I got a guess that the canon could be some prayer (or
a spell) because the first h is transliterated as ה which position
is that of E:
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵
𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿
𐩴 𐩵 𐩹 𐩠 𐩥
𐩸 𐩢 𐩭 𐩷 𐩼 𐩺 𐩫 𐩡 𐩣 𐩬 𐩪 𐩲
𐩶 𐩰 𐩮 𐩳 𐩤 𐩧 𐩦 𐩩 𐩻 (𐩯 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿)
(𐩳 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿) 𐩱
𐩨 𐩴 𐩵 𐩠
𐩭 𐩥 𐩸 𐩢 𐩷 𐩺 𐩫 𐩡 𐩣
𐩹 𐩬 𐩼 𐩪 𐩦 𐩯 𐩼 𐩲 𐩰 𐩮 𐩤 𐩧 𐩻 𐩶 𐩩
but only Elohim is אלוהים and הלחם is "the bread" (which makes me
think about Jesus calling bread his divine flesh, and there's a
proverb in Russian "хлеб всему голова" (bread is head to
everything) and heavenly abyss is named хляби (hlyabi) in
old-russian (native russian speakers usually hardly know what it
means (they (just as me) would only say that it's a sky, but if we
only know it in the context of "хляби небесные" then it's heavenly
sky. or if that is what opened up before the Deluge, could people
think of clouds as of bread? the most similar word to hlyabi is
хлеб [hleb] (bread, hlaef) and manna is thought of as semolina
(манна & манная каша & манка) it all could be just nothing
and volk-etimologie, but
also doesn't really know where that word comes from, but gives an
old form (literally хлеб) and for whatever reason connects it to
Middle High German slamp (they translate it as feast) and Dutch
slemp (which they translate as "tasty food") and another meaning
of word хляби is liquid filth, which could be linked to batter and
Since you like looking for god's names in abecedaries, I felt like
also the final letters of Ugaritic alphabet can be read as Tius
(but I'm sure about it even less than about that the-lehem,
because lehem for hemel looks very likely if saying that moon is
made of cheese is of ancient origin. Ancient people could get
lsd-trips from time to time because of ergot, and bread again
being white next to black ergot growing like a snake out of
ear(oor) I wonder why you call it so, in russian we destinguish
colos from colossus but it's close to spike, not ear or is it as a
rabbit's ear?) that could be real good and evil tree because some
powerful evil it could cause: gangrene because of vessels spasm.
And wish to grow ergot for sorcery could be a reason for witchhunt
whence "spoiling the crop" would be not such a baseless
occusation. War on drugs is the continuation of the witch-hunt.)
Take your time.
okay, the letter ended there. no have a nice day or all the best,
I'm such a хам cad lout twerp tyke tike mucker and a very rude you
man I wanted to write young, but my fingers disobeyed to that lie.
45 is new 25 isn't it? with all the technologies I have more time
than before. Отказ от тяжёлой работы и алкоголя творит чудеса как сказал кто-то, я добавлю что женщин тоже
надо избегать (у меня седые волосы полезли когда позволил
женщине остаться когда хотел выгнать (дважды) но дал три попытки
зачем-то) но я аутист, может это правило менее важно.
I have to stop smoking weed and I will figure out how to make
something big since I don't work in language when I am not high. I
write down some occasional findings, but they're not work, they're
20 times less intensive.
I wanted to show you ergot but you check it out yourself. It's
(and I went offline to start book on magic, explaining
superstitions with actual reasons beyond the hund: imagine in
today world if gipsy witches taught your children smoke weed and
drink witchy wine)
The specific sign 𐩪 is S in Sabaean, and ⵄ is I
in Tifinagh. (a sign similar to I was used
for Z long ago)
a couple of similar signs are vowel in Sabaean: 𐩱 & 𐩠
are E & A
Okay, this one is still raw, but If you only knew what have found
in my notebook tonight!
It's in london copybook (the serie after american public transport
serie which was after fish serie)
Voiced Sonor Voiceless as three mothers (in russian Voiceless is
just deaf, and that is the old mother)
ABGD (because they say that C was voiced when C and G was the same
letter (some long ago))
IMLN (l is probably lingual click, imitating horse, because Ma is
also horse, and No is Go for horse)
OPST (because Q is not met in the most of alphabets, because R is
Р in russian, `cause ᚱ is probably П)
IMLN is probably IMKN (but then k is not sonor, and L is similar
to Г like λ is similar to ג)
because If H is И then HIJKL is the same И claster, and LMN is
So that velar column is all freaky and uncertain, and it becomes
much better if we only keep less ambiguous letters:
IMN (but if M =N, then IML, which pretty much contradicts what I
just said about I = L, but if M = N then isn't N = И = H first
because 'n' of and is и and second because N is Н in russian and И
used to be written as H in old-russian)
Just as sefer Yetzirah mentions only water of lips and fire of
tongues (and air for vowels is not in the jewish text, only in
translations. I'd say vowels are solids, as land in Африка,
I thought I was India, because it promotes K in indian fashion.
E was Europe. But only when there was E. When there's only I it's
Iberia or some other Europe.
Now I have no reason to think of O as of asian line, because who
in the Ost passes labies first?
AMT is read by diagonal, the truth. AMS could also go by that
diagonal, if S was the other silent, but before C appeared there
could be no S, so I think. only Ш maybe& Ш & Ⰿ-like T of
upside down Ш.
I only saw final Z, not final S, so I go with final T. The Truth
(sefer yetzirah mentions that three mothers is a great mistery, so
don't expect it to be too open.
After all there's no third element, only B & T, and AMT could
be left to be figured out by someone who actually knows hebrew (I
actually don't, but I still managed to figure it out because of
how accessible thee extra-cortex of the internet-powered
linguistic information. Language science, but linguistic for its
adjective. I will reconquer linguistics from chomskians. Somebody
deliver genetic therapies to that dnst3-tortured tribe!
a word about halaham (the lehem, bread) is that if хляби is
related to хлюпать, что может и к еде относится (хлюпают вкусной
нямкой) и к грязи: а жидкая грязь также может быть названа bog,
and bog (Б-г) is god (Г-д) in russian.
Is it related to the first scientist, Thales of Miletus, speaking
of Water as the basis of everything?
historically recognized as the first individual in
Western civilization known to have entertained and engaged in
Maim is literally plural Ma (im is plural suffix, and though today
it is only used for male words, I heard from my teacher that it
was not always the case)
Шамаим огненная вода? а эрэц тогда закусь?
кровь и плоть? вино и хлеб?
жидкое и твёрдое, инь и ян, тёмное и светлое, холодное и тёплое, х
& т? т как тётя, Ⰿ-like mama?
Ⰿ is glagolythic m, х как хер, her, but they say t was written
this way, but could x be z? could x be h? could it's h-ness cause
thought of vowel in the end (which was accepted in archaic rome,
in runic alphabet, in greece, in russia — greece, russia and some
scandinavian alphabets are those who follow this tradition. Others
place new vowels next to their original forms, and semites even
began beliving that they don't have vowels at all (or they're only
But I don't know how your browser shows Ⰿ
(because here in mine it is similar to Mc'Donald's logo, a large
m, but the same unicode can be recognized as I learned it before
unicode made the mess: four balls at the ends of K rotated 90
degrees clockwise. in the same style with other letters.
If I was a master knitter I would learnt to knit by wool but I
don't have passion for нитьting.
sewing is also from chinese or/and japanese shi-ito (or only
A wiked manner of japanese to draw letters. Look a g, they know
it's from c, a form of c
it is clickable, but procede on your own risk: it could be filmed
directly from brains and cleaned by ai, either way it is a work of
art, and it is potentially dangerous in some form, just my spooks
(испуги, с пуками) at least it looks this way, a masterpiece
三つ編み mitsuami - косички (braids)
I thought mitsu is water and it is also three. Is it why mem
is triple? 𓈖 three mothers is it them?
Klotho is the protein
No insecuity lines.
but I'm still here. I'm stuck here again (the worst song of L7 tbqh) the band worth more
Some random linguistic images follow just because I sort my saved
the random stopped here because I think I know what that
tetrahedron can be.
I'e bbeen promising to put this project on hiatus for some time
now, but I'm mouthful of thc-powered smoke again. So weed is a
drug, because this habit controls my action stronger than
intellect, or with the same power: it has to rationalize the
smoking, so I have to work on the intellectual level to give up
weed. How it rationalizes it today: I don't have anything else
coming my way anyway (false!) and I haven't finished here yet
(true!) the first one is referring to no arranged meetings for
today, no even money to start building my apartment to motivate
the investors to fund me further, and I spent the funds I kept for
materials on weed instead. (true)
The lie's found.
He has to look for new contracts as my mom told me about my
brother who drinks (and it's also a druggie habit) I must look
for new contracts. I must make science, not business.
This is the main argument. I don't want to work with my hands
either (I use them to type, traumas are especially unwanted) I
have to hire professionals, so we work from other sides of the
professional spectres. arts and technologies.
I also should be shaman. So I will be bearded and hairy and high.
I wear and bear hair. bear'd is haired.
Science is service. Business can be service too, but it's another
kind of service, serving the clients, not the truth alone.
Is it weed still convincing me to keep on smoking it? Oh snake,
the jesus, lucifer, prometheus.
Thank you for bringing light to that diy-pipe alright.
First I convinced me to work on this field instead of medicine
because I thought I'm close to the break-through, after which they
will recognize me and I can make contacts with truer biologists
It came out that academic public is fucking clueless and not even
interested (they're not interesting them selves too) so I only met
a couple of researchers on the field I'm currently in. Others
remain clueless, but these two at least see the axial symmetry
(one of them sees it more clearly, the other is more educated, but
both of them are not professional linguists, just like I am also
not by academic standarts: nobody pays me for my work but my
some more random images are coming your way.:
I will remove these four once(whence) I find a better scan.
random flow goes in series.
and the same in finer detail:
I keep on correspondance with Hans R. (aka Joannes Richter)
and he sends me Flinders Petrie's book The Formation Of The Alphabet,
which I have downloaded over a month ago and never read and
utterly forgot it so I asked him to send it to me.
Incredibly embarrassing. so I mirror here, and the paragraph he
told me to pay attention to in the context of discussion we had.
(a mirror for the booklet)
I sent a letter to J. Richter today, you may find it interestign
Why do you set apart L & R, when they're one above the
other? Do you know there are more than one form of R: russians
(and maybe scottish too) pronounce it at the same position L is,
only vibrating by the tip of the tongue, so their R (or Р,
that's how russians draw it, their P is П, that's a greek thing)
while brits (and maybe french too) pronounce it by uvula - you
don't even have uvulars in your table. Now, about that table: always count what was the chance of
the position of the letter at that very spot: If you see how
often labials follow vowels in english alphabet, you'll see that
the answer is up to 80%, which does seem like a systemic (if you
count Y in, it's 2/3 which is not that impressive, but still
more than a half) It doesn't make sense to count another colum, if only one
letter in that column: it could have standed anywhere and you'd
see the same system in that case: you'd just place that column
somewhere else. Recognize word apophenia and make your best to be sure that
you're not following some false structures. Those additional letters in ugaritic is probably what made
me say in that up to 20 years old piece of draft that more
ancient writing systems don't follow this structure as well as
modern english latin: how can we even be sure that the ugaritic
abecedary is authentic. It supports Vowel-Labial-Linguals order
not worse than others: only M i not in its place. But all the
other columns (the distinct velar-coronal in english latin - and
only there! is it one of reasons (or consequences) that the
commonwealth rules the world?) all the other columns are a mess
of linguals (just as the myth tells: 5 vowels, b & t
(neither K nor R, these are of later origin, together with h
maybe, but the chronology of appearing of different letters is
yet to be destinguished: no historic source will tell about:
ugaritic abecedaries are on the verge of what is found and
they're already complicated so much, that they're even further
from the source-code than some alphabets used up-to-this day
(maybe the final triliteral row is built upon canon and not
expanded yet, that is what makes it even more interesting
(together with runic alphabet stone from Bornholm, which
preserved the first raw in the form of ᛆᛒᚦ, where ᚦ is both
Г&D, or B is both b&c, which is less likely, but who
knows, I know few reasons of why velars could be born not by
linguals, but by labials: mama is kaka in japanese, not labials
but velars are the first consonants in eastern alphabets and
syllabaries, c is graphically not that far from ᛒ, japanese
p,f,b are made by diacritizing h, russians pronounce suffix -го
(go) as -во (vo) But of course d has even more reasons to be the father: c
is staveless d, ᚦ looks like г which looks like r, which is р in
greek and russian, both are lingual - that is first of all, g is
d in russian cursive, so now, writing this letter, I realize once again, that
both B & D are parents to C: C as in child, ko in japanese,
-ъk in russian, Жили-Были Дед-да-Баба, родился у них Coloboc.
