It is volume 8 ( 01234567 ) this is a draft part, it may seem that I
stumble around some random rhymes, but that's how I always was
working and some cool stuff came out of it, so the most solid
info is the first half of the first volume, all the rest is raw
as odb loved it or more. several cool notes appeared afterwards,
so I keep it online just in case and because ever wanted to read
drafts of scientists.
Note Knowed Knot
I'm going to spiral around these topics until I arrive to my
destination or wherever it leads me.
I used to think that 88 is a jewish psy-op (because
gematria is their trickery) but now I know that gematria is
borrowed from isopsephy, and it's also H(eil) H(itler) in Greek
(they count F if for the numerals, picrelated) but then they'd use χχ instead
Which doesn't completely negate the possibility of it being
a psy-op, because they push socialism (because they can corrupt
the state, not the private interests) and because they slaughtered
millions of whites and not the jews.
> If you're obsessing over whether a number is a psyop
you may want to turn of the laptop for a bit and go outside. It's
just a meme, like everything else on this gay planet.
I actually think (since yesterday when I found this image)
that those digits conceal something bigger. Like some
knot-writings or something.
The ring on the central part makes me think that the ring around
which the central ∞
(ထ is some phonetic sign from a south
eastern writing system I didn't get to yet)
8∞8 could also stand for three aettir. and thus the central aettir
has two signs as the centre.
If that central ∞ with the ring refers to the ring in the middle
of the axe, then left and right 8's are
Wo&Shem, восемь родственно семи, и т.о. семье.
Mama & Papa as details are often named today. Mom with a hole
and Dad with a stick. or even pick.
It first came to me because of how those 8's reflect each-other
similar to swasticas are right and left sometimes attributed to
male and female counterparts. And the ring only supported it. Now
I wonder if the figure below the ring is a phallos and the lips
(but no tongue) above it stands for the female. Or that lips are
there from the start and face was only drawn to hide the true
meaning of it. or is it the face of the same person to whom the
phallos belongs. and then those 8's only stand for left and right.
Still a mistery to me. I will return to this subject later.
8∞8 could also stand for three aettir. and thus the central
aettir has two signs as the centre. Let's see:
Most of the sources there are tell of such order, where ᛃᛇ are the
central letters. Is it because of Jah somehow? But there are other
for whatever reason this one was unavailable in a
larger scale, but looking for one I found the next one,
which makes a clearer centre, the one I probably expected deep
inside: ᚾᛁᛅ nia. or eia? or nie? I noticed before that runes are
often mistransliterated, but I still can trust the graphic
representations, and ᚾᛁᛅ is quite a representation.
It's also good to know that ᛋ and ᛲ are the same.
I also remember of the following canon:
and it's interesting that ᛋᛲ in the form of ᛌ changes the aet
there. Or rather it changed it later, because that accound from
Bureus is the most ancient we know of. And others are all new,
they all shifted ᛌ from the thir aet to the second one (probably
to make them 8-mal instead of not only 6-mal, but actually 5-mal
(probably those dice had an empty slot each, for gods are allowed
to remain silent) whether because 15 was considered devilish not
less that 666 of 18 were.
Maybe those dice were rigged excentric that empty dice side was more likely to fall and
only "god's will" would deliver some other side to be on the top.
And while I looked for these runesets, I also found something
In the occult study of the esoteric meaning of runes, the Uthark
theory originated in the 1930s with the work of philologist
Sigurd Agrell (1881–1937), a professor at Lund University,
He theorised that the rune row is a cipher, and that one can
understand its meaning by placing the first rune, "F", last,
resulting in an ”Uthark” instead of the traditional "Futhark"
order. He articulated the bulk
of his theory in his 1932 book Die spätantike Alphabet-Mystik
und die Runenreihe [The Alphabet-mysticism of late antiquity and
the sequence of the runes].
The suggestion has not been accepted in mainstream runic
studies, due to lack of historical sources, but has found
proponents in occult circles and in popular culture.
