It is volume 9 ( 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8) this is a draft part, it may seem that I stumble around some random rhymes, but that's how I always was working and some cool stuff came out of it, so the most solid info is the first half of the first volume, all the rest is raw as odb loved it or more. several cool notes appeared afterwards, so I keep it online just in case and because ever wanted to read drafts of scientists.


Let's list the main points of this work so far:

alphabetic order has some structures if lined out in planar tables
1. when it's cut into lines beginning with vowels.
2. when it's cut into lines which has vowels in centre of lines, and some vowelless lines are allwed if they are even only. But not all alphabets can be arranged like this, but some of them arrange into it nicely, so probably even less people knew about such arrangement.
3. reflection between the halves (or folds around some important letters)
4. reading of that first arrangement when the diagonal of reflection is lined from the top left corner into the right bottom one.
These four hypotheses are arranged by the rate of my belief in them. I'm pretty sure hypothesis number 1 is numero uno indeed, it's most probably a historic arrangement, I met few records of this structure, one from a modern-day amateur scientist, one from one english book, one from one indian book. I found that structure independently and it came frist or the second after the third. (hypothesis 2 came in the 3rd, and hypothesis 4 is the most recent one, it literally was born in the end of the previous volume)

Also transcription of ancient texts cannot be trusted 100% as all the science have reflected on itself and discovered a replication crises, of which I think I was aware of, because I knew I had to do it from scratch, but I was motivated by some linguistic forum to dig further in the past to be taken more seriously, so I followed that ruiling.

Christian claims that it's them invented all those writing systems are false.

Also some open threads to ancient egyptian, music theory, both iberias, chinese, native american, african and polynesian writing systems, some mystical and mythological references, leading to whole that culture to find relating pieces and gesture language can be a source of theorizings, and there are probably more, ogham of course.

These claims are up to you to find out how credible am I, I think I trust them pretty well.
(I lay out the argumentations for them in the previous volume. here my task is to go further, and I think a good and perspective source for research is the short words of some old european language such as latin in relation to modern european languages and how the same short pieces relate in them.

a = 1, to,  well I didn't expect the reference to 1 2, but here it is. a is but in russian, which also follows a.
of об
в was v in russian and б was where ё is now?

de оf
до to

is есть - why does modal word has the to in russian?

am ем

are  ести

are am is as AMS
Вы Я Он
В could be the b, the prehistorically first letter.
I as the centre between A & V.
N of он is the final letter of its' line, and could be lmn the xyz of the past?
also N is ν

VIN? ni = мы? я тоже последняя. V was the last and that's W of we.
VJN? and Он as the alphabetic sequence is

чем могут быть алфавитные слова как не следом более древней системы? и слово ёж предстало как базовым как еда, и представить, что люди начинали звероловство с поедания ежей можно представить очень даже: в еже мяса как раз на раз, другие звери их скорей всего не умели ловить а человек знал, что можно тупо камнем убить его. ежи кусаются, так что да, руками ловить погано. Возможно, мы делали себе одежду из шкурок ежа. Любопытно было бы посмотреть.
Но скорей всего эта дрянь колкая, так что наверное нет. Может на щит разве что прибивали как оружие, но тоже своих же поколишь некстати. так что наверное нет. еж еда и только.



A guy contacted me about his app and I thought that he will be more interested in some other research:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znx-odtXgw8 (Global Alphabet by Yuliana Gorokhov)
and though I first thought it was purely an artistic project, watching it now I see that she speaks of historical unity of all those alphabets. And it makes her work much more interesting, and she even removes the first stroke of Л the way it obviously is a swash when you compare cursive Л and l.
but then I watch further and I notice that she doesn't reconstruct the prehistoric unity, but turns it into truly an artistic project, which makes it less interesting for me, but the latin-arabic font is cool)

And when I searched for it, alphabet ted, I found an african professor speaking of ancient arabic writing systems, and here's a tidbit:



and there he recommends his book, which also contains many sources for research:


(I link it to a pirated version of his book, it also cannot into ctrlF, so it's a demo version, for all of you to see how beautiful is this book, of what perfect quality is its pictures. It seems old russian or european equipment was sent to africa and preserved there pretty well. Pirates do break some unjust laws, and I justify that because I give them free promotion, either way how am I less worthy than librusec where I found it. Sharing is caring. Pirating boosts sales because it promotes) I would mirror, but it's too big.
I selected this one image, because it can indicate how muslim missionaries also lied about their inventions, That time people knew of much more useful writing systems, why would they use african system a little, but not completely, why does it go labials first if modern scholars didn't know that? Why would it be named ki ka ku as if it has som other, the eastern order and only three vowels. And notice that signs with a i u go syllabricly with diacritic over the same sign, and other syllables are off this structure, completely arbitrary. So maybe that guy did invent it, adding his silly additional syllables to the ones used before him. to the original Ki Ka Ku. KKK is some psy-op, so it seems, it could hit africans with godly awe via these synapses, no wonder they were scared. It was a psy-op, a terrorizing.


綺麗な [kireina] is carino or carina in italian.


использование эпиграфов честно ли? Иногда читаешь эпиграф и книжку закрыл потому что и так слишком много понял. А еслидальше читать того же качества текст будет ли? У меня эпиграф строго информативный.



contiguous and contagious are similar not only by their orthography, but semantically too.



fear and affraid are connected via dutch vrees (verbal form is vrezen) or such form in old english.


I swear when I pray, does it mean I'm for sure.
(the question is are swear and sure are cognate? да, блядь!
is blядь is блять is быть? ля ы bl balaкать lalakatt. bla-bla-bla is ля-ля-ля. бl = ы because l = i and б is optional? (because in english do is duh, blatt. and english -ing swears or curses are translaterd into russian with -ed матs)

but ы is the opposite of я in this claster.

la is modified ы, ы is some abstract vowel, and probably that's how they sang before they learned to merge vowels with consonants into syllables.
ba bu bi is russian semantic name meme, so I lay it out in this oghamic order.
da du di could be да do ты or duh, du дей. opposite or not, я and ы are both of i-claster, unless у is y and я is а. are ы and я both y's and that's how it splits from where it splits into u and i (both can be a, because of bus and i's name's ai)

| is  ו ا i
ו stands for и which is i, and and.



those knucklebones are also called astrogali and tallus. which can be related to tallysticks.
talli astrogali, probably a coincidence, or similar suffix.
https://www.academia.edu/24831681/Astragali (mirror)






Пуруша (др.-инд. पुरुष, puruṣa IAST, «человек, мужчина, дух») — согласно индуистской мифологии, существо, из тела которого была создана Вселенная.

В Ригведе жертвоприношению Пуруши посвящён отдельный гимн — Пуруша-сукта. Пуруша — Наслаждающийся — четырнадцатое из 1000 имён Вишну.

В индийской философии термин «пуруша» означает «божественный дух», макрокосм. В философии санкхьи пуруша — множественное неподвижное мужское (духовное) космическое начало, «чистое сознание», созерцающее динамичное женское начало — пракрити (материя). Пуруши являются вечными, их основные свойства — отсутствие свойств (ниргуна). Однако Пуруша, созерцающий пракрити, склонен ошибочно идентифицировать себя с ней и с гунами.

В первоначальном учении присутствовал тезис о множественности пуруш (пуруша-бахутвам), тогда как в позднейших трактатах провозглашался уже принцип единого пуруши, наделяемого качествами, близкими к атрибутам атмана Упанишад.


перекликается с

 Берешит , Берешит , Bereshis , Берейшит , B'reshith , Beresh't , Берешит , или Bereishees ( בְּרֵאשִׁית - иврит для «в начале» первое слово в parashah ) является первой еженедельно часть Торы ( פָּרָשָׁה , parashah ) в ежегодном еврейском цикле чтения Торы . Параша состоит из Бытие 1: 1–6: 8 . Берешит (парашах) - https://ru.qaz.wiki/wiki/Bereshit_(parashah)

(но это не точно)



The word renown shows that k in known is a prefix. Probably, the same as in russian к which is to.
and then now is probably now and n is a suffix of the past or done as in done and gone.



𓄿 in simpler representation can give 𐲀 as back and beak and A as legs and tail and wing and a as head and body.


here A regains its beak as if it simply rotated its head or maybe itself in the form of A and with swash it rotates its head to its right.
Swash of G makes g even closer to d (both meet again in g being russian d)
And it gives us ABᚦ EFG
and next H is a form of I, a double I, and swashed form of J shows that it's half a I, a י (is it why they thought hebrew didn't have vowels? Because I was shorter than theirs? Then such tendency existed? Arabs spoke their semitic language at least a millenium longer and they have ה which is vowel in half of hebrew examples is completely consonant in arabic ه also why o is in the e-line? is efg actually opq?

but abc structure demands all hijkl to be one claster. and it's easy because l ~ I and h ~ ג ~ λ ~
but positionally those letters don't correlate:
א ב ג ד ה
j  i  h g f
ξνμλκιθ
do I wanna say g ~ κι / f ~ θ / ν ~ N ~ И?
ה~ joy / ד ~ да ~ и / ב ~ va ~ go / א ~ f as we saw it in futhark?
Can I pull every owl to every globe?


covid is cow it
go it, избегай этого, cow ~ go (уходит, не дерётся) а бык бычит? бык be, остаётся, не уходит.


to and tu
to ~ you is the semantic origin of that prefix. to ~ твоё, тебе
me ~ ne ~ моё, мне.
to ~ take
no ~ don't touch.
take ~ touch

от ~ of
oт ~ oб
to / off
до ~ то ~ to
от / до

то и ты показывают как второе и третье лицо изначально не противопоставлялось?
and вы is as a form of we? вы is the way to speak to ours, ты is a rude way to address a foe.
(ты и те, а не вы и мы)
вы и мы are both labial and it is where the first and second person pronouns meet.
вы и ты подобны c которое и с b и с d.
c ~ sie (but also Вы (U) and She and They, and is it where W and Ш meet?)

(раньше я зачастую использовал ~ и / бестолково, как придётся, теперь я вижу, что следует писать так: ~ почти что =, / значит противопоставление (like 2 to 4 is a half, for example, but that's not only possible form of antonymity, grammars are more complex than math)
both grammar and math have ma in it's base, just as music has m
three m's
not only myth, but also grammath grammar is grandma, grany говорение
math is mother. and music is the younges, maiden because other positions are taken. lala
Music is muse? Three mothers are three grandmuses?
I think I came to this conclusion before in this work.


I as a newer, individualism pronoun. Ah! Ya! some междуметие видимо взято за него.
Междуметия до сих пор не особенно частями речи воспринимаются, потому что крикнуть можно такое, что и не запишешь, как lleju which I think sounds as ee-huh, but I didn't find any other transliteration of that cowboy whoopee. [yā-who]

I is ego, literally его. Ich is literally их.




here can be the explanation why high and low sounds are named so



οπρστ could be some Pythagorean line with
ο standing for the circle
π standing for the π of περίμετρος
ρ - I expected it to stand for radius, but google translate that word as ακτίνα
σ could be square or area, square of the square's area because square's square is the square of it's side.
τ could be τετράγωνο but then I see that it's square which is quadrat, not area. area is περιοχή, with π.

diameter is διάμετρος which is literally two metres, as if radius is a metre by default, as it is often so in trigonometry.

so I don't really know greek, it's time to visit that professor with whom I worked with greek before.
π standing for both περίμετρος and περιοχή and when diametre is 1 metre, perimetre of the square is literally π, and when radius equals 1, περιοχή is literally π. I wonder why it's radius in one case and diametre in the other. weird. will return to this weird stuff later. I mean what were the chances! even if it's p>0.05, this number is totally arbitrary, so why would I care, humanities are not hard science anyway. And I also probably calculate my p-value wrong. Here a guy explaining what it is and why it doesn't really matter as much as they want it to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42QuXLucH3Q



Minazuki (水無月, "Month of Water"). The 無 character, which normally means "absent" or "there is no", is ateji here, and is only used for the na sound. In this name the na is actually a possessive particle, so minazuki means "month of water", not "month without water", and this is in reference to the flooding of the rice fields, which require large quantities of water.[15]
無 standing for no is used as na (I would never know it, because it's always bu elsewhere, actually is's wu in chinese and mu in japanese, it is bu only when it's a prefix) and here m and n meet again.
(it's irrelevant that there's no historic records of european-japanese contact before the ones we know of, because m~n unity was even before l~r unity (because both l~r is the same sign in japanese) and we have no historic records of l~r unity either, but I think it's conserved in the language iteself (мы, но нас, us, nos, uns ~ wir, nós, we, мы) is this w~m unity testifying that we ~ no (no as in nos. this w~m~n unity is supported by v~ν and whether these words are related or not, the syllable is definitely the same, that ancient w~m~n nasality, and japanese show at their nose when they say watakushi (tachi is plural suffix)

how to avoid a military conflict? abolish military complex.
(countries without mic are annexed without much bloodshed if their politicians are not polite enough to go together and in their unique way, it takes some diplomacy to be a sovereign nation, military power is nothing but bullying. And don't we all have a duty to oppose the powers which be? we shouldn't, because ghandism work, shaming bullies is powerful enough. no need to risk total annihilation, and I hope actual missiles are all secretly dismantled, and people are just not told because it's not their business, maybe later, but biological weapon is reality again, we should isolate ourselves, to protect not only from traumas but also from other forms of life trying to take our place)

that -na of no could semantically originate this way: димино ~ не дима, но рядом
не вода, но водная



Is bouquet a bucket?



проверка: прёт ли трава что взял:
Шудры рабы своих тупых фантазий
каких фантазий? желаний
шудра чувств раб
лабиализаtion of the language happened
язык не подразумевает губ
шудра - старинное слово - соло (во это часть лабиализации? even n is lingual)
m came out of n then.
б & в are the same word "in" like ν

фантзия ис э нью уорд. рашшнс донт еуен хэу ф's.

язык even vowels are lingual in that word. language is also all lingual. but губы старт with г, but unlike

if Б & В are v, then they're also of ν
M is closest to N, thus does it mean it's the first of n's?
nop are ноп in russian. and that is some labial claster together with m actually.
mnop is it why m is here? historically? to show its specific role?
is it minor? both i and r are in direct proximity
minor as this mall small sequence, in comparison to the major ones from a to u or something?
M-inor
M-ajor
r is final? t is final, but t~s~r. isn't ß β? because if r~s, p~r, p~s, b~p
once again.. can I pull any owl onto any globe? I do need some help from ai, because it's all too big for my head.

Anyway, it's spring now. Time to build. Give up the weed.


] remember blaming Hawking for using word god in his book for over hundred times or something.
[ ctrlFed vol.1 for god and it's 43 times, in 2 it's 33 mit times, in 3 it's 56, and so on.


op q           r   s t
up que     are set
up where are set
(it's some revelation,

abcd upset
bcd беседа
bcde посидим. be, see, deй
fghi fuck?
klmno ёклмп?
pqrstu просто ёпрст?
ё is io? those two initial vowels (I wanted to say labials, whether because vowels show how the lips look: whether it's no or yes.
yes is i, ー, 一,
no is | then? but which one?
ו as u, bu, fu?
ا as a-, un-?
ן as no, and thus n~l~ל as if ל is even longer lן then ו
v~ν as ו ~ ן it wants to go in reverse, whatever I hope you all know greek and hebrew alphabets by now.
וןל
 then they're the snakes? the beasts: 𓃭

Are hieroglyphs Noah's arc? Ковчег также и ковчег завета.
Каждой твари по паре? 𓃬𓃭
𓃭 is now recognized rw instead of l as in old azbukaz, but also  mꜣj as if it's мяу и raw. мясу мяу мур
but l and r are also recognized transcriptions:


here I finally smoked some good letter (in the same evening, same seance)

𓃭 is the largest of the trinity of 𓃭𓆓 𓆑 or is snake the longest? Pitons could be longer than cats, piton could swallow a cat. and 𓆓 looks more like ל than ן, and ל reflects N as if LMN are all related, L mutated out of n in one direction, and M — the other.
N is common? between B&T.
N as the central letter? M was named the
a b c d e f g h i j k l m | n o p q r s t u v w x y z
they're both the central letter.
lo pk kp lose and keep?
jq joke ir ire?
the first associations make perfectly antonymic sense so far. I wasn't even sure what ire was, I though happiness, but a smoke warm gum gun it was.
hs has? gt get? (get получает, добывает, goes it, go it, goed, good? goone? gone? didn't get yet)
fu fuck you? ev eve? makes sense. eve is l'eve? love? l'öve l'ёve, ёв ~ ёб
dw dow? do? dω? cx sex? cakes? kicks? сх, спих, спихнул, перепихнулась, спит пихается? странная парочка. спихни спи ~ fall sleep slip. sleep and slip is the pair of спи и спихни.
to kick ~ пихать.
kick пих
kicks kids. was it a common joke to kick eachother? To stay alert, to stay on watch. Но такой быдляк мешал задумчивым, и его в сущности запретили. законодательно как хулиганство.
leave it now, let's go on:

cy.. and I notice that I missed a letter, and that coud be the reason cx doesnt' reflect dw
a b c  d e f g h i j k l m
z y x w v u t s r q p o n

m/n is the central letter, reflects only itself and thus odd undelimo? (неделимо поровноу)
oh I missed it right here that I used c before.
by be? d as do is very cool, but in this pair is az. if it's antonyms it's ends. (alpha & omega, nachalo i konets) jesus is Az? Az esm.

az by cx dw ev fu gt hs ir jq kp lo mn
as be sex do eves fuck get have ire joke keep low man
I think my associations are caused by my sexual restraint.
Thank god I don't have ass as teh first associations.
by could be buy,
cx cakes
dw dow daw dew down dawn dew is related to dawn?
ev is even or eve (pretty much the same0
fu fuck for sure
gt get (e is соединительная глассная (е & о) in russian) literally get and got. gut is gut gu got?
hs has he's hos house have home has house
I have home, he has house.
me have home, he has house his

me and he is the opposite then.
me and thee tho too
mi is three though. ksn? akasatana.. kana.. ka-na. n as the end. after n o starts, the voicelesss counterparts, and in that N resembles Z

here there but he and thee
he was the one who made us US, made me МЫ
Mы is the pluralf form of Me, just as We is the plural form of Wo, and thus Me = Wo? Men ~ Women?
Those are two forms of first personal pronoun: Me are how men said and We is how women said?
We is a coward's way to say Me, cow way, тёлок способ.
спасибо значит пособил. -el suffix is reflected with prefix с-? съел eaeten. if this hypothesis is valid, l ~ n, but.. ел ate, съел eæten. с = with, со- = co-, en ~ in? с и в, и союз.
с и в а о к ж у я н then if ж is here, so no, but 9 is better than 8. unless it's that octal numeral system.
op is об? о?

в к с represent all forms of consonants
and а и о у я tells that я must have been e, as if я = io = ю = ё = е
а я и о у (о около кого-то, у у кого-то, у = в, then. thus only к & с are the idependently monoliteral word in russian, and they both could be c because semantically к & c are similar, if к is not to, but at.

are those forms of c related to some of the vowels? like to ɔ
около is not far from at of к около окосо, приклонился, присоседился, прислонился is the word. сон and спасть, придавить,

а я и о у
я is place of её, another word made of vowels. ея is the very same word.

и о у = ибу?

I o V?
I хуй
V пизда?
о соединительная гласная оф ו or is it meaningless poetic wandering?

I'm p biased to see мф матершинные смыслы, потому что mater is the basics, основа и материя в моём сознании отчего-то синонимичны. matter mother основатель,

но понимаешь, что это недетская тема, и как только грамоте стали обучать с малых лет, все эти мифические смыслы стали неугодны, естественно, детям ебаться рано. прикинь ещё и детей детей воспитывать. пока ты ими правишь, ты им мешаешь размножаться, что безумие. не ты, люди. я бы одобрял, ободрял бы романы своих детей способные перерости в секас?
Why is it here? Is it the decline? I'm highe for some many lines and many good ideas, such as:
snake lion snail as LNV lion is l, not n. snake is s, thus samekh? snail is literally snl. I wander in open space now, it's not much to do with anything, too far too soon. Attempt after attempt, but not in a row, leave it to boil for some time to maybe extract

Any way, I go to https://drevlit.ru/egypt_dictionary_eng.html to see what is snake in egyptian, they pair hieroglyphs there, as mayans did. And I wonder if it's true, no, it's just their trick having not too much of a relation to reality, where 1,2,3 hieroglyphs went drawn in a line, but never by two:

I wonder how authentic these texts are, because why would hieroglyphs looked different ways. Here's another one unreliable the same way (I think I read something about boustrophedonism of some egyptian texts, but look how lazy my research is, I don't go to check it, I leave it raw as drafts may allow, so I think that the previous and the following couple are modern collages)


but the original text all looks the same direction:


























I wonder what could be said on this panno. When I know ancient egyptian so I can read it, I will compare it to this superhit:

I made this site a journal more than a book (my own magazine with blacksjack and hookers)



𓅓𓄿
M A
owl eagle
wife husband
is it how people saw those birds?
Just as kids think fox is wolf's wife.



did I tell of 𓄿𓅓𓅱 as amш? or is it ωMΣ?
I wrote about the first question in a notebook, not sure if I posted it here, I usually try not to double.
not to copy, but make some authentic but that ωMΣ is the new part, I wonder if it's true.


а её и
о у я
f follow e
ф follows у
if o is the beginning of the second half, and mn are the first letters, jkl are something newer. and when we spoke about fantasy being a newer word also because russians didn't have f's, then jfk is some meme. or it could be apophenia again. ai will sort it out. Or, hopefully me with my neocortex enhanced by some external additional ultra-neocortex be able to do it soon.