I used italic (almost cursive) and it's less of cursive than
cursive: only few letters are cursive:
a & a, g & g, maybe v & v are
the only ones redrawn, others are only inclined:
It's especially good I used italic here, beause the font I use in
gmail has g like it is in italic:
g is d in russian cursive
g is d.. is not correct, this form is never used in russian. only
g, and with the swash too, is d in russian cursive. but
not italic: д is another form of russian д. both g
& д are d in russian (Дд) it is weird. it's almost as if
both forms are ᚦ. and Д is as if it' ᚦ rotated counterclockwise.
I noticed before that d is Д rotated counterclockwise. And as
clockwise is the lucky direction, russians (and greeks?) took it
from the west (as we ajlmonst always do, to be honest) and runic
nations took it from us. But if it's not a charm, but a curse from
an opressor (force nation to draw deus-letters cotated more open..
is it more open? no, close is clockwise
because it's lucky to keep tubes shut.
If reforms for whatever reason rotated letters counter-clockwise,
did it open them? or was it some grammatic magic to oppress?
either way, in this case russians took from normans and sent it to
rome. Which is counter-intuitive, counter-historic, and why
wouldn't grammarians of the nation (and neighbouring nations too,
allies are always around) noticed that "one way is delight, the
other is not, some naught" -- it's some ancient, magical, that I
didn't even dare to leave here the original spelling of the spell,
you can google it about 231 gates by yourself. I probably
mentioned it openly before, but now I grew more sensitive to these
equivalence of linguals (even velar and coronals can reflect
eachother as voiced and whispered forms)
is kinda tabooed: they teach that it appeared only in middle
ages, forgetting to mention that they speek about greek
minuscule here. Roman Cursive is basically minuscule, and its
history is deep. Even the word cursive is scary.
modern cursive forms don't reflect eachother, b reflects g, p
reflects.. j maybe? I'm sorry I'm thinking while I write.
I am going to send these 7lines to my friend Hans, just archive it
here for both legal and scientific reasons (some information in
this text can be new, and thus it can have interest from the
so I procede:
russian guy (probably even from my own city) noticed that voiced
consonants are grouped in the beginning of the alphabet, while
voiceless ones are at the end of it (it only happens in russian
alphabet, afaik, but I was also told that C sounded like G when
the C & G wasn't divided - but it's still a hearsay for me,
I cannot read those ancient texts, I haven't even looked into
this corridor of this not-a-rabbit-hole)
even though it's my simplification, he also noticed sonors
B&T of the myth "The Three Fates or, some say, Io the sister
of Phoroneus, invented five vowels of the first alphabet, and
the consonants B and T" and this BDPQ-symmetry seem to confirm
the applicability of this principle.
this voiced-voiceless thing is so native to me, that I will not be
surprised if it's one of my earlier revelations, I had something
this big and then I just forgot it, I only remember that it was
something big in the alphabet, and I don't remember noticing the
rhyme of the lines until adolescence when I got something to do
with военкомат. I know it sounds weird, but this guy lives
in my city, what were the chances, but I will know of this only if
I meet him and he admits that we learnt at the same school. If
he's my age, it's whether I told him that or he told me this (is
it possible? I don't remember anybody but me knowing of that what
I noticed, otherwise I would at least think of asking whoever told
me of that, and I also felt like feeling it, not really
understanding, or I would probably put it down, would have drawn
it. did I? I would never know. Probably not. So he also uses
livejournal, he can be of my age, but if he's not, then whether
some longer transmission happened or he did discover it himself. I
do need to talk to that guy, he could be the fourth in the group
So I went to his journal and asked him this question:
Расскажи, пожалуйста, откуда узнал про
звонкие-сонорные-глухие. Потому что это такое знакомое, словно в
детстве знал, но это было столь велико и столь нечётко (К &
П/Р) что просто выпало из головы. Спрашиваю потому что каковы
шансы что мы оба из Челябинска? и не 1976 ли года рождения? к
тому что может мы в одной школе учились или в одном кружке
астрономии занимались. Я поместил ссылку на твой журнальчик (на
ту стаью про звонкие-сонорные-глухие) в свой blogk aeiou.ru и
эта тема становится одним из фундаментальных камней теории:
мифические первогласные BT в таком порядке,
в таком порядке, я её упростил до звонкие-глухие, но
звонкие-сонорные-глухие могут быть триптихом "три матери"
(общемировой похоже архетип, понятие tridevi хронологически
раньше понятия trimurti, а до христианской троицы был культ трёх
матерей (трёх материй?) Norns, Moriae, Fates (те самые, которые
фигурируют в мифе "The Three Fates or, some say, Io the sister
of Phoroneus, invented five vowels of the first alphabet, and
the consonants B and T")
хорошо, что анонимные ответы здесь скрыты, ответить можно на
woodeemann на gmail.com или https://vk.com/id58166550
(отчего-то я перестал злоупотреблять серыми
оттенками. скорее всего потому что обленился. более стоупудовие
я писать-то стопудово не стал)
It's funny how the line of the myth finds me before Robert Graves.
Probably because I placed it in the beginning.
And it also finds XPBNGStm
(what a pretty encoding of something even more precise than
an url into one simple index. And that peruvian guy or a gal
(I am a biased mucho, so I say a guy, a kid to be less
precise, but that smells satanic already, don't disturb
these deeper layers, it's not exactly sane)
and all of the sudden I learnt to read music, and so should
I made this screenshot and thought "Aleut"
so I saved it as aleut.
I don't usually think such sudden terms, and I thought I saw
So I thought I just saw this word on the page. But, to my
surprise, the whole page omits word aleut. and nowhere on the
screen it is. This is totally related term, how could that be,
and that was the page I closed a minute before I closed the
page, which is still weird, because I don't remember keeping it
in mind, or knowing this term before, hearing perhaps, not
Why is it here? the fact that we are here in
a draft doesn'tt mean we have to callect here raw meat. It does.
there are two shifts to type with just one hand having middle
and nameless fingers as an anchor/.
It's so good I have two hands!
Evans didn't invent it, he preserved it. Would church destroy or
not allow it if it was heathan? Let's think nicely of him even in
our arrogant guesses.
I spoke that if he invented, it, he'd make it similar to european
in some sense, but sense in which it is similar to our alphabet is
of such a nature that he probably didn't know about it, an some
more obvious parallels are not seen, so whether he was of such a
sorcerer-tier erudition even noone is in the internet aeon, and if
he was then why is he not among the greatest, but some church
clerk? Or whether it's the wisdom of history of writing itself
showing us that aleut writing tradition. It is not aleut! Somehow
it seems it's not aleut. wiki doesn't mention aleut, but it's
still weird because it mentions several languages of that region,
but not Aleut. Gosh, it doesn't even mention Eskimo, and all we
the whites know is that there's only some eskimos in the middle of
nowhere. Doesn't it mention aleut, because they don't want us to
know of this nation, living among russia and usa and not giving a
fuck about our... they have to give a fuck: they're not allowed to
be one nation, Russians genocide nations. They're not allowed to
visit their relatives, unless they get visa in vladivostok. than
from petropavlovsk-kamchatsky they have to fly to that city across
the border. So many gasoline burnts just to get a permition to
some basal human right.
So, back to cannadian aboriginal syllabics. Why is it in plural?
Are there more than one? So many nations use it. Why would they
choose this clumsy and unpopular system if it wasn't their own? It
is their own. Now let's notice the structural features, that
witness how it is an ingenous, related to ogham, first of all in
their vowels: Evans would probably make it in latin order, and
here we see something very similar to oghamic order: aouei in ogham, aoie
in the northernmost america. Shows a-o distinction more basic than
AV, . And their long forms are just in deeper strokes. It is some
completely new feature, european way of writing doesn't allow such
The bigger truth is there's no border between Europe and America.
Ingenious people lived on those territories in such a large
quantity, that they had many nations (Greenland is full with
eyeliner fisheaters, danes are a minority in there, and some mad
Icelandic king was expelled and lived in Greenland, from where he
probably (I read of it in some historic article) setteled another
colony to the West, and of course there they were never alone, if
people can live there, they live there, at least as some secret
place of their family, and invaders must die)
Evans letters are similar to devanagari sometimes, but I'm pretty
sure that theory is even worse form of apophenia than some lowest
parts of this book. (thanks gods for having the highest parts)
Devanagari vowels are in japanese order, also doubled with longis,
so why wouldn't he add the stroke to make it double the way
devanagari (and latin too) have? To be extravagant? Then he
wouldn't work for the church (wouldn't that system crush his
spirit long before giving him any position) of all the above I
declare that Evans was a good and kind fellow, who so gracefully
fooled the official idiots and villains that now we can know of
Aboriginal syllabics of North America (they're also in Alaska and
probably was used at soviet territories before they were occupied
by russian orthodox church.
Hooray, I'm right:
James Evans (January 18, 1801 – November 23, 1846)
was an English-Canadian Methodist missionary and amateur
linguist. He is best remembered for his claim of the invention
of the "phonemics" writing system for Ojibwe and Cree, which was
later adapted to other languages such as Inuktitut. While it was
long believed that Evans was the original inventor of the
phonemics writing system, there is some evidence to suggest that
the Cree people already knew the writing system
and Evans simply adapted it for print.
I think from now on for quoted text I will use italic instead of
(as I wanted to do before)
this is from the link in that 1:
Those who favour the use of syllabics over roman may appreciate
the research and insights of John Murdoch, who completed a
Master of Education degree at the University of Manitoba in
1981. There are a lot of insights here far too valuable to be
forgotten. John wrote to Cree Literacy Network about it in 2017: “I
researched the origins and evolution of syllabic characters for
Cree, Inuit and Dene languages, producing a MEd thesis at the
University of Manitoba in 1981. Although James Evans, the
Wesleyan Methodist missionary played a part in the first
printings in syllabics at Norway House, He was not the person
who was the most instrumental in the writing systems conception
and spread. During my research I visited archives as well as
Aboriginal communities in the Boreal Forest as well as the
Eastern Arctic. Missionaries George Barnley, John Horden,
Jean-Nicolas Laverlochère, Edmund Peck and Jean Baptiste
Thibeault all arrived to Cree, Inuit and Dene nations who were
already able to read and write in the system. A more complete
history can be found in my 1981 thesis, Syllabics A Successful
Educational Innovation.” First, a link to the electronic theses and disserations
collection of the University of Manitoba’s Faculty of Graduate
Studies: John Murdoch,
1981. Syllabics: A Successful Educational Innovation. Downloadable pdf: Murdoch_Syllabics_
Probably this is the guy:
John E. Murdoch (1927–2010), an American academic in the field of
So how did I know that? I know their tricks:
they claim that Mashtotz created georgian alphabet which is
obviously a lie (he didn't know this structure georgian alphabet
they claim Stephan created Permian script, when other travellers
wrote that Parma has at least three of them without fucking
So now I have to take a better look at Cherokee syllabary and
Chances are Sequoia is a fictional character, introduced whether
by James Mooney or by conspirators before him, because he who
controls the past controls the future, he who controls the present
controls the past.
For whatever reason they need us to believe that all the culture
comes from some capital: so all the west is controlled from
Rome. And Russian script tells that all the Russia is controlled
from Mos Cow.
They have to program us to stay and pay them 60% of our
wage, and that is the sorcery they command.