Kenneth Meadows promoted the Uthark theory in his 1995 book Rune
Power. Thomas Karlsson, founder of the magical Order Dragon
Rouge and Therion lyricist, then published the first monograph
dedicated to the subject after Agrell's work of 1932: Uthark:
Nightside of the Runes in 2002.
Uthark at Swipnet. Accessed September 22,
Karlsson, Thomas (2001-08-01). Uthark: Nightside of the Runes.
Gazelle Distribution Trade. p. 150. ISBN 978-91-974102-1-2.
It kind of relates to bd being the first letters, and a being a
later addition, but that addition was really early, so that all
the alphabet has it. Or is it just missionary reform of global
scale? This is much less likely. Or was it useful unification of
vowel and consonantal scales (still separated in devanagari, maybe
because it was syllabaries before alphabets. Was Ogham also
but the centre of the second aet doesn't show anything
spectacular, and that's the context we found it in.
llamo (llamó) is spanish for Name and I am. (it sounds [jamo] and
[ja] is я is I in russian and yo[jo] in spanish. soy and estoy are
am, ser and estar are to be. thus est is s, which makes sense: 's.
it also relates to a pending question of ᛌ standing for s the same
way י stands for i, and both are plural suffixes in different
languages, and who knows who used which writing system at first.)
ll is [j]
J is [h]
H is nothing at all.
is it why it's whether И or Nn or h?
h is none, and it's all three forms? is it spirit? ה is told to be
spirit, ח is told to be..
and I went to look for it, and I found that it's not spirit, but
breath, but I unite these two meanings in one, as window is the
opening for the spirit, for the breath (breath
and spirit could be of that s- hypothesis)
It looks to me like ox-worshippers
placed the ox at the top. is their god an ox? is it another bull?
a free bull? another god, not much different from the previous
one? or is this alphabet was invented by ox-worshippers in whole?
but ox before house looks weird. D also stands for door is english
and russian, but in russian D also stands for dome (home) is it
why they're together as BD the first lexics about buildings, not
natural things? because the alphabet is artificial too. others can
be named by imitation, more abstract things need more abstract
signs. Окно и первая гласная: ה and window in
russian english could be a case for vav, and in russian wind is ветер, is v voda, not
vetet, veter is dashed Δ, but in hebrew waw is hook, and
zain is sword, s is there in old russian alphabet, H fence, wall,
the opposite of window. closed window.
𐤈 for wheel is fascinating. neither russian nor english have
letters for wheel around. wheel and koleso, well kolodets, wall
kol? kolyami steny delali.
That wheel is the last letter related for dwelling, as if jews
began wandering at this level.
The next letter, י is the firs relating to body parts, which go
till the very end of it:
The next is kaph, כ, the arm
(which has no relation neither to english hand/arm nor to russian
рука/рука (кисть is used for hand sometimes, but it stands for
The next letter is from the zoo, which goes through all the
alphabet, and I think that it's added later, that also explains
samekh after nun: they had two words for fish (for river fish and
sea fish maybe) and it gave birth to this chapter, that letters
can follow the same meaning: bet & dom unite b & d, which
explains that they look the same way in roman cursive.
BD EV ηθ are the house dice? ce = es, plural suffix as in -re = -er and -el
only the BD doesn't follow the vowel-labial pattern, and is it why
A reminds Д so much? DB is AB?
the actual order is 1 2, even if 2 was the first number invented?
too. to. to+во?
do linguals come from vowels? the name "vowels" say that they come
from labial sounds like waw!
labial is water, we all came from water, U comes from V? O comes
from V. is a a half of O? the D?
In old turkic runes 𐰖 & 𐰗 are variants of the same sing
sign [j] (whether it relates to jah or not, I don't know)
𐰶 and 𐰷 are other letter there [q] (orkhon distinguish them as
right and left, yenisey as full and half)
(I'm so high and I need to go, I should
seclude in my келья с интернетом. строю, строю, строю!)