I keep on collecting pieces to this puzzle from some other places:


(this one is here for no reason)




Х said about А that he's a dark (or black) genius, and she wants a white one.
So is it good to cooperate with a black wizard? Blacks tend to lose, black is bad.
Black and bad are probably cognates, human (at least russian) mind sees black a s bad.
I believe all the world does, at least the best half of it. So let's turn into white light wizards
We're heavy, we work at nights, to fully concentrate, we wouldn't sing in daylight, rockers who gig at sunlight are faking the funk so to say, they suck, maybe manson went down because of being burned by the sun. burnt out at the sun. He would never play on day light if not the money. some diamond wizards buy everyone. Love can trump diamonds. Because hearts are higher than diamonds in card games. It came to me some long time ago, who knows how legit this spades, clubs, diamonds, hearts. Spade is the грубая сила. Clubs are police, conspirators, gosudarstvo. Diamonds are bourgeoisie. Hearts are love.
God is love. How did I arrange them, I don't konw. But looks more slick than shudra, kshatri, vayshna, brahman. shudras work with spades (in russian it's пики. т.е. орки-урки здесь живут, надо их перевоспитывать. Их пытаются загнобить, типа потому что они выёбистые, но на самом деле у них гиперкомпенсация (им постоянно нужно доказывать себе (но как будто другим) что они не лохи) и восстановление их самоуважения - более разумная задача исправительных органов, которая скорее всего практикуется в скандинавии (но это не точно)

spades as water? because of the form of the sign ? as if a drop of water at the same base has, which is naturally three (four) balls laying at eachother. as if stones would. So clubs are solid. Thus shudra are shit (жидкие, жидкий народец было более общим понятием, которое осталось лишь как самой презренной нации чуть ли не топоним. Язык изменяем, и открыв эти неполиткореектности в языке мы можем их исправить или научиться у них. А зачем нам древние понятия, мы начнём переписывать геномы и национальность станет ещё более размытым понятием: allegence to the flag, obedience to the state, a rudiment from apes or reasonable strategy? Clubs are strong not only because they can come winning with a club against a knife. Club is a great weapon, because it can cause less open bleeding, so it's easier to control if you want to beat a man or kill em. ими и им одно слово, и просто суффикс множественного числа, известный с незапамятных времён: 𓏭
Egyptian 𓏭 is ,, т.е. и т.д.
те и тתו (' is not י)
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 are rich people because vayshya and diamonds. And here I see that card deck and varnas have different opinions on whether vaishya higher or lower than kshatriyas. both are shudras from the pov of brahman, only vaishyas are rich shudras and kshatreys are key shudras. R & K? Shudras are S pretty much qrs, pretty much all the linguals there are (t~s because ת without dot inside is read as th in thin)
Brahman is B, the labial. so is it k before r or after? q is before r, positionally yes, but chronologically r was before q, because q is not known to many alphabets, so first there were brahmans (shamans? shaman is shudra's brahkman? from the pov of the priests) and others were divided into rich and poor? no military among men, they're all military, and only later did good warriors unite against the others? How could it happen? When good fighter commited crime and peace in the city is not possible, the murderer would probably be expelled (execution is a paradox of murder for the murder: if murder is illegal why this one is? maybe that first murder was also justified not in less degree. Also good fighters saved lives, so it's also fair to forgive them for taking one? So expelled, and have to go the other city or to live in the woods, where he'd meet such good expelled warriors as them (did it became a law that they were to be killed not to let them be fighting for the city's enemies?) and gangs fought the cities and took control there and became the rulers, and the caste in itself. Kshatriyas are probably of this origin. So were rich people still higher than warriors? Rich people would hire warriors, to make them respectable. That's Europe. They can afford it. As a result, their economy is booming. boosted. (not doomed and busted) and poorfags of the east and south stand kshatriyas above vaishyas and as a result their countries don't know how to make money.
Brahmans of those countries should teach their societies to praise the rich, not higher-archers. The one who shoots further sits higher, because he is teh best for the best position.
Because brahman should rule with love, not fear. People should love success more than they fear death.
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ is the normal european (and unicode) order, and on the East they could arrange them as
♠ because of their tops, not their bottoms, and two balls is great, three balls are only one ball at the top, and other sharps are rich (red) and poor (чернорабочий) разница лишь в том, что у vaishya пика и сверху и снизу, а шудра с ножом, но с голой жопой. Brahman naotborot изобрёл земледелие (лопата книзу, лопаты происходят от копий, копать и копьё однокоренный однозначно (пики are spades in english, see, learn from the Europe call пики ломами, а после на лопаты переделай, лопата от слова ломать? лопасть? to пасть, ложка лопата однокоренные тоже, лопать ломать ложкой (кусок торта например) ложит (роняет) и ложит (кладёт))



There are informational conspiracy against weed:
1. Sensemila, безсемянка, какого лешего тебе нужна трава без семян, если с семенами лучше: только трусы не нуждаются в семенах, чудесных, волшебных камушков, семена колдовские объекты. Гроверы нарассказывают кучу теорий как вещества пропадают, уходя на созревание семян, но практика показывает, что одна из лучших трав, которые я куривал была с хорошими зёрнами. Я трус, кстати, мне давали самые большие семена что я в жизни видел, я их проебал. Тупо проебал, может парочку друзьям подаривши, глупо, тупо, мудово. Русы трусы, в моём случае это точно. Мы слишком много думаем о самом худшем что может случиться, это у меня от бати, русские вайшьи же предприимчивы, они любят успех больше чем боятся неудачи. И как при слиянии шудры с вайшьей мог получиться брахман (искатель знания, а не чувственных удовольствий)
2. Vaporizer, also 9 letters (10 if sensemilla or sensemilja and vaporizers) whenever I smoked it, it only gave some body high, but no mind-high. And when my friend smoked the dark brown aftermath the next morning he got that mind-high of the top notch, thus all the substance was left in ther,
3. Hydroponic, thus it's 10 letters. as in Parliament and Funkadelic too, actually.is psychidelic also 10 because ps is one letter?
I smoked hydro after I smoked.. what? The best grower I know grows in soil saying that hydro is not his kind of thing. And I smoked something I knew was hydro and I thought that hydroponic is probably another element of this conspiracy, and this formal similarity indicates that it can quite be (I didnt know of this 10-letter thing before I began writing this text, it came to me as I typed.



Relaxe e viva meu nego Leve a vida que você quer
does it indicate the queer is he who wants, хочет, ищет, искать ~ ask,
and google translator reads it so weirdly: Relaxe sounds from portugese as helashi.
R isn't only looks like cursive h, it also sounds like that sometimes.
other words didn't raise questions (final r is not even heard, as h would be)

efgh
opqr
r is a form of h, it' clear now, and finally explains h's position better than I could before.
Learn phonetics of all european (and other) languages, this I can do, it's more achievable than learning them all. Lexics doesn't matter, and in the end I will find the international set of necessary toki pona.

Relájate y vive mi negro, toma la vida que quieras
in spanish R is R, but what's surprising v sounds as b
Labials are labials nobody guarantees anything else about them.
Beba Veva sounds exactly the same in spanish? If google doesn't fool me, I think why would they.
Just as B sounds as V in russian, so V sounds as B in spanish. Is it the letter we should use instead of б? but б reflects д and Б reflects Д in a way, so why would we miss it, especially since B is Б in english, so why would we differ? and if use V, use it as V, so transfer to latin where you can? ц = ts, ч = ch, ш = sh, щ = sch. Take brittish orthography and they will love us for them. It's a source of love that will cost us rien. Nothing, rien, not rein. not reign, though people will read foreign press more. We'll be as european as poland. Russians will become more european than Vietnamese when they accept the superiority of latin script. 



啊 is so dense it merges into black rectangles in some fonts.


I think I negleted armenian alphabet for too long. But it contains ancient letters too, and the way it was mutated-mutilated may tell that it is very ancient and very great:
   ԱԲԳԴԵԶԷԸԹԺԻԼԽԾԿՀՁՂՃՄՅՆՇՈՉՊՋՌՍՎՏՐՑՒՓՔՕՖ՗՘ՙ՚՛՜՝՞՟
ՠաբգդեզէըթժիլխծկհձղճմյնշոչպջռսվտրցւփքօֆևֈ։֊
What made me look at it was that ՠ I knew nothing about. It is just some перевёрнутая ա
Ա is named aib, as if it unites a & b. as if a is ا and b is U
its minuscule form ա if it's aib could draw it as i & u united in one aib



Ӏӏ is how some "russian" letter looks as if l is minuscule I, ctrlc+ctrlv those first two into google.
And it is russian only because of moscovite imperian polities, it is only used in some lanuages of Caucasus: In the alphabets of Abaza, Adyghe, Avar, Dargwa, Ingush, Lak, Lezgian, and Tabassaran, it is a modifier letter which signals the preceding consonant as an ejective or aspirated consonant;[1] this letter has no phonetic value on its own. An exception is the Abkhaz language, which does not use the palochka for rendering aspiration, but instead uses the schwa (ә) as a modifier letter for labialization.
In Adyghe, the palochka is also a glottal stop /ʔ/.
    Example from Kabardian Adyghe dialect: елъэӏуащ [jaɬaˈʔʷaːɕ], "he asked her for something"
In Avar: кӏалъазе [kʼaˈɬaze], "to speak"
In Chechen, the palochka makes a preceding voiceless stop or affricate ejective, but also represents the voiced pharyngeal fricative /ʕ/ when it does not follow a voiceless stop or affricate. As an exception, in the digraph ⟨хӏ⟩, it produces the voiceless pharyngeal fricative /ħ/.    Examples from Chechen: йоӏ [joːʕ], "girl" and хӏорд [/ħoːrd/], "sea"

and who said these writing systems are inferior? I say: they're even further from aeiou-grace than russian, and I was taught they were made up by commies or right before them, they used to use arabis, and if they had their own national writing systems (they probably did: even africans and americans did)
And to discover those writing systems (out of earth or obscurity) is necessary, because we still don't know where the alphabetic structures were born and what stages it had is also very unclear to this day. I only speculate, but the furthest in the past I have looked was ogham, paleohispanic, cree. they are still hanging in air to this day. Ogham only a little resembles runes, but runes seem to be more complex way to write. Or is it ogham more abstracted, secret? Didn't it all come from hieroglyphs, because why would you go the other way or why would it be unrelated. I believe it all was born somewhere near yin-yang tai-chi. And from there it could sparkle fires of knowledge, of knowing good from bad, and oghamic ᚐ and ᚑ could be one way to look at it, ᛆ and ᚮ tells that b~a/l~o only l is before o and b
and B and L of ᚁ and ᚂ is how the same yin yang thing was reflected in consonants.
What is the third consonant differs: the modern transcription denotes ᚃ to be F (or W), but the name of the system is Beit-Luis-Nion. and Nion is ᚅ  today. It's as if F(W) and S(ᚄ) was inserted in the middle of it later. f and ſ. as in false.
the opposite of t of true and j of joy the s of sorrow and f of fake and flawed and false and fallen and... fallen as an apple from a tree, beaten and will rot because of this.

F(W) being the third (if B is the first!) correlates to alphabetic F(ו) and tells that whether BLF are the consonants without vowels, and L is Г as λ is ג. Then S is alike to russian Ѕ and N is the M claster..
Or.. BLN is the order and it's MLN. and samekh maybe follows. and W is the ω
and it supports the idea that bcde is the order existing before abcd.
And the name beit-luis-nion tells that there was neither samekh nor "e", that bcd is all the order of the consonants. aiu or ao? whatever is vowel order, consonant syllabic order is bcd. and that chart went extended to pqrst, for example because sometimes there were more than three vowels. What do vowels have to do with it? Before bcd order it was ᛒᚦ (the thing making me tell that runes probably predate normal alphabets. this and the more rich culture over their use: not only the myth of their creation, but also binden runes, staveless runes, divinations, trees, etc. and also that semites are deceitful, even though it's not polite to say so, it (I honestly admit it) was a factor in the consideration of this thing.

aoi is blue and this is vowel order of ogham
akai is red and could stand for alphabetic order, or should I call the eastern canon syllabaric instead?
even devanagari can be seen as syllabary if we consider the vowelled consonants syllables no matter how unicode draws it (I don't know how it does it) because korean is alphabetic, but unicode definitely gives them in syllables, and they have as many of those as chinese do, and they look similar, which if I didn't know their histroy history, I would recognize it as a link between chinese writing system and the syllabaries of the region. Lets entertain this possibility, let's look at them all from this angle. I know I cannot trust european history, why would I trust teh eastern easian one.

ㄱㄲㄳㄴㄵㄶㄷㄸㄹㄺㄻㄼㄽㄾㄿㅀㅁㅂㅃㅄㅅㅆㅇㅈㅉ ㅊㅋㅌㅍㅎㅏㅐㅑㅒㅓㅔㅕㅖㅗ
ㅘㅙㅚㅛㅜㅝㅞㅟㅠㅡㅢㅣㅤㅥㅦㅧㅨㅩㅪㅫㅬㅭㅮㅯㅰㅱㅲㅳㅴㅵㅶㅷㅸㅹㅺㅻㅼㅽㅾㅿㆀㆁㆂㆃㆄㆅㆆㆇㆈㆉㆊㆋ ㆌㆍㆎ
are also represented as (some on the top are also ligaturic, especially the second line)
가각갂갃간갅갆갇갈갉갊갋갌갍갎갏감갑값갓갔강갖갗갘같갚갛개객갞갟갠갡갢갣갤갥갦갧갨갩갪갫갬갭갮갯갰갱갲갳갴갵갶갷갸갹갺갻갼갽갾갿걀걁 걂걃걄걅걆걇걈걉걊걋걌걍걎걏걐걑걒걓걔걕걖걗걘걙걚걛걜걝걞걟걠걡걢걣걤걥걦걧걨걩걪걫걬걭걮걯거걱걲걳건걵걶걷걸걹걺걻걼걽걾걿검겁겂것 겄겅겆겇겈겉겊겋게겍겎겏겐겑겒겓겔겕겖겗겘겙겚겛겜겝겞겟겠겡겢겣겤겥겦겧겨격겪겫견겭겮겯결겱겲겳겴겵겶겷겸겹겺겻겼경겾겿곀곁곂곃계곅 곆곇곈곉곊곋곌곍곎곏곐곑곒곓곔곕곖곗곘곙곚곛곜곝곞곟고곡곢곣곤곥곦곧골곩곪곫곬곭곮곯곰곱곲곳곴공곶곷곸곹곺곻과곽곾곿관괁괂괃괄괅괆괇 괈괉괊괋괌괍괎괏괐광괒괓괔괕괖괗괘괙괚괛괜괝괞괟괠괡괢괣괤괥괦괧괨괩괪괫괬괭괮괯괰괱괲괳괴괵괶괷괸괹괺괻괼괽괾괿굀굁굂굃굄굅굆굇굈굉 굊굋굌굍굎굏교굑굒굓굔굕굖굗굘굙굚굛굜굝굞굟굠굡굢굣굤굥굦굧굨굩굪굫구국굮굯군굱굲굳굴굵굶굷굸굹굺굻굼굽굾굿궀궁궂궃궄궅궆궇궈궉궊궋 권궍궎궏궐궑궒궓궔궕궖궗궘궙궚궛궜궝궞궟궠궡궢궣궤궥궦궧궨궩궪궫궬궭궮궯궰궱궲궳궴궵궶궷궸궹궺궻궼궽궾궿귀귁귂귃귄귅귆귇귈귉귊귋귌귍 귎귏귐귑귒귓귔귕귖귗귘귙귚귛규귝귞귟균귡귢귣귤귥귦귧귨귩귪귫귬귭귮귯귰귱귲귳귴귵귶귷그극귺귻근귽귾귿 and 21 such blocks (22 times) more (but chinese still have more of signs)
and to compare this verbosity to chinese hieroglyphics (by semantic and phonetic to probably find similar charts for the hypothetic ancient common set of words. If toki pona does well with a little over a hundred, so can they. I think japan alo has less than two hundred basic signs from which the rest of them is composed.)
So my guess is it all began as drawing, then those drawing were normalized, standartized, and then their elements were recognized separately and those elements later became letters. And ogham is a representation of some basic philosophic system, which later merged with those letters and seriously influenced them into arrangement according to their phonetic features, the very system I have shown you first.


the following is some Ideographic Annotation Top Marks
㆐㆑㆒㆓㆔㆕㆖㆗㆘㆙㆚㆛㆜㆝㆞㆟ㆠㆡㆢㆣㆤㆥㆦㆧㆨㆩㆪㆫㆬㆭㆮㆯㆰㆱㆲㆳㆴㆵㆶㆷㆸㆹㆺㆻㆼㆽㆾㆿ
this are just strokes:㇀㇁㇂㇃㇄㇅㇆㇇㇈㇉㇊㇋㇌㇍ ㇎㇏㇐㇑㇒㇓㇔㇕㇖㇗㇘㇙㇚㇛㇜㇝㇞㇟㇠㇡㇢㇣
㇣ is the third stroke in 㔔 (I didn't even know they had such. but is it truly chinese? not korean?)

this marks are recognized only by japanese and koreans: ㇰㇱㇲㇳㇴㇵㇶㇷㇸㇹㇺㇻㇼㇽㇾㇿ
(the wiki links only on their wikis)


I was playing with unicode sets, I found many new directions to research.






Z8_GND_5296 is found in 2013, the year I made this discovery public. And it's among the oldest and most distant known galaxies at approximately 13.1 billion light-years (4.0 Gpc) from Earth, which is important, because they say that Detailed measurements of the expansion rate of the universe place the Big Bang at around 13.8 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe.
so it's only a question of time until they reject that abrahamic misconception: some department clerks already invent props for their precious theory, but the smarter ones already question the previous props, all those dark things. The universe is infinite and indefinite. That is the only possibility by logico-philosophical reasons.
But they also say that the size of observable universe is 46.508 billion light years. I wonder what they mean and if it's true, but that could be why they dare to say that universe expanded faster than light.
and here's explanation, they already prepared to the further perfection of telescopy with this mental gymnastics: The word observable in this sense does not refer to the capability of modern technology to detect light or other information from an object, or whether there is anything to be detected. It refers to the physical limit created by the speed of light itself. Because no signals can travel faster than light, any object farther away from us than light could travel in the age of the universe (estimated as of 2015 around 13.799±0.021 billion years[4]) simply cannot be detected, as the signals could not have reached us yet. Sometimes astrophysicists distinguish between the visible universe, which includes only signals emitted since recombination (when hydrogen atoms were formed from protons and electrons and photons were emitted)—and the observable universe, which includes signals since the beginning of the cosmological expansion (the Big Bang in traditional physical cosmology, the end of the inflationary epoch in modern cosmology).
According to calculations, the current comoving distance—proper distance, which takes into account that the universe has expanded since the light was emitted—to particles from which the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) was emitted, which represents the radius of the visible universe, is about 14.0 billion parsecs (about 45.7 billion light-years), while the comoving distance to the edge of the observable universe is about 14.3 billion parsecs (about 46.6 billion light-years),[11] about 2% larger. The radius of the observable universe is therefore estimated to be about 46.5 billion light-years[12][13] and its diameter about 28.5 gigaparsecs (93 billion light-years, or 8.8×1026 metres or 2.89×1027 feet), which equals 880 yottametres.[14] The total mass of ordinary matter in the universe can be calculated using the critical density and the diameter of the observable universe to be about 1.5 × 1053 kg.[15] In November 2018, astronomers reported that the extragalactic background light (EBL) amounted to 4 × 1084 photons.[16][17]
As the universe's expansion is accelerating, all currently observable objects will eventually appear to freeze in time, while emitting progressively redder and fainter light. For instance, objects with the current redshift z from 5 to 10 will remain observable for no more than 4–6 billion years. In addition, light emitted by objects currently situated beyond a certain comoving distance (currently about 19 billion parsecs) will never reach Earth.[18]

so that is not the universe observable today, but якобы принципиально наблюдаемая, при том что это гонево на гоневе и гоневом погоняет (предел наблюдения на теории большого взрыва ускоряющимся расширением погоняет)
and they are prudent, planted the seeds for further and infinite cope: The size of the whole universe is unknown, and it might be infinite in extent.[19] Some parts of the universe are too far away for the light emitted since the Big Bang to have had enough time to reach Earth or space-based instruments, and therefore lie outside the observable universe. In the future, light from distant galaxies will have had more time to travel, so additional regions will become observable.




Jews can be antisemites because their parents are jews. Imagine if their parents had a chance not to ever be jews, if they didn't contact their local mestechko to be recognized, they would ever live like goyim and thus wouldn't be a subject to future holocoasts. And nepotism is not the best way to advance in life. And, as Korwin said, jews are smart people, they recognized that both nepotism is reprihensible and holocoast is inevitable in one way or another. I demand it to be in the form of genetic therapy and cultural universalism (everybody can contain all the cultures. Whole human culture can be written on one flash-card or manybe even on a dvd if.. no, it cannot, movies take one dvd each, so not even one flash card can contain them all. Human emotions are writen not in such a quality as the dvd, we remember it in less quality of the grain, but we remember it probably in analogous way, or is (not does) deeper cross-connection of memories considered part of human culture?
And conflict with the parents, which sometimes occurs,
And conflicts with the parents, which sometimes occur,
what is s in english grammar? this letter can run by the sentence, and artist drawing the text can draw those lizards too, and thus `'s like י would appear and matres lectionis too. or is it a rational invention, those matres lectionis. Why would hebrew term have latin name?

Matres lectionis (from Latin "mothers of reading", singular form: mater lectionis, from Hebrew: אֵם קְרִיאָה‎ ʾem kəriʾa) are consonants that are used to indicate a vowel, primarily in the writing down of Semitic languages such as Arabic, Hebrew and Syriac. The letters that do this in Hebrew are aleph א‎, he ה‎, waw ו‎ and yod י‎, and in Arabic, the matres lectionis (though they are much less often referred to thus) are ʾalif ا‎, wāw و‎ and yāʾ ي‎. The 'yod and waw in particular are more often vowels than they are consonants.
The original value of the matres lectionis corresponds closely to what is called in modern linguistics glides or semivowels.[1]

(this last line is to promote the misconception of consonant languages)
Ма́трес лекцио́нис или «ма́тери чте́ния»[1][2] (лат. matres lectionis из ивр. ‏אִמֺּות הַקְּרִיאָה‏‎; ед. ч. mater lectionis) — в консонантном письме согласные буквы, используемые для обозначения долгих гласных звуков.
Из-за отсутствия гласных букв однозначное прочтение текста в консонантной системе письма зачастую бывает затруднено. Поэтому для обозначения гласных (преимущественно долгих) используются согласные буквы, обозначающие звуки со сходной артикуляцией: [w], [j], [h], [ʔ]. В иврите в этой роли используются следующие согласные: <א> алеф, <ה> хе, <ו> вав и <י> йуд.
Один из вариантов появления матрес лекционис, зафиксированный в иврите — стяжение дифтонгов [aw]→[oː] и [ay]→[eː], например в словах בית «дом» [bayt]→[bet], יום «день» [yawm]→[yom]. Затем буквы вав и йод, употребляемые в этих словах для обозначения согласного звука исчезнувшего дифтонга, были переосмыслены как обозначающие гласный звук, появившийся на его месте. После этого написание матрес лекционис распространилось на обозначение даже тех гласных, на месте которых никогда не было дифтонгов. Более того, при появлении систем огласовки матрес лекционис не исчезли из письма, а стали использоваться для обозначения гласных совместно с диакритическими знаками.
Матрес лекционис встречаются уже в угаритской, моавитской и финикийской письменностях, но широко применяются лишь в еврейском, арамейском, сирийском и арабском письме.
Позднее, в мандейском, авестийском и других алфавитах, а также в некоторых современных разновидностях арабского письма (напр., алфавиты для курдского и новоуйгурского языков) и еврейского письма (алфавит для языка идиш) матрес лекционис регулярно обозначают все гласные, фактически превращаясь в гласные буквы.
Гласные буквы греческого и латинского письма, а также кириллицы исторически восходят к матрес лекционис: например, буква I произошла из согласной буквы, обозначавшей звук [j], U — из [w], А — из [ʔ], Е — из [h], О — из [ʕ].

אֵם קְרִיאָה or אִמֺּות הַקְּרִיאָה‏‎?
אֵם קְרִיאָה is "if reading" in both yiddish and hebrew. I can see how nations written with low letter can be offensive to those who consider themselves part of the nation: they got used to writing their nation with a capital letter (in english, but not in russian, russian nationalism is deminished by oppressive ruling and orthography is also in the governance of the ruling class. Even though it's not class, but caste, occupation, they have chosen it themselves or by nepotic links have grown into the system so it's both occupation and upbringing. They upbring us all in their schools. And that is a an another argument to teach your kids yourself.
אֵם is both if and mother, so such a naming into some latin text, I guess.

Both אֵם or אִמָא are mother in hebrew (but not in yiddish, even though yiddish is different from dutch by that additional hebrew lexics from the bible. Are ashkenazi natie of dutch christians digging deep and going oldschool?

A great argument against future holocausts: why burn dutch people who were jewed into being jews? If someone can be psy-opped into any nation, they can be psy-pped out of it ad into some other one, if that other one is developed enough, and maybe if not you can convince those подопытных that в царстве слепых одноглазый король and they plunge into some inferior culture, not noticing that they may adopt some inferior features from those people. Индуцированный психоз, например, как в случае с верующими. And spaniards should take care of their own sephards. And so on. Palestine will be better of being israel. And I capitalized Palestine only to denote the beginning of the sentence, and now to show capitalized how. I'd rather visit Israel than palestine. That's to sort it out. Islam is a worse form of judaism, more open form of it actually. semites are semites, and those ashkenazi and sephards are they considered to be goyim by some palestinian jews? Many of those jews are historically came out of Europe themselves. Now that thing, Europe. Do I respect Europe. I worry about Europe, they used to be the best place on earth, now I would be better of in the woods or mountains. I must believe technology will change the world faster than religion will get there. Make changes so large, that no religion can ever compete (promises of immortal happiness cannot compete with technology guaranteeing such comfort for real)
Teach the jews that honesty gives honours, гонор это цыганский уровень чести, честности, открытости, бесстрашия, уверенности в собственной правоте, цельность мира, научи их белому.
Когда тебе не нужно хитрить, потому что у тебя и так всё есть или у друзей найдёшь, поделятся.

социум оседлых сообществ гораздо могущественней кочевых понятий бродячих собак:
для челвечества это информационный век, а до него был атомный, а для человека как единицы его глиняный век только недавно стал веком бетонным, и оставался бы глиняным, или даже пещерным, как в каменном, если бы человек был как животное один. Организация превратила людей в человечество тел овечеством? лучше слова не нашёл? отечество телотечество челотечеством отцы овцы почему эти слова так похожи? почему в иврите аба, почти как овца орёт, я не знаю, я задаю больше вопросов чем ответов даю, но вопрос и предшествует ответу.
и ответы я тоже даю (другое дело что все они содержат в себе невысказанный безмолвный вопрос is it true?)