Yet that could have been some white lies, which allowed him to
preserve the writing culture from eradication, which happened to
(I just shared it at my second favourite site and noticed that I
use reddit spacing,
natural here, wrong there)
The Alaskan and Siberian Yupik, like the Alaskan Inupiat,
adopted the system of writing developed by Moravian Church
missionaries during the 1760s in Greenland. The Alaskan Yupik
and Inupiat are the only Northern indigenous peoples to have
developed their own system of picture writing, but this system
died with its creators. Late nineteenth-century Moravian
missionaries to the Yupik in southwestern Alaska used Yupik in
church services, and translated the scriptures into the people's
> have developed their own system of picture writing, but this
system died with its creators.
And the links lead nowhere in particular. It seems I'll have to
dig into this direction myself.
"The vowels added by the priests of Apollo to his lyre were
probably those mentioned by Demetrius, an Alexandrian philosopher
of the first century BC, when he writes in his dissertation On
Style: ‘In Egypt the priests sing hymns to the Gods by uttering
the seven vowels in succession, the sound of which produces
as strong a musical impression on their hearers as if the flute
and lyre were used, but perhaps I had better not enlarge on this
He calls the strings vowels. Vowels define their lines. But what
are the letters in lines, if lyre cannot зажимать струны, изменяя
их частоту? Манера игры! Смычок и щипок. Долгая и краткая. ᛒ и ᚦ
and aeiou can depict the form of the lyre:
somehow it looks more like pan flute
let's look at japanese vowels:
looks like no musical instrument would look.
let's look at oghamic:
looks like some other variant of pan flute (but the previous
variant I like more.
They all begin with a for some reason (and thus show their common
what is common between japanese and european is this triad:
and ogham has it reversed:
depending on the transliteration and notation.
Are all these musical gamuts? They're the closest to gamuts I can
And so we can encode speech into music.
but if ᛒ and ᚦ sound similar to ᚠ and ᚵ (or
is it ᚠ and ᚴ?) but on another note, then what is
Whether they didn't use vowels, or vowel was щипок и смычок
Somebody made a thread on history of math and I rolled
(I omit the previous couple of my responses,
they may be nothing new to you)
Zero was used since Zen was conceptualized.
But from language point of view, I will be
enormously surprised if we find out that people didn't have words
like "nothing" before that.
>I will be enormously surprised if we find
out that people didn't have words like "nothing" before that.
And I won't:
>>Latin nīl ‘nothing’ in Horace, Odes
>>>By 1770 BC, the Egyptians had a
symbol for zero in accounting texts.
AХС is a weird bisexual project: in its golden era it was an alpha
with a great gal and a gay friend.
And that friend set a powerful question in the form of the link
between heterosexuality and homosexuality: would you rather fuck
an old woman or a young guy? If the woman is very old, then guy
may seem as a better alternative: but we shouldn't make this
choice: it's a false dichotomy: порока следует избегать, я был бы
счастливее если бы не смотрел порно. и здоровее. есть всё же
области этого мира, в которые не следует залезать. Говорят, что во
многих знаниях многие печали, но не всякое знание несёт скорбь:
многие из знаний облегчают и "упраздняют?
почему это слово означает отмену? в праздник не работают" жизнь.
А значит зная чего именно избегать, или чем это заменять, ведь
порно столь аддитивно, потому что замещает что-то очень важное.
Любовь? взаимная любовь навсегда! о как бы это было прекрасно,
хоть это и делает этих людей уязвимей (смерть такой половины
навсегда обездолит душу партнёра (не потому ли убивали жён
погибших вельмож? чтоб те не предались блуду, желая заполнить
пустоту от ушедшего мужчины. куда меня несёт. Зачем вообще этот
Порок порит, портит. а порток:?
Рок порок? Пророк про рок? Иисус Jesus sometimes look like Yesus,
was he the orginal Yes-man?
Я открыл душу для Иисуса, но кто вошёл туда? Кем был Иисус?
Великим магом? Но ведь основа магии - channeling. Who did Jesus
channel? The Heavenly Father.
Who was the heavenly father?
Do believers open pores of their cells? I was imagining our soul
as a матрёшка, но неразборная, а одна внутри другой в 3д-рндере.
And I thought that our souls have doors, and I thought of cells
having walls and doors. (door is through in Dutch)
Parcae, Clotho Lachesis Atropos, inuenerunt litteras Graecas
septem, Α Β Η Τ Ι Υ [?] ; alii dicunt Mercurium ex gruum uolatu,
quae cum uolant litteras exprimunt; Palamedes autem Nauplii filius
inuenit aeque litteras undecim [...] Simonides litteras aeque
quattuor, Ω Ε Ζ Φ, Epicharmus Siculus litteras duas, Π et Υ. has
autem [Graecas] Mercurius in Aegyptum primus detulisse dicitur, ex
Aegypto Cadmus in Graeciam.
> alii dicunt Mercurium ex gruum uolatu, quae cum uolant
In spite of how it is in english translation, where this sentence
is placed after the next, it goes right after that 7 letter
sequence, and thus its "ex gruum uolatu" relates it to my
conception of Many letters being the forms of V, Where Λ < >
V are A E O U and I is the I, and X is both X & + (which is T. both can be, but we do need B, and
if V is U, it cannot be B, so whether there were only 4 vowels,
as in hebrew and arabic, and then V was The B, or X was the B,
just as H- syllables give birth to labial sounds in japanese,
which is definitely connected to european scripts. I don't know
yet how, but official imperialistic tradition declaring japanese
culture merely an affiliation of the chinese one, is definitely
doesn't look real if you compare those cultures side to side.
Today we can, it the past it was impossible for an european, so
I think. People travelled much, so how do I know, but how many
educated men who had opinions on this version of history
travelled enough to make an educated opinion? How many japanese
could see what china actually is like? So they accepted the
belief? Because they were occupied by china for a couple of
centuries. Britain was also occupied by France for a couple of
centuries. Nobody tells France brought them culture, I think,
but maybe only because Romans did. Romans held Britain long
enough to build some roads and deliver some terminology (though
it's not easy to say if some terms are roman or french, because
both are roman))
X is double V.
If V is U and vowel, then double V is W which is never vowel
(unless E gives it its voice becoming an j, as in new. But who
said new should be written this way? on what grounds?
So W is double V. Thus X ~ W? wxy (x is among the v-gang. right
next to w) and isn't I half of V? Thus V is the basic form, and
thus there shouldn't be more than 4 of them. But Ⰳ which is
something between Ⰲ and Ⰴ can say otherwise, but isn't it a form
of C, which is <? C=E? С=Σ!
So can V be W?
V is both U & W!
U in one dialect can be V in the neighbouring one:
. . I thought ukreignian U is V in russian, but в is в and у is у.
удивить is здивувати (is that prefix the final letter
different in different alphabets?)
улица is вулиця убить is
вбити (забить is забити, so that у can be
synonymous to за, but as separated short words they are not)
Ⰲ and Ⰴ is devinitely V & Λ (actual L is Ⰾ which is the Ⰴ with
a line in the centre. this font, this unicode in 2020 shows some
other forms of glagolythic I have seen in books (probably because
I saw russian forms and these are probably serbian) so I add the
forms I saw and after them is their unicode:
somewhat varied order and three additional letters: ⰬⰭⰮ or are
they somewhaere from before, I'll figure it out somewhere further.
40 figures in the image,
first row goes the same 10 signs in the both representation, but
the second line is one-letter bigger in the unicode: ⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔ
Ⰺⰺ is the other form of Ⰹⰹ or Ⰻⰻ (I know it looks like 8 on my
screen, I hope it also does at yours, because I think unicode can
be displayed differenty, so in the following example you can see
how the same unicode is displayed differently:
Ⰽ looks like ᛋ (both are probably c's) but you can see in the
image it can go on. Just as ᛋ can: ᛊ
It's somewhat funny how Ⰺ can look very much like Ⱄ, but it is
as if they didn't properly distinguish between I & Ζ:
gosh, they even have some z in the name for i!
Today I figured out that von List can be correct about the body
poses asigned to runes, and I began looking for the images, and
they are not there, and the first of the kind (but of some
different nature or origin)
Because that left corner is exactly the perfect figure I realized.
I want to live in that posture Jesus've immortalized, only I also
want to be in the water so my feet look sorta downwards, so all he
liquid soap residues can floww off me, not to collect between my
toes, not to make the skin between them crack. It's like hair and
nail, the h & n, the r & l, the similar yet different
власы и ногти вроде такой парности не являет. если тольно не
сравнивать v & ν, л & г, s & t.
I don't know is it's some structure or if I've lost it by placing
s & t into one claster. They do meet in the sefer yetzirahの
three mothers. If the third one is S or T? It's actually one of
the questions in this work right now.
Satan or Tefol? I like me mentioned
it, because that's what I came here to show you tonight:
Rune no.15, like what were the chances! It's about how the volume
2 I think ended. Oh wow, no! it ended with me being in the middle.
the second mother is us. The firs one is god, the third one's the
devil, the death. So is бог related to birth? both are b mother.
bcd so I see. I was speaking of the first mother and thought of
her as of b. How is that? The first rune? The first letter of the
alphabet is b, as some cabbalist said. I will attach the video
here after I buy a large sdd. it's archived somewhere.
I spoke about humanity being the beast, but I spoke it more
phylosophically than scientifically.
Humanity is between the b & t.
Speaking of S & T. whatever, see it in Jazz Cafe (the one without
the bus) or I forgot it at all.
^˅<> are the abcd, so I think. and they're the first
letters, those "craned" by Mercury (or Hermes)
and the rest of the
here come some more of correspondence, it is related so it has its
right to be here no less than those e-drafts:
> Originally denoting a consonant /h/,
its sound value in the classical Attic dialect of Ancient
Greek was a long vowel [ɛː], raised to [i] in hellenistic
Greek, a process known as iotacism.
> Of course the vowels already existed before writing had
it became vowel when θ was replaced from its vowel position
(they say F mysteriously appeared in greek alphabet when it
was used for numbers, but I haven't explored that territory
yet, that could be a lie)
borrowed H and they always recognized it as i, and they
borrowed N and always recognized it as N, but several
centuries ago some reform took place and now H is И and N is
Н. I still wonder why.
also borrowed θ and they alway recognized it as F.
is transliterated as th into english, as in theology (and
russians recognize that th as t) but fairy is [feya] in
russian, and it's definitely related to greek θεά (even though russians stress
not a, but e)
and in russian H is definitely
part of the claster of I & J and maybe, it's the
newest guess, maybe that claster is HIJKL (then M is
after vowel) k seems to be a little off, but so is x in
the claster of UVWXY (but whoever placed these clasters
there (if they're not some illusion) probably didn't
know of the vowel-labial-linguals thing, because they're
at the places which deviate from that structure the
Russians continued to replace θ (first in the end of the
alphabet, number 9 at the picture, so they're in
greek order) though I read they never used fita and
fert(500, Ф, comes from Φ) at the same time, but
that some reforms replaced one with the other back
and forth (I haven't properly explored this either)
and in Dead Souls by Gogol it's said that some
people considered θ obscene (which makes me think
labial letters are describing feminine features (and
male and female organs are praised in the East, so
probably they're B & T in all their forms of yin
russian kirillic (or I just found it's more correct
to spell cyrillic) doesn't have θ, but greek is not
the only influence of it: runic ᚼ can be seen around
the same place it takes in the runic alphabet from
Bornholm, but not exactly:
line is ᚾᚠᚵᚼ
line is еёжз, thus ж is at the g's place, which
makes sense, since g can sound as dʒ, and ж always
sounds as ʒ, which looks like з, which is the
following letter, and is probably a form of ж making
a claster with it (because after g goes Hh, which is
Ии in russian)
if you meet a russian alphabet in the form of a
square 7*7, you should recognize them as some freaky
fraud, which is for whatever reason more popular
down here than the true language science.
could ᚼ sound not as h (х is russian h, and it looks
like staveless ᚼ) but as ʒ? I know J can sound as
both (it's almost h in spanish) and I found the
exactly same rune, ᛡ, transliterated as j (or is it
ʒ? j can be both, I see one of its names even begins
and another one right next to it:
can tell some stories: ё-word is the same as f-word. (though
it sounds as yo [jo])
H was pronounced as E and the following letter (in greek. I
use latin letters, but speak of greek now) sounds pretty
much as F, then it could be a line written across the others
(which incredibly correlates to genetics, where the same
place at a chromosome can be read differently, depending on
what was the starting codone) еёжз like hijk (then L is a
vowel similar to I, just as H is a vowel similar to E, and з
reflects k in words like знать [znat'] (to know) and the
same spelling and everything but recognized as a noun is
is a weird letter: not only does its minuscule looks like
majuscule i, it also sorta sounds like that sometimes:
Mallorca, papillon, which would explain the position of M,
if the 6-letter lines are make out of the shorter triliteral
couples. Either way, position of M is similar to position of
θ, and if R is at a vowel position two (as they're both in
sanskrit, which also has two R's) then what is S and what is
Ϻ? either way this guess falls apart at xyz (I hope these
rants inspire you more than distract, otherwise it will be
quite polite not to response or to ask not to write under
the influence of cannabis)
Looking for "ancient greek abecedary" doesn't return much:
and that's it,
so I tried it in greek:
(only google translator doesn't know abecedary, so I probably
should also try "ancient greek alphabet")
"αρχαίο ελληνικό αλφάβητο":
and that didn't return a single artefact. few casually scribbled
abecedaries is all I know of them.