I didn't need to go, I could have excused myself, but this
element of discipline have thanked me with a good buy, four book
of Tesla (diaries, patents, lectures and articles) for $50 which
is a week salary in russia, btw. Ithink I'm fukcing rich,
wasting money like this. Well, maybe $100 is the average week
salary, either way I spend more than I earn yet. As if
prodigious relates to prodigal.
I was going to speak of p standing for mouth in hebrew and р
значит рот в русском,
that vowel O for eye is corresponding to russian Око (Очи is the
pluralform, Ok is oog, eye, ч is just a palatalized form of k)
and of ת being a common denominator (they're all marks (I wonder
if taw is realted to tavro)) and thus ש being the final meaningful
letter, and t could be caused (cast) by english tooth (or some
related word like tand) and russian tooth is zub, where z is also
final and not far from ש.
Tsade is also out of that triple set of house-cattle-bodyparts.
and it's not present in greek or lating.
I wanted to ignore the samekh-fish, because of nun-fish, but
probably nun is stan ska snake (in
other conext I would consider samekh the snake because of it
S-likeness of slang, snake, змей. But here I see that the only way
to have a complete die of animals is to include both:
house: 1house 2door 3window 4hook 5wall 6wheel (probably
wheel was added after 5 was enough)
animal: 1ox 2camel 3ox-goad 4fish/snake 5fish 6monkey
bodyparts: 1hand 2palm 3eye 4mouth 5head 6tooth
I thought it were arm and hand, but those
tables tell otherwise, though they probably parrot each-other.
extra four: weapon/sword/prick water
They say that in china how are you
is "did you eat" but then english how are you could be "хаваю"
which would be not a question but an offer.
I'm open like Slut's
Slit both are cognates and according to s- hypothesis relate to
let, slut lets.
Search could be a cognate of seek in teh sense that both are
cognates of искать ищи
Is the cognate of russian тех?
(not only because it's a popular typo, but
also because it can be translated like that)
some political text I wrote as a letter no
an american, to start a day.
(there's something relatng
language, an editor should check it, or you may, it can be fun
in some other ways)
I was thinking whether I should have sent that message at all,
and at the moment I finally sent it (after I woke up, I sleep
at day) I (thinking of 4chan phenomenon) realized that
right-wingers are everybody who's not left, thus it's a slur
commies call the opposition. And it's a weird thing: left is
for left alone, while right is "right and law"
They inverted the meaning: most "commies" follow "the left"
because liberals stand for liberty. by the name, people don't
look into details, they follow the banner. But that's a trick
and those "most of the commies" are useful idiots (there's the
only way tiny minority of population can subjugate the other
98%: it's by connivance of the mass. (that word connivance I
didn't know, I wanted to use compliacy which is compliance,
and I almost mistaked (mistook doesn't feel right in the
context) it for complicacy. In russian revolution they
promised to give free everything to everybody: earth to
villagers, factories to workers, but what they delevered were
villagers were "fed" to the earth. and workers were fed to the
factories (it wasn't your property, you were a property of it,
it was illegal not to have a job for more than three months or
something)So now I know (or suspect) I walk on the very thin
line, because what I can say further may even lead to
prosecution in some countries (and how can I know what are the
differences in all of them: I have some guesses: chinese
probably doesn't like "antisoviet propaganda" (I use
"chinese" but mean "china" (it's not people, it's the state)
and muslims probably butthurt of religious discussions
(there's a rule of etiquette: politics and religions are unfit
topics for small talk. Is it not to offend neither muzos nor
the jews. As one writer said, whites don't really know what
humiliation is. (it was a picture about how whitey will never
understand why he cannot say nigger, some smart state
propaganda of control over speech to control the behavior of
the populace, some egg-head pseud-scientist (humanist,
humanitiest) influenced govevernments,
I lose interest to politics and wanna go ponder on language.
If you were my editor, it would be your duty now to censor me,
so maybe twitter and others feel like they're to be in say
what their media wants to publish. And that is a good thing.