This weird image cannot be found by neither yandex nor google, I think I have to contact that А. Куприятнов, but www.kuprphoto.ru doesn't work and web.archive.org tells he's Александр Куприянов and I find his email and phone number, I will use email to ask about where was this image made to learn more about this wonderful abecedary: if Т instead of Ӏ were a typo, they would fix it some long time ago, but it has some very deep and serious meaning: It is the final letter of that abecedary, and АӀ is not using Ӏ(І) as a ten, but as a stroke (only not above, but along it) Т is for Ten and for Тцать,
the difference between Ӏ and І is most probably caused by he mess in russian unicode, and not that they were actually in any way differet in the language. they are now.
一丁丂七丄丅丆万丈三上下丌不与丏丐丑丒专且丕世丗丘丙业丛东丝丞丟丠両丢丣两严並 丧丨丩个丫丬中丮丯丰丱串丳临丵丶丷丸丹为主丼丽举丿乀乁 乂乃乄久乆乇么义乊之乌乍乎乏乐乑乒乓乔乕乖乗乘乙乚乛乜九乞也习乡乢乣乤乥书乧乨乩乪乫乬乭乮乯买乱乲乳乴乵乶乷乸乹乺乻乼乽乾乿亀亁亂亃 亄亅了亇予争亊事二亍于亏亐云互亓五井亖亗亘亙亚些亜亝亞亟亠亡亢亣交亥亦产亨亩亪享京亭亮亯亰亱亲亳亴亵亶亷亸亹人亻亼亽亾亿什仁仂仃仄仅 仆仇仈仉今介仌仍从仏仐仑仒仓仔仕他仗付仙仚仛仜仝仞仟仠仡仢代令以仦仧仨仩仪仫们仭仮仯仰仱仲仳仴仵件价仸仹仺任仼份仾仿伀企伂伃伄伅伆伇 伈伉伊伋伌伍伎伏伐休伒伓伔伕伖众优伙会伛伜伝伞伟传伡伢伣伤伥伦伧伨伩伪伫伬伭伮伯估伱伲伳伴伵伶伷伸伹伺伻似伽伾伿佀佁佂佃佄佅但佇佈佉 佊佋佌位低住佐佑佒体佔何佖佗佘余佚佛作佝佞佟你佡佢佣佤佥佦佧佨佩佪佫佬佭佮佯佰佱佲佳佴併佶佷佸佹佺佻佼佽佾使侀侁侂侃侄侅來侇侈侉侊例 侌侍侎侏侐侑侒侓侔侕侖侗侘侙侚供侜依侞侟侠価侢侣侤侥侦侧侨侩侪侫侬侭侮侯侰侱侲侳侴侵侶侷侸侹侺侻侼侽侾便俀俁係促俄俅俆俇俈俉俊俋俌俍 俎俏俐俑俒俓俔俕俖俗俘俙俚俛俜保俞俟俠信俢俣俤俥俦俧俨俩俪俫俬俭修俯俰俱俲俳俴俵俶俷俸俹俺俻俼俽俾俿
и таких в той части юникода 41 штука. about 261 512 each, a good over 20000 hieroglyph set

did you know 亖 is a legit hieroglyph for four? I love these unicode tables already. Just in case, once again, unicode. unique code.

I wonder why I cannot find neither ten, nor four in here, I was looking for ten, wanting to show how much that T of that clock looks like it. In yiddish ten is tsen, which is natural, they're related. in hebrew it's asher or something, faggots don't even transliterate hebrew in google.
十 is the T ten, it was in the third of those ~261-sign blocks. 512 sign blocks they are, I miscalculate the first time I know it because 512 is dual or binary number: 29

Those clock also have Ѳ looking like Ф and look at how Д reflects Б (which is not on the clock though, because Б is some later addition. And how Д reflects А on some other level.
Those clock (in comparison to the abc structure, tells that probably that Ѕ is actually ϛ which is reported to be labial, something like Ϝϝ as if ſ ~ f

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abecedarium tells:
The alphabet used for monumental inscriptions was very different from the cursive. The uncial, occurring very rarely on sculptured monuments, and reserved for writing, did not appear until the 4th century. The majority of objects bearing the abecedaria are not of Christian origin, with the exception of two vases found at Carthage. These objects included tablets used by stone-cutters' apprentices while learning their trade. Stones have also been found in the catacombs, bearing the symbols A, B, C, etc. These are arranged, sometimes, in combinations which have puzzled scholars. One such stone, found in the cemetery of St. Alexander, in the Via Nomentana, is inscribed as follows:

   AXBVCTESDR . . . . . .BCCEECHI
   EQGPH. . . .M MNOPQ
   RSTVXYZ

This can be compared with a denarius of L. Cassius Caecinianus, which has the following inscription:

       AX, BV, CT, DS, ER, FQ, GP, HO, IN, LM

Jerome explained this similarity. Children were made to learn the alphabet in pairs of letters, joining the first letter of the alphabet with the last letter (AX), the second letter with the second to last (BV), and so on. A stone found at Rome in 1877, and dating from the 6th or 7th century, seems to have been used in a school, as a model for learning the alphabet, and points to the continuance of old methods of teaching.



AX, BV, CT, DS, ER, FQ, GP, HO, IN, LM sets the sequence of ABCDEFGHILMNOPQRSTVX, and if T is I, then TVX is a quite alphabetic IVX. But what HILMN then? some insertion? was it AEO before?

is what I found about AOE, and though it's probably read as ΑΘΕ as if for Ἀθηνᾶ, Ἀθήνη, Ἀσάνα but I suppose it something more magical: the oghamic order of 123 of AOE, where E is 3. whether because Θ is labial as Ѳ and thus Ο with a dot. and the lingual vowel Ε is a C with a dot? who knows, een though it doesn' look like that in this representation, it actually could be the third of ГFE, where Г is g is d is a and F is Ѳ is Θ is O.
And another example of that ΑΘΕ

With M the central letter between them.

And some other similar coin:

is it the sequence? does this sequence of EF following the ΑΘΕ and then the next in line would start with Φ? We'll I looked for Φ coin, and see what I found:






and some more coins with a bee to show that it finds coins even if they have Ф not in initial position:

this one is different.
and also this just in case, because it contains its own riddles:

This is definitely of some other period, with much finer sculpture and more straight text.
and a couple of something resembling letters can be seen at its obverse (avers in russian)
ob = об = о = a (de, thus d~b again)
and some more mysterious coins:


But these could be more tokens than coins, the private money: whether half a horse (it would then take two coins to buy a horse) or an axe if the mint is of a forge. Is it where the word forgery comes?
Because look at these:



as if they were half a donkey or a jar or wine and chicken or a pie.

And mysterious letters on coins are used and in much later periods:

Sometimes with some obviouse meanings:

Sometimes with not so much:

But that masonic M is actually moscovite, Λ would mean Saint-Petersburg.
and Е. М. at the one before was Ekaterinburg Money (екатеринбургская монета)


𒀭 used to be BioViva's logo. It is a hieroglyph for god and it's said they called it an. which is next to the al. and Am is aum, om, он, on I want to go on. I want to live in a seclusion, because who knows what's on the outside. I want to go on. I am a ogon's fanboy? I want to keep my fire burning? I want to keep my soul alive.


Kijk is "look" in dutch. If jews were thieves, as russian феня often indicates, they would find offensive when people around that shout it.

around that around there, around them. they is the third person, and there is the farthest указательное местоимение.
Here relates to he, because when people are far, you cannot speak about some one of them, you don't see them separately sometimes. So far they are you don't see their faces.



I think I found why Composer lags: too many fonts. I used to have a block of unicode collection, I remove it, I will see if it lags after that. ..
Okay, it is indeed much better. No lags at all. So I should stay within few languages it seems. Or maybe even quantity of new letters also matter. I have a huge block of chinese hieroglyphs about and it works well without the block I left in the end of unicode.html.


Bees don't make hexagons, they make cilinders, the simplest form, cilinders of the same diametre naturally lay out into hexagonal pattern. because the wall is equally strained (not stretched, but the opposite, straightened could be because of stretch, but also because of stress, сжатие, а не растяжение, сжатие изнутри комнат. or did that wax actually strained, stretched into filling those hexagonal angles.
wax stretched. in the corners, which is very firm. The leads are sorta piramidal probably because it's how it stretches from both inside and outside where bees walk over it. But that's a theoretic speculation. I should have watched a video prior to these lines.




??? (forgot why) - here had to be the first example which made me think that p ~ st, but once I actually woke up it went away, and it still can be regained once ai compares all words with p to the same words with st instead of p. And ai part is needed to compare the synonymicity, the pairing can be in a prepairing part by a simple algorhythm with set freedoms (so it coulg change i to e, as in stick peg) and then we compare what phonetic pairs make the most of the words and we calculate the proportion of those pairs to the frequency of those letters in general vocabulary and then we place these relations along the normal distribution, and we see the anomalies, and those anomalies will be the real things, but for now let's entertain this idea by hand:
P~ST
Pater ~ St.Ater ~ С-т.Отец
ᛋᛏ~ᚢ
part start
stop pop
stay pay
steal peal
pink (pig) stink
stick peg
right: straight~право (as if gh is f, literally digamma, and then h is a form of g, both can be transliterated into russian with г)
f could be st because f~p? then st ~ gh, all four are gammas? abc (c & d are both gammas too them)
funk stunk? meh..
punk stunk! much better indeed.
found it! found the first example: page i stage.


Yesterday, compiling the second box of aeiou songs, I thought that I should try ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ because that's the orderd Demetrius from Alexandria spoke about.
and the first find is magical: https://sci-hub.do/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00397672808590203?journalCode=sosl20# (mirror)
(that is literally the first actual spell I see since I began this work: We were told to translate a spellic at our grammar lessons at uni (like Tesla I attended it, but dropped in few years, I was better than that)
And now it actually spells, and I think I know how to spell those vowels: the way russiand would spell them: a e i o u, the way they are in bar pen pit rock pull, the universal way to recognize them, ei i ai ow ju are some local meme, which probably was force-memed because that vowel thing worked, so they had to make sure people didn't read them properly. Or maybe eiaou is the actual gammut. But as that gammut is reported to be descending,
I would suspect it to be even further that way: ieaou. I for 1 and V for 5.
And some of those greek vowels are the same: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rg5h-QMDnUI (mirror)
(if that reading is correct, with all those pletora of vowels they still don't have u (they probably get it by some dyphthong, even though it is not a dyphthong) which speaks towards the fact that u is the later vowel, that it was f before when f was w. but why does ע looks so much like У? but thus it also looks like y, and also لا but cursive ע looks almost exactly like ꙋ



when some other thread russians are not europeans appeared, my natural response was
We're american.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atoq7L9l-Mo (mirror)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RgRGWlDo70 (Norman Dodd - Tax exempt foundations - Manipulating politics and culture, Norman Dodd: Reece's Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations, Norman Dodd On Communist Conspiracy in the US(Tax Exempt Foundations)
and that plan to merge USA and USSR he mentions, made me to conceptualize a meeting tunnel, the return handshake, Project Alaska: when merging happens, we'll unite with alaska, especially the ingenious people living at the border will be happy: now they have to fly from kamchatka to vladivostok to fly to alaska from there and then to return to another side of the border to meet relatives from the neighbouring vilage. And the fact that Moscow will now be american city should not bother moscovites, because Tokyo didn't become worse once americans took control over Japan. Or who knows how traditional japanese thought about it (me personally I automatically wrote better instead of worse, maybe because I use better much more often than worse, or because my subconsciousness had its minority riport. report.
Either way, those "traditional" russians crave fro world domination, and as a part of the USA they will undobtedly become a part of that world power (they never were the whole of that power in the first play, and now like a fish swimming at the side of a whale is safe from being harmed by that whale.


I'm so antiestablishmen, I cannot say Доброго Пути, because of pootin' (I do want him to be kind. but do I have to beg him? to respect him? But that's a great slogan: Be kind. Resign.)
(so that weed I was questioning seems to be working: see what I did today in just few hours with the way I woke up with p~st thing until now)
I keep on looking into what search fro ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ can bring, and it's only 5 pages of videos, but they're not of kids rhymery, but of pythagorean music.
I will bring them all here:
1. http://klyuchikrealnosti.liveforums.ru/viewtopic.php?id=106&p=5 (mirror)
and that link is so huge, it gave me other pieces: Abhisheka is a rather alphabetic word, and it does have a magical meaning. Which is not so wonderful, since I researched magic when I got more magic, but nevertheless, it's one of ours now. And it's wiki tells me that those idols are named murti, whether they are male or female.
2. downloading books on magic from libgen.rs I wonder if spell is the opposite of bless.
(I went downloading them looking for that oslo ostracon, you can do so yourself, I don't mirror them)
also is culture mispronounced conjure?
That oslo ostracon was directly mentioned in (New Texts from Ancient Cultures) Andrew T. Wilburn - Materia Magica_ The Archaeology of Magic in Roman Egypt, Cyprus, and Spain-University of Michigan Press (2013) and John G. Gager - Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World (1999) and after all those curse books I wanted to download something to outbalance that just in case, so I have downloaded about 36 books on blessings of all sorts.
3. okay, those 5 pages of links seem not too much to breathe through, but those are about 50 links, so I'd better slow down to surf through them more осмысленно. I will close this cound for now, I will return to this branch, that's later. 50 (actually only 21) only in videos, there are who knows how much more in general. I will stick to videos and images only in my quest this time. and there are not that many images, only some abraxis stuff. Which is weird and actually may indicate that ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ is some local meme, and AEIOU is the universal formula. Discredited by being childish, but that's actually basic, deep, real, and all the mystic literature is mistaken by some inquisitioning will. but then I ignore abraxis (because I don't understand what it is, even though the word is alphabetic) and see at directly alphabetic artefacts:

That stone thing was also called gem, even though geologically it is not necessarily a gem, that could whether tell of any stone becoming a gem after it's polished, or that it was a good trick that even terracota miniature could be sold as a gem, and maybe that's the function of using the foreign word terracota instead of honest admitting that it's only clay.

and few more images from that hunt:

This image is told to be an
Amulet inscribed with signs and letters of magical power for overcoming the malice of enemies. (From Brit. Mus., Greek Papyrus, Nu. CXXIV.–4th or 5th century.) (Kenyon, Greek Papyri, p. 123).
and
But of all the names found upon Gnostic gems two, i.e., Khnoubis (or Khnoumis), and Abrasax (or Abraxas), are of the most frequent occurrence. The first is usually represented as a huge serpent having the head of a lion surrounded by seven or twelve rays.
Over the seven rays, one on the point of each, are the seven vowels of the Greek alphabet, which some suppose to refer to the seven heavens; and on the back of the amulet, on which the figure of Khnoumis occurs, is usually found the sign of the triple S and bar.
Khnoumis is, of course, a form of the ancient Egyptian god Khnemu, or “Fashioner” of man and beast, the god to whom many of the attributes of the Creator of the universe were ascribed.
yet I wonder if I wouldn't mistake Hnubis for Anubis. hm.. and isn't abraxas Osiris then? I know I go too far. have fun.

and the following image (also clickable) tells
Judging from certain Gnostic gems in the British Museum, Abrasax is to be identified with the polytheistic figure that stands in the upper part of the Metternich stele depicted on p. 153 and below.
This figure has two bodies, one being that of a man, and the other that of a bird; from these extend four wings, and from each of his knees projects a serpent.
He has two pairs of hands and arms; one pair is extended along the wings, each hand holding the symbols of “life,” “stability,” and “power,” and two knives and two serpents; the other pair is pendent, the right hand grasping the sign of life, and the other a sceptre.
His face is grotesque, and probably represents that of Bes, or the sun as an old man; on his head is a pylon-shaped object with figures of various animals, and above it a pair of horns which support eight knives and the figure of a god with raised hands and arms, which typifies “millions of years.”
The god stands upon an oval wherein are depicted figures of various “typhonic” animals, and from each side of his crown proceed several symbols of fire.
Whether in the Gnostic system Abraxas absorbed all the names and attributes of this god of many forms cannot be said with certainty.”
E.A. Wallis Budge, Egyptian Magic, London, 1901. P. 177-80.

and though I don't see no alphabetic sequence I would expect to see next to someone with such name, I think I should ignore the texts at the top and the bottom, and maybe try to make sense out of the middle procession. Isn't it Thoth processing the very first?




Having written and instead of in as a typo made me think. in is v in russian and v is and in hebrew. hm..

Rotations whether clockwise or counter-clockwise might originate in electrodynamic rules of left and right hands. I should know them by heart and mind, to speak about this subject further.


here, I just sent a letter to an ally. I will highlight what is important and what i want to speak further on.
Dear Happy (may I call you this instead of Slaver and Vashe Slave)
I found a piece you may want to choose in your work.
Two rather masonic letters of Google and G-mail (gmail literally used an apron for a logo in the past) Their company is now named Alphabet, maybe because of all that fuss I started on the internet some times before they rebranded. Because I use their products, so they were second to know. But of course it's синдром собственной важности)))
I think I saw such animation when elements separated into lines to unite into something else. but I don't remember where. And if they осмысленно эти логотипы создали, то что они имели в виду? У М сначала пишут ноги, а затем тот изгиб что идёт выше? У G тоже сначала написали нижнюю часть, а затем верхнюю? Но нет, у цветов ведь порядок есть: в радуге красный жёлтый зелёный синий, что отлично ложится на G и тогда М это 𐤌 and a leg to it. Я также перестал комплексовать по поводу своей нестандартной манеры общения, какая ни есть она естественное следствие затворничества: недостаток опыта общения неизбежно выливается в неловкости. Но это дело наживное, а может кому-то ещё и забавное. Тем кому не забавно наверное и книжку читать не стоит, там я себя тоже не сдерживаю, сам иногда удивляясь куда свободный поиск способен завести (пренебрегая академическими правилами я решил не только недостатки подобной позиции хапануть, но и преимуществами по максимуму воспользоваться)
thank you and tot ziens.

> M это 𐤌 and a led grown dran drawn after starting with pussy we drew a line and then added another leg,
These masonic letter could be М & Ж (I think I spoke about this weird thing) does it say that in Google we fucke them with our questions, and in Gmail they fuck us getting access to our correspondance?
M for masculine, G as F? are both digammas? is G also ς Ϛϛ (and I didn't think of how much ς  reminded it when I came here) and isn't it where my p ~ st grows from? because f~p. So all these are female letters, I guess. Labial male and lingual female? This doesn't make any sense. Gyne-cology, miso-ginia, genie? gals can make miracles. birth fro one, and they can do more. Ж is also on that line.
Now I'm overwhelmed. Does Lingual-Labial thing have gender semantics or is it strictly wishful thinkings?

Man, Father, Papa, Musculine, these words should have closed this hypothesis long ago.

But yin yang! But who's good and whose bad is arbitrary! Depends on for whom. Not always, but at first thought. at first sight. thought is sight? could be. So think is seeing? Could be.




4. I keep on digging on that ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ thing and it definitely delivers:

here I mirror it just in case and I post some images from it in here:
but there's other was to see it:
(yet that way says "naive" in its filename)
and there they also explain why, it's also clickable, and here's a mirror
(and it gaves the same other image there, so this link is probably one of the sources of the previous one)
and some more:

and that somewhat familiar tetraktis can be found in bigger scale and two versions:
  
(you should know how to find sources yourself, I will return to these things later)
5. http://adonay-forum.com/diskoteka_magov_prekrasnaya_muzyika_dlya_prekrasnyih_dush/drevnegrecheskaya_muzyika_i_vospitanie_dushi_he_mousike_therapeia/msg/?PHPSESSID=b3a3bfe24a4765c89c12d8ad1e757c46;%msg_id%
(some text on ancient greek music, I haven't read it but mirror nevertheless)
they also had this funky image in the background, I found it and here it is just in case who knows.


6. what am I doing here? cataloquing? anybody could do that. Just insert ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ in the search bar, see that for yourself.
7. I stop my moaning and go on, this was to be 6th point, but hepta is seven:

(this images are clickable, and it's so interesting I had to mirror it for you)




stake is stick



Russian memes fuck russians up. Here's another one: Ломать не строить (it stands for "to break is not to build" (because it's much easier) but it would sound the same if it stood for "break, don't build")
Russia is crusher. Rooshitt is to crush in russian too.


Дружба это (совместное) тружение.
.also дружить с инструментом)

Служба это слежение.



Слежение это преследование, не последу, а пред ним. установка жучков и ловушек? шпионаж.

шпик от слова шпионаж not sci, but spy, sci сознаёт, spy подсыпает и подпевает.



Дух это и есть запах.


Моя капсула защищает от земли, огня и воздуха, сама при этом являясь водой. воплощением воды, вода со всех торон. чистый элемент (воздух в смеси. но вода же тоже в смеси: кислород растворён, все газы что в воздухе в ней в каких-то пропорциях растворены. надо чистую дистиллированную воду в вакууме стерилизованную.Тогда она жёстака голодна погазам (может ли такое быть, давление пациальное или ещё какое незнакомое мне слово, опыты покажут.
Смывая мы смываем дух, не только запах. наша воздушная фракция не пополняется же постоянно, а просто есть, летает вокруг нас на невидимых нитях ведущих к самым порам. но говёшка  лежащая просто засыхает же. но если воду добавлять, она продолжит вонять же наверное. ккие железы у каках, никаких. вонь просто есть? вонь это когда в воздухе растворяется летучее вещество. И эти летучие вещества роем бус вокруг нас.


В моей капсуле мыться не придётся никогда. Мочу терпеть не придётся. И хотя новорождённые регулярно мочатся в свои околоплодные воды, я решил создать вывод каналии непосредственно для пениса. А значит нужно рубашку изобретать (наполненная жидкостью. но как сделать сгибы нетравмирующими. я думал и пришёл к выводу что только полная обнажёнка позволит не тереться о края рубахи будь он из силикона или ткани. Полная свобода. Оригинальная среда. Целостность организма может быть достигнута лишь при восстановлении плаценты (и это если внешние оболочки, выстилающие матку изнутри не являются тоже нашей тканью (я слышал лишь про один послед, и это плацента. Онавместе с оболочками выплывает? нет, я видел её всегда отдельно.

see images 11, 12 to see where mother's tissues come into play,
see images 21, 22 to see how placenta is like guts. So we can rebuild placentas out of the patiens' guts.
(I don't mirror this image because I don't know where I took it, and I mirror them only as some courtesy to my readers so they don't have to search for sources themselves. Some promotion to the publishers is even redundant, because any copying of their material makes reader find those very publishers more often, because reverse-search is a super him. hit . Hit переводится как попадание. (see hit and miss)

To take heat is to get hit?

Let's return to our placenta and let's ee it from the oher side:





Gush, I'm so much out of my depth.



The image in the centre (with orange, blue, green, purple quadrants) is the only one explicitly showing that the sack is from this side of placenta. And thus our body in its full form is a sack of our own and the placenta is also ours and is on the outside of it.
But the second image before it shows that mother cells cover us, so that sack could be of mother genes.
So I leave it here as an artistic gesture, for me to look into again and for you to get excited and inspired.




When I was younger, I thought that it's necessary to have a question before you smoke. Now I almost never do and answers come by themselves. As if my subconsciousness have been working since the last time and it knows better what to tell.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthographic_ligature#Chinese_ligatures

The Cǎonímǎ (草泥马) ligature combining the three constituent characters

 A Chinese ligature for zhāocái jìnbǎo (招財進寶), a popular New Year's greeting

They pretty much illustrate how complex hieroglyphs can appear out of simple ones.
(notice how the "happy new year" thing goes right to left (as column traditionally go in chinese) and the final hieroglyph is at the top of it all using an element from the previous hieroglyph as a part of itself.

財 (wealth) is as if created out of the combination of 寶 (treasure) and 招 (trick)
進 is move on, advance, and thus 招財進寶 is trick money advance treasure.
jaw-цай чин-бао Zhāocái jìn bǎo (and such cool phrases is how we can learn the language)


Ꜩ, ꜩ are an european digraphy. Is it also how european letters appeared?
Is Ꜩ, ꜩ Ц, ц? ts? but they only have st and is it суть, and ц is це? its isit this is, this is it. the it. that.

these is a plural form of the. thees frist, these later. as metre is meter, but by this logic meter appeared before metre.


длать делатьь (да, от слова длань) работать значит от слова руки. но не с ребятами ли работют не с друзьями ли трудятся. Согласно одной картонке, друг и труд родственны, true is the word.

do droug friend buddy, I don't know english as good as I know russian. Let's see it in russian first and then explain it to europeans. Друг дорог. был бы я столь же уверен в английском? Like is friend and different cognates or related? the opposite of другой ис безразличен. друг как краткая форма другой перекликается с английским friend and different, so I say they are cognates in my theory (at least until some counterexample challenge this educated guess)
So not труд, but different. Can труд~друг constitute a counterexample to that friend~different theory? Different looks like it is dis-friend. but it is probably de friend. другой ~ true? not fake, not copying.