This part goes parallelly with Jazz Cafe
with busses on its cover.
so I began looking for dialectal abecedaries, but not much came
out of it so far:
I have some doubts about these transliterations, or even more I am
doubtful about the order, but I don't know anything about lydian
yet, so I leave it as is. C as ᛏ and coming the last is
intriguing, but it's still nothing to me.
Not sure if this was here of if only in my
notebooks, copied it where I posted it first:
Nations are often named after personal names:
France is of Frantzs, Germany is of Germans, Danmark is of Dans,
Svenska is of Svens, Slavic nations is of Slavs (Vyacheslav,
Vladislav, Borislav, Izyaslav) and thus Rus is of Rustams or
Ruslans (both are colloquially shortened to Rus)
Last pre-christian artefacts were destroyed by last Rurik, Ivan
the Terrible. Wherever christians claim to be the creators of
writing system, they lie.
These htmls are random at least sice second
half of volume 1
-slav could be similar to -son (or it could
be something completely else)
While the word slave can be still related to slavics: Slovitt is
to catch, so the word could be russian, and names ending with
-slav could be slaves' names. But until we have a true
scientific linguistics and not the miserable shame they keep on
teaching today, we will never know for sure.
I am here building the truer language science.
I don't know what it will be named.
Let's reclaim grammar. I wanted to say
let's reclaim grammatology, but let's reclaim grammar.
Le mot « prolétaire » désigne à l'origine un citoyen romain de la
plèbe si pauvre qu'il ne paie pas d'impôt et ne peut être utile à
l'État que par sa descendance (du latin proles).
Is it the meme which made me celebate? Is it why idiocracy is the
I've been out for awhile (haven't smoked for days, and beofre that
I dreamed of my spheres when I got high (I commanded myself to
switch and I did, but I missed this thing, and I'm glad today I
wrote a lot in the second "old times - new times" notebook.
And I recall what I wanted to add here when I was sober: (Aristotle)
and it took me awhile to find that article (under that clickable
and while I did, I found some more:
but first some more I found when I compared the Aristotle's winds
diagram (above) to Homer's (below)
This one is according to Timosthenes, who lived later that
Aristotle, but it seems chronologically later works can document
some older concepts (Timosthen's diagram is closer to the Homer's)
It is as if Aristotle's scheme is in some other language.. But no,
now I see only Boreas cannot be found at Aristotle diagram, where
it sims to be named Mesos. And if not Timosthen's diagram, I would
relate it to Apartctias. And that and naming the nameless
directions is the only difference from Aristotles, so Timosthen's
is probably a later form of this concept.
It is the same as the one of Timosthen's, and in red we can see
the Roman names
Libonotus instead of Libonotos in greek blue seems to be a typo,
but surprisingly Zephyrus and Eurus seem to be the two with Roman
-us even in greek forms everywhere, which is rather weird.
But they all seem to be typos, because I found this: Zephyrus or Zephyros (Gr: Ζεφυρος)
But it made me thinking: what if A is where sun rises and Z where
Z sets seths zethz
Once again it seems to me english is more occult than you'd expect
it to be.
But Aristtle's diagram shows A & Z the other way around. I
wonder why no other diagram gives me letters.
But then again wait, here what I found today when I was looking
for the diagrams above:
not that one, this one:
Now I see clearly that he arranged those winds alphabetically, Α Β
Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν
for whatver reason omitting Λ, which brings Μ closer to the Ι,
especially since Κ can be missing.
Is K actually M? because it is Meses (because see the first image
of this collection: M has no wind)
I would rather see K having no wind, it would make it easier, but
this situation is fine too.
But it makes me think: are some letters go missing because some
winds are not present in some territories? I am also pleased to
see that there are 12 winds (or at least 12 directions, because
that's 2 dice, and I just now figured out runes as чередующиеся
singles and doubles, see it in the second "old times - new times"
Here I experimented with writing some texts which would conceal
alphabet in its body:
D what you have to do
E I say yeah!
F you feel then
G where you have to
H (age, edge) of chances (changes) is here
S as (IS?)
T tea R areM amS isT (thee)
W (double you)
Абы вы годы её жизи
икал мнопо расти
Уфы хоцеч шащъ
ыь (и) э юя
абы вы года её
жизы кал манер суть
жизы кал ман опер суть
абы вы где жизе и калом нопрас ты
уф хцчшщъ ыь э ю я
a, be there do if go hi joke all man op q rst
you vow axe yizz
I was looking for EFГ-like way of making the triad, and I only
found Ⅎ L Г (only the Ⅎ looks the other way, I didn't find such
t-like f not even in the following block)
𝈀 𝈁 𝈂 𝈃 𝈄 𝈅 𝈆 𝈇 𝈈 𝈉 𝈊 𝈋 𝈌 𝈍 𝈎 𝈏 𝈐 𝈑 𝈒 𝈓
𝈔 𝈕 𝈖 𝈗 𝈘 𝈙 𝈚 𝈛 𝈜 𝈝 𝈞 𝈟 𝈠 𝈡 𝈢 𝈣 𝈤 𝈥 𝈦 𝈧 𝈨 𝈩
𝈪 𝈫 𝈬 𝈭 𝈮 𝈯 𝈰 𝈱 𝈲 𝈳 𝈴 𝈵 𝈶 𝈷 𝈸 𝈹 𝈺 𝈻 𝈼 𝈽 𝈾 𝈿
𝉀 𝉁 𝉂 𝉃 𝉄 𝉅
the 𝈙𝈘𝈸 is the closest to EFГ and it's different than the
and the other collection:
𝈑𝈜𝈙𝈙𝈐 𝈚,𝈥 𝈦 𝈫𝈪,𝈿,𝉃,𝈣𝈸𝈁 𝈲𝈲𝈭𝈮𝈉𝈃𝈨𝈎
𝈵𝈆𝉄𝈌𝈩𝈑𝈊𝈅𝈘𝈹𝈰,𝈭 𝈸,𝈾𝈌𝈥𝈘𝈚𝈩𝈲𝈌𝈧𝈩𝈗 𝈳𝈠𝈉𝈩
or is it just some example of the use of the system? it seems
so. They wrote music into this almost unknown alphabet and what
are the roots of it and what is the level of authentity I can
only guess now.
These sounds can be even heard (I've no
idea how have they figured that out, probably some melody they
knew was found)
the links are like this: https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/𝈙
I will deliver midi player into this thing
later, for now I only could make it by coverting midi into mp3:
I mostly work in my notebooks now.
Found g.o.d again
but that form of it is from today's Long Shot movie.
g.o.d & g.o.p
as above so below. both fish seem to flow in clockwise direction.
and thus republican party рубит фишку, а демократы для деьма.
демоны деймо, шайтан шайтэн, энд ай позишн майселф эф э троль who
wants to be alef. s and t are the end of the alphabet. d is at the
end of the line, but first time it is so neutral deus applies to
devil too. but angels and bogs are a b бог и бетта ту зы эйнджелс?
What is C? C is God. That's from my recent notebooks: end of the
Northern Lights or somewhat later.
a couple of new reasons to believe in god (I
wanted to tell you all story, but I found it graphomaniacal)
a) if the world is simulation, Elon's reason seem alright (I used
to question why would somebody waste power on us, now I see that
if processes in simulation are faster than in the actual world,
it's possible to make a model of civilization not much worse than
the upper lever one, that would deliver inventions of 45th century
b) it doesn't matter if god actually exists if he allows to avoid
sid. avoid sin. avoid datan. avoid satan.
sins actually lead to physical diseases (not only mental ones,
they're themselves the mental ones)
c) our ego can be not the most interconnected part of our brain,
and some ganglia can be more powerful, and that ganglia can act as
god, healing body and connecting to other gods like that maybe
(that's a guess and the least powerful of the three, but at least
this one is easiest to verify/falsify)
Because to my surprise I found that I don't know the old russian
canons (there were many before Peter, but they say situation was
stable, different canons, but it tells they don't actually know
the details of situation before the reform, here let me collect a
pair of such examples:
The following table is an application to one of my otebooks, about
b being a suffix of past tense, and r is a suffix in future tense,
and that r only can be seen in french (vulgar latin, ne? or what
was the actual language or dialect or a stage of development of
But it seems (according to the table why did I never know after
the latin course in my uni) b just indicates some tense and past
from future is different like a from o i u
And r, so it seems is also a verbal suffix, but for perfect forms
of those past and future.
Why it is important is that grammatic table seems to be grammatic
indeed: grammata is letter.
a m s are three mothers (suffices? are suffices words to tell
something. they are and the basic they are, so simple we don't
really realize what they are other than some formal norms of our
−a =m ≡s
female, neutral, male genders in latin adjectives.
Today I sent two letters with this:
I think I recommended to use lineal instead of linear (not to be
confused with linear A and linear B) but now I think we should
keep on using linear, so internet search by that word will also
lead to us. And linear A and linear B may want some more
subj: lineal are linear (Re: yantras) since
we draw them right to the vowel.
That תֹ֙הוּ֙ וָבֹ֔הוּ thing could be
our B & T, especially since sefer yetzirah speaks about
letters in this text.
Does it describe duality emerging after the triad nature was
already described in the previous line.
It is bible,
the very first lines:
בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃ just like sefer yetzirah tells: אָֽ
is air, מַ֖
is water and שָּׁ fire
הָאָ֗רֶץ הָיְתָ֥ה תֹ֙הוּ֙
וָבֹ֔הוּ וְחֹ֖שֶׁךְ עַל־פְּנֵ֣י תְה֑וֹם
וְר֣וּחַ אֱלֹהִ֔ים מְרַחֶ֖פֶת עַל־פְּנֵ֥י הַמָּֽיִם
בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם
וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ) because why אָֽ
is air if it literally tells Erath. הָאָֽרֶץ
are literally earth (ץ th)
was recognized as air because it's
vowel, but vowels determine the accent,
the dialect, the musical mode, the
Could letters be maps? Then אָ֗ is western europe (france,
germany, spain, italy. but gosh they all have different
probably eastern coast of the Mideterranian. firm borders on
the south and unexact wave at the north where all sorts of
הָיְתָ֥ה תֹ֙הוּ֙ וָבֹ֔הוּ וְחֹ֖שֶׁךְ עַל־פְּנֵ֣י
תְה֑וֹם וְר֣וּחַ אֱלֹהִ֔ים מְרַחֶ֖פֶת עַל־פְּנֵ֥י
(or בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃) like I colored
these three groups
הָיְתָ֥ה תֹ֙הוּ֙ וָבֹ֔הוּ וְחֹ֖שֶׁךְ עַל־פְּנֵ֣י תְה֑וֹם
וְר֣וּחַ אֱלֹהִ֔ים מְרַחֶ֖פֶת עַל־פְּנֵ֥י הַמָּֽיִם׃
But it doesn't make much sense to colour
שִׁ֖ green so I have to change the coloration:
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח
י כ ל מ נ ס
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
fire was golden, it doesn't make much of style.