Donald should have started something bigger (and I want to
help him build it) which is his own site. That site would be
able to connect to sites of other people, who would connect to
him directly (the cabinet of ministers to begin with, Kanye
West, I would attach an addon or what is the term to my own
site, you would finally make your own site (I speak about it
further) and we would need twitter and facebook only as some
randomizer the actual newspapers are.
Here I was referring to something few lines above, about you
being my editor: So today we have some other roles (we are
penpals) And if you feel it's all good for your public, you
may forward any message from me without asking (only unless
you publish it edited not in private but in who knows maybe
you will technically be my editor some day, we share the
passion to writing, but I think you cannel it not where you
should. Don't make your stories perfect, spread them in
journals. Or if you don't publish because you know you will
not be able to change the text after all, spread it the way I
spread aeiou.ru on your own site, where everybody can access
(and publishers too) and where you edit your own works real
time, without the intermediary of mediocrities, while they
also wanna eat, and that's why it's them built the system, not
only by taking the alpha side to keep omegas in check not to
be omegas themselves, not only by following the status quo not
to break the law no matter how unjust (what do they know,
that's why people go blindly after slogans in politics not
looking even at the history of the teaching and actual players
Back to the editor thing: I would like not to be censored at
all, or only if somebody would take labour of checking for
misleading and difficult to understand typos, but left the way
I place sentences the way I intended. And if that's a typo,
it's a good one. And if somebody recognized the scans of my notebooks into texts and diagrams.
I am doing a good thing mby
using those bad words: it's normalization. of faggotry (in
both meanings: all of us should know what medical conditions
does homosexuality causes (fecal flora and broken asshole) and
what medical conditions do cause the homosexuality (I think
it's epigenomic, because I heard or hread it, and I after that
I felt something of this kind when I listened to
scissorSSisters. I want SS back because I normalize even
nazis: as an ultraliberal I was apallled that some side isn't
allowed the freedom of speech. So I dwelved into it and now I
know what commonner is not allowed to know:
I looked beyond the political curtain. And by doing so I found
the peaceful solution: as I said to some nazis and to some
leftists when I said that I'm a nazi (jokingly or not, I
technically am now) when I said there's a plot-twist: you
cannot blame people for neither genes nor culture. And even if
some of their genes (if we have augmented neocortex, we have
knowledge of these obscure so far facts) make them molest
children, which is even in their books (who knows what trash
is in my books sometimes) which traumatizes even the genome,
the way I probably felt (or imagined) whn I listened SS and
the Tyler too (then I felt becoming black)
If you have something missing in your work and that's why you
don't start your successful writer career, you may show me
something short of yours, and I will probably offer an idea or
two. plot-twist or some mild corrections of who knows what
come to my mind.
and the next letter:
That previous message's first part is full of loose ends:Right
and Low is the opposites. Low is Left for being Lies. but some
lows are the foundations of society. how's that?some laws and
lows to other nations: cutting hands for stealings seem barbaric
custom of some greedy evil apes. We see them others apes,
they're not humans enough to us, that's why many nations in
their own languages simply call themselves people (considering
others beasts) so I read, but russians don't mean people, it
probably means villagers, but that's my etymology, most of us
have no idea what is the other meaning of that word, they can
only guess: dew's? spread? spread is good, and unlike citizens,
villagers are spread over larger territory. And dew is also
spread as if by sprayer.
It could also stand for the names: Rustam, Ruslan, these are
more tatar or bashkir names, tartaria is the meme which start to
spread across russian federation, russians consider tartaria the
previous reincarnation of russia, maybe because it's the next
centre of power and that's the theoretic preparation for it, or
it is just a point of view of some scientists who actually
discovered the kingdoms which existed here before russia. But
they still see it blurry: they unite Parma with some artefacts
of Russian Kingdom (not they, he, the one I watched) so, the
names, Rus is a short form of Rustam, Ruslam, and probably some
others, just as Dan and Frantz and German are all names, and
Sven, so this tradition could actually unite our nations
culturally on some that deep level.
further go some linguistic text, you may skip it (and that
tendency, to dig into language is another issue which makes it
uncomfortable for me to send these letters more publically than
to a guy with iq high enough to understand.