       _..._    
     .::::  `.   
    ::::::    :    FIRST QUARTER
    ::::::    : 
    `:::::   .' 
      `'::.-'
       _..._    
     .'  ::::.   
    :    ::::::    LAST QUARTER
    :    :::::: 
    `.   :::::' 
      `-.::''  


this picture makes me think D was the first letter, and A ~ D
and C was the final letter. final of four? if they're quarters? Were they quarters when they were three? Simpler humans only know three moons: растущая, полная, стареющая, как три fates, three moirae, three mothers, moon is mom. Sun is son.  Or is it father? Did we know fathers when we were apes?

no moon (new moon) is definitely a quarter, but did people know that? did they measure or did they just see? did they just watch?
D O C is the order then. Or is it b o d or is it b c d?
c as целый or is it v for volle?
Why is it here? What does it teach us? I got a habit of thinking in writing, which makes many uncertain things in print. And though other (also academicians) publish bs, it doesn't excuse me when I can not to.
I don't know what's with me. I'm socialized today, I'm out of my track tonight. I will visit this site 2morn. is n row? or ning? morgen is both, but why so? gen can be anything? or almost anything?


Before I go I may want to ponder on colours. This basal stoned state can actually help here.
I figured out that black is bad and white is good (it is racist, but europe is racist, every nation in the world is racist, it is natural, even those jews who pimp multiculti are natie towards their own state they finally acquired. I hope this fact will pacify them and send them into a reflection, they're naturally two-assed, but now they can be shown at this fact. I hope this alone cures them.

Yellow is gold, money. Brown is black (dark) yellow, bad gold, bad good, spoilt goods, rotten or recycled food.
Green is alive. (because plants show the difference more obviously in colour)
Red is important
I figured Black Green Red in BLM flag. but they align their flag as Red Black Green as if it tells Matter Black Lives. Warning, Black, Green (young, youth) So the flag tells Beware of Black Youth.
Warning! Black Youth. Y as in Yellow and желтый is almost зелёный. ЖЗ is how they go in the alphabet. Г and Blue should follow, neh? YG з in russian is where g is in latin. еёжз efgh, geel is yellos, yellow is жёлтый. y ~ g (way ~ weg) Red and Orange are E & F? E & Ё?
It doesn't seem to lean any where  to lead any where.
Red is алый? If geel is dutch, let's keep on working in dutch: red is rood or blozend, orange is oranje. (marantz or oranjevy in yiddish)
red = important
orange = glad?
yellow = gold
green = alive, young
light blue = light? soft? (not very sad, good sad, noble melancholy)
blue = sad
violet = violent (bruises are violet) or фиолетово is indifferent in russian.

white is light
black is dark
brown is shit
grey is grave
this is some straight rainbow. square rainbow. with only four colours.

6+4 is 10, which is interesting (there used to beonly 6 musical notes, and there is only 6 colours in some flags. Blue is one colour in english. 4 and 6 are how lines in english alphabet go.

white as air? black as water? brown as gold? grey as green?

red is a new white? red blood is clean, white, light. Blue blood is considered to be dirty, black and blue are not too far. even in russian siny & cherny are not that far, siny is especially close to sery (blue to grey) and  what I say here is language can demonstrate the evolution of understanding of colours. Some times blue were gray? Sky is both blue and grey. And black too. But isn't it never white? Never white.
Sun is white. And moon too. sol and lune, blanc, wiss, white ~ light. So both moon and sun are white, and sky is black and can only be light blue when the sun comes. Clouds are white. Clouds are definitely white. облако может быть и содержит те же бл, что в белом.


I'm meticulous because я мучу. Мучаю? no, мучу в значении готовлю, из муки например, не из мУки, а из мукИ. both are probably one word and means grinded. Pulverized!



A an anticommunist I am still have to admit

a as un- anomal, no = nor
then angel is anti-geel, от можел пожелтения пожилой пожил.  жил жёлтый, жив зевёный ребёный зелёный = молодой. желчный = старик.
So not only musical camut went descending, so did coulour.
violet is goddes do godly violence


Январь Февраль Март
Апрель Май June
Июль Август Cентябрь Октябрь Ноябрь Декабрь
What is wonderful about alphabet is that out of 12 names, 6 begin with vowels. In english J is not vowel now, so there it's only 3, which if out of 12 is more than normal. But J is vowel originally it's I.
Январь-Февраль is very alphabetic beginning of the year. And calendars used to be alphabetic. And alphabet have alphabetic structures I discover and March being the first letter, as if it commands Start.
Fevraly is of fever, лютый, и так славянские названия месяцев позволят этимологизировать европейские? Не знаю пока, посмотрим.

I highlighted with grey Names which break the structure, and though octabr, nojabr could be black, they could be an ostracon of some other (also alphabetic) structure: octo nuno deco, une du could tell that ᛒᚦ was how the abc began before a.
or is 0 Åå

And I know August and July is months named after emperors, but what they were named before? after then are month by numbers (as new elements in periodic table. and laphabet is a periodic table)
alphabet as a periodic table.

I thought of most years it's 365 days, and primitive childish decimal brain sees it as not dividing into ten, but well-dividing into 5.
365/5 = 73 and I look for it, and I notice that someboy noticed it: bodies are boys. buddies.
The number of days in 1/5 of a non-leap year.
and also this is how 73 may be represented:

it is one of so called star numbers.
the next is used for chinese checkers:



What if there was only 6 months? 366 is
Январь Февраль Март
Апрель Май June
If J is dʒ, then only March is out of the abc. Otherwise we have three months (out of six) beginning with labials (none of the second 6 do) and the other three can be attributed to vowels (three out of the other six are too) is J of june the first labial? Is I

Were we talking with lips to ours, to MINE and talking with voice to others?
мурлыканье и мяуканье?
Then I would be the closest to linguals we had, and J is a form of I. a short form of И, й.


ЯФМАМИ

ИАСОНД

(mother and son?)

JFMAMJ
JASOND
Among meaningless letters MAM & SON are one above the other.
Son is secondary. JFMAMJ Janus aFrodita(Freja) Mars Apollo Mercury Jah(Jupiter)
Freja is Venera, Venus. Mars is Mars. Mercury is Mercury, Jah is Son or Jupiter? Jupiter, Son is SON?
What is Apollo? and Janus? (Janus could be earth (because Jupiter is the furthest) Mercury is also the furthest and we can know that it's may's M the mercury, becaus mardi is of mars. marks are military borders.
Mars, Mercury, Moon. Why are so many celestial features have
creature created, real. credible.
feature fantasised, fanthom, fathomed, fairilike, fir fair на веку на веру?
JVМ..
venus and mars are the closest planets to us.
J must be Earth, which looks one side at a day and the other side at the night. So whoever invented calendar they knew how planets work, they probably understood earth as a ball and created language so that even god himself would like to use it, or so that they claimed he did invent it.
Jah=Nos? Я
Ve=Nos? В (F, лютый, furious, and venus the planet is ух!)
М=arse Is it where we used to begin? To count all planets and finish with course to venus after we conquer earth? Is it where the myth of martians start? how ancient is this heresy? or tradition?
JVM..A
April has to be Jupiter, because.. because it is what's coming next and the planet was observed in antiquity (they say, at least 7th or 8th century bc in babylonia)
Apollo is Apulu in etruscan and it was a personification of Sun and Apollo is considered to be the most Greek of all the gods.
so Mercury, and only after mercury jupiter. But why would they think Mercury to be further than the Sun? Or were there not 6 planets but only 5? 365 breaks into 5 better than into 6. pentatonic. befor orange: red yellow green blue violet. blue and red violet, I think we recognize this colour for some long time. And green between yellow and blue, as is also known since we know precisous transparent gems.


a clickable thing to research letter later:


RED YELLOW BLUE could be the primal three, the three mothers? три цвета, три материи?
красный полон огня, синий полон воды, жёлтый полон чего? Не был ли жёлтый белым? Воздух или Земля? Белый воздух, Жёлтый песок, земля. песок темнеет вбирая воду, значит земля могла казаться вобравшей столько воды, сколько песку в себя вобрать не под силу, только смешавшись с илом, с концентрированной водой мог он стать земле подобным. Смотри, устаревшая до нельзя наука, а и она чему-то научает: как делать землю, например.

RED YELLOW BLUE are the only pure colours, others come out of them: Orange is Red+Yellow, Green is Yellow+Blue, Violet is Blue+Red.


JVMAMJ
Jah+Nus (a не луна ли двуликой считалась? Луна смотрит то на право, то налево, но не, не сразу)
Ve+Nus
Mars
(SUN)
Mercury
Jupiter

Mars and Venus are almost at the same distance from us. And Venus is said to be even a little bit further.
And I start digging into how further is which, and I found that they give me the wrong numbers: they fed me with average numbers, by which... Mercury was closer to us than Venus.
(keep on reading, further I notice that "current distane" thing, see my rant and laugh)

On average.
Which means Venus is further from us than Mercury more ofthen than closer (and it can approach the closest of them all, and yet.. here's a clickable image explaining it all:

only it tells Indeed, when Earth and Venus are at their closest approach, their separation is roughly 0.28 AU—no other planet gets nearer to Earth.  But then look at the previous screenshots: some of them are lying.
1 AU is 149,598,000 km (1.496e+8 km)
0.28 AU  is 41,887,440 km.
Thus those screenshot disinforms again, they again give some average minimum or something.

If the months were attributed to planets.. as if moon appeared in some planet's house. I have to research it yet. Then there's a connection between days of week and months: mardi is of mars, lundi is of moon, so are these systems even correlate? Lundi Mardi Mercredi Jeudi Vendredi Samedi Dimanche
Mercredi is 100% after Mercury.
MMJ are like MarchMAyJune
Jeudi is probably Jupiter's. (or maybe of Jah? Sun? Apollo is a sun, Jah is too. isn't it? I dunno)
Vendredi is of Venus
Dimanche is some revamped to Sabbath or some other holy day, I think.
Why would the order of the weekdays be such? Mars after Moon?
I will return to this topic some other day. So far, I collected the astronomic gif:
                                                                                                        
(I've tried to place earth and sun in scale, but that orbit of the moon has to be almost half of the sun. Earth itself wouldn't be even seen, be it is even smaller than the moon orbit. They say you can almost place 30 Earths between the Earth and the Moon (384400÷12742 as the distance to the moon and diametre of the Earth. I hope these numbers are correct, the more I work with letters the worse I become with the numbers, I think I need and extra-neocortext just for the digital things)
and another example to show that you should always test the information to know what you're given.

and if we look closer, we see that it's the current distance, so it's me who's fullish and ignorantly arrogant. Look at me and laugh, haha.

and the same link once again, only now venus and mercury are shown (if they had some moons)

                                                                                                    
the distances should be 68.85, 108,72, 149,01, see for yourself if I'm good or not. I think... not so much.
Here, let's make the distances more in proportion, but now sun is way too big (or did I mess it up?)
                                                                                          
it is a simple task on proportions, and I suck at it as a schoolboy. I am worse, I don't do math regularly.
but back to the lanuage stuff.


I say it is some knot writing in the centre of it:





Parliament and Funkadelic are ten-word letters, and I think I saw ten word letters as some government organizations.. We don't know if it's true, of course (I don't even remember what exaples there were) but what if some force outside of the music business taught the blacks some other manner of behaviour (other than white american) by introducing in use some another word. Funk as nasal Fuck. Now they have additional word for fucking, and thus fucking became a black thing, and thus white birth rate dropped. In my case it is because I strive for immortality. And that could be a rather common cause (those who want to drop white mortality inevitabley work on different fronts


I suddenly know of whon company who used герб как оберег, герб и оберег из тех же согласных состаят. Что еврейское понимание языка нам говорит, это что глсн лшн. Согласные имеют гораздо большее значение,

thunder sounds.
hunter hides.
Think this thought and realize (this is a rhymic line. And this way rhymes don't bother the meaning lines and only украшает их как цветочками или зеркальным отражением, блестящим чем-то.

hunter hint похищает хищник
hunt & похищать, you see, гласные только с толку сбивают


hint is a налёт, но только в значении налёт иронии, как от слова нальёт, налито, тонким слоем (в отличие от наложено, положено, клали клади - вот такие, похожие суффиксы следует сравнивать)

делать делал
делайте делали
(второе и третье лицо они же настоящее и прошедшее время)


а ещё есть различение по числу делаю делаем и это первое лицо описывает будущее. Потому что суффикс с не меняет времени остальных, те примеры могли быть такими:
сделать сделал
сделайте сделали
сделаю.. и тут я вижу, что делать и делайте это не настоящее, а тоже будущее. и первое лицо тоже между настоящим и будущим. Я был, я бил - это универсальные формы прошедшего времени, не только третьего лица. Но в моей  голове почему-то в прошедшем времени  первыми лижали формы прощелшего времени. логично. я не в тот "ящик" заглянул

делает делаем (мы по прежнему стараемся сравнивать с максимально похожими фонетически. И здесь гласные очень большое значение имеют)

ты & мы противопоставляется здесь. Но на самом деле - он и мы.
(this grey text reminds palimpsest) Let's call this book palimpsest. No, let's not. It's not.
ты ~ он? вообще не близко.
делают те
делаем mы (me as a singular form of мы)

In prnouns english, russian and chinese uite. Let's not fight anymore. Let's share the globe and keep it clean. But that way removal of a government in one country will будет угрожать (will переводится как будет, рыба перевозится как фиш)

me we
мы wo
English of Chinese and Russian from English: not necessarily genetically, but in the form of language. How else do people borrow language if not genetically? Educated neighbours would influence educated nations to borrow their words: yes is understood in russian. So it can just come in passion And if it is morphologically modified (as джинсы, то это слово воспринимается родным и становится неотъемлемой частью языка. Джинсы наебнули совок. Продукт настолько в большей степени охуенный, чем то говно что в совек выпускали (мягкий растягивающийся хлопок, там и структура ткани наверное и сама нить значение емели.


wo we me (me could be a mispronounced we, the further itteration, maybe under the influence of people living in europe before chinese culture was brought to them with other miracles. and they understood wo as we and used we for their own.. я (me) is what we learn to be given something, and it is a согласие. and it sounds as yes. да ja? me we oui?
we ~ oui
я ~ ya
(and so pronouns tie between other three nations: english french russian german)

yes in chinese is 是的 shida (it's transliterated as shide, but it sounds a instead of e) thus second hieroglyph is literally да.  是 is the actual yes, and it is european si. And de could be used for russians to understand that word too. So shida went to be more powerful than shust just si.
But that 的 is translated as of, which makes it de indeed. The french de.
and if it is translated as -self,it is both french de and russian -ся
de is -с?
разденься de razden?
раздевать раздирать.
в вежливо
р рвать


So back to what I was saying before that: whites are the ones who strive for immortality (in my private case, and as indicates the birthrate drop and that only  whites attend RAAD Fest. The only blackie I saw there was an employee of one company.
And it is a good and natural thing. The cutedge of tech is where retards are not welcome, and it could be correlated to Craig J Venter Institute
that very de is used for aim in chinese. because de that place arrow have to hit, and thus de is to in english, and because french de is of in englihs, of and to is the same thing? I think some Jo would be.

jo is de and of? wouldn't it be just some





M is owl in egyptian (the owl you can often see in their texts is an alphabetic symbol of M, these tables are mostly correct (they differ in details) And M is also associated to see as mare, and water does reltat to mother, But a trick is all three matters are called mothers (that universal boncept of tridevi is probably much more abstract today, when we divided three times from three agregate states of matter, when we invented not to use the same concept to everything, because it can be misleading.
So M is not only for woman, which could be simpolizing it in many other ways (like the angle in the centre is the genital triangle, and 🜄 which is alchemic sign for water also has this shape. and M is similar to V and M is similar to N (we, me, nous, nos, нас, us, мы) and ν is greek N. - and probably other cultures had oher point of view on who is Mama (mama is daddy in georgian and deda s mama there)


about the talking drums: I think it's like some popular song, they know the words because they know the song. But it's only a guess,, they can have some better rhythmic ear for standard phrases. But that is what I first thought. Now I think it's some song they both know. Songs allow texts to be encoded in melodies.

You can literally see it. He recognizes some standard phrase, they probably have some better ear for rhythms. Brian Eno said that they don't dig tonal thing as much as we do (would he really dare to say something like this or is it just my addition) but in rhythms we cannot compete.


I think syllables bear much more sense than single letters:
Ma & Mи are separated as My & Me or Mom & Me, Mom is mine, but not exactly me.
Mамочка моя-моя? моя мочка? мочка значит мягкая? мягкую можно мять.
лёгкое может лечь? тяжёле лучше ставить, а не ложить? загадки..



What if fuck is an abbreviation of for god's sake?



Me is We'll is Will.
But mysly chto posle. What is after that me.
Mysle (Think, Thoughts) what if think is thing not realized yet. To realize is to implement into reality, to understand and to make should be divided by very short time so they are reality. Is it reality when it's in my head. Maybe yes, but also реализуй.. реализовать означает в русском не только создать, но и продать. создание здания? мироздание? здание строение, здание устройство, здание знание, сознание создание. здание делать знание знать. здание со дание. знание со нание? knowing? connecence consi.. consceio.. conscience? connect? cjn con struct, создать, структ строит фрукт фроить fruit i ~ к connaissance is a french word I was looking for, in english it's cognizance, осведомлённость, юридический термин, наверное поэтому так близок к романкому.

Fruit shows how i~к

hijkl is all one big IJ think. thing.

H-L (is it a lesson to give your ego away? I remember how my bad-trip pretty much ended when I said that there's no me.

Hl Mm Nn
Oo Pqr St
Uv Wy Xz

Aa Bb Cd
Ee  Ff  Gh
Hl Mm Nn
Oo Pqr  St
Uv Wy Xz

            Aa
Bb Cd  Ee  Ff  Gh
             Hl
Mm Nn Oo Pqr  St
             Uv
         Wy Xz

It is in this structure, but not a very good structure. Or is it a man on a jet engine? Is t ome double cross? And Uv used to be the final letter. Especially since W&y are forms of Uv And I also had to change the order, of xy, which is technically cheating wheatever reason I had I didn't even give em.

            Aa
Bb Cd  Ee  Ff  Gh
             Hl
Mm Nn Oo Pqr  St
             Uv

a man jumbing with a coattail of Uv?
T is the final letter of the hebrew. I think it could be reconstructed by some masonic scholars having access to some unknown books where the reasons for the alphabetic orders are given explicitly and who knows maybe simply prescriptively. Maybe they make it into reality not realizing what they're doing, automatically, merely speculations

א ב גד
ה  ו  ז
חטיכל מ נ ס
and doing the same Hl trick in hebrew I see how ridiculous it is.
 ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
that י-line always messes it up. is it ego that spoils it all?
Is ego will as in I will or We'll.

‎When I combine letters like this, checking them on axial symmetry is meaningless.

 
But
Aa Bb Cd
Ee  Ff  Gh
Hl Mm Nn
Oo Pqr  St
Uv Wy Xz
Is rather wicked as an example of how far I'd rather go.
Because h is in Gh and H is in Hl
I didn't even notice.
Aa Bb Cd
Ee  Ff  Gg
Hl Mm Nn
Oo Pqr  St
Uv Wy Xz

Аа Бв Гд
Ее Ёё Жз
Ил Мм Нн
Oo Пр Ст
Уу Фф Х

Х as a final letter would reflect phoenician script.  But it's not nice of me to cut it so abruptly, but if

also something like џ used to be a final letter of some old russian. was it?



Why have I never watched at serbian alphabet before? Some orthography is so weird that it makes me think that those forms of Д & п & т may have had some origin in the past, before Vuk.
Here's what I'm talking about: Karadžić based his alphabet on the previous "Slavonic-Serbian" script
Here's the difference:  Честь имамъ всѣмъ Высокопочитаемымъ Читателемъ обявити, да безъ сваке сумнѣ намѣренъ есамъ, ону достохвалну и цѣлому Сербскому Роду преполезну ИСТОРИЮ СЕРБСКУ, от коесамъ цѣло оглавленïе давно сообщïо, печатати. — old serbian, but also who knows how old it is and what was before it, wiki doesn't give a separate article to it. and here's the new version: Част имам свим Високопоштованим Читаоцима објавити, да без сваке сумње намерен јесам, ону доста хваљену и целоме Српском Роду прекорисну ИСТОРИЈУ СРПСКУ, од које сам цело поглавље давно саопштио, штампати. (I have the honour to announce to all Revered Readers that I am, without any doubt, intent on printing that praiseworthy and to all Serbian People valuable SERBIAN HISTORY, a whole chapter of which I have published long ago. )

S and T are united in Ottoman translated into russian as Osman.
and that relates to то~сё. but only if this~that.


But if so many personal pronouns sound as yes, why does french nous is more like noes?
Is it where the antonymity of the pronouns manifest?



I wonder why we can speak with undefined syllables both yes and no when yes is a double syllable uh-hu and no is much more single whether longer than ones used in that yes or if double, the first part is so much more stronger than the second one, that it could be single and the second syllable would be just a phonetic swash.

no as uno? duh as du?
but why are dogs taught the other way around?
is it because when A came to stand first B became second instead of being first. And though 2 is probably chronologically the first recognized letter, before 2 comes 1, and probably that's why Aa & Дд are so alike, because ᚦ was the 1 when ᛒ was recognized as 2, and that is probably why not a single numeric sequence (LMN, UVW, and even EFГ, don't go in a straight order. EFГ is the closest to it, but it's in reversed. Is it a key, that they all were that way: HIי... MNL then? WUV? or is LN IH and M is the third in that ӀНМ? H standing for И which is currently used for I and ӏ stading for i is another argument pro that HIJKL thing)

But to close the serbian question for awhile, let's look at other fonts of theirs to see that those anomalies are present only in cursive (which may be much more informative than the official font, because cursive is not that much regulated. So on the following table they forgot about cursive majuscule, but the minuscule anomal т & ш are shown:

I think I say these ш & т, but there also was something else, it was г п т but what was it..


Die Kleinbuchstaben Б, Д, Г, И, П, Т und Ш in russischer (links, blau), bulgarischer (mittig, rot) und serbischer Schrift (rechts, gelb), jeweils Normalschnitt und Kursive

It's interesting, that Ш ends their order and its cursive is similart to Т who also can.

I wonder if it matters that between И & T there are 11 letters and between П & Ш there are 10.
I wodner if it matters that between И & П there are 8 letters and between T & Ш there are 7.
There are 14 letters between Г & П, but he added so many new letters into that space, let's see it in russian: 12 between Г & П, only 2 between П & T, so I guess these numbers do not matter.



From the Old Slavic script Vuk retained these 24 letters:
А а     Б б      В в     Г г       Д д     Е е     Ж ж     З з
И и     К к     Л л     М м     Н н     О о     П п     Р р
С с     Т т      У у     Ф ф     Х х     Ц ц     Ч ч     Ш ш

He added one Latin letter:
Ј ј

And 5 new ones:
Љ љ     Њ њ     Ћ ћ     Ђ ђ     Џ џ

He removed:
Ѥ ѥ (је)     Ѣ, ѣ (јат)     І ї (и)     Ѵ ѵ (и)     Оу оу (у)     Ѡ ѡ (о)     Ѧ ѧ (мали јус)     Ѫ ѫ (велики јус)     Ы ы (јери, тврдо и)
Ю ю (ју)     Ѿ ѿ (от)     Ѳ ѳ (т)     Ѕ ѕ (дз)     Щ щ (шт)     Ѯ ѯ (кс)     Ѱ ѱ (пс)     Ъ ъ (тврди полуглас)     Ь ь (меки полуглас)     Я я (ја)


that information is from the link, to which the following image leads:

another table shows some other font, with cursive п, т, ш similar to russian forms, but it represents a wicked cursive form of Б, which once again contraposes Б & Д:



and their latin script may just show how the U line could be in the past:



Now I wonder if I really know how academia works. What if they rejected me a couple of times to make me keep on working on this problem until the theory is enormous or before I give up if I didn't really want it as it would be if I stole it, for example. Would I keep on digging, if they published me? I don't know. At first I just wanted to make it better, making it bigger happened naturally. I kept on trying until I flew the way I fly now. I'm high as a kite and nuts as some nasdat naxi.


So even though there's georgian anomaly of mama & deda, I consider it an anomaly. But baba as daddy, isn't it directly connected to that? Maybe, I look from the european perspective and I will look at it after I realize the sources and forms of pronoun antonymy.
I call M female letter, and J is male, and words like Man & Жена I consider as some derivatives of them, meaning the opposite sex by the posession suffix -n of own. as they use similar suffix in russian and in japanese for genetivus. and male is probably a cognate of man, and female is a derivateive of it just as woman (and both female & woman use labial prefixes, or maybe not directly cognates, but related, only -le suffix stand not for own, but for -like or something of the kind.