Were labials made in blue gems? were vowels diamonds?
It seems I am supposed to research the ancient jewelry
a e i o u . r u
b f j p v
c g k q w
d h L R x
M s y
n T z
is RoMe Reign, Rule over Me? is Po actually
Ro? russian Ро. Here I claim that some tribes in italy still
call Po Roh. But most probably it is wrong and not more
scientific than etrurians are russians.
But Rhein and Rein are Reign.
תְה֑וֹם is abbyss. T as emptiness, небытие, while B is literally
But google doesn't have translation for בהום
yet guesses it's домой in hebrew (no guess for yiddish)
But yandex doesn't have translation for בהום yet guesses it's
Die in yiddish (no guess for hebrew)
הַמָּֽיִם in the end of the second line is the water. It's
interesting, because first line ended in earth.
My guess is the third line ends with fire, but I don't remember
such a line.
וַיֹּ֥אמֶר אֱלֹהִ֖ים יְהִ֣י א֑וֹר וַֽיְהִי־אֽוֹר׃
and my guess immediately supported by the light in the end of the
אור [or] just like gold in french
And though I didn't expect much from the line four, it returned
the opposite of light, חֹֽשֶׁךְ׃ the darkness.
וַיַּ֧רְא אֱלֹהִ֛ים אֶת־הָא֖וֹר כִּי־ט֑וֹב וַיַּבְדֵּ֣ל אֱלֹהִ֔ים
בֵּ֥ין הָא֖וֹר וּבֵ֥ין הַחֹֽשֶׁךְ׃
So we have them coming in pairs: Earth and Water, Light and
Darkness. Some poetry it is.
Next line ends in אֶחָֽד (one)
and the following in מָֽיִם (water)
does it means it's going to repeat the same sequence and land is
one (as it is, it was in the first line)
and following was כֵֽן (yes)
and the next one is שֵׁנִֽי (second)
Which reflects one. Because they go not in fours but in pairs.
again goes yes (first in pair as the previous time)
and then goes טֽוֹב (good)
again goes yes (first in pair as the previous times)
and then goes טֽוֹב (good)
and then goes שְׁלִישִֽׁי (third)
which is natural, for he counts the days. thus one is the day one.
and then go שָׁנִֽים (years, or teeth)
and then goes yes
and then go הַכּוֹכָבִֽים (stars)
and then goes הָאָֽרֶץ (the earth)
and the goes the good (at the second position again)
and then goes רְבִיעִֽי (which is fourth, even though it would be
nicer if it went second as the other even)
and then goes הַשָּׁמָֽיִם from the very first line.
and then goes good
and then goes earth
Which just deranges that quest of mine apart.
and then goes חֲמִישִֽׁי (fifth)
and then goes yes
and then goes good
and then goes earth
and then אֹתָֽם (translated usually as them, but google tells you,
and then goes earth
and then goes לְאָכְלָֽה (to eat)
and then goes yes
and then goes הַשִּׁשִּֽׁי (the sixth)
Here the first chapter ends, and unless I missed a line, it's far
from some order of this kind. Unless few first lines may tell some
story in this way, but it's probably nothing, just yes, good, yes,
good as a magic spell I know now.
I think I figured out why Composer lags more and more: too much of
hebrew: it gets deranged by these lines going back and fourth.
I actually came here only to tell you of tohu va vohu being those
T & B and it went on itself.
Do these lines tell that there are two kinds of labials: the onse
that come from vowels, and the one of linguals?
This freaky image made me think of Meccan triad:
أفرأيتم اللّـٰت والعزّى Have you thought upon Allat
الأخرى And Manat the third, the other?
تلك الغرانيق العلى These are the
exalted gharāniq [?cranes]
لتُرتجى Whose intercession is most sought after.
Because similar are El to Allat, Is tu Uzza, Mind to Manat (razum
in russian, pravda, radost, rai)
Cranes are mentioned in the myth of creation of the alphabet: Then Hermes reduced these sounds to characters,
showing wedge shapes because cranes fly in wedge formation and
then carried the system from Greece to Egypt
and thse cranes could relate to both cunieforms and moon phases,
for those three goddesses could be the faces of the moon. Manat,
Though in that image Moon is only amove the third goddess and
rightly the waning crescent,
many texts in the internets tell that Allat was Moon goddess, so I
suppose that symbol behind Allat is not Sun, but Moon. (not son
but mom?) and the morning star above Uzza is probably another
symbol for morning, as the waxing crescent (crane?) is the
If al Uzza with the article, so is Al in Allat also the very same
article? Uzza Manat & Lat would make beter for ABC structure,
but here it seems L again goes before M (according to the image
above, even though Mohammed mentioned Allat first.
Danish long-branch runes (in the
an Swedish/Norwegian short-twig
runes. (above & below)
More on this topic somewhere in the second half of the green stars notebook.
are tzars stars? it seems to be that very
tzadi, tzadik is fit to be a king.
Zar, ar could be the very er suffix.
what grasps my attention in the staveless runes above: no ᚭ maybe
because ᛆᛆ was that.
and in this ᚭ relate to ᛓ which is how ᛒ is in short twig runes.
which makes quite a compilation of doubles of labial letters: ᛒᛓᚠᛘᚮ and the final one ᚢ could be seen
like doubled staff. which makes sense if T is the final letter of
the orfer. of the order. that could be quipu and different colour
of the thread or other indicative would be used if they all were
out of the same knot. knots are like notes. quipu in the european
culture confirmed (couture is almost
culture because national features
and really to my surprise let's check the other somewhat double: ᚼ
is h (or j or ж) nothing seem to be labial about it other than in
greek it's the place of θ (which is somewhat labial, and see how
it's double) but only if ᚵ is η, but then where's ζ unless Ζ is
the true digamma. unless ᚼ is ж which is a form of z which is з,
and russian second line goes еёжз (that's it) but am I not
supposed to consider it in the oldest historic context? I don't
know that context enough so I compare it as it is. At least this
canon I know.
ᚱ could be a form of ᚢ and ᛦ could be some other form of it: q, ц,
ч, and some people recognise it as some form of R, which would
make ᚱ П (Р is R in russian and П is P)
ᛏ surprises me the most, also how it reminds ᛘ just as m comes for
both (something like m is cursive t in russsan) but I feel
reliefed because of it's form of ᛐ in short-twig runes.
and I'm not sure about ᛋ
but this all not so important that all the labial are double.
Let's see what's the problem with those double linguals:
not much to be seen, only that I omitted ᚾ first, only there's no
ᚾ in the rune table before other than N, and could that \
represent both and it does in staveless futhark.
And what I'd consider E is the other way around ᛅ and stands for
that very A which is ᛆ
But in the bornholm stone it's the way I say it, it's the corner
stone of my runic research:
Unicode doesn't present the O as on this stone, instead it
delivers this set of them: ᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚯᚰ
ᚭᚨᚬ probably stand in the tables before for some hooked form of a,
which I recognize to be the o:
they're all double too. And that is the letter missing in the
staveless set. Probably because it was written by doubling of ᛆ or
ᛅ funny how they're all the other way around. Though ᚬ reminds the
Bornholm O not less than ᚮ (maybe even more, if i knew what was
more important. Runes are so obscured and so uncertain and so
poorly studied, so much intentionally noised maybe)
a letter I sent to a friend today, it could be important in the
context of this work. We were talking of shabbateanism and
frankism when he came so it's a continuation of what he was
asking me of how I feel about jews by showing me some journalist
interviewing some pollish nazis whom I felt to be some putin's
agents or some other polish comsomol offsprings to contol the
Про евреев тему поднимал поговорить про моё отношение хочешь?
Отношение сложное, коммунисты меня напрягают больше, но учитывая
что у меня батя под влияние той же вышки попал, врагами я их
иногда и считаю, но считаю что нужно находить взаимовыгодные
решения. Но опять же друг-враг это абстрактные понятия (как ни
странно) люди сложней: что-то мне в одном нравится, но
категорически напрягают другие черты. Твоя политическая позиция
меня озадачивает, но поскольку ты не людишь политические темы,
или может потому что моя позиция точно также озадачивает и
напрягает тебя. Считаю ли евреем тебя? Считаю что у тебя тех
гаплогрупп немного больше чем у меня, с чем связываю и
политические предпочтения, хитрые еврейские планы известны
сегодня почти всем, а скоро вообще всем, но что с этим делать не
понятно, хочется чтоб в финале был тотальный бесконечный
хэппиэнд для всех актёров и массовки. Эти националистские игры -
продолжение древних культов ~ культур, где чужие традиции
кажутся сатанинскими, а может они такие и есть, но те считают
что и нормально, у нас такой хитрейший план, договор с самим, и
так далее, отсюда и сходство понятий чурки и черти, наверняка с
той стороны тоже такие же эпитеты. great satan это арабы сша так
называют. (маленьким иногда слышал что израиль так называют, а
иногда что россию) т.е. сколько людей столько мнений на самом
деле, в одной только библии plot-twist'ов штуки три насчитал, и
это может ещё и не предел, не зря же она как любая религиозная
книга (наверное) противоречивая, чтоб смыслы расходились как
фракталы (или специально так написали, или само по себе из-за
того что много людей писали) в общем там не понять кто их них
плох кто хорош: бог оказывается диаволом, а исусхристос
Люцифером, а апостол Павел антихристом, но он пропатчил
Люцифера, чтоб его последователи в нищете не погрязали, чтоб
заботились о завтрашнем дне, несмотря на то что Иисус там
сказал. У евреев такое же бешенство своими фракталами расходится
через талмуды всякие (Сефер Йетзира интересна для изученяи
ранних стадий алфавита: там передаётся часть доеврейской
культуры, до иудейской во всяком случае, как через
гравитационную линзу видны более древние понятия, которые я уже
знаю по другим источникам: три матери и каждой соответсвтует
буква. Сейчас (в шестом томе) рассматриваю непосредственно
первую главу ветхого завета, с которой Сефер Йетзира
соотносится, т.о. расшифровывая всё это (связь букв с элементами
и так далее) я тем самым обогащаю еврейскую культуру (при этом
евреем в строгом смысле не являясь) так и Губерман обогащает
культуру Русскую (культура от слова Коль (голос на иврите) в
значении речь, язык. эколь)
It's in this book just not to вставать дважды. It's a subject of
great interest to me, but it's still not directly related here,
but it touches some themes I mentioned here, so here we go.
Are disease and decease cognates?
is autism and asocial!
ist and ism vs al, is as (ass как) ешь. or it?
continues in the first of fractal serie (somewhere in the first
half of the notebook)
Sometimes I get amazed how vast the field to research is, here's
some Tocharian languages I never heard before, and they had some
ancient writing systems: Tocharian A and Tocharian B.