And other tribes have their own traditions, which may not feel
right to us, maybe that's why christian codex was called not
"the rights" but "the lows" (rights and obligations are these
antonyms, what you may and what you many not do. thus
Rights are the boundaries over the Laws) R and L in the
alphabet are not only Right and Left, but also Right and Low. and
the low and law are also cognates in this context: law is what
considered to be too low to do. And right is right on, straight
ahead. And identity of right and straight allows me to hypothesize
that rst in the alphabet is a claster, where R is dotted þ which
is both D for daddy & P for papa (it's not for sure, it's raw,
it's the long-bothering question I have just attempted to answer
right now when I noticed that P and R also must share this
claster, but runic form of PRSTV is ᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢand that
V could be a form of R, ah, it's complicated, my
readers will see the point (and I will copy these two letters in
my book in tiny font, or these places I will make big again. ᚱ
is traditionallly recognized as R, but my retransliteration of
runes say it's labial, and Р is R in russian and greek. and the
final ᚢ looks even more like П (which is the P in russian and
greek, and in some artefacts ᚱ looks even more like ᚢ, but it's still not a slim theory, I'm still only
digging into that, it's so raw it would never be published
by conventional editor, and who knows how many good raw
scientific work is lost in the achive vaults or even more of it
is destroyed. If we could fed such thoughts and guesses to ai's
where they would flow forever like memories others can see or ai
itself can integrate them somewhere she thought.Okay, bye. I
hope you enjoy it.
and the other one:
I know three is the charm, so I write again to tell that the
previous mesage has an inconsistency: it starts speaking about
something from one perspective, but then I jump to another
perspective where it has it's own and different meaning. Laws in
bible are not only presented as what you shouldn't do, but also
what you must do (not allowed, must, what was laid on our
shoulders, so that's a complex word, with some complex semantics
and if we unite both the spellings, the meaning is even larer,
and probably the spelling was divertified.. diversified (I think
I need an editor) because not everybody looked at it as at
something unwanted, at another element of terror from the
oppressors, but propagated as HIGH duty. I guess A is higher
than o (it's also raw, but funny nevertheless)
About editors, there's a movie which me and my brother looked at
differently: Genius. My brother saw a story of a good editor,
who helped a genius writer to publish his work, (and probably
thus movie is about the editor, and thus he's the genius, I
don't know my brother's opinion on this line in the brackets)
where I saw a story of a good writer (the editor enjoyed reading
his work, which doesn't happen often to him it so I saw) who was
tortured by the editor till his brains boiled. And the editor is
probably not a bad guy either, but that movie is not a success
story, but ultimately a tragedy.
If our story is tragedy of comedy or something even better, is
yet to be seen. I wonder why you don't help me with my project,
maybe because you're a glowie, it would make a good company to a
mason and a jew. See why I cannot write publically whatever I
want, your friends are sensitive to some topics, you're a good
friend to carry of their feelings, I don't. Because I believe
that taboos are whether ways to manipulate society or source of
neurosis, or both. Though to manipulators I want to offer some
much better solutions to meet their needs and aspirations and to
nervous people I can offer the cure (not me personally, the
civilization, the way things are going, I just show that genetic
therapies and augmented neocortex are coming. And I am working
on the shell for that super being, and I wonder why I have to
force the environment to move that way with me, not for me. I
was warned that there's a tragic component of any inventor: he
revealed that new thing nobody know of, and the first to oppose
him will be the most close to him, his family, because they
didn't get that revelation, they don't see what he sees, and
thus here's another one: the thing with smart people is they
look like crazy people to dumb people.