שלי is my (or mine) in hebrew.
שֶׁלְךָ is your (yours) in hebrew.
and I think I think I see a pattern here. And expecting to see some shalan for his I see that his is
שֶׁלוֹ is his in hebrew his.
שֶׁלָהֶם is their
and שֶׁלָן was what returned


  מייַן

And I realized that I need a table of hebreew pronouns for some reason.

But instead I find this:

(if you click it, it tells of pronouns there, I will post here too)

Look like water starts with M, I spoke about it before, and linked that Water Mater Вода Моет to M(מ) they speak about in sefer yetzirah. Там вначале огонь и вода вместе, как ша-маим огневода (мем огненной воды не оттуда же ли) противопоставленная твёрдой земле. Эрэц. Воздух по любому среди огневоды, среди проникаемых проницаемых (the same с) - I placed russian с instead of c. why? by accident.  Эрэц последняя идёт. Шамаим первым идёт Ша огонь идёт первым. Может Алеф была огнём? Нет, огнём был Шин. Аш Вообще-то аш содержит и алеф и шин и начинается с алефа. Хорошо. Пусть аш будет א
Тогда маим остаётся Мемом, а эРэЦ это Р & Ц. R & Z. Г & Д, zar rex господин. г-н, г-д, господень, К & N, KinG, Qr Queen? K is king, Q is queen, C is caesar or царь, or count, G is graf например,
К столбец - это золото. Т.е. А это Агонь, В это Вода, Г это Глина, Д и того хуже, как и г.
E это из огня? еда. F это фрукт? Ж жевать З зевать? Ё это ёжик и ёлка. Царица чтоли привезла? У нас сосны может только были? да не, гонево же. но синие ели диковинка. Может там тайна в том, что чернила подливают для чудесности.

Если первая губная В, раз Вода, то во второй строке может Б и есть, тем более что в русском первая половина более отчётливо звонка.

Если Е еда, то Б уж не баланда ли, что это вообще за слово?
Булка, например, Бутерброд. двойная б, Bread & Bulka. Could ul be re, could ka be ad?

Брага может быть? Если Еда, то Питьё. П было здесь? Есть и Пить же следующим. Кто-то убрал все глухие из первой части русского алфавита, чтоб создать в нём структуру, которой в неё не было?
Есть и Пить, Жрать и дальше не скажу.
Искать? Копать? Рыть? Лить? Ловить? Мыть? Ныть?
Отнять Пряать Красть? Рыть Ссать толкан давить? нет слова что я искл на Т. defecate begins with d as I recognized, but I could recognize it wrong. But as a little child have humans been and in that state could they invent alphabet, and alphabet transformed them to taboo some things, so в следствии этого они вынуждены были табуировать си структуры порождённые старым мышлением.

И зачем я их обратно откапываю? Я уже спрашивал себя, справится ли человечество с примитивным пониманием языка? Но я, кстати, так и не доказал, что хулить и худой от хуя, а не наоборот или вообще параллельно.


Агонь Вода Земля
It seems russian alphabet (Гора, Грязь, Говно, Глина, ЧерноЗём. Земля с водой: М внутри.
Значит З а почему вообще З? Δ sounds as ð in greek. And russian alphabet is from greek.

I thiught in greek water is aqua, as if they placed water first. But to my surprise it's νερό
earth in greek is γη, and γ is the very third letter, following the.. β.
ν is not v in greek, it's n, it's Nero. что учитывая m~n очень похоже на море. but sea is θάλασσα and I'm pleased to notice that it supports the idea of labiability of the θ.

Учитывая, ч я черри-пикнул русский, натянув О на А, выбрал не ту букву какая шла сразу (из Глины бог слепил людей, не могло быть у бога говна, потому что всё что у бога драгоценно (здесь могли быть дикие истории из жизни верующих, но не будет сегодня)
Агонь Вода и Глина. Это русские сказки? Евреи и русские делят культуру? Русским алфавит достался, а евреям евангелие, еврейское нагелие. ангелие хотел я сказать, но наголее им присуще. сущее при них.
Агни огонь, а потому писать Агни считаю архиправильнч. И если в библии идёт..  а в библии так и ещё, Аш Maim aRex. Глина как арех раскрывается? Не было чтоли о? О это твойная а. долкая а, а-мега (чего бы выделяли букве о долгую форму раньше А?  и H как двойное И, или Н ещё дальше по этой шкале высоких нот ушло чем просто I, dvoynoe E.
E EE=I (II=Y, II=H)
A AA=O OO=U (in greek Y is instead of U, and double O is Ω

so it is as if in the West A O U & E I Y and in the East it's A O Ω & E I H (but only H is placed before I. Directly before I, and in russian it goes ИЙ, long I (and historically H) before short I, J. just as it is in english latin IJ. J is short I when it's.. at least in some other european countrie' latin.


A O U
 E I Y

A O Ω
 E I H
    Y
I wonder what Y is in greek then. I guess it's Ю. nasal I or palatalized, yotirovannoe O.
Я is probably one of these: ꙖѤѦꙘѪꙚѨꙜѬ, probably Ꙗ
as if in greek Y unites all three features: vowel, labial and lingual at the same time. And that's naturally ju. jew? no, ю. thought jew probably also includes features of all three peoples: Wit of Whites, Jewfro from Blacks, and semites are neither Yafetim, nor Hamim, thus they're chinese themselves, the asian race. sem as in сина, псина? скажи мне что ты ешь и я скажу кто ты. п is probably pais. but then сина не (прошу извинить подобные заскоки, пусть будут чтобы видеть как бывает) jew in chinese 犹 and sounds as yo (йоw) and the same hieroglyph is used for these meanings: still, yet, even, nevertheless, even now, however, in spite of everything, notwithstanding, Jew, Jewish, as if, to scheme (so I guess chinese also know about cabals of cabbalists and their hutzpah which are stereotypes in europe.)
据 sounds more like jew, but it actually stands for according to, evidence, sickness of hand, certificate, on the grounds of, act in accordance with, seize, fortified
犹 reminds 我 and that stands for я which sounds very similarly: ya. and stands for I (me)
Ik (l) MiNe? mistransliterated ΜΝΣ which gave birth to the concept of samekh?
and they ecole~school etudant~student etude~study and so on - some body definitely got it wrong, and they have never changed it.
Another thing to think that jews are from china is that china in chinese is dʒongwo, where the first syllable reminds jew a lot. gwo is country, so it could be some jewing country. But do I have loicense for such a speech? Why do I act like a retard? Because I shouldn't smoke mere than once per day.




Hooray, a new day. What will it bring us I still do not know. Let's see.

And I haven't end getting high and already hooked on some internet randomizers.

Here. Will leave the room only when I really need to. So let's talke about something we already know. Because we definitely don't know many of what we knida know for sure (but if we do't know them for sure, we'll have to go online to clarify, and there some randomizers live, they tend to lead us not where we intended to go, and worse than this, they fill us with some random information we have no idea if it's true or not.
School is also randomizer. School is enforced randomizer. Schools randomize our sphere of interest (it doesn't grow by the needs of our personal neural development, that program they read is rather random. They may interest you from time to time, but you immediately go to something else not allowed to go where you ask if they teach you anything at all (they wouldn't even give me physics or maths, if my father didn't teach me that.

I must tell my niece, when she sat on my knees that school is not a place for her. School is not a place for anybody.

Я хочу общаться в мире идей, мир людей мне не интересен. люди ло идеаль. not ideal.


Идея интересна, what if I remove those additional я, people would think I'm self-less.

интересная ~ интересна мне
итересует ~ интерс интеу н интерес у тебя
интересуешь ~ интерес у её (ж, she, sie - сие, the thee this - see, difference in how we understand pronouns influences all the grammar, and though it's a raw theory, I already understand it as something big, because I was cooking it for some looong time, so it's not cooking, it's some discovery, digging into something huge. global. all our culture is influenceb by it because it's in the basis, some of these ideas could come from feral apes or whatever we were before)

интересна интерес она?
интересен интерес он.

т.о. не она и он, а на и ен. Открытый слок соответственно женский, закрытый слог мужской.
на и ши, как это могло быть? и заметь, что язык в древних словах этих (если в такое древнее, то оно из н, both in & ν) and where did M come from? K? как не только кохатися, но и kussen, родственное английскому kiss. poessen is probably kissen not in kaf (kaf is mouth in hebrew alphabet, азбука. названия слов могут быть ключом к различию в алфаивтаъ, давай посмотрим:

иф каф ис мауth, then it's clear how M would come out of K, I thought of K because of


see what I found in egyptian: 𓄲𓄳𓄴𓄵𓄶𓄷𓄸
𓄲  𓄳  𓄴  𓄵  𓄶  𓄷  𓄸
e, p   a,d     g       b     c, г      s       R? (p+ or e+ E is one of the tightest letters, and P with some simpler stroke is R)
(I'm only guessing here and almost every where. Is it poetry or science? it's something new)
abcd
efgh
if d is a, then abc def (B opens into E and Г doubles into F)
ABC
DEF
GHI (G is g which is another form of д in russian)
It's as if cursive ד of ᚦ gave birth to both д and g because it could go both ways, to do or to go.
ד also looks like Г, because both could be axe, not door. So if I challenge hebrew names for letters, how can I know of Kfa being a mouth? Because of jewish word .. haha, mouth is pay, not kaf, kaf is hand. And to my surprise I notice that (and here something happened in my personal life that I completely lost interest to writing this stuff, I began weeping some offtopic instead, but that mess I cut it out)



> Если сформулировать главную теорию, которую вы выстроили, в одном предложении. Правильно ли было бы сказать так: наличие внутренней симметрии в алфавитах доказывает их непосредственную связь?  Какие выводы позволяет сделать ваша теория?

Их непосредственная связь была очевидна и до меня, моя теория показывает, что официальная наука, говорящая что финикийский - первый алфавит, понятия не имеет о чём она говорит, что в алфавите есть уровни гораздо более глубокие, чем уровень который представлен в финикийском. Уровень четырёх элементов. О трёх элементах, ещё более глубоком уровне понимания мира, до концептуализации воздуха наверное, говорят и греческий миф о создании алфавита и еврейский миф в книге сефер йецира, но там не сказано что их кто-то изобретал, сказано лишь что они есть, так что евреи не являются создателями алфавита, надеюсь они меня за подобные предъявы не удавят, потому что они хотя бы сохранили этот слой в своей культуре, остальные вообще папуасы в этом отношении (причём сохранили в виде, более ясном, чем в греческом мифе, именно как три матери, и в более базовом даже чем греческий миф, где א уже разложена по гамме AEIOU (предположительно, гласные родились из музыкальной грамоты, так что алфавит - это перекрещивание двух(!) элементов (женского и мужского, воды и огня) и гаммы, что означает что сначала алфавит был силлабарией, и лишь затем стал строго говоря алфавитом (что привлекает очень большое внимание к палеоиспанским системам письма) Мне интересно найти этот миф в египетском исполнении, но я пока не нашёл даже последовательности похожей на алфавитную (или на халахам, который они вроде использовали) но сейчас загуглил халакхам и нашёл https://lechaim.ru/news/pervaya-nadpis-semitskim-alfavitom-15-veka-do-nashej-ery-najdena-v-egipte/ которая ссылается на https://www.timesofisrael.com/first-written-record-of-semitic-alphabet-from-15th-century-bce-found-in-egypt/ где уже есть картинки, но в прошлый раз я видел одну из них - она позиционировалась как азбука в порядке халахам, я повтыкал и не понял как они это поняли по столь малому количеству строк, а сейчас говорят, что она ещё и двусторонняя.. сейчас допишу это письмо и отправлюсь читать https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.5615/bullamerschoorie.379.0103 ("A Double Abecedary? Halaḥam and ʾAbgad on the TT99 Ostracon" by Thomas Schneider)

Сложно сказать чья версия более древняя: с одной стороны, сефер йецира непосредственно называет АМS (abc) тремя матерями, проводя во многом знак равенства между ними и мировым (учитывая, что не только европейцы и индусы, но и евреи и арабы эту тему знают: в строчках корана, называемыми сатанинскими стихами, именно они и упоминаются, как богини, которым арабы поклонялись до установления ислама) культом трёх матерей, которые мол создали (составляли?) гласные, Б, Т. (а форонида Ио была судя по всему жрицей, которой это открылось. Была ли она по совместительству известна как Сешат или нет мне пока не известно) а с другой стороны греческая версия отделяет два элемента (именно воду губных и огонь язычных) от гласных, показывая что это две разные системы.
Так что оба мифа очень хороши и полезны и показывают помимо прочего, что мифы МОГУТ являться историческим свидетельством (этого современная история не признаёт)




признаёт ~ признают было ли разделение по лицам раньше, чем разделение по числам? оттуда путаница с мы и me, но не, you & я же тоже путаница, но совсем другого свойства. антонимия местоимений, когда-нибудь я за неё как следует возьмусь.


turning base metals such as mercury into gold (chrysopoeia, from the Greek χρυσός khrusos, "gold", and ποιεῖν poiēin, "to make")
could it be some code of turning stories of previous gods (such as Mercury) into stories of Christ?
Does that Christ, they all seem to look after, secretly is a codeword for gold. It would explain a lot.



10,4 [десять и четыре] т.е. , is read as י and , actually can be substituted by и (which sounds as י)
(did I tell it before? I wound't know, I haven't got high for days)
and as 10.4 is a variant of 10,4, , is a probably a swashed ..



Only today have I recognized that vowel trapezium is much more correct than I thought, so if you read my rant about it in vol.2 and there was no link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formant then you probably should return to volume 2 and look for trapezium in there.

And even though that formant doesn't exactly correlate the previous representation of it by the arbitrary raise of the tongue, there are definitely many dialects and different people pronounce those vowels differently, and even though  I like this new version much more, I still predict that it will show different in different выборка.






and that previous table when the whole bulk of the tongue, taking different shapes, as can be seen at MRI videos of people speaking and singing, by one dot is obsolete and it never was some good science, so the rant I initially placed in vol.2 (continuation.html) makes some sense nevertheless it's also wrong per se and could be caused by me only quite feeling the front part of the tongue and not knowing that k is made by the back of the tongue until I was shown an mri or an xri image of pronounced k.
It's as if l in k is the palate and c is actually the tongue touching it with its back and me feeling it only now, but before I saw how it looks I felt it to be the part of my throat, as if some soft palate played here, little did I know that soft palate only works for nasals, which I found out only yesterday.


(mirror)
I wouldn't trust it directly, because it's singing and not talking. What comes next is some video in german, and other languages have different way to pronounce vowels, and even within one language different speakers my sound quite differently, all that could be influenced by the way they place their tongue, or it could be that within one dialect these forms are only influenced by the form of the skulls.
(mirror)



I think I have some mild turret syndrome: I don't need to материть (in english it's to curse, посылать, to course, so it's not necessarily bad, but all forms of magic was banned because of curses in the same of in the sense of damnations) often, but I tend to use bad words in speech as filler, and russian variant of this word is so disgustingly metaphoric, that it has to be edited out of this language. Or should we preserve the orksk language? should I respect the orsk filler?

мислим (mislim, "i think")
(would it be considered plagiatry if I took it without this change of font I occasionally got in the beginning of this book? Either way it would look better in the text if torn out and pasted as my own. Now it makes sense how "simple artists copy, great artists steal" but only in this rare context, or have I yet to see 



мислим (mislim, "i think")
In the north it's called myslim, not muslim. у, not u. (greek and russians draw U as У НУ ye N ν (some екфыр trash) and isn't it why Y is named U-grek. or I grek? is I U? u и, И N ν v u и -- v is in arabic? in aramaic? in hebrew! n is in english and german, и is in russian, such different readings of the same symbol, the same word. We on't recognize words of each other, but we know those words, we yet have to recognize. And when we recognize the words of eachother, we know all the languages at once. Just allo more freedome to free dome is free space, at least above the ground. why doesn't government allow us all to dig for gold, for example? Because they want money for such activities, so do everything but share is some old


трус и дурак очень близкие слова. трясёся, как больной психически. страх и сотрясение мозга? сотрях. страхом с трахом. ушибленный ущемлённый. ошибаться.
also traumatized has both meanings of psychologic and physical trauma.

Gazing at the to, I felt urge to compare prepositions to numerals, as if those positions are by numbers.
1 on
2 to
3 through
4 for
5 ?
6 ?
7 ?
8 ?
9 ? nein
10 ?
if that is true that four first numerals are also приставки, then on ~ in, of ~ for, by ~ to, at ~ on, and it is only a guess, I will return to it when I find some more prepositions. between is some larger word, built up of two others, so I thik, but I stil will return to this hypothesis.


kill is ge-ill.
завалил geill желе жидкое
girl. gail. gel. gal. call. I have to colour it in more and more grey, grey is the actual reading, so it's more great and new version of gray. gray is dorian gray, grey di aubrey and sasha grey
di aubrey, parrish, okolnikov, kondrasheva all these words speak about death and work on immortality.
It's hard to believe it's not some play. Is god there watching the play of our random? are gods? I pray them all, because I only saw some of them, I don't know either (don't know nor neither. ниже подпись. понимание поднимание (как поднимать? это фантазия) )
завалил замочил заварил зачморить зажморить зажмоурил зажмурИл зажмУрил защурил за shier all. зажим, заджем, зажатие задеяие задечие . задатие, задача, занячие, занятие, назначение,
такой дрифт в фонетике и семантике. не знаю являются ли они

The language itself rhyming connects words, most of rhymes are grammatically similar.
so when I say I my first rhyme is want to die. I lie would be the second one. I fly would be also a lie or in the other sense it could be frooty in the fourth rhyme would be that very I am fly. though it's not a rhyme as good as the first one, who do you eat, russkie? я головка от куя оркская версия той же местоименийной рифмы.




Я начал заниматься наукой самостоятельно, целеустремлённо, самоотверженно, отдав все свои жизненные ресурсы на достижение научных целей вскоре после того как в процессе обучения в школах понял, что мои способности лучше чем их программа. Учебный план следует менять скоро и споро. бордо бодро и борзо. бордо багровый. г is g in english and d is g in russian cursive.
abc is abgd. gd & si are two names for the same place of the alphabet. alphabet probably was before bible and maybe before the system before that, or so on.

c царь, corol, carl, king knight, конь? шахматы легендарнейшая игра и уже засветилаь в восьмиричности. k is king or knight? see, it doesn't work like tat and if it does, it's probably not in english unless english scholars knew this system. I think they didn't.

Vanity is vain so why do I make it public under my own ame? because I am inane a little, not very fit to social norms.
But at least I don't post my name in open, you have to write me an email or find it hidden in pictures.


каждого человека можно как датчик использовать, чтоб получать данные от них, и такие датчики как я как будто инопланетный, показывает не так и не то что другие, but makes sense nevertheless.



Вера В что-то
Надежда На что-то

в яро?
на держится.

на деется на что-то
ве ярит во что-то

яр = жар = ire = fire
dʒ j h f
жар жыр пыр пар пор жор
пора пыра? В поры зверям пыряли? поры как дыры-пыры? d dʒ j h f p

fire pyre supports that dʒ p spectre.
daddy and papa, пыр, prick, хер, пэр, пёр, пар, herr, parish,




I thought that new gmail logo was bad, I even dared to write them about it, and now look how much it looks like my system as if it goes in columns (or in pages of an open book: first page tells of vowels and labials, the second page speaks of velars and coronals, as it could be in some azbuka of english.



I tried to place these letters into something of google colours, but it was so lame, and why be mistaken with google? my way of represent the same is not worse than theirs. it also speaks of bustrophaedon I don't know what to do with,  Let's ponder on it: does this order negate egyptian "letter looks at the beginning of the line" thing? It rotates letters when they go the other way, so it keeps that rule, you can see where letters have face by looking at some bustrophaedon text.



Today I said to my gay friend "too bad A for asexual isn't included into LGBT, it would make it all easier" he laughed and said no.
And right after that I found this:

  Here it is some massive gay propaganda, telling of cis world as strict and boring, as some prisoner's pigama, which is of course false, gay is brown. I am so mean! I said of gay friends, do they know how much you are disgusted by their choice? How can I be such a hypocrite. Let's see at it deeper, blacks and whites make those 6 colours triple: red yellow blue and orange green violet is a little less normal sequence, and though today we have red green blue as a standart, I don't know how do they get yellow of it, while orange is red and yellow, green is yellow and blue, violet is blue and red, so red yellow blue it probably is. Yellow is too light, red blue green those colours are, like the ones I chose to use.


α pretty much repeats ω in its graphics,
α and ε and thus ω are the same letter, turned 90°




this artistic artefact allows me to reconstruct glagolitic matrix:

Заломало меня их раскрашивать. Может позже закончу, когда найду прогу получше.
В рамки выделил те, что после 900, а потому позже добавленные скорей всего.
В кириллице непонятно является ли NJ нумерной буквой, а потому возможно ижице-подобная V-образная Ч традиционно закругляет алфавит.
Just as a similar to cursive v letter is 900th in the most glagolitics
but if that v is ч, then it's a variant of the previous letter.




Are hoes hers? are humans hims?

was saw
me am
of for
but that could be some standard freakiness.

what то
all these pairs can be coincidences, especially this one.


In russia it's like they make us all affraid, that's how they rule. By brutal force or fear of it.
I need my family around me to make it and russian government or its minions took my bro.
Do I really need my bro around to build it? He payed me salary to keep me in the comfort zone.
How dare I say it. But it's true, what if that bad will is actually good will. Let's see how long it take to take an individual out of the (сейчас пока отвлёкся на меньше минуты пробеала мысль быстрая, я бы не успел записать, что лебедев зашкварил всех чёрненьких опять. тупые как пробки, кто так дела делает?
Поощрила плохого человека, отсуди у него квартиру как оплату (не согласно) вопреки контракта, по которому человек должен был получить оплату после продажи недвижимости.
согласно / вопреки
с голосо / в упрёки

кто так дела делает? здесь насрали, убежали, там насрали, куда они сбежать собрались в интернете, интернет глобален, это государства пытаются пыжатся его гранить, рубить, рассекать верёвочки, это и есть го-о насрали на тропинке, чтоб никто через говно не ходил. граница где насрано?
геноцидятся пеноцидится гено цид гены цедят, просеивают гены, чтоб выкорчевать всё ненужное и заставить бы уродов физической силой работать.
I understood this lighter patterns. Here they are showing thought which came to me while I told the story in black. And usually they substitute brakets (substitute subse... cобой сомо... (составляет is it because ... is оставляет))
The previous six (maybe even five) black lines are thought which came to me in a moment задумчивости.

of -ов
-ов -ы -и
ы as a local form of и

complex сложный сложенный соm- polozhen
жен x it is weird because of chromosomic x standing for female. Y for man is the proof of ancient people knowing some good microscopy, if Y & X are yang and yin. 3 & 4, it all supports it. Did we realize this very principle of cosmos in some other level and it comes through it all not just in our cultural layers but in nature itself. So what I just said tells why it will not prove that ancient people knew chromosomes? but the graphical part, why knew these forms in the upper meaning of 3 & 4 before we saw chromosomes into microscope. Am I sure? X & Y are letters added in some late antiquity, so they could have good microscopy? Using glass balls as lenses and using different spectre of the light: different wood burns with different frequency. Fire could correlate the tunes making resonanses with each other, thus we could relate letters to different kinds of tunes. We could resonate the same wood differently. and thus И & Z & N could share form. are some хладни тоунс х и у?

It's funny that when I spoke of И Z я подумал о глаголице, которая наверху, разбита на половины.
а напротив о
б напротив п
в напротив р
г напротив с
д напоротив т
художники предыдущих по



So what if Ad was the beginning of the alphabet? AZ-book. used to be aзбука, but to split nations they made us use their word, kniga, whose language was it? knyazey's казнящих, грозящих, бранящих "сказал А говори и Б!"
ᛆᚦ
ᚾᚠᚵ
ᛁᚴᛚᛘ
ᚮᚱᛦᛏᚢ
or
ᛆᚦ
ᚾᚠᚵ
ᛁ ᚴᛚᛘ
ᚮᚱᛦᛋᛏ
But no, I don't recognize who could be number 3 or 4. So this guess is hanging in the air and fuck it.


Братан молоток, заколачивает, а я микроскоп. Хотел помочь матери с работой, раз у них сейчас на человека меньше, будет же не хватать. но микроскопом заколачивать можно, но расточительно и малоэффективно. Чем-то же я могу ей помочь в её работе? Мыслью, разрешить то, что у неё понять не получается, у неё сейчас о брате ещё голова занята заботой, и подобое управление, при помощи страха, и приводит к меньшей эффективности

Не общайся не подумав как следует можно сократить (как в математике?) на
общайся подумав как следует. И если эти частицы сокращаются как в математике, то имеем вид
(не общайся)/(не подумав как следует) = (общайся)/(подумав как следует) общение на фундаменте раззмышления над оным. я чаще импульсивен, безумен я. без умен не умён умён учён. м майнд, ч читать учён вчитан вычитан слоган умножан и делижант. дерижор.