Wooden tablet with an inscription showing
Tocharian B in its Brahmic form. Kucha, Xinjiang, 5th–8th
century (Tokyo National Museum)
Tocharian B manuscript, c. 7th century AD
(in larger scale is mirrored here)
the image above is also clickable to where it says this:
Tocharian A and B are significantly different, to
the point of being mutually unintelligible. A common
Proto-Tocharian language must precede the attested languages by
several centuries, probably dating to the late 1st millennium
Tocharian A is found only in the eastern part of the
Tocharian-speaking area, and all extant texts are of a religious
nature. Tocharian B, however, is found throughout the range and
in both religious and secular texts. As a result, it has been
suggested that Tocharian A was a liturgical language, no longer
spoken natively, while Tocharian B was the spoken language of
the entire area. On the other hand, it is possible that the
lack of a secular corpus in Tocharian A is simply an accident,
due to the smaller distribution of the language and the
fragmentary preservation of Tocharian texts in general.[citation
The hypothesized relationship of Tocharian A and B as liturgical
and spoken forms, respectively, is sometimes compared with the
relationship between Latin and the modern Romance languages, or
Classical Chinese and Mandarin. However, in both of these latter
cases the liturgical language is the linguistic ancestor of the
spoken language, whereas no such relationship holds between
Tocharian A and B. In fact, from a phonological perspective
Tocharian B is significantly more conservative than Tocharian A,
and serves as the primary source for reconstructing
Proto-Tocharian. Only Tocharian B preserves the following
Proto-Tocharian features: stress distinctions, final vowels,
diphthongs, and o vs. e distinction. In turn, the loss of final
vowels in Tocharian A has led to the loss of certain
Proto-Tocharian categories still found in Tocharian B, e.g. the
vocative case and some of the noun, verb and adjective
In their declensional and conjugational endings, the two
languages innovated in divergent ways, with neither clearly
simpler than the other. For example, both languages show
significant innovations in the present active indicative endings
but in radically different ways, so that only the second-person
singular ending is directly cognate between the two languages,
and in most cases neither variant is directly cognate with the
corresponding Proto-Indo-European (PIE) form. The agglutinative
secondary case endings in the two languages likewise stem from
different sources, showing parallel development of the secondary
case system after the Proto-Tocharian period. Likewise, some of
the verb classes show independent origins, e.g. the class II
preterite, which uses reduplication in Tocharian A (possibly
from the reduplicated aorist) but long PIE ē in Tocharian B
(possibly from the long-vowel perfect found in Latin lēgī, fēcī,
Tocharian B shows an internal chronological development; three
linguistic stages have been detected. The oldest stage is
attested only in Kucha. There are also the middle ('classicalʼ),
and the late stage.
Based on 3rd-century Loulan Gāndhārī Prakrit documents
containing Tocharian loanwords such as kilme 'district',
ṣoṣthaṃga 'tax collector', and ṣilpoga 'document', T. Burrow
suggested in the 1930s the existence of a third Tocharian
language, which has been labelled Tocharian C or "Kroränian",
"Krorainic", or "Lolanisch".
In 2018, ten texts written in the Kharoṣṭhī alphabet from Loulan
were published and analyzed in the posthumous papers of
Tocharologist Klaus T. Schmidt as being written in Tocharian
C. Phonetically, Tocharian C shows preservation of the
Proto-Indo-European labiovelar *kʷ in the word okuson- "ox",
compared to more divergent reflexes in B okso and A ops-. Based
on morphology, Tocharian C is more closely related to Tocharian
B than to Tocharian A, as shown by the secondary cases in
Tocharian C are more closely related to Tocharian B than to A
(e.g. ablative A –Vṣ, B –meṃ, C –maṃ; 3rd person singular
present suffix A –ṣ, B –ṃ, C –ṃ). These similarities suggest
that there may have been a continuum of Tocharian dialects north
of the Tarim River ranging from Tocharian B around Kucha to
Tocharian C around Loulan/Kroraina. On September 15 and 16,
2019, a group of linguists led by Georges Pinault and Michaël
Peyrot met in Leiden to examine Schmidt's transcriptions and the
original texts, and concluded they had all been transcribed
entirely incorrectly. While a full report of what languages
these texts represent is not yet available, their conclusions
appear to have discredited Schmidt's Tocharian C claims.
and how I found this writing system? Again by accident, from this
Вопрос о существовании у шугнанцев письменности в
древности является дискуссионным. Единственным упоминанием о
возможном существовании древней шугнанской письменности является
сообщение китайского путешественника VII века Сюаньцзана — в
своём труде «Путешествие в Западный край во времена Великой Тан»
он упоминает страну Шицини, которую исследователи отождествляют
с Шугнаном. По словам Сюаньцзана письменность в Шицини такая же,
как у тохаров.
which was found in the quest for ꝩ
I didn't find it yet, but that place also linked me to Komi
script, believed to be christian, I think it's pre-
𐍔 is old-permic letter e.
𐍐 𐍑 𐍒 𐍓 𐍔 𐍕 𐍖 𐍗 𐍘 𐍙 𐍚 𐍛 𐍜 𐍝 𐍞 𐍟 𐍠 𐍡 𐍢 𐍣 𐍤 𐍥
𐍦 𐍧 𐍨 𐍩 𐍪 𐍫 𐍬 𐍭 𐍮 𐍯 𐍰 𐍱 𐍲 𐍳 𐍴 𐍵 𐍶
𐍷 𐍸 𐍹 𐍺
some Stefan is sid to be the source of the script (though armenian
Stefan only owned the palimpsest)
too weird-looking to be of christian origin. But let's ponder on
𐍔 𐍕 𐍖 𐍗 𐍘
𐍙 𐍚 𐍛 𐍜
𐍠 𐍡 𐍢
𐍣 𐍤 𐍥 𐍦
𐍧 𐍨 𐍩 𐍪
𐍫 𐍬 𐍭 𐍮 𐍯
𐍰 𐍱 𐍲 𐍳 𐍴 𐍵 𐍶 𐍷 𐍸
We can see that final line is different in unicode and the table
above, I'm not sure I coloured the final line correctly, or rather
I am sure I made it poorly. 𐍪 𐍫 are probably obegas or they
reflect koptic or russian ШЩ, because what follows does
repeat russian canon, yet with some peculiarities.
I'm even not sure about 𐍣 line, because if it went in greek canon
before, why would it deviate from it .
But it deviated from it even in the second line, and deviating
from it in russian way, with all consonants there are some ж's and
and no samekh, so it isn't greek. What if greek second line
changed due to the eastern influence? I dunno, it is all so naked,
unfounded, not based yet. I only ponder, but the fifth line is
also not greek at all: more like russian. or was russian
influenced by parmic scripts? is that canon even correct? which
one? they could be both wrong.
and what is 𐍭, by its position before 𐍮 I think it's that цю
which makes that line very russian: фхц is how it goes in russian,
then I suppose 𐍩 is more u than o, also see how it reminds runic
ᚢ, I doubt a christian would allow himself to make this reference,
more like it is a natural borrowing of the form among heathen
nations. 𐍪 is probably another form of that o, a greek influence
maybe, or some other nation, there were many between Greece and
Parma. 𐍫 could be ф, 𐍬 could be х
𐍔 𐍕 𐍖 𐍗 𐍘
𐍙 𐍚 𐍛 𐍜
𐍠 𐍡 𐍢
𐍣 𐍤 𐍥 𐍦
𐍧 𐍨 𐍩 𐍪
𐍫 𐍬 𐍭 𐍮
𐍯 𐍰 𐍱 𐍲 𐍳 𐍴 𐍵 𐍶 𐍷 𐍸 𐍹 𐍺
whoever лепил последнюю строку или что это,
понятия не имел об алфавитных структурах.
Those small ones are ◌𐍶-like, some attachments. Why would some
christian stephan go that weird..
if 𐍴 is я, then I dare to guess 𐍳 is 𐍙-ed 𐍴, another Combining
Old Permic Letter the unicode makers didn't know of? seems
It's funny how 𐍘 and 𐍙 seem to claster as H and I did. Whould
that 𑀡-like ancient Z feet better for both and then ЖЗ would be
reflected by GZ. is Z final letter after musical notation? Was H
introduced by some musical grammarian?Is musical school the
alternative, the opposition to other schools? Math Mus and Myth
are the three concurrent groups? Trinity of christianity could
secretly combine all three under its grasp, but we don't know how
much is preserved in the other schools. I mostly know Myth
(letters) My's? L to R? Mysl? Teller? let tell, take lake? take
cat. My mind is in poetry mode, it is guessing rhymes, but it is
not science any more. I leave to smoke some more maybe.`
and there's another more important script system I need to learn
Vowels are presented in their independent
form on the left of each column, and in their corresponding
dependent form (vowel sign) combined with the consonant k
on the right. A glyph for ka is an independent
consonant letter itself without any vowel sign, where the
vowel a is inherent.
Such diversity may say only one thing: it is the epicentre of this
Old-brahmic 𑀕 for ga
does relate to Г and Γ
and so probably do 𑀔 and 𑀖 for kha and gha. thus 𑀓 for ka is
inverted 𑀕, thus 𑀕 is Х voiced
and like Х what letter does it? ה
Some letters are duble: 𑀘𑀙 and 𑀝𑀞 and 𑀗𑀚 too even though
they allowed 𑀘𑀙 to stand between them. They're like B c D
and that is it, unless 𑀟𑀤 is such a couple, they are for ḍa da
so could be better to learn together.
There's also 𑀡𑀦 for ṇana but double-single here doesn't repeat
single-double of ḍada
ṭha tha brings another symmetry: 𑀞𑀣 tha is without a dot. can it
make into cat miaws cats miaw meow
google translater reads meow as miaw. e = i, a = o. meaw is read
less a than meow.
which is o which is a, americans must think of a and o
differently: a is their o, and o is their a? but in other cases it
isn't so. Do they think of dyphthongs differently than of letters
моясь мы её смываем (а она защищает от болезней)
I will survive and never meet people being clean again.
I will wear leather. and will only change t-shirts and pants and
I will occasionally wash myself before some rite. Or maybe not.
Did ancient people wash only before sex? They could have sex in
battles. Rape was never frowned upon until recently? But it is
prohibited in torah? But is't it only between jews, and nobody
then cared about the neighbours. So we ended wars by ending rape?
We film every little piece of land now. More and more often and
oft and often are supposed to be synonims, but I suppose it used
to be as thorough and thoroughly.
and more oft and thorough
sorrow is thorough
leather and feather
weather clothure dresser
feat is подвиг
A relatively rare or difficult accomplishment.
(archaic) Dexterous in movements or service; skilful; neat;
(obsolete) To form; to fashion.
(transitive, informal) To feature.
feat neat as v is ν
leather feather heather weather
Studying magic squrares in the third of fractal notebooks (isn't
I found an interesting one, in the very centre:
сердце в самой середине, yep, it's
Look what I found today:
these are the closest to arabic I saw so far. I announce it its
origin now, amateurishly perhaps.
and some other day:
Остатки этого письма сохранились в чувашской
народной вышивке. При помощи таблицы символов можно легко
расшифровать, какие напутствия и добрые пожелания оставили нам
The random part is over, I came here to compare etruscan to runes
Romans borrowed some script from etrurians, yes, but who did
etrureans took it from? My guess is runes, maybe because I am
biased, but maybe because runes are more primitive (less in number
and simpler in forms, and some similarity between these two
writing systems persists. which allows me to say these writing
systems are related, well duh, they are territorial neighoubours
how can they not too)
This temple and (this) statue have been dedicated to Uni /
Astarte. Thefariei Velianas, head of the community, donated it
for the worship of our peoples. This gift of this temple and
sanctuary and the consecration of its boundaries during his
three year term in the month of Xurvar (June?) in this way, and
in Alsase (July?) this record together with the divinity/statue
shall thus be buried by order of the Zilach that the years may
outlast the stars.
Now you just know I need ai to figure it all out, I collect it all
like poststamps in the childhood.
But I went on a journey and return to share a video under this
Where it is as if o was substituted by some ᚮ (which has its
stroke upwards at the actual artefact)
Those three forms make sense if it's arms raised up.
and evening we're on our hands, heads down, tired?
and let this be here, it's rewritten ugaritic alphebet sten
That first stage makes me think they began drawing and reading
these in chinese manner, not in lines, but in columns.
And on the next one shu for hand is similar to chinese and
Chess could be connected to alphabets somehow, 16 figures on each
side is reflected by 16 runes of younger futhark, and 32 of them
all reflect russian 33 where one of them are tried to be rejected
from time to time: ё is written as е in the most of texts. Is it
because antichristians took over and print books in russia?
The image is clickable (yet I have modified it because I don't
believe in the 4th разряд) and though it doesn't tell much, it
links to the bigger research https://scan1707.blogspot.com/2019/08/blog-post.html
where they link to Fomenko, but I guess I am
freaky enough to belong to that croud. Because I know academia
is corrupted, so I have to collect the good ones among the
freakds. And this branch of them is good, and they don't
base it on him in the main part:
Агрикола в своих книгах о металлургии (1530-1557)
использует систему долей, кратных восьми: 8; 16; 32; 64; 128.