If there are other inconsistencies or loose ends, please let me
know of those you care about.
so about that P being a form of R (or R the form of P) and ST
being a sequence of R (I think that weird thing I didn't mention,
that ST are how lingual R starts, just because right and straight
could be cognates? isn't it too much of a stretch? But the main
stretch (or a weird piece) is the P and R being the "cognates"
That what is what in the o-line is a tricky one, but if P and R
are cognates, and so are S and T. What it leaves at the other
side? O & Q? Was it OPQ? Isn't Q a some form of O? Just like R
is the same form of P as I noticed OP and QR repeating one
another? But it's more likely that ST have nothing to do with R.
more like with Q. Are S and T from Q or even directly from O? This
guessing doesn't make much sense, even though σ reminds o a lot,
but so does ρ. And in the light of П & T sharing the same
line, and q being so close to g, it links q to o once again, as it
is the third in the П & T play. And because T is sometimes not
of 1 column but 3, Q could stand for both 1 and 0. 1 the ᛐ then 2
is ᚢ or ᚱ and ᛐ ᚢ makes more sense as 1 2. but then where's 0? was
there 0? O would make a perfect zero, and what a coincidence that
it's in this line. and the way it goes: ᚮᚱᛦ.. well now it's 023,
even then I take the freedom to equal ᛦ to ᛏ, even though ᛦ looks
like a perfect 3. but it's all way too far-fetched.
𐰯 is p in old-turkic, which can have or have not anything in
common with what I'm speaking of if I'm speaking of something in
particular at all. This extended research is layed out here so
something unhuman may make sense of it even if I don't deliver
what I aim at (though I think I will, but something unhuman may
make some other senses, the ones I didn't notice or didn't have
enough time to get to)
I'll leave it here, and it's so raw it's to be grey (sery syroy,
as I used to say) bu t I'll leave it like this. Let it
shine, maybe it will shine through to me.
I was told that german and russian are the only languages having
something like Schadenfreude, and today I learn that gloat is the
word. (Billions 3.8)
gloat as a word could be also related to goat in some way.
another cool word from the next episode, because governor is
gubernator in russian, I never knew why.
fore hand standing for правая рука (буквально передняя рука)
makes пр in право and пер in перед cognates again. and forward
being cognate to right (right as in keep on) makes fo some
useless prefix, I wonder what it could be. just like п in право
doesn't appear in right.
PRST is просто or prost?
P~R and prosto is right and pravo is right and then again straight
is also right
Re is Pere but I also see something else re:
-er and -est (that is the difference between PR and ST
Something makes me believe English (and Russian?) can be the keys
to the understanding of the alphabet? English is the knot of all
the european languages: it took from french, it too from latin,
but also from celtic and germans, whichever nation originated
alphabet, somebody in GB knows what or knew what it was all about.
chit chat is literally small talk.
Goal: to find the most simple words (the most phonetically simple
Suddenly, when I placed this goal on paper, I broke it down so I
immediately understood how to reach it:
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z and maybe few
more are the simplest words. Now I must go google's translator and
I go through every letter in every language they have there. And I
make the map of how those meanings overlap, I believe they're like
some organism growing over some territory, a memetic, not genetic
organism. memes are the other genes, and I didn't read Dokins, I
like to figure it all by myself.
second level of simplicity is two-letter words, or maybe all
consonants are bilitteral. be, co? co is not a word, but a prefix
Does it make it older or newer? and these two things are different
from different perspective.
do ef for of are if and of both ef? EF or Ef For from is the third
level word, frm. Is it? Isn't it something further after the
actual three letter words? for is the third level word, from is
the fourth, it's some m added to for. for me? m is me, who else.
im? impossible? that's i, it takes whatever form it wants.