(talk in the business) ? (not personal life) how are these two combining in that mathematical term?

demonism of my name borders another term: dementia. безумие от слова бес.
деменция
бес    умия
деминишед ция (ци?)
демен de mini (less) менее.
д в начаеле становится е в конце?
de man, like man, of man, человеческой природы. демоны звери черти дёрти жорти жерди чёрты, шорты, сорты, морды, хорды, лорды, ворды, орды, рд is an interesting affricate. орда и order.
хорда. орто(гональ) райт райх write? right rd. right, dextrum. deus treus unus quartus quintus. sextus.
septust octopus nonus dixi.


These birds fold their arms on their back, as we also can, but they seem to pull their breastcage as they do it. грудь колесом выгибают, руки немного получается закручены когда, но из этого положения и мы сможем всечь по воздуху так, как у нас иными мускулами сил бы не хватило, дыхание с движением крыльев тем синхронизируй, перейди на дыхание осознанное. подчини сееб

is misplacement of m in adam reflects ijlm as if this line is идём, очень мужественное слово.
а ева ева, потому что её можно to eba (ебать) дева, плева, слева, женщина слева, друг справа.
liasons on the left (women like their man to be her right hand. так что левая рука это те кого ты правая рука)

That video above was placed here to demonstrate that in these creatures it's obvious that arms are at tha back and legs are at the front, wings are at their back.
там также видно, что попугай недалеко от сокола, просто решил ягоды есть или чем там они питаются. орешками быть может. да ктоже им даст, хлебной коркой быть может иногда. я орк и злюка, это точно. I'm ork, dark elf, a crossbreed of orcs and gnomes, neither elf nor even human, in that racist english tale. we understand literature, thank you very much. From here we can see us as being normal cis people and all the europe and jews are all gay, correlation between jews and homosexuality is really astounding, maybe one stigma attracts the other, or their traditionas are gay but we russians see that gay as the gay.

If reader knows I'm a foreigner, it will give himorher them more freedom in interpreting the text.
(because they may assume that I wanted to say something slightly different)

часы части числа.
два это две половины. 1/2
три это три трети 1/3
четыре это четверти по 1/4
пять это пять частей по 1/5 в среднем. и так далее, часы числа части.
числовой частный методы я не знаю их достаточно хорошо чтобы сравнивать.
часовой
часовня часы отмечает, звонит

сорока magpie. mags, chats as aunt maggie. is magpie bastardized maggie?



is mag related to mouth? then hag is has, hags what he has.
lags louse? louth! s;ei sleughth
lags lousy
rags rousy?
sacks сыпучее
packs пахучее
wacks worse худшее
bags пакучее паскучее паскудное посконное
bags packs
паковать парковать проковать по cover. to cover.
packet packedge пахочь пахоть похоть пот?
пикет picket picked spyed шпик c пикой
пика пихать лук лучше лучший лучш луч шаттл? settle, lounch was the word I was looking for. лучники launch,

Gleba is глеба in russian, thus this term is universal yet few people know this term, it's that soft spore-bringing part of a mushroom, and it reminds russian word хлеб and english obsolete hlaef.

f is reflected with б. does it mean that russain alphabet used to go like avgd of gd, об = о, thus akd could be normal as it is in the east. and than the second line would go ebёжз which is definitely the f-word. je fgh
af gd (were voiced-voiceless even a thing then? because only russian seems to have it.)
ebёжзь
им лан (лань лад ладно, love, в~д,  (k made it all кал, sacriledge against the previous culture, and the masses didn't get it, because they
oprst упрости. .???

оказывается, папоротник цветёт: смотри индузий. В этом месте расстения встречаются с грибами, смотри решёточник красный and Восточноазиатский вид рода Весёлка с жёлтым индузием
endligsh speakers know it as sorus: A sorus (pl. sori) is a cluster of sporangia (structures producing and containing spores) in ferns and fungi. This New Latin word is from Ancient Greek σωρός (sōrós 'stack, pile, heap'). sporus

лишайник lichen (лАйкен) is symbiosis of some одноклеточных с грибами.

весёлки действительно весёлые: stinkhorn как хуй, clathrus columnatus is like pizda.


I have so many books I don't read, because I don't want to bead my mind on somebody else's thoughts, to be independent in my суждение judgements understatements? understandings? I was told it all. White Goddess told me that мне всё сказали. мне всё скачали. мне всё закачали. мне всё закатали, мне всё сука дали. сока дали. сока дави. сока данеси. сока чать. чать тянуть? чаять. закачивать засасывать. с read as k & ч.
качать = сасать

но в жаргоне это антонимы.

сасать более простая форма буквы си, что и говорит с.
качество это внимание к детали. какая s.  k or ch? твёрдая или мяхкая? са или си? сасите это другая форма того же глагола, когда хуёво играет, он кому-то сосёт чтоб на сцену пустили, а если он крут, то она или он сами говорят сосите.
качает = сосите (противоположной команде)
если качает он говорит сосите, пейте, sos помогите. Качает со чаем. съ чаем. с кофеем. ем я ем.
буду. Я буду Дмитрий. деметрий. деметры de metra.

White goddess is Demetra. I always knew her as Demetra, because I found those cults by researching my own name's etymology. Dmitry is literally mama's boy.

my lord my lerard,
he who learned, hewho learnt. he who taught, he who toth. тот.

Кондраши кудряши.

on = at = у = c? with? um? on (this line is so raw it should come in gray, but there are many such)


яхве Я хво Me who Я кто. я кво. т~v, again, there should be a collection of these. The question is are there pairs I don't have links between? I must build a wheel like in 231 gates, where each letter is linked to every other letter: 22*21 и разделить на два (потому что связь при таком подсчёте подсчитывается с обоих сторон (а путь один на двух) и получим 462/2=231

But when I apply my links to that scale, I think I will have stars with many links between the main letters, and only few or none between the letters in the stars and other stars, and then operating with those newfound structures I will compare the links within the stars and the links outside of them, and if I find no difference between them, I will measure if those structures are there merely by some chance.


 י I ה ו ה Who in Who? The & The? I & I (me, myself & I, Я (the same) & (the same), I,i,j
Triple form in arabic is connected to previous, abugidaic structure? Som e A O E was in their syllabic tradition. maybe, thus those syllables naturally transformed into initial, middle, final version, and by similarity between those forms we can say which was is the basic form and how they tend to grow at both ends (I think final is the afterswash, and.. why guess if I can see:
(a frame with arabic .odo, please)
Their gimel has only 1+2 & 3 form (first and second is the same form, form 3 has final swash.
B & L have their swash upwards.
A is the same in all forms: ا except la: لا but then this digraph is pretty much the same
all the ب پ ت ث   ل ن ی come in halves: بپتثلنی three times is بپتثلنیبپتثلنیبپتثلنی
(to show you how they all are two letters: la and the rest.
بپتثلن یبپتثل نیبپتثلنی ب پتثلنیبپ تثلنیبپت ثلنی
is the same three lettrarii separated with spacebars elsewhere, only ی is different from toher other curves.. nah, ن is also specific in all fonts I saw. they're four (or only three in arabic, though fourth goddess is hidden by the other three you can see any given time. so you're confused if they're three or four. some trippy messages, l is higher above bcd's is n having not one end, but two ends raised? not Λ but N, so if we compare arabic and europic forms. Λ is ل and it is L, because they write the same image in the way they write it. L is leg, and it looks not in the beginning of the line, but it runs where the line runs, forward. So they misread egyptian hieroglyphs, and we can read them if we read lines with animals running forward, not backwards. Backwards didn't make no sense, and was established as a norm by some wthether ugnorant or malevolent neighbour, like greeks for example, greece reigned over egypt, so they are first suspect)
جچحخدذرزژسشصضطظعغفقکگمهو are ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ  م ه و 
جچحخ reminds بپتث
ج چ ح خ reminds ب پ ت ث
Why do I study this? Why don't I collaborate with academia? Thye ar e momopolists.
What are they doing? They control the narrative, you are not welcome there. Where is the нечестивцев союз. Я глупый. Это точно. Так зачем эти девять томов? Я нарыл атм много интересного, атмта, is hueta inddee (independent researher is indi and he can talk of me. Close the district. I am insane like mad. I am going to spread my wings and fly away. I want to make people live forever. I want to be the wizard who will reign the world. Not gonna reign the world unless you find yourself good place into this world. Join the system. No struggle no pain, leave me alone, please. I am insane. We both did come in peace. I'm crazy. I was in an opposition to the kings. Why not to join the kings? Why not to make the maximum out of this world. I don't like them. They know I don't like them. I am autist, I am out.
Join the jew. Jurisprudence be prudent to jou.

بپتثنیبپتثنیبپتثنی are ب پ ت ث ن ی
ب پتثنی   بپتث نی   بپتثن ی
ی's shape doesn't matter. It's different from other by having two dots under it: نین (nin)

للل لل ل are l ll lll

ب پ are the other letters having dot's underbelly. and it made it three of them: بیپ
بیپ (ب ی پ) is beep because that's how it sounds, and because bp are the only labial letters in this group, and somehow they are singled out with a letter, whych could be y, the labial ю, or the V [U] itself.

بپتثنی is بیپ نتث  which is b.i.p & n.t.th and why are they not in order in tha alphabet?

بپ تث ن ی
y is at the end of all the sequence. but only of this one:
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
and there's other, when it's purely I.
ا ب ج د
ه و ز ح ط
ی گ ل م ن س
ع ف ص ق ر ش ت ث خ ذ ض ظ غ
this ع غ line is 13 simbols and of 13 notes is arabic music. one more than europe, and it sounds werid, specific.

پ    چ  
   ژ          ک  
are persian residues, they don't have numeral meaning
28 signs can relate to 29.5 days of a lunar month, 28 plus additional days when needed. numberless day. and couldn't it help them divide the sky into 360 instead of 365.4 sectors, degrees.
does sun go all those degrees? No, it only visits some range on the southern sky. From the east to the west, and because the planet is tilted, it goes in different numbers.
Numeral meaning of thos 28 makes no sense, because in that tradition they had numeral alphabet split by 9 by 9 by 9.
I like this direction, text goes and letters look back when I type these lines, but they move to teh left, so further is further left, Is it the root of the conflict of the cultures? That like лебедь рак и щука we pull this world into different sides.

Why else would they look that way: 𓄿𓇋𓇌𓀀𓀁𓀂𓀃𓀄𓀅𓀆𓀇𓀈𓀉𓀊𓀋𓀌𓀍𓀎𓀏𓀐𓀑𓀒𓀓𓀔𓀕𓀖𓀗𓀘𓀙𓀚𓀛𓀜𓀝𓀞𓀟𓀠𓀡𓀢𓀣𓀤𓀥𓀦𓀧𓀨𓀩𓀪𓀫𓀬𓀭𓀮𓀯𓀰𓀱𓀲𓀳𓀴𓀵𓀶𓀷
𓀸𓀹𓀺𓀻𓀼𓀽𓀾𓀿𓁀𓁁𓁂𓁃𓁄𓁅𓁆𓁇𓁈𓁉𓁊𓁋𓁌𓁍𓁎𓁏𓁐𓁑𓁒𓁓𓁔𓁕𓁖𓁗𓁘𓁙𓁚𓁛𓁜𓁝𓁞𓁟𓁠𓁡𓁢𓁣𓁤𓁥𓁦𓁧𓁨𓁩𓁪𓁫𓁬𓁭𓁮𓁯𓁰𓁱𓁲𓁳𓁴𓁵
𓁶𓁷𓁸𓁹𓁺𓁻𓁼𓁽𓁾𓁿𓂀𓂁𓂂𓂃𓂄𓂅𓂆𓂇𓂈𓂉𓂊𓂋𓂌𓂍𓂎𓂏𓂐𓂑𓂒𓂓𓂔𓂕𓂖𓂗𓂘𓂙𓂚𓂛
Они встречают читателя лицом. читатель идёт им навстречу. Теперь понятно.
Чтоб читатель не обгонял их, чем проявлял бы неуважение, а шёл бы навстречу, чтоб встречал.

𓅱(𓏲 𓏱)

𓏱 is probably the very same arabic و, just as L & ل look the different ways. so is L not leg? or is it betn in the knee, and thus is

߀߁߂߃߄߅߆߇߈߉ߊߋߌߍߎߏߐߑߒߓߔߕߖߗߘߙߚߛߜߝߞߟߠߡߢߣߤߥߦߧ is n'ko and I don't buy that it is relative.
Because of EMS of ߋߛߜߡ which is from left to right m gb s e
m is triangular as mi, 三
upside down triangle is some gb, and it quite could be a form of m, some weird labial, mixed with k.
in their ingenious order it is round, sphere, circle first.
cube, box, square the second
M is the most complicated sound, by the eastern tradition females go last.
Дам пропускают вперёд, если в доме безопасней чем на улице.
Z is 7 because H is 8 and h used to go

I think I saw h written as something like these: or but I fed it to yandex pictures and google pictures, and they didn't find anything better than ᛟ, so I think I have seen those forms in dream or.. I search images better than google and yandex combined, and I found this image, and if you click it, it leads to protosinaic script, showing that this form is similar to the h of archaic greek, and yes it is h.

Then 9 is whether θ or و of the following y, the i.
Since I agree that they could transcend from octal to decimal. mal is better than kal as would be in the form of decal.


a meets de in that a is to and de is of.
Can I say that french is shorter version of english?
à mi-voix is At middle (of) voice but italian sotto voce is more common among englishmen.
in russian it's also a standard phrase: в пол голоса. Sotto voce is шёпотом, sotto is sub, под, ниже.
ниже is both descriptive and prescriptive.


Notice, that hieroglyphic 𓎚 stands for both voiced and voiceless h, but only recognized in voiceless form in both protocanaanite and archaic greek maybe too, according to the form of and how it could look in cursive.

That table claims that 𓃾 [kꜣw] (“oxen”, and how similar that kꜣw to cow)
They say that 𓃾 relates to 𒄞 (alpu) [GUD] bull, ox (so alpu or gud? alpu would related it directly to aleph) gud relates directly to govyad, govinda, cow.

I wonder what the other two are: 𓃾𓃿𓄀     

𓃾𓉏  go first and some of 𓆛𓆜𓆝𓆞𓆟 follow? Let's see if internets has anything about it. They don't.



Here, something related to Ϻ standing for S, Carian alphabets use the same forms greeks do, but apply them to sometimes completely different sounds:

𐊠𐊡𐊢𐊣𐊤𐊥𐊦𐊧𐊨𐊩𐊪𐊫𐊬𐊭𐊮𐊯𐊰𐊱𐊲𐊳𐊴𐊵𐊶𐊷𐊸𐊹𐊺𐊻𐊼𐊽𐊾𐊿𐋀𐋁𐋂𐋃𐋄𐋅𐋆𐋇𐋈𐋉𐋊𐋋𐋌𐋍𐋎𐋏𐋐

𐊣𐊫𐊺𐊼 of LOEK only can be arranged into abc (and even abcd) order if o plays the role of labial, which I doubt. 𐊺𐊫𐊼𐊣 as EOKL but I really, really doubt it, I doubt that that transliteration above is correct, but what do I know, I just must doubt everything, to be sharp.
I wonder why I didn't know about them before, that I do wonder.
And here some more: phrygian doesn't seem to have unicode bloc, so here it is in image:

and a couple of similar scripts from the region:
𐊀𐊁𐊂𐊃𐊄𐊅𐊆𐊇𐊈𐊉𐊊𐊋𐊌𐊍𐊎𐊏𐊐𐊑𐊒𐊓𐊔𐊕𐊖𐊗𐊘𐊙𐊚𐊛𐊜 (lycian)
𐤠𐤡𐤢𐤣𐤤𐤥𐤦𐤧𐤨𐤩𐤪𐤫𐤬𐤭𐤮𐤯𐤰𐤱𐤲𐤳𐤴𐤵𐤶𐤷𐤸𐤹𐤺𐤻𐤼𐤽𐤾𐤿 (lydian)