Античные солнечные часы разбиты на 8 секторов.
1649a напомнил, что в Древнем Риме год делился на
нундины - циклы по 8 дней.
Как в Древней Греции, так и в Древнем Риме одна ладонь была
равна четырем пальцам - не пяти. Локоть был равен либо 20, либо
28 пальцам, то есть, в основе 4, а не 5. Отсюда легко прийти к
восьмеричной системе счета и невозможно – к десятичной. axsmyth
увидел здесь же и корни дюжины – это 12 фаланг 4 пальцев.
mahead указал на шахматы: 8 клеток по каждой стороне, 16
белых фигур (дважды по 8), 16 черных.
isinor обратил внимание на особенность словообразования
существительных русского языка при их подсчете:
1 -- именительный падеж, ед. число -- например, один стол
2 -- родительный падеж, ед. число -- два стола
3 -- родительный падеж, ед. число -- три стола
4 -- родительный падеж, ед. число -- четыре стола
5 -- родительный падеж, мн. число -- пять столов
6 -- родительный падеж, мн. число -- шесть столов
20 -- родительный падеж, мн. число -- двадцать столов
Счет до четырех формируется из словоформ единственного числа,
множественное число появляется только начиная с пяти единиц
учитываемых предметов. И так - для всех существительных;
примера, который бы выпал из схемы, найти не удалось.
На идентичную ситуацию указал igorvin69 - один год, два года,
три года, четыре года, пять ЛЕТ.
Самые ранние известные римские пасхальные таблицы, составленные
в 222 г. Ипполитом Римским, основаны на 8-летнем цикле. Румбов
на компасе восемь. Римских месяцев без встроенного в название
номера – 8; пронумерованы лишь 4 последних. Монетные системы
европейских стран до середины 19 века основаны на числе 8 и, как
следствие, - 16 и 24. Для медных монет Российской империи
чеканки 1810—1830 годов монетная стопа составляла 24 рубля из
одного пуда. Вплоть до революции в России масса крестьян считала
осьмериками. В. И. Даль: «восьмериковый, относящийся до счета
осьмериком». Президент США Томас Джефферсон использует в письмах
доли, кратные восьми. Барингс-банк, проводивший сделку по
продаже Луизианы, взял в качестве вознаграждения 12,5 % или
Газета Протестант пишет: "В денежном эквиваленте десятина
равнялась 12% (Лев. 27:31)". Число явно расчетное и с
достаточной точностью равно восьмой части.
alpsrife пишет: "...если вспомнить, как выглядят счёты, то там
две чёрных костяшки, и восемь белых. То есть, любые счёты
применимы как для сложения в десятичной, так и в восьмеричной
that quote from this site:
https://scan1707.blogspot.com/2019/08/blog-post.html (mirror) even mentions me,
contributing to that list, but I contributed much more, here:
https://chispa1707.livejournal.com/3404246.html (mirror) so I allow myself repeat it
and I decided to place my response here, because it relates to
this work a lot:
Но по той системе IVXLCD равно.. 365, %°
а 123456789 в сумме будет 45, что разбивает 360 на 8
а сумма всех чисел от 1 до 36 будет 666 (36 = 6*6)
непонятно только почему 365.4 округлили до 360
а, ну да, чтоб притянуть "несовершенный" мир к математическому
"совершенству" IVXLCD ближе к реальности чем 0123456789?
шестеричность (с точки зрения десятеричной, округляющей 8 до 10)
римской системы проявляется в том, что самих символов 6 (M это
сокращение вроде нашего тыс, потому что та система, о которой я
знаю: где тысячный порядок отмечается над цифрой, может идти до
бесконечности, тогда как финальная M делает её тупиковой.
> Отдельный расклад в рунах это маловато.
это не отдельный расклад в рунах, руны официально разбиты на
аэтты. это основа системы. Моё предположение - потому что это
изначально была шестеричная система, и руны разбивались на
игральные кости (что ведёт к четверичной системе, предшествующей
шестеричной: смотри knucklebones.
По греческой легенде игральные (или гадальные?) кости (или кубы?)
изобрёл Паламед, тот же самый, который добавил в алфавит 11 букв
таким образом, что их стало 18: The three Fates created the first
five vowels of the alphabet and the letters B and T. It is said
that Palamedes, son of Nauplius invented the remaining eleven
Странно, что про ættir информацию так сразу и найдёшь,
As you can see, some researchers recognize ᛦ as z, others as k the
REWRITE THESE CHAPTERS: ᛉ is recognize as z,
oh, no, none does. one recognizes it as R, other as Y. I think we
found two more readings of the same rune. P only has two ways to
read it: as P and as Р(the russian R) does it wintess that Norsk
is more ancient than sousk. In my notebook, fourth of the squamas,
I just wrote about my tendency to be biased towards some not so
ancient writing systems, to demand them having relations to the
more ancient ones (because if the structure is known by it, the
structure forgotten by the academia so it seems. or is it known by
academiaa? some narrow brook repeats the knowledge of the
structure: History of hornbook mentions it not giving out the
source, some egyptologiests like Petrie know of this structure, or
at least mention it, egyptian alphabet is in the structure but
weirdly I wonder how do they know it. They probably expose in
museums only the secondary artefacts, keeping all the true ones in
the private palaces. Either way, I still wonder how on earth could
they not know of such an inventions as speaking letters, for many
centuries, millenia if we think of chinese, why would they invent
it so verbose, or letrose, if they finally met russians with greek
or some other literary culture?
Why do I keep on swallowing on official datings? Why don't I use
the structural analysis of the writing systmes themselves to see
their similarities and thus to draw their development with a
little help from ai.
𐳰𐲰 is ʒ in old hungarian, the final letter, reminds z & russian я previously known as az
𐰱 is ič, či, č /itʃ/, /tʃi/, /tʃ/ in old turkic.
ж & ч are not that far. also phonetic is close to russian,
latin doesn't have ж & ч letters. nor greek.
in norsk ᛘ is M, but ᛉ is also z, which could be a mistranslation
of some hungarian runologist, or could be the link between norsk
and hungarian and turkic runes. But first we must figure out if ᛉ
was ever used in norsk runes or only ᛘ looking like ᛉ (which is z,
but also ks, and in the form of ᛦ it's ɻ (that R) and y and ᛣ is k.
(REWRITE THESE CHAPTERS)
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(not ᛣ)ᛋᛏᚢ of
bornholm and additional runes
𐰀 orhkon a
𐲔 ak [k]
ᛇ is ï ï, ȝ æː? [iː]?, x ~ ç while ᛢ is kw (thus not turkic, but hungarian
𐰁 yenisei a
𐲔 (the same k)
ᛇ ᛢ are the same pair as in previous triad,
but ȝ of ᛇ
is g in night, thus it could be a link 'twin 𐰁 and 𐲔.
also they're turned with that boot towards the beginning of the
line in all three wrunic thintems.
𐰂 yenisei ae
𐲂 it is eb [b] in hungary, but by some accident, it is third
there too. And also after a & ae
ᚷ known as gebo, but stands for [j] and it is also named jebo
which is extremely close to hungarian eb.
𐲂 is eb as it покрыл the \. crossed out the issue, payed with sex
for the issue? I dunno, it's some ancient morals, I expect
something dirty to appear or is it only my dirty mind?
As in case of F (the letter after E) and Ё (the letter after Е)
different words for the same sign of action.
𐰃 orkhon i, é, ï
𐲒 ei [j]
ᛚ is l, ᛐ is t (could ᛚ play for j, as it does in some ll's)
all these are lingual, I can give them this
𐰄 "yenisei i" compare it to japanese イ and hungarian
(the next one) is even more similar.
𐲇 is ed [d], but 𐲐
is also i,
ᛆ a ᚿ n (N & И meet again, and ا and I)
(it is the second triad I look at (the first
one's next)) next, but if next one, it's the next one.
𐰅 "yenisei e" (it is the
first triad I compared, they show hungarian and turkic runes
related. we'll see)
𐲏 is eh 𐲊 is e
is it how -ing transfers into the east: fucking is fuckanie if
with russia suffices, but this word (actual wrussians' words are
-ebanie and simply eblya where I think l ~ n and l is an. 1 is an.
doing deyanie, was it doinᛝ? e = cc? because ᛝ is very similar to
ᛃ recognized as j, which is close to ie.
ᛃ is similar to い which is similar to и. イ
is similar to i, as if hiragana goes for russian and katakana
for latin script). Then a is
russian (bceause hiragana あ reminds it) and A is latin, because
katagana ア is it.
I returned here from the start of this list,
and I find all three systems interconnected, I have to make
those rings like latin- greek - russian. But it will be in the
𐰆 orkhon o [o], [u]
𐲙 en [n]
ᚲ [k] [k], [c],
[tʃ] [k], [g]
doesn't seem like these three have much in common (they look not
that much alike to cry for them)
𐰇 orkhon oe
𐲭 rudimenta ue (Ü, ü, [y])
ᛲ sh ᛋ s ᛴ FRANKS CASKET
again turkic and hungarian runes are more similar than they are
to norsk. 𐰇 and 𐲭 reflect as 𐰃 and 𐲒
This table of orkhon tells they are two different systems. and further letters go in different order.
but I will continue with my list of unicode runes? I will see
through their canons later.
𐱃 orkhon at [t]
𐲄 ts. 𐲅 enc.
𐱄 yenisei at [t]
𐲤 s. 𐲍 g. 𐲖
ᛃ ᛈ ᛊ ᛝ ᛖ ᛗ ᛟ ᛠ ᛢ ᛥ
𐱅 orkhon t
𐱆 yenisei t
𐲭 [yː] (ю) 𐲝 Nikolsburg Oe
𐱈 bash [baʃ]
𐲫 uu 𐲪 u
ᛞ d ᛗ m
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(not ᛣ)ᛋᛏᚢ of
bornholm and additional runes
𐰯𐰞𐰃 are ilp, and they're three mothers: 𐰞𐰯𐰃 are ipl, vowel,
У римлян в году было 304 дня в 10 месяцах. Календарь уже
лунно-солнечный, Метон давно обсчитал все и знает, что в году
365,25 дней, но 304 дня в году римлянам хватает. На деле, мы
имеем дело с побочным эффектом перехода на десятичную систему.
Лунный месяц содержит 29 или 30 дней. В восьмеричном римском
счете это пишется так: XXXVI – это 29, и XXXVII – это 30. В
нынешнем понимании это числа 36 и 37, в среднем, 36,5. Умножаем
36,5 на 10 римских месяцев и получаем 365 дней в году. Перед
нами не следы иных астрономических циклов Земли и Луны, а
обычная ошибка, характерная исключительно для эпохи перехода с
восьмеричного счета времени на десятичный.
(he probably doesn't know of the sum as 365, or now he knows, but
I googled that 304 day year, and they do believe it:
Древнейший римский календарь содержал десять
месяцев, причём первым месяцем считался март. Этот
календарь был заимствован у греков; согласно традиционному
мнению, его ввёл основатель и первый царь Рима Ромул в 738 году
до н. э. Календарь содержал 304 дня.
(По свидетельству Макробия, римляне не разделяли
на месяцы промежуток времени между концом десятого месяца и
началом весны, но ждали ее прихода, чтобы опять начать считать
and then I googled 256 and found it to be zenzizenzizenzic, which
lead me to this:
Does this system relate to the previous topic? Probably not.
256 is also the number of characters in the new Braille 8-dot
256 is the number of Odùs in the Ifá Corpus:
it's probably chaos I pick things out of, but these are some new
information for me. let it be.
У мер [u mer] (at measures, на пределах, D ead, at the edge)
У mothers? Measure is Mother?
It resonates with a video I saw today:
Whichever etymology those words passed, cognates are cognates.
Also knoweing how sloppy or lazy or whatever academic workers
are, you cannot expect them to be exact and you have not
time to check all their etymologgies yourself)
Love, Life, wife? (герои погибают из-за баб?)
Почему я использую для этой.. что это? этимологии?.. три разных
Is it science or some poetry?
if смерть came in russian, let's find other two in russian too.
amore be more see more?
not even pure english? what is see more anyway.
> Japanese ニ(に) [ni] and ミ(み) [mi] standing for 2 (二) & 3
(三) consequently kinda supports my bold hypothesis that chinese
weiring originates in Japan. Because they teach that only mi is
originally japanese (for chinese form is san) but ni is a
chinese form (for japanese form is futa) but now I just doubt
Japanese ニ(に) [ni] and ミ(み) [mi] standing for 2 (二) & 3 (三)
are like Devil & God standing at the end of the third volume.
I expected the 12 there, but
couldn't allow the third volume withouth the third as thetth
(theta is Seth? theta is sister? sister of Гoroneus?
Before I create Venn Diagram for runics, I will see the one I
These two have different quantity in the centre, and I like the
second more: Y is not russian form, and even even y is named
i-greek in latin and и-грек in russian, Y is, they know y as Уу.
They also separated Y & Υ
But what about k? is it because how different k can be or because
italian doesn't have K?
If the 9 of the second one are grouped in the lines of the three
distinct vowels it contains: AEO,
we can read it in english to get three vowels,
A B T (c and t are both linguals, ᚦ is both ᚲ and D)
E M H (I like how H is both ΕᛘΗ in greek and EMN in russian)
O P X (because X used to be the final form of T, because
what did it look like in.. (forgot to write
that thought down)
E was also I, and O was also U
thus ΕᛘΗ and ИМН
ᛘ and ᛉ tell the story that ᛘ was with E and ᛉ with I, and Θ
combines features of both.
features as feathers, næ..
(japanese ne and russian na)
ABT? I thought first line was supposed to be voiced? C isn't.
if H is Н[n] then second line is sonor. and final is voiceless,
but I heard C used to be G. it is still voiced in russian Г[g],
but not russian C (с is voiceless s)
so was T Г?
I never read of hungarian aettir, and here it seems these three
groups are 10 letters and it is important, because I saw some moon
calendar of 19 signs. 19*19 = 361, which is not impressive at all.
I think I understood those 19 signs as something related to the
moon, but now I just don't know.
That is why I have to redo it in parallel but consequent texts on
separated topics. As soon as I realize how to make links among
them better than by frames, I will. Or maybe I'll do it after I
find the system I'm looking for.
I've trusted those architects that made the hous inconvenient so
that tenants move around and could thus live forever. And I move
around and I understand that dvizhenie smert
I want to keep my homeostasis by being static. The opposite path
not to jump from one hot spot to the other, but avoiding those hot
heavy spots intentionally грузный горячий to avoid hot spots by
living in water? the opposite of fire.
?'s are often instead of ,'s because it is there in russian the ,
stands. , безымянным пальчиком сделав
подворот, в отличии от точки, которую я сейас мизинцем нажимаю,
и то лишь потому что ? is on the spot of russian ., and I ddn't know that безымянный две кнопки на
нижней строке жмёт.
La fleur de vie.
Нашёл изображение цветка жизни, которое makes more sense чем то
что у Мельхиседека и вообще везде:
Возможно, вам понравится группа Попрыгун И
Вам. U in nederlands. у англичан I с большой буквы, у нас и
голландцев - Вы, у нас пока не обязательно, но в документообороте
вроде везде и скорее всего не только.
je ты, а вы всегда с большой: U you как V Вы.
словно у больше буквы V?, словно У это V с палочкой, Y, долгое, U
долгое V? W uv yв в как п, вульва и пися, губные, п как w c
палочкой сверху, подобно тому как м в египетском сова с ушками как
у буквы м. Доброе Утро!
stop speaking out
of your S (S is for satan,
probably ancient people didn't distinguish between beasts like
asses and goats, they are even similar in russian: osyol &
i pod statt koze kozyol
s taliey osa
no ne stal eyo osyol
strekoza rukami mashet
к in козёл is рог? as in колоть?
Tails of arabic and georgian could be from the conquest of persian
aempire by arabs. Were Colchis under Persian Empire when it was
conquested? They are christians, so probably not.
So that doesn't really matter, it was some other nations's
influence in some other period, but if the words with those past-t
letters of arabic have cognates with some pre-tav letters, it can
be supported by it.
is there a way to visualize more topics you have written
green lines are clickable (but you have to allow scripts for
them to be clicked)
You've read the Language Crystal?
the first time I hear about that book. Have found it,
downloaded. Will look into it, thanks.
So what are the 3 Mothers?
to sefer Yetzirah - 3 matters (fire, water and air (but I
think it's not air, but soil (soiled, solid) yet I'm not sure
about that too) symbolized by S, M and A) according to other
heathens, triple goddess which I suppose to be 3 faces (3
phases) of the Moon. Triple but single at the same time (the
concept christians adopted, but none of them seem to
understand this mystery) and if the Moon symbolizes the 3
state of the matter (gas, liquid and solid) this I can only
guess now. Those three mothers (fates, parcae, norns, whatever
they called them) probably symbolized time, because they were
more powerful than the kings of gods (they had power over
Zeus/Jupiter, but he didn't have power over them) and moon
probably symbolizes time: weeks are the phases of the moon,
and the alphabet of 26 probably was used as a calendar to
count fortnights (it removes the argument about if it's waxing
yet of already full, and you can always distingish waxing from
waning, and those forms probably originated letters b & d,
though in russian we recognize them as Р[R] растущая
[rastuʃaja] (growing, waxing) and С[S] стареющая [starejuʃaja]
(getting old, waning) because the crescent froms those
letters) and some further, more abstract 4-fold sequence of
> V < ^ could form the vowel-labial-velar-coronal
sequence and a clockwise rotation.
Just dropped a feedback to google, I hope this citizen diplomacy
won't getme killed.
The new logo is unreadable, especially when the tab-bar is
inactive, screenshot wouldn't show (speaking of .ico)
I also made a joke about G being masonic, just as the apron of
gmail. I'm sorry, I like that apron, even though it looks weird on
Don't be shy, even feel free to usurp those symbols: if they
matter, they're common. That apron probably always was an
M is also a powerful letter, of which I write at aeiou.ru and
that's how Mason starts. Okay, hi. Or is that envelope a
hieroglyph of mail for M
Before that moment I thought it was a hieroglyph for an owl with
those horn brows. Minerva is connected to commerce as merchants
could be the first mailmen. And owl is also among her atributes.
Thank you for good service, hope this serves you back.
And we can see that envelope was in the original design.
Iplaced it here because that feedback made me think of this
symbology until I found another source of the graphics of M.
This symbol is famous because it can be written with one broken
line without gaps. These two words, broken line, have different
meaning which is weird.
It's probably caused by those graphs, where they draw a continuous
line, when in reality there are only dots of measurement.
- - - – – – — — — 一 一 一(japanese 1) − − −
+++ ーーー(japanese longis) ꟷ ꟷ ꟷ(sideways I)
♭♯♀♂ ß ſʒ «» „“ Åå šʃ Ґґ Єє Її Ϻ Ϲϲ. Ⲥ 卍卐(swas)
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(not ᛣ)ᛋᛏᚢ of
bornholm and additional runes
𐳺𐳻𐳼𐳽𐳾𐳿 (old hungarian & next R2L)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵
𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿 (Old South
Arabian, R to L)
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת ך ם
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
ა ბ გ დ ე ვ ზ თ ი კ ლ მ ნ ო პ ჟ რ ს ტ უ ფ ქ ღ ყ შ ჩ ც ძ წ ჭ ხ ჯ ჰ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ/ς τ υ φ χ ψ ω
𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d 𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ 𐎊и 𐎋 𐎌 𐎍 𐎎 𐎏 𐎐
𐎑 𐎒 𐎓 𐎔 𐎕 𐎖 𐎗 𐎘 𐎙 𐎚 𐎛 𐎜 𐎝
𐎠 𐎣 𐎧 𐎥 𐎨 𐏂 𐎩 𐎫 𐎰 𐎭 𐎱 𐎳 𐎲 𐎴 𐎶 𐎹 𐎺 𐎼 𐎾 𐎿 𐏀 𐏁
𐏃 𐎡 𐎪 𐎮 𐎷 𐎻 𐎢 𐎤 𐎦 𐎬 𐎯 𐎵 𐎸 𐎽
𐎠a 𐎡i 𐎢 u 𐎣k 𐎤ku
𐎥g 𐎦gu 𐎧x 𐎨c
𐎩j 𐎪ji 𐎫t
𐎬tu 𐎭d 𐎮di
𐎯du 𐎰θ 𐎱p 𐎲b
𐎳f 𐎴n 𐎵nu 𐎶m 𐎷mi 𐎸mu
𐎹y 𐎺v 𐎻vi 𐎼r 𐎽ru 𐎾l
𐎿s 𐏀z 𐏁š 𐏂ç 𐏃h
here I collected several writing systems I use the most, so I
don't have to search for them.
Ææ Øø Åå Ää Öö Üü ẞß ā ē ī ō ū ǖ á é í
ó ú ǘ ǎ ě ǐ ǒ ǔ ǚ à è ì ò ù ǜ â ê î ô û
and here lays an article explaining these
(I only lost the hyperlinks because
where I took it, ctrlc+ctrlv behaved weirdly) here it is.
but it could be too much of an honor, because it seems to be not
the only set of those:
pbp̪ b̪ t̪ d̪ tdʈɖɓ̥ɓɗ̪ɗpʼt̪ʼtʼʈʼm̥ mɱ̊ɱn̪̊ n̪ n̥ nɳ̊ɳʙr̥ rɭ̆ɺ̣ⱱ̟
ⱱɾ*(ɽɺ)ɸβfvθðszʃʒʂʐɧɬɮꞎsʼʃʼɬʼʬʭβ̞̊ β̞ ʋ̥ʋð̞ ɹ̥ɹɻ̊ɻɥ̊ɥl̥
though these two sets ar probably of
different fields (orthography & phonetics)
and phonetics being so abundant in its symbolics still places
same signs in different cells, which tells it's all not certain
(and different people pronounce the same sounds differently) and
unnecessary when audio-recordings is widely available (but not
in books made out of trees)
and I still didn't find the one I needed: Åå so it was too much
of an honour indeed, or am I just grumpy?
either way look at what I had to go through to get the å I could
write in my nnotbook in a second.
(I add it upstairs just now, even though you saw it earlier than
– k s
t n h m
y r w
a あア かカ さサ たタ なナ はハ まマ やヤ らラ わワ
i いイ きキ しシ ちチ にニ ひヒ みミ ※ りリ ゐヰ
u うウ くク すス つツ ぬヌ ふフ むム ゆユ るル ※
e えエ けケ せセ てテ ねネ へヘ めメ ※ れレ ゑヱ
o おオ こコ そソ とト のノ ほホ もモ よヨ ろロ をヲ
І і Ѳ ѳ Ѣ ѣ Ѵ ѵ Ѕ
ѕ Ѯ ѯ Ѱ ѱ Ѡ
ѡ Ѫ ѫ Ѧ ѧ Ѭ
ѭ Ѩ ѩ Ꙋ ꙋ
𓄿 𓇋 𓇌(𓏭) 𓂝 𓅱(𓏲 ) 𓃀 𓊪() 𓆑 𓅓 𓈖() 𓂋 𓉔() 𓎛() 𓐍() 𓄡
a i ij a(o?)
p f m
𓋴() 𓊃() 𓈙(𓈛 𓈜 ) 𓈎() 𓎡 𓎼() (𓏏) 𓍿
ḳ(q) k g
ch d dj
𓐝 𓋔() 𓍘() and
though I don't think biliteral or triliteral signs are less
g m n
t I decided to avoid
collecting them here, because I don't use them yet.
᚛ ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅ ᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ ᚋᚌᚍᚎᚏ
alphabet 𐤀 𐤁 𐤂 𐤃 𐤄 𐤅 𐤆 𐤇 𐤈 𐤉 𐤊 𐤋 𐤌 𐤍 𐤎 𐤏 𐤐 𐤑 𐤒
𐤓 𐤔 𐤕 numbers 𐤖 𐤚 𐤛 𐤗 𐤘
some tricky :: ׃