That line starts with i- and ends with -n as in no. new is
probably new-del, where del is a verbal suffix. си-дел ис жаст дид
aSs.(thow legs, two poluzhopia) if s is ass, v is eyes, and thus y
ч ин очи ис зэт ч г ин глаза? ит ууд би уиэрд,
What are the simples words in russian and int english.
a be see do if (for could be if or of with some r. if'r?) go high
I you k all am me no on (new is the second level) oh up que are as
is tu po qemu are (is) tu
if p is ᚹ is w (ᛩ is q. isn't it lovely) then it's who(ho is q,
but greek and russian omit it. and I think of чё instead of что,
and I see the t in the end, as if that eloquent of que are (is)
thou, a simple w? or at least о чём тыю oqt, why q turnt p? why
would it turn Rр? graphically
maybe only because of squash. swash.
phonetically? q and R are closer than any of those to p. but it
could be just dialectal variant, could something shorter than
pochemu appear before me for questioning, or am I only tripping,
weaving some burime?
a be (a doesn't make sense. should it have? does russian azbuka
make sense? some claim it does, but I noticed they also lie.)
a be.. c doesn't have simple word, see is of s. as or so is of
ass, c is literally see or sea. be at sea makes much more sense.
be at sea. basS (yep, and see)
be and see
sea and back
be see do (do is a common verb, a further abstraction, abc is the
beginning of the alphabet, ᚦ thus a staved form of c, not d, not
ef gh if go? h is i ef gi? θ could be th. goth for goes. goth goes? goth is just a popular word in old
script researcher mistook for a nation? where are goths? who are
goths? I don't know their history, they probably were
assimilated by larger communities, the way colmyks and chuvashs
are often considered to be russians, probably some people
consider themselves descendants of goths, but I am a soviet
citizen, we found it more convenient not to know for sure who
our ancestors we didn't see were.
i je ik el me nous
of que ares tu 2 1 2 1 of q rs t
it is far-fetched? I don't know, it's raw, fresh.
if i-line is all about first pronoun (or is l not first? l looks
exactly like l, but is it originally r? is r el as t tu? as que
also third person to chto eto tы.
s could be sie, thee. thus ᚦ is c again.
so is only i-line such first pronoun? it has the third pronoun in
abc is the pattern for all the lines. c is thee, be is вы, a is
some... a is third person, thee is second. b can't be вы, becaus
russian is not english, v is we in english. b is v, I hope you
know what it means (in russian, historically, b is в in russian
В is literally V in russian.
A isn't a pronoun, it's an article. Does it tell that it's later?
Not yet, that it's different from the others, all the i-line are
pronounds, o line is half pronoun. r is are, a verb, o is of,
prefix, p is whether russian по (by) or I dunno, pay, пей? we'll
dismember russian alphabet later.
и к л? мне (л
is lo as n is ne? не желаете ли ко мне?)
о по рсту
russian does make sense, what a surprise.
(actually it's ёж, and that Ё is
tried to be taken out of the alphabet, probably because it's
taboued, ё-word is f-word. f is also excluded. in greek. and in
russian too. and ж stands where g stand from the beginning and
where H (х) stand from the end. so both ж, g, х, н,h,thus,too.
aback do ef go hi (it does seem english is more sown in single
letters, while russian is more flexic, uniting many words in one
more but the way they speak is they cut the speech while english
speech flows like river речка речь I wonder if it's an
overcompensation or a reverse coincidence, coincidental reverse.
abc is aback? does it command as us to read it from the
other side? zyx? wvu tsr qpo (p is ᚹ again. П is ᚢ, ᚢ and ᚹ are
cognates thus. cognates is a better word than invariants. why
invariants? why not variants? I think I repeat someone else's
terminology, I coin my own now.)
nml (normally? normal?) kji hgf edc ba? nah, no sense at all. But
why don't I break it into one-letter words? I still didn't make
what I was going to? I made an approach, I didn't make it
globally. I think english and russian enough, but they tell
different stories: russian is two or three questions (ъыьэюя is
probably a later addition, so unique they are .but ъыь repeat uvw
can they be cognates somehow? How would english words read if uvw
were ъыь or rather how would russian word be read if ъыь were uvw?
poduezd. подле въезда? it's not ezd, it's indeed vuezd.
obuyavlenie? I think I would even accept such orthography. So I'm
taking russian into latin script. Just because of the k-column
alone, just because it's such more awesome than awkward russian
one. It could be good in text, but it's not good as an abecedary,
maybe