and there are so much more: anatolyan hieroglyphs that were used directly before alphabets appeared:
𔐀𔐁𔐂𔐃𔐄𔐅𔐆𔐇𔐈𔐉𔐊𔐋𔐌𔐍𔐎𔐏𔐐𔐑𔐒𔐓𔐔𔐕𔐖𔐗𔐘𔐙𔐚𔐛𔐜𔐝𔐞𔐟𔐠𔐡𔐢𔐣𔐤𔐥𔐦𔐧𔐨𔐩𔐪𔐫𔐬𔐭𔐮𔐯
𔐰𔐱𔐲𔐳𔐴𔐵𔐶𔐷𔐸𔐹𔐺𔐻𔐼𔐽𔐾𔐿𔑀𔑁𔑂𔑃𔑄𔑅𔑆𔑇𔑈𔑉𔑊𔑋𔑌𔑍𔑎𔑏𔑐𔑑𔑒𔑓𔑔𔑕𔑖𔑗𔑘𔑙𔑚𔑛𔑜𔑝𔑞
𔑟𔑠𔑡𔑢𔑣𔑤𔑥𔑦𔑧𔑨𔑩𔑪𔑫𔑬𔑭𔑮𔑯𔑰𔑱𔑲𔑳𔑴𔑵𔑶𔑷𔑸𔑹𔑺𔑻𔑼𔑽𔑾𔑿𔒀𔒁𔒂𔒃𔒄𔒅𔒆𔒇𔒈𔒉𔒊𔒋𔒌𔒍𔒎𔒏𔒐
𔒑𔒒𔒓𔒔𔒕𔒖𔒗𔒘𔒙𔒚𔒛𔒜𔒝𔒞𔒟𔒠𔒡𔒢𔒣𔒤𔒥𔒦𔒧𔒨𔒩𔒪𔒫𔒬𔒭𔒮𔒯𔒰𔒱𔒲𔒳𔒴𔒵𔒶𔒷𔒸𔒹𔒺𔒻𔒼𔒽𔒾𔒿𔓀𔓁𔓂𔓃𔓄𔓅𔓆𔓇𔓈𔓉𔓊
𔓋𔓌𔓍𔓎𔓏𔓐𔓑𔓒𔓓𔓔𔓕𔓖𔓗𔓘𔓙𔓚𔓛𔓜𔓝𔓞𔓟𔓠𔓡𔓢𔓣𔓤𔓥𔓦𔓧𔓨𔓩𔓪𔓫𔓬𔓭𔓮𔓯𔓰𔓱𔓲𔓳𔓴𔓵𔓶𔓷𔓸𔓹𔓺𔓻𔓼𔓽𔓾𔓿𔔀𔔁𔔂𔔃𔔄
𔔅𔔆𔔇𔔈𔔉𔔊𔔋𔔌𔔍𔔎𔔏𔔐𔔑𔔒𔔓𔔔𔔕𔔖𔔗𔔘𔔙𔔚𔔛𔔜𔔝𔔞𔔟𔔠𔔡𔔢𔔣𔔤𔔥𔔦𔔧𔔨𔔩𔔪𔔫𔔬𔔭𔔮𔔯𔔰𔔱𔔲𔔳𔔴𔔵𔔶𔔷𔔸𔔹𔔺𔔻𔔼𔔽𔔾
𔔿𔕀𔕁𔕂𔕃𔕄𔕅𔕆𔕇𔕈𔕉𔕊𔕋𔕌𔕍𔕎𔕏𔕐𔕑𔕒𔕓𔕔𔕕𔕖𔕗𔕘𔕙𔕚𔕛𔕜𔕝𔕞𔕟𔕠𔕡𔕢𔕣𔕤𔕥𔕦𔕧𔕨𔕩𔕪𔕫𔕬𔕭𔕮𔕯𔕰𔕱𔕲𔕳𔕴𔕵
𔕶𔕷𔕸𔕹𔕺𔕻𔕼𔕽𔕾𔕿𔖀𔖁𔖂𔖃𔖄𔖅𔖆𔖇𔖈𔖉𔖊𔖋𔖌𔖍𔖎𔖏𔖐𔖑𔖒𔖓𔖔𔖕𔖖𔖗𔖘𔖙𔖚𔖛𔖜𔖝𔖞𔖟𔖠𔖡𔖢𔖣𔖤𔖥𔖦𔖧𔖨𔖩𔖪𔖫𔖬𔖭𔖮𔖯𔖰𔖱𔖲𔖳𔖴𔖵𔖶𔖷𔖸𔖹𔖺
𔖻𔖼𔖽𔖾𔖿𔗀𔗁𔗂𔗃𔗄𔗅𔗆𔗇𔗈𔗉𔗊𔗋𔗌𔗍𔗎𔗏𔗐𔗑𔗒𔗓𔗔𔗕𔗖𔗗𔗘𔗙𔗚𔗛𔗜𔗝𔗞𔗟𔗠𔗡𔗢𔗣𔗤𔗥𔗦𔗧𔗨𔗩𔗪𔗫𔗬𔗭𔗮𔗯𔗰𔗱𔗲𔗳𔗴𔗵𔗶𔗷𔗸𔗹𔗺𔗻𔗼
𔗽𔗾𔗿𔘀𔘁𔘂𔘃𔘄𔘅𔘆𔘇𔘈𔘉𔘊𔘋𔘌𔘍𔘎𔘏𔘐𔘑𔘒𔘓𔘔𔘕𔘖𔘗𔘘𔘙𔘚𔘛𔘜𔘝𔘞𔘟𔘠𔘡𔘢𔘣𔘤𔘥𔘦𔘧𔘨𔘩𔘪𔘫𔘬𔘭𔘮𔘯𔘰𔘱𔘲𔘳𔘴𔘵𔘶𔘷𔘸𔘹𔘺𔘻𔘼
𔘽𔘾𔘿𔙀𔙁𔙂𔙃𔙄𔙅𔙆
As you can see the set begins similar to the way egyptian hieroglyphs go: 𔐀𔐁 and 𓀀𓀁
𓀀𓀁𓀂𓀃𓀄𓀅𓀆𓀇𓀈𓀉𓀊𓀋𓀌𓀍𓀎𓀏𓀐𓀑𓀒𓀓𓀔𓀕𓀖𓀗𓀘𓀙𓀚𓀛𓀜𓀝𓀞𓀟𓀠𓀡𓀢𓀣𓀤𓀥𓀦𓀧𓀨𓀩𓀪𓀫𓀬𓀭𓀮𓀯𓀰𓀱𓀲𓀳𓀴𓀵𓀶𓀷
𓀸𓀹𓀺𓀻𓀼𓀽𓀾𓀿𓁀𓁁𓁂𓁃𓁄𓁅𓁆𓁇𓁈𓁉𓁊𓁋𓁌𓁍𓁎𓁏𓁐𓁑𓁒𓁓𓁔𓁕𓁖𓁗𓁘𓁙𓁚𓁛𓁜𓁝𓁞𓁟𓁠𓁡𓁢𓁣𓁤𓁥𓁦𓁧𓁨𓁩𓁪𓁫𓁬𓁭𓁮𓁯𓁰𓁱𓁲𓁳𓁴𓁵
𓁶𓁷𓁸𓁹𓁺𓁻𓁼𓁽𓁾𓁿𓂀𓂁𓂂𓂃𓂄𓂅𓂆𓂇𓂈𓂉𓂊𓂋𓂌𓂍𓂎𓂏𓂐𓂑𓂒𓂓𓂔𓂕𓂖𓂗𓂘𓂙𓂚𓂛𓂜𓂝𓂞𓂟𓂠𓂡𓂢𓂣𓂤𓂥𓂦𓂧𓂨
𓂩𓂪𓂫𓂬𓂭𓂮𓂯𓂰𓂱𓂲𓂳𓂴𓂵𓂶𓂷𓂸𓂹𓂺𓂻𓂼𓂽𓂾𓂿𓃀𓃁𓃂𓃃𓃄𓃅𓃆𓃇𓃈𓃉𓃊𓃋𓃌𓃍𓃎𓃏𓃐𓃑𓃒𓃓𓃔𓃕𓃖𓃗𓃘𓃙𓃚𓃛
𓃜𓃝𓃞𓃟𓃠𓃡𓃢𓃣𓃤𓃥𓃦𓃧𓃨𓃩𓃪𓃫𓃬𓃭𓃮𓃯𓃰𓃱𓃲𓃳𓃴𓃵𓃶𓃷𓃸𓃹𓃺𓃻𓃼𓃽𓃾𓃿𓄀𓄁𓄂𓄃𓄄𓄅𓄆𓄇𓄈𓄉𓄊𓄋
𓄌𓄍𓄎𓄏𓄐𓄑𓄒𓄓𓄔𓄕𓄖𓄗𓄘𓄙𓄚𓄛𓄜𓄝𓄞𓄟𓄠𓄡𓄢𓄣𓄤𓄥𓄦𓄧𓄨𓄩𓄪𓄫𓄬𓄭𓄮𓄯𓄰𓄱𓄲𓄳𓄴𓄵𓄶𓄷𓄸𓄹𓄺𓄻𓄼𓄽𓄾
𓄿𓅀𓅁𓅂𓅃𓅄𓅅𓅆𓅇𓅈𓅉𓅊𓅋𓅌𓅍𓅎𓅏𓅐𓅑𓅒𓅓𓅔𓅕𓅖𓅗𓅘𓅙𓅚𓅛𓅜𓅝𓅞𓅟𓅠𓅡𓅢𓅣𓅤𓅥𓅦𓅧𓅨𓅩
𓅪𓅫𓅬𓅭𓅮𓅯𓅰𓅱𓅲𓅳𓅴𓅵𓅶𓅷𓅸𓅹𓅺𓅻𓅼𓅽𓅾𓅿𓆀𓆁𓆂𓆃𓆄𓆅𓆆𓆇𓆈𓆉𓆊𓆋𓆌𓆍𓆎𓆏𓆐𓆑𓆒𓆓𓆔𓆕𓆖𓆗𓆘𓆙
𓆚𓆛𓆜𓆝𓆞𓆟𓆠𓆡𓆢𓆣𓆤𓆥𓆦𓆧𓆨𓆩𓆪𓆫𓆬𓆭𓆮𓆯𓆰𓆱𓆲𓆳𓆴𓆵𓆶𓆷𓆸𓆹𓆺𓆻𓆼𓆽𓆾𓆿𓇀𓇁𓇂𓇃𓇄𓇅𓇆𓇇𓇈𓇉𓇊𓇋𓇌𓇍𓇎𓇏
𓇐𓇑𓇒𓇓𓇔𓇕𓇖𓇗𓇘𓇙𓇚𓇛𓇜𓇝𓇞𓇟𓇠𓇡𓇢𓇣𓇤𓇥𓇦𓇧𓇨𓇩𓇪𓇫𓇬𓇭𓇮𓇯𓇰𓇱𓇲𓇳𓇴𓇵𓇶𓇷𓇸𓇹𓇺𓇻𓇼𓇽𓇾𓇿𓈀𓈁𓈂𓈃𓈄𓈅𓈆𓈇𓈈𓈉𓈊𓈋
𓈌𓈍𓈎𓈏𓈐𓈑𓈒𓈓𓈔𓈕𓈖𓈗𓈘𓈙𓈚𓈛𓈜𓈝𓈞𓈟𓈠𓈡𓈢𓈣𓈤𓈥𓈦𓈧𓈨𓈩𓈪𓈫𓈬𓈭𓈮𓈯𓈰𓈱𓈲𓈳𓈴𓈵𓈶𓈷𓈸𓈹𓈺𓈻𓈼
𓈽𓈾𓈿𓉀𓉁𓉂𓉃𓉄𓉅𓉆𓉇𓉈𓉉𓉊𓉋𓉌𓉍𓉎𓉏𓉐𓉑𓉒𓉓𓉔𓉕𓉖𓉗𓉘𓉙𓉚𓉛𓉜𓉝𓉞𓉟𓉠𓉡𓉢𓉣𓉤𓉥𓉦𓉧𓉨𓉩𓉪𓉫𓉬𓉭𓉮𓉯𓉰𓉱
𓉲𓉳𓉴𓉵𓉶𓉷𓉸𓉹𓉺𓉻𓉼𓉽𓉾𓉿𓊀𓊁𓊂𓊃𓊄𓊅𓊆𓊇𓊈𓊉𓊊𓊋𓊌𓊍𓊎𓊏𓊐𓊑𓊒𓊓𓊔𓊕𓊖𓊗𓊘𓊙𓊚𓊛𓊜𓊝𓊞𓊟𓊠𓊡𓊢𓊣𓊤𓊥𓊦𓊧𓊨𓊩
𓊪𓊫𓊬𓊭𓊮𓊯𓊰𓊱𓊲𓊳𓊴𓊵𓊶𓊷𓊸𓊹𓊺𓊻𓊼𓊽𓊾𓊿𓋀𓋁𓋂𓋃𓋄𓋅𓋆𓋇𓋈𓋉𓋊𓋋𓋌𓋍𓋎𓋏𓋐𓋑𓋒𓋓𓋔𓋕𓋖𓋗𓋘𓋙𓋚𓋛𓋜𓋝𓋞𓋟𓋠
𓋡𓋢𓋣𓋤𓋥𓋦𓋧𓋨𓋩𓋪𓋫𓋬𓋭𓋮𓋯𓋰𓋱𓋲𓋳𓋴𓋵𓋶𓋷𓋸𓋹𓋺𓋻𓋼𓋽𓋾𓋿𓌀𓌁𓌂𓌃𓌄𓌅𓌆𓌇𓌈𓌉𓌊𓌋𓌌𓌍𓌎𓌏𓌐𓌑𓌒𓌓𓌔𓌕𓌖𓌗𓌘𓌙𓌚𓌛𓌜𓌝𓌞𓌟
𓌠𓌡𓌢𓌣𓌤𓌥𓌦𓌧𓌨𓌩𓌪𓌫𓌬𓌭𓌮𓌯𓌰𓌱𓌲𓌳𓌴𓌵𓌶𓌷𓌸𓌹𓌺𓌻𓌼𓌽𓌾𓌿𓍀𓍁𓍂𓍃𓍄𓍅𓍆𓍇𓍈𓍉𓍊𓍋𓍌𓍍𓍎𓍏𓍐𓍑𓍒𓍓𓍔𓍕𓍖𓍗𓍘𓍙
𓍚𓍛𓍜𓍝𓍞𓍟𓍠𓍡𓍢𓍣𓍤𓍥𓍦𓍧𓍨𓍩𓍪𓍫𓍬𓍭𓍮𓍯𓍰𓍱𓍲𓍳𓍴𓍵𓍶𓍷𓍸𓍹𓍺𓍻𓍼𓍽𓍾𓍿𓎀𓎁𓎂𓎃𓎄𓎅𓎆𓎇𓎈𓎉𓎊𓎋𓎌𓎍𓎎𓎏𓎐𓎑
𓎒𓎓𓎔𓎕𓎖𓎗𓎘𓎙𓎚𓎛𓎜𓎝𓎞𓎟𓎠𓎡𓎢𓎣𓎤𓎥𓎦𓎧𓎨𓎩𓎪𓎫𓎬𓎭𓎮𓎯𓎰𓎱𓎲𓎳𓎴𓎵𓎶𓎷𓎸𓎹𓎺𓎻𓎼𓎽𓎾𓎿𓏀𓏁𓏂𓏃𓏄𓏅𓏆𓏇𓏈𓏉𓏊𓏋𓏌
𓏍𓏎𓏏𓏐𓏑𓏒𓏓𓏔𓏕𓏖𓏗𓏘𓏙𓏚𓏛𓏜𓏝𓏞𓏟𓏠𓏡𓏢𓏣𓏤𓏥𓏦𓏧𓏨𓏩𓏪𓏫𓏬𓏭𓏮𓏯𓏰𓏱𓏲𓏳𓏴𓏵𓏶𓏷𓏸𓏹𓏺𓏻𓏼𓏽𓏾𓏿𓐀𓐁𓐂𓐃𓐄𓐅𓐆𓐇𓐈𓐉𓐊𓐋𓐌𓐍𓐎𓐏𓐐𓐑
𓐒𓐓𓐔𓐕𓐖𓐗𓐘𓐙𓐚𓐛𓐜𓐝𓐞𓐟𓐠𓐡𓐢𓐣𓐤𓐥𓐦𓐧𓐨𓐩𓐪𓐫𓐬𓐭𓐮
Probably, these sets influenced eachother in the moden time.
only 𔐀𔐁 both mean ego (I, я) and so does 𓀀, but not 𓀁 (which is ем)
𔐙 is translated as oculus into latin (eye in english), and 𓂋 is believed to be r, mouth. 𓂎 is the eye, ir.
https://unicode-table.com/en/14416/ gives translations to anatolian hieroglyphs and it seems they're accurate, but I will not collect them here, because it will be some monkey business, they are listed in some other books, and machines helping me making such dictionaries are necessary.
𔐈 amplecti обволакивать envelope.
𔐎 prae , logosyllabic pari (so they had some logosyllabic signs, just like egyptian, some related system, related to egyptian, and before that I only knew meroe alphabet, I wonder how many there can be, undiscovered by me, or maybe even by nobody)
𔐓 syllabic á
𔐞 syllabic tá (I read they spoke about it for this ta is the same ta in take, because that ta is take)
Transliteration of logograms is conventionally the term represented in Latin, in capital letters (e.g. PES for the logogram for "foot"). The syllabograms are transliterated, disambiguating homophonic signs analogously to cuneiform transliteration, e.g. ta=ta1, tá=ta2, and ta6 transliterate three distinct ways of representing phonemic /ta/.[10] Some of the homophonic signs have received further attention and new phonetic interpretation in recent years, e.g. tà has been argued to stand for /da/,[11] and á seems to have stood for /ʔa/ (distinct from /a/), representing the descendant of Proto-Indo-European */h₁/.[12] One of the latest confirmed discoveries pertaining to the decipherment of Anatolian Hieroglyphs is the re-interpretation of the signs ta4 and ta5 as <la/i> and <lá/í> respectively [13]
or maybe it was about the next one, or who knows what at all:
𔐫 capere , syllabic tà
𔐭 capere2.capere2 , syllabic ta-x?
𔐮 capere2
or this:
𔐬 syllabic tà
and the list of syllabics go on:
𔐤 syllabic na
𔐷 syllabic a+tá
𔐽 syllabic nì
𔐾 syllabic ká (is it some hand gestures?)
𔐿 infra, sub , syllabic ká

Omniglot did the job, and they recognize this script as Luwian:



and some ideograms, to show that it's not to envelope, but to embrace:



but the signs they use are sometimes different from the unicode forms.

Is it not latin, but actual luwian? no, it' latin. Is latin lydian? probably not.


Suddenly is a in a I U is just an article standing for 1, if a is only 1, then indeed this abundant concept appeared later than 1 and thus b was the first number, and 23.. what does this section remind me? 231.
and d ~ 1. not 4, but 1? as in 1 4 7 in ternary system could be next order each? But I didn't find any historic reference to ternary numeral system other than 太玄經's 𝌀
Or, before abcd, when it was only ᛆᛒᚦ, before ᛆ it was 21? hm.. and then so were ᚠᚴ and if it is so, then ᛚᛘᚿ is the next line with l standing for I (and MN being that.. 32 now? I'm confused, indeed)

Could 𓀀𓀁𓀂𓀃 be an actual order of them? like
I M (я ем, ja jm) or is it just fantasy..



What catches eye first is that I in egyptian is I, [i]



It also seems that 𓃾 was only a logogram and wasn't a phonetic symbol at all, so how can those researchers of protosinaic link these two heads? Because it is literally both are bull heads. Which could be a sacrelidge in the further east.

Мясоедство, говядоедство, было отправной точкой раскола между востоком и западом и востоком?

Граница между индией и пакистаном. И снова я лезу в политику, потому что языковые и культурные различия - это политическая тема.


𓄿𓅀𓅁𓅂𓅃𓅄𓅅𓅆𓅇𓅈𓅉𓅊𓅋𓅌𓅍𓅎𓅏
𓅐𓅑𓅒
𓅓𓅔𓅕𓅖𓅗𓅘𓅙𓅚𓅛𓅜𓅝𓅞𓅟𓅠𓅡𓅢𓅣𓅤𓅥𓅦𓅧𓅨𓅩𓅪𓅫𓅬𓅭𓅮𓅯𓅰
𓅱𓅲𓅳𓅴𓅵𓅶𓅷𓅸𓅹𓅺𓅻𓅼𓅽

are probably AMS, where S is inhaling between upper teeth and the inside of the lower lip, which imitates the sound of little bird the most, the best. and that sound could mutate into w. and ш too.
(I said about it before, I just felt like specifying the sound in case I didn't the last time)


Скрипи scream (с краем, with cry)
creak крик


Those birds I the video of which I posted before, I didn't manage to say that руки в боке, но птицы показывают, что бок на самом деле back, ноги снизу значит спереди? руки в боке значит заде. но ноги же из жопы растут. зад сядь seat sit.



A new piece on trinity:

Some of you probably know of Amon-Rah, and it gets to this:
In the Leiden hymns, Amun, Ptah, and Re are regarded as a trinity who are distinct gods but with unity in plurality.[13] "The three gods are one yet the Egyptian elsewhere insists on the separate identity of each of the three."[14] This unity in plurality is expressed in one text:    All gods are three: Amun, Re and Ptah, whom none equals. He who hides his name as Amun, he appears to the face as Re, his body is Ptah.
As you can notice, those names begin with vowel, labial and lingual.

Then again I don't know if it's cherry-picking or not, but the Amun's name itself is rather alphabetic:
𓇋𓏟𓈕 𓁩  (i-mn-n)
I don't know how to place the second hieroglyph above the third, so here it's in image:


and is our AMN AMS A MN Ϻ Amen Ауминь Аум Аумнй Ау мне!
And Reh (why Reh, it was Rah before, it is Jah before.
Я
I & eYe
И Икраткая(больше размером чем И)
как W is twice V but it could be double U and u looks like и

if Rah is Reh, then it is ר letter. The one reported (on the same level of one cool guy said) to be the first of all letters.
Meditating at ר this came:
четырёхчастность не только алфавита, но и гамм скорей всего тоже или их сразу было пять? сразу наверное была одна,

Только сегодня узнал, что goal это ворота, goalposts штанга.
goal as go all? ворота замка? officially it's of unknown origin, and if goal is ворота изначально, и лишь затем мяч в воротах, then I claim goal to be etymologized as go all. For this ai should

Эксперимент с искусственной маткой мог быть поставлен и на заре человечества: за счёт рабского труда, и может даже рабских трупов. Но столь затратный эксперимент (что кто-то силдит в матке, а другой огонь пддерживает хотя бы, даже если воду носить вдруг не надо, потому что ручей перекрыли. Школы могли быть культами поддержания жизни людях в шарах. Или могут быть. Нет, не должны:  людях требует в: в людях. почему? ях is ве?


аутист и артист одно и то же слово? аутист больше артист чем артист. более сложное слово, а отец очень простое слово.


en is и in some russian word, as if en is the correct (old) form of and. and is end and add. one or inoi

add is до-бавь добери
away is у-бавь убери

d = t = 𓏎 = +
w = n = 𓈕 = -

d = a = 𓄿
w = ш = 𓅱



And I stumbled across this ancient piece of linguistics:

From immediate finds is hiragana is named hiragana, because f and h is the same consonant in the syllabary. And some forms are whether colloquial, but hiragana ka immediately tells it's some artist's mistakes. Or if a native japanese wrote it, thatn they 're dialectal, and actual, but I think It's an example of how academic science can be wrong.

But it's still interesting, because it's also some other order: f goes before ka and after k m follows, which is weird. Especially, because the order A-Ka-Sa-Ta-Na is present, only as with the vowels (A I U is the common order and E & O placed differently, but if we include ogham into the consideration, we can see that only the order of A first, all the other vowel are after that is the universal order indeed. But by the division such as japanese is closer to alphabets than ogham to them tells how much secretive and закрытым был огам, но на счёт того, что это они сохранили изначальный порадок букв, тогда как остальные его растратили сомнительно, потому что бет лойс нон is the name of oghamic canon, but b l f s n it is today. Which may say that instead of 5 notes were only 3.
So it could be with vowels: a i u or a o e? o being two a is present in both ogham ᚐ ᚑ and runes ᛆᚮ, thus e could be the ᚒ which reminds E when it goes vertically, which it usually does.
+ as A again, ⰰ is more +like sometimes.
ᛝ would be great o in this context, but it's ng

Could ᚾ be ᚽ and thus ᚼ? no, too much of an assumption.

Some more images from the same book:




(where I found it (in all dead links, so I had to research the internet on the description to find it) it was called нагари или санскрит, but this page explicitly says Nagrou or Hanscret.

I found a better collection of the same book:
I list these pages here, because most of them seem legit, but probably only because I don't know them, and as much as japanese is off from time to time, so can the others be:

























I found them at http://planches.eu/planche.php?nom=ALPHABET&nr=1
and extracted them with https://www.toolsbug.com/images-downloader-online.php
among the other peculiarities that japanese table has is exactly the 50 signs (modern tables have 49) and -n is still among.. I wanted to say -wu gang, but there's no w- set, they have some additional n' instead.
a-  anomal
be- belittle
co- cooperate
de- debug
e- eliminate
f? for- forget
g? ge in dutch?
h?
i+- illegal, irreversible, impossible
k?
l?
m?
n?
o?
p?
q?
re- reconstruct
s?
t?
un- unknown; up- upregulate, but then we have to include downregulate, and that's too many letters.
v?
w?
x?
y?
z?


-a (latin plural and feminine?)
-b (latin verbal suffix of whether past or future or both, buduchi



If god is love, amat can be a great name for it. him. her. depends on what you love or who loves you or he, ams & amt are thus the same in this context. amt is matt мать mat, мяхкое, мятое, моет, может, умеет, имеем, материя, артерия, опять начинаешь! поэзия проза позор позеры бейцы бойцы бисы бесы басы боссы бусы базы бразы брезы борзы персы парсы фарсы персы мурсы морзы. морды мерзы морозные борозды строфы растафары фары стары я сам поэтом стал, смотри какая гадость




I usurp here everything I want to integrate, I delivered some images myself in the past, since then I rarely draw them myself, my art now is mostly rip-offs of pdf to png by https://pdf2png.com/ I don't know if such commercial buys off their product, I'm thankful and hope they are well. Just do your thing.


Only in 1st and 2nd conjugations does b appear in both past and future, it's more universal for past, for which b always appears, in all conjugations. I feel as if I show face when I say conjugations: like I сморщил морду и выставил язык прищурившись.

And they are here because I wanted to see how exactly does those future and past b's differ, to consider that b just be and before or after off there, of terra, and the difference is pretty obvious: in the past tense after b always a, and in the futurum it is anything but a, and literally anything: o, e, i, u, but not a.
and that site is a powerful tool, or it has some powerful tables, I take some more:


and some more from the same site:

ei thad for her dad makes me believe dad is related to father, and then father is θather. thather. but thatcher is the closest word to that. не тятя но тётя.
and it lead further into ik being I in the same line as M for the mother, and θ for the father also stands out of its place. F stands in that very line. so second line is father's line, third line is mother's line, and the first line is for Бабушка и Дедушка. но Жили Были первая строка, потому что there's no way father is 2 and mother is 3. Father is 1, Y. and Mother is 2, to raise what one man can carry, mom and nun. The third line is for тётки, тот, те, сей (но тоже третье лицо. Тогда почему Ik в третьей (ну хорошо, во второй) строке, а не among EFGHθ? Is H-line include both Ik and θ? father Ik, moms and nuns are they? and U is even after that, only some diplomacies and agencies had to invent and use U ?
Bы вообще в первой строке (которую добавили позже, оттеснив θ с первой строки) а ты похоже на те потому что не отличали второе лицо от третьего? Он сделает, кто сделает тот получить деньги. Милости проси. Будешь мил если сделаешь что-то. Я глупец, грубец, голубец, рубец, трупец тупец тухнец тупит мертвяк не отвечает на вопросы dumb~dead? is dumb deadinside?
me & те these words look exactly the same to the tinest detail, but first is english me and second is russian they [te] it's their t looking like m. is it a drop into the antonymity of pronouns? a gulp.





My idea that all first signs in consonants ar labial (and what is aouei is yet to figure out) is supported by that new transcription, that h is not h, but j would be sad disprove if it was straight out J playing like both h & j but the name of the letter is uath, which is combination with j gives юаθ youth? it would play along well with дети & child & qid.
there it had an addition of aicme named forfeda, which I only recognize as forfeða in icelandic, but ogham is irelandic, so what is with all these lands? forferda is scared (пропердевшийся?) в норвежском, but all my volk etymologie is in vain, because there's not only google translator, but also wiki (yeah I know both are to be used very cautiously) The forfeda (sing. forfid) are the "additional" letters of the Ogham alphabet, beyond the basic inventory of twenty signs. Their name derives from fid ("wood", a term also used for Ogham letters) and the prefix for- ("additional").[1][2][3] The most important of these are five forfeda which were arranged in their own aicme or class, and were invented in the Old Irish period, several centuries after the peak of Ogham usage. They appear to have represented sounds felt to be missing from the original alphabet, maybe é(o), ó(i), ú(i), p and ch.[clarification needed]

See, they're not forfathers, but some additional wood. So that is showing how you shouldn't trust blindly what you read on the internets, and I expose myself by sharing this draft. Everybody are wrong sometimes, so they all would be exposed as such frauds from time to time, and that could be the reason why there's no tradition of publishing drafts (of something which is naturally wasn't publishable enough, not to having come through the editorial process. But here you also can see how I correct myself from time to time, so some of my readers may implement this too.
When they say " five forfeda" they speak about the first five of the six, they are not divided into three sometimes, but into 5 and 1, I don't post it here, it's on the wiki/

were Irish vowels insufficient to the brits? because wiki could be much more correct: X could be just written across the staff to make the [x] which could happen to be mutated into k or who knows maybe eo sometimes. [oi] could be just o, the angular it had be because only straight lines are accepted so it seems, they're all straight. ui could be G, but that's a guess. others are too weird, I think those X & O could be some signs more often than the others and the others are so rare they'rs авторские, ненастоящие, они вообще все, вся форфеда неаутентичная. Я это чувствовал, а затем и в вики прочитал, может чувствовал потому что раньше читал и сформировал своё мнение на счёт форфеды тогда, а сегодня лишь помнил решение, понял решение, но процесс его получения напрочь из памясти стёр, так и надо. 


So at the top of it all, I imagine that vowels were only oglasovki, tochki, kotorye mogli vne stava raspologatsa (ne videl takogo, just predpolagayu) oh wow at last I began speaking english in latin. speaking russian in latin I did just before. ya two letters but some words are shorter, but all those are's and is's are slowing it up.
and left and right are so arbitrary, and only three letters were in one direction (because of beth-luis-nion.. why cannot I remember them, they're female names all in four letters: beth, luise, nino with reversed no? what is nion? are others names?)


I was told that those triangles of mine are modular arithmetic, and this is some awesome images you can find when look for modular arithmetic:



Here they connect those 231 gates too, at least visually.
How do they connect to aeiou? maybe chladni figures, maybe in no particular way, I have to play with voice and chladny waves.




I guess this day is over, my pictures are better than my text, it's time to sleep.


But I didn't and found some people comparing canadian aboriginal to devanagari:

where this image leads, they say Parent systems: Devanagari, Pitman shorthand
But because in cree script it is very much abugidaic, it is cree alphabet was before devanagari, civilization spread
and I looked for Pitman shorthead, and didn't find anything similar to Cree syllabics, but this shorthead is arranged in a similar four-corner ways, but I'm pretty sure it was arbitrary, by somebody not even knowing Cree Syllabics, let's compare them side by side:



As you can see, if somebody created one system base on the other they would base it on it more similarly, but here we have absolute chaos, no comparison. And yet, the best picutres of pitman shorthand:
I could only find consonants, but it will be enough to compare:

as you can see, almost nothing similar, only the  yay could compare, but that's not enough and as I said for devanagary: in Cree it's more systematic.
The only thing they could have (the missionaries) added from that pitman shorthand - is that some signs are doubled, which is not shown in the presentations of Cree I gave you in the previous volume.
But here is the missionaries' cree, what was his name.. James Evans, he could added those silly dashed forms:

See, replication crisis, kali yuga, babylon.

But that shorter star was considered more based: more close to the base:

Either way, let's start with learning them, and then we'll dig on further.


I see that ma and pa are similar quadrants, let's work with them:

Probably that was not the initial pattern, because why would vowels go in different order?
pa after ma, pi after mi, but then whether e or o goes the scuares (corners courts) disagree, and thus it is not as mnemonic as it could be.

k and n are also similar, but легко запомнить: н ничком, к колом (ничком лежит, колом стоит)


This is what I got when I grouped the lines by their vowels, and I got the direction to go clockwards.

I go to bed with the heretic idea that if that comparison of devanagari to cree is accurate (it's far fetched I think, but I will look further into them) then it's Cree which reached India to.. but where is the eskimoic evidence? ice melts, so no evidence. They don't live on eyes, they probably have some bones and leather at least. Why would they need these signs? What rich literature do they have? Why do I shill for them? I never met them. I just see a glorious uniqness of the system and I read that Cree knew script before christians, but mostly because of the pattern of christian behavious towards ingenious systems.             ...or maybe not. I was super tired and super stoned that night.



Next morning. New morning. Good morning everybody.

Another example of recent "invention" of a writing system:
Zanabazar's square script is a horizontal Mongolian square script (Mongolian: Хэвтээ Дөрвөлжин бичиг, Khevtee Dörvöljin bichig or Mongolian: Хэвтээ Дөрвөлжин Үсэг, Khevtee Dörvöljin Üseg),[1] an abugida developed by the monk and scholar Zanabazar to write Mongolian. It can also be used to write Tibetan and Sanskrit.[2][3]
 
Of course it can be used to write tibetan, because it is tibetan writing system, so if he invented anythig, it was not script, but font. Such is devanagari, but first compare to tibetan:



let's place them on the same plate:

Tibetan Buddhism, which preserves the Vajrayana teachings of eighth-century India, is practised in the countries of the Himalayan region, Mongolia, and Kalmykia.
tta ttha dda ddha nna and ta tha da dha na look so much alike, that they're fonts withing this font, different ways to write the same tibetan letters.

he maybe added a couple of letters, such as gha, you know you can trust these tables completely. I saw mistakes and ommissions on other charts, on those I knew, these I compare blindly. Why read me? I will publish what I find. these are my drafts, pretty dirty and rather raw.

In mongolian square script in tsa tsha dza you can see one raws repeating the other with some diacritics.

and another reason to say that that mongolian square script is more authentic than some 17th century novodel is comparison of it to brahmi, and I start with ba so much more basic in mongolian than nepelian:



But suddenly I notice, that that ba is pretty much the only sign that correlates directly, others are too much different. Va I also recognize, and sure enough it's also va in mongolan. And if that nagle doesn't matter, I thnk I can recoglize la, but others, not so much. Okay, ya, and again more similar in mongolian than in tibetan. But ma is more recognizable in tibetan than in mongolian. Don't mongols have cows? Or maybe that is cow's head drawn in profile, and in tibetan you can see it in semi-profile with one horn to your side, and only the tip of the other can be seen from the head. Brahmic pha can be recognized in mongolian, so there are probably more, and my such work we can reconstruct the initial set or can we not, I leave it here for some smarter heads.
Bha shows, that whether my set of tibetan is not complete, or that Zanabazar used some source related to tibetan, but not the tibetan I use here.



desuetude is the state of disuse. how and what grammatic processes took place here I wonder.



I sobras ebru
Я собрался умру, я обрался к евреям, я собираюсь познакомиться с ними поближе

язычник я зычник язык и голос едины уста

נָא (на) is please in hebrew. энд э вэри неприличный постфикс в русском.
but it could also be the imperative of give, на, take (if it was ha, it would be have)


ани роцэ лэдэбэр ам равви бэрусит на (или как на или бабакаша)
ладэбэр  говорить
мадэбэр говорит, говорю, говоришь
мадэбрим говорим. в русском и иврите один и тот же суффикс?  но русские его воспринимают как мы, а евреи как множественное число вообще. Т.е М это не только мы, но и много. Тогда почему в английском мы? заимствование. прикинь. duh.

тогда почему в русском мой меня? обратное заимствование?
а женский род множественного числа суффикс от, в русском делают и те тем и отлично от мы.
глагольные суффиксы имеют местоимённую природу. делаешь значить sie было ты. потому что сие подобно thee, and то подобно тем (им) суффикс множественного числа в чистом виде?

делаем = делай и me (so m is the personal pronoun? in
им значит много, баран им значит несколько баранов (их же несколько)
но к им есть однокоренное: ему у=1? у указательное. у = в = in =one?
ей тогда тоже её
их что за.. e = y? dirty a? were there only a and diacrited a? as only a is used in latin suffixes of the past, all the other vowels are exclusively (and seamingly without any structure, e o u i all over the place)
их это he задом наперёд (может такое тесное соседство повсеместно: им me, я I, you we, те эти, тот: вызваны малым количеством букв в тот период, но тогда мы можем посчитать эи буквы:
й а и м, у, t, e
5 vowels, m, t
(s is a variant of t as сии is closer than те (те is точка, finita, f n t)
abcdef
ghijklmn
opqrst
f & t
f = gh? then h ~ n
end = n&t? the end of the first half and the end of the second half
abcde
fghijklmn
opqrstuvwxyz

abcd
efgh
ijklmn
opqrst
uvwxys
& after z is a risky reminder of st, because to is and in japanese, d reflects t and da is used as and too.

opqrst
uvwxyz&
r ~ y? q ~ x? p~vw exactly. or is q reflecting w? both are probably ligatures with final v
but q is not labial. is q ligature of two hebrew letters? ו + כ = ק? then I say that hebrew influenced latin. Q for que еврей и вопрос тоже очень похожие слова, и то что они отвечают вопросом на вопрос меметично. Но на самом деле я говорю, что это общая система и люди изображали то, что когда-то имело пиктографическое значение.

о как рот? мы вроде решили, что буквы не показывают рта? но японо-китайское 一 also sounds as i, and mouth in their script is 口 (ko is co is very close to o, and it is рОт in russian, so when Alex kicks that man's rot it is both english and nadsat. what else rots regularly? rot)

So what if those й а и м, у, t, e show mouth? в Т язык упирается в нёбо (ирминсуль упирается в небо ветвями) М могло быть 𓈕 зажатым ртом. с фибрацией.
А is muscles stretched by the lower jaw maximally? Λ could be mustaches and - could be the lower lip, and if Λ is the mustaches, it reflects 🜂 standing for yang. ا is male, standing, 一 and 𓈕 are female, laying. (𓈕 in demotic is very much 一)

oh wow, wiki got demotic page improved! Some Vorziblix added it edited about five months ago.


L tells that their l can be directly related to both arabic ر & ل and latin l cursive.
M & P looking like S & C (if we reverse them, because look which way the animals look, it's right to left) make me question their transliterateion, like what if owl stand not for M, but for С as in Сова.
P~S M~C it is interesting. C as gamma (more m than g, maybe g is the the and amma is mama? Г~B again, strange, suddenly I notice this song turns on grace jones's song in my head, with all the intro and stuff and now it's pull up to the bumper baby when I began thinking of the intro, probably that song was my reintro, or I liked it when I reentered grace jones)

t definitely came out of demotic egyptian. It wasn't jews who inented the alphabet, it was their sworn enemies (sworn as with swords? зарубились) the egyptians.

Let's collect the letters, those who look alike and those who look like some other letters and then those who doesn't look like anything at all if there be such:



I wonder how all w, h, i can be written as a vertical lign, but then it doesn't confuse me much that I may look just like l, or it does.. and the w is vav, and the h can be seen as the opposition to n, as if some japanese has to do womething with that: like hai is yes and nai is no.. or is it way too fart-fetched, far-stretched?

Is egyptian ka the same far-eastern ki, I wonder.


lieutenant is read as leftenant. I wonder why.



смерть и старость когнаты? m & т are M & Т (in english and in russian, so it would make sense to mocpare russian and english words, and I will, but now I found something close to cognate in russian both times.

Сколь сильно языки меняют восприятие (как может и восприятие обусловленное генами породило тот или иной зяык (в зависимости от географических факторов во многом. Лингвистика настолько сырая наука, потому что она в идеале должна включать и генетику и географию, и это только на г, кто знает что ещё там нужно, теология, археология, сканеры глубоких слоёв не только пергамента, но и толщи земли.
Но не опасно ли пронзать землю частотами, если они влияют на живые организмы? Пущай живые организмы в решётках фарадея живут, это понятно (на самом деле не понятно)

I wrote further with a typo, probably as furter and gmail converted it into future, not further. Do they try to tell me that furthere is a fucked up (some obsolete) future.

Spheric bathes have advantages as is, and they go further, they allow us to dissolve the skeleton, if the biochemistry of skeleton contradicts the biochemistry of blood vessels: Aubrey told my by skype that calcium in arteries is a huge problem.

To join the brittish commonwealth. When technology allows all the russians speak english.

Сколь сильно языки меняют восприятие: испанское хабло вместо английского спик или немецкого спрахе п = пр? глсн лшн? похоже на русское хавло, что очень глубая форма слова рот.



This initial A does remind demotic 𓄿 and both print A and 𓄿 remind eachother too.
also the third letter is probably s, which reminds that 𓎚 which is recognized as some h, but we know that h could easily be ʃ which could both originate from 𓎚 and cause that |-like s in that manuscript.
So here I directly say, that latin cursive comes directly from the demotic script? Then why wasn't demotic script understood? Could it be understood by coptic priests who just didn't recognize its connection to the temple texts?
Here, let me mirror it for you, so that it would go left to right as we do,

As you can see, with the exception of the swash in the right top corner, it's almost exactly cursive a.
Or it's just linked to the following text not at the bottom, as we do it, but at the top.

I don't see b, to try to reconstruct how would egyptian alphabet look, but let's mirror it all, maybe so we'll see it:


Paradoxically, only now I notice that one of demotic forms of 𓇋 looks like y. so 𓇋 is both i & y.
It seems we see the vowels more than anything now, a, i, y, o, and e could come out of ie of 𓇋𓏱
By the way 𓏱 or 𓇋 looks either way when we compare 𓇋𓏱 to 𓇋𓇋𓏱 I may think that those example are taken sometimes form left-to-right, sometimes from right-to-left texts. I could be wrong, but it's a direction to study.

Let's look closer to the next vowel, o:

and I suppose that the first form is more distinct while the other two are just fasthand versions of it with a interswash connecting those wot halves directly reminding ᛃ or ᛜ,ᛝ

And in the further letter it is seen that whether european scripts parted ways with egyptian demotic before that second form came out of the first (as the comment on the original table tells) or that those two forms coexisted into the latest times (and that comment on the original table tells they were) Because in the first and more distinct form you can see m or maybe even μ:

(the first form is to the right, this is a mirrored image)

𓇋𓇋𓏱 doesn't surprise me after I know of y as ij.

I don't want to cherrypick, so I will look at them all, but don't I cherry-pick when I say that w is hebrew vav when I used latin just before? I hope not, because they're explicitly the same system, and I compare cursive gimel to c and cursive dalet to d and het to h and so on.

Demotic 𓃭 is l, this raises no question so far.



this letter is the least understood so far, but it's still in minority, and it is some weird local h's so in could be whether some ζ or ξ or ص or ط or who knows what else.

Some other signs are directly presented in the coptic, so it's not greek influenced coptic, but coptic influenced greek? Or did they influence one another? So that coptic influenced greed first, and then greek influenced coptic making in align in the alphabetic order.

Even if I move 𓄿 above the line, I still have more different signs than the similar ones, and the way I give myself liberties to interpret the other signs, it could all be rather apophenic. Either way (aopophenic or not) it is here to demonstrate how I work and how I explore the possibilities of probably connections. and sometimes this labour gives good fruit. I still don't know if this comparison is truly etymologic or merely mnemonic. Either way, I told you it's a draft.
But then I have to move 𓅓 above the line too, for I recognized it. And then it's even. 13 letters per group which makes me wonder if that guy used english latin alphabet to play out of here, but then no, he had so many diffeent h's english doesn't have. so let's try to arrange those signs into english latin alphabet's grid:

I did the best I could, I placed one of h's into c block, because of how demotic counterpart of it reminds russian cursive gimel, the г.
I also placed y at Y's position in greek alphabet and one of h's into the x position in case it's ξ.
I don't know if one of s's had to take the position of z, either way, they're not that far from it, so you can see it. Maybe one of d's deserve the positon of z, maybe one of h's deserve the position of j..
There's still too many t's and only one w and only one y for both u & y.
So probably this 26's-ness is just a coincidence.

That b of theirs, I think I know it's b without that j or what that snail could be and the demotic form of that hieroglyphic b is definitely a foot. or could book be of that form even then? I need some history of costume now.


On those inverted images or ooks like to. And it correlates with inverted ᛚ is ᛐ which is ᛏ and so because I draw such a fat line around both ᛚ and ᚱ, I consider ᚱ being some ligature of ᛚ with ᚲ for example. to is and in japanese, and и/или is very close.

or is a questioning form of to? I think it's my long-forgotten idea of inversion for questioning. But myabe not. It's whether in my first two notebooks or not at all.

pan is пьянь (фавн)

𓁲 is probably bes, the only one looking fool face.



Делает делают тот и те. ю~io~я~ё~e.

difference between та и те is ет и ют.
iot has ot (the hebrew suffix of plural)

deman an is en (plural)

lemon.

limen

lyom juicy sochny. i dunno..

lemon. lime. mile, meal,

вы мы ты
w m т
we mы the

ты это тот, а вы и мы это близко, но разное, ты же более грубое и дальше в серое. вы красное мы синее? откуда эти цвета? они случайны? у меня в алфавите первой идёт красная, но если язычные огонь, то они должны быть киаспым , гласные красные складно. языки пламени, н не потому ли а ~ д,,,?
но лучше д ~ а (дмитрий александрович так меня зовту)
в д is the first yin yang.
биньян? I dunno

b z
z & я are final letters and both stand at the same key.
both b&t?
bo th
bo te
BO TE
(нолики и крестики? мяхкие и тёплые? потому что те температура? were those scientific notions from the dawn of science not changed, and thus v = швидкость, speed.

Во ~ Тe as На/Дай.
aye. but I have to check is it's true:
На дай. Both Во и Те are semantically closer to На then to Дай.
На и Во делят форму ν & v (alphabets are arbitrary, and whose mysteria were more convincing, those alphabet they took. Different languages use the same alphabets, same language may use several alphabets through their history.

Thus those different reads of the same letters They're such ancient letter

I claim that the same forms having different readings are the ancient commons, c is from k to s to ch
How can n be both N & P? v is both N & V. V = N = П? Абсурд. V = Г = Λ. deal with it.
c as s is more common, thus k came out of s, and abc dictates that c before d and s before t.
m is both M & T (т is т in cursive, п is п in cursive) and it relates to Ϻ because s ~ t.
(I probably should have explained why, but I write about it before, I will combine these pages by topics anyway, so what's the point: Δ sounds as ð, ת sounds as θ. ams and amt, and probably so on.

if V = Г = Λ then П is closer to V than before. even though both are vowels. C is not vowel at all, but that's what, in the contrast of s being a form of t, c being a form of d contradicts and sounds here by a biggest resonance of all this work, it's as strong as m & n being t & p, even though p is 2 because of π which is not minuscule, but majuscule form of the same П in russian. (maybe because П & п are so alike) and actually it questions both the origin of those minuscule greek forms and the validity of the legend from linguists that greek minuscule appeared only in the medieval times, because I think they confuse us when we ask them with minuscule in general, there's something in minuscule they probably don't want us to see. like bd pq thing or f t thing or who knows what else.

I work from both ends: I want to dissolve all the long words into the words as short as possible, and at the same time I go from the otehr end (oder ende) from the letters, as short as can bee.

B boot D dlann=ladon, and in this l ~ d.
is l leg? do horse have four legs? or paws? or only soft are the paws. soft paws. horse has hooks hooves, and legs. I .. what doe it matter?  l is leg, long, lag, see the sequence of meanings? leg and lag don't have direct link, but via long they both connect to it. Thus long is the basic form, thus r ruki, l/n nogi/legy, lyahi, lyashki, лежки, leg'ki, leghki light? legky ляжки. это вроде было, но я же говорил, кружу ккак коршут. коршун.

каа и ква (но отбой каа выдуманное слово. может это хинди или санскрит? это же киплинг)

lingua is also leg, but it's an inside leg. lingum is also with in. lingua are all linguals and I wonder what w can be if not inside. though it's slavic bias, but I am slavic, I will naturally have this bias, so accept it as a norm and adjust for who how awesome those etymologies of mine will be to take the hypothetic past for the model.

lingua is not leg but long, l+ing (ling lang long like sing sang song)
sing sand was written by accident in the previous line, and it made me think of sing ~send.~gong ~going. ~saying~song thus sing is saying. or rather song is saying. singing is saying, sing is saying. thus s is say. not see? повествоваватние has so many v's , so if it matters, v is see.
d is do, b is be, M~W because мыть~wash





b большой (big)
d дорогой (dear)
r редкий (rare)
an this guess-fest makes me question if l is long, because even though in russian длиный l is present, I still wonder if dl is legit l.

k король (king)
k ключ (key)
q королева
q кто (que)

w вода (water)
w ветер (wind)

v ведьма (witch, vex)
v ведать (wit)


l love (любовь)
h Hate (Ненависть)
Jh hot (жар)

s small (мал)
мал и small are definitely one word, and that explains long длинный. d & s are l & m
t & s? (if l & m, maybe it's folded here?
tsrqp
lmno
l is 0.5 wide, m is 1.5 wide, they come together like mother and a child. элодим comes to my mind but I don't know hebrew


I heard yesterday that miyazaki draws on average one minute per month, that's 60 seconds per 30 days.
60mal system is 360=60*6 and 60=6*10, so they knew 10 even then.
60 seconds per 30 days is 2 seconds per day it's 48 to 50 frames, and that is hiragana-katakana.
But even then they (in anime) draw less frames per second, so they probably draw some key frames and then fill in if they feel like it. Which is a smart thing to do. 48 frames are 6 frames per an hour of standard 8-hour workday. one frame each 10 minutes.


Are children presented with teddybears to protect them when a real bear comes. So bears recognize their kind, but not their kin, and leave a child alone maybe, especially because they cling to those teddy bears as their own. It probably worked if this tradition survived. Kids also like deddybears, so it could survive even if it didn't work..


ch in chto is valid russian in both french and english readings of that digraph.
(но с другой стороны "пишеца что читаеца што"



Back to that b is for big & bolshoy thing.
good ~ goed ~ крут ~ хорош. how far are these initials allowed to deviate? as little as possible.
So I must find the perfect matches, like king~король и key~ключ, and then I build a map of all such pairs and I see te topic they all follow.



Yo is actually y'all:







I notice how r looks so much like i in this image and I wonder hor far it may go:
ijklmnopq
rstuvwxyz
hm.. interesting, let't see the other side:
abcdefghi
defghopqr
very interesting. first I thought of some צ aligning that line so that p mirrors f, but that a/d thing made me go hm.. d/g, interesting. e/h, very interesting, but the most of the pairs are clearly off. c/f as gamma and digamma could be interesting, and b/e as in that diagonal symmetry which led nowhere.
who knows, who knows, let's see where it grows.


> h is named ʌʃ in latin, which makes it similar to ש which stands where s does.
is h the אש ash? fire is higher or something of the kind. f is a form of h in japanese.
abcdefgh
are these four the four elements? b for water, d for terra, f for wind(fan) and h for fire.
And it would explain the order of 🜄🜃🜁🜂 by water and fire being first, and air and soil coming later.
Or was it earth and air first and water and fire only the further notions of those?
Yin & Yang as empty and full, no and yes?



a piece they asked me to write for Academia Letters, can be of some interest fro my own readers too:

The task I've placed before me is to disassemble words into morphemes and the morphemes into even shorter ones and to recognize those morphemes in other languages so I can assemble the words of those languages from the morphemes I know from my own so I can understand languages instead of memorizing them. Etymologically or merely mnemonically I don't care until some contradictions emerge. So I decide that chinese wo (I) is a singular form of english we, and that we is mirrored in russian as both мы and вы. Мы is mirrored back as me and Вы is an example of what I call antonymy of pronouns, when only several simple words are used as pronouns, but with different meaning, as if those were the names of the tribes and what was we for one tribe was you for the other, so german ich is их in russian, latin ego is его, and so on. And that very ego is probably to be disassembled into two or three smaller parts. Or maybe not.
A good place to start would be chinese, because their writing system conserved the language in the times when words were ultimately short: each hieroglyph is just one syllable. And thus we'll be able to write english in chinese hieroglyphs. Mama is obviously 媽媽 and I say that we can do so to every word, even though it's not the goal per se.
And at the same time, understanding that letters are probably the ultimate short parts, even shorter than those hieroglyphs, which can be disassebled into radicals, some of which are probably even related to the lettes we know, some of them can be found to be ligatures, as if 大 is ta or something, which is useful as a mnemonic tool even if it's not historically accurate, but then again truth is supposed to me the simplest path and thus these mnemonic techniques will eventually gravitate to the true etymologic lines.
And while I probably need some help from the ai to recognize all those pieces of those puzzles, I made some significant progress in that second route of recognizing what letters themselves are, and actually my project aeiou.ru being a travel log on all linguistic and extralinguistic topics is mostly about it, about the structures in alphabets (some of which are known to men and can be found in some obscurest treatices, others are probably unknown: so I found that alphabet is the repeating sequence of vowel, labial, linguals, vowel, labial, linguals, vowel (and here appears an universal exception of M replaced by J or K (which could stand for Jesus Kristos or could be some other initials, like Jah and Kronos, who knows, even priests of Apollo didn't know this structure, which was developed by the previous, matriarchal, society, which can be seen by the names of inventors: whether Io or Seshat. But then there's some other myth, where Odin invents runes, and being divided into three aettir they probably represent dice or the three elements, three mothers, three matters, three agregate states of it, which is just another evidence of runes being much more older than it's allowed to teach. If priests of Apollo knew those structures, they wouldn't mutilate the greek alphabet with the two additional vowels, as some myth tells, and myths have proven to be good historic sources on this prehistoric subject, even though it is a taboo, probably because the word myth has at least double meaning.
So, yes, some structures are known from some obscure literature; others, such as symmetry around the vowels where a comes on top, bc below it, def (with the vowel in the centre) further on and here the tetraktis structure (which could be the source of this symmetry) leaves place to something else, because further goes ghijk and lmnopqr so that this line winks that it's not a coincidence with l at the left end and r at the right. stuvw xyz and it appears to be the case in many other alphabets. Armenian doesn't follow any of those structures, but memoirs of his students show that it's only because he mutilated the previous armenian alphabet (yep, he didn't invent it, probably none of those christian missionaries did) which followed greek canon, with his own letters, which you can find by comparing armenian to greek side by side. So even though kabbalah teaches that each letter has its meanings, and Yoram Lemelman even made a dictionary after he recognized those meanings, I salute him (with a natie salute just to make him and y'all relax, stop reigning with fear, it's the worst form of rule, you can do better than that, of if you don't you're incompetent so you intimidate the competition, which is lame and you should know it) but I decide to make my findings independently so later I can compare what I found with what he already published. At first I even avoided reading what other people write about alphabets, it appears they don't know much anyway now when I read them I can tell. Even Diringer can mistake syllabary for an alphabet, but it's not about that.
Then ancient music theories can be of much help to reconstruct those structures, those five vowels the greek myth tells of could be the source of pentatonic scale and b t, the labials and linguals into which consonants are divided could be some primitive forms of bemol and diez (I know what they say about this stuff, that it's relatively recent, but then some recent stuff may happen to be reinvention or restoration of the older one, so you always should dig depper to find roman cursive ater you were taught that minuscule appeared only in the mideaval times (which could be true for the greek minuscule, but could also be not, who knows, they had so many dialects in there, so many languages used that writing system, that only yesterday have I learnt about the bactrian alphabet.


So that's it, and the funy part it's 999 words, 5666 characters, and I didn't even made it on purpose, and after I found that it's so, I edited it, and had to lose one simbol when corrected japanese for chinese, but then I found it when I corrected graduate to gravitate. So anyway, back to Bactrian, what a find!

here when the find began:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sho_(letter)
Ϸϸ, how could I be not knowing it!
and looking for it in unicode, can you believe that ϻ is a minuscule form of san, so that is literally the same letter M, only it's read completely differently. what on earth was going on there! if that greek letter had a minuscule form, it's completely false that minuscule is from medieval times.
Either way, Bactrian:

look at how a & d meet again in minuscule. and o too. hm..

It is some greek alphabet, and it is some minuscule as I can see, so their teachings are all false. Even though phonetic trapezium, which is named so, but only includes vowels, so I think, but then I remember of formants and probably not only vowels, no, but either way they all seem to be wrong by placing some 3-dimensional structures into 0-dimensional dots on their 2-dimensional scales

Either way, being strongly influenced by the bible, I feel like ending this volume after I mentioned those numbers, and the program lags again, see ya in vol.
 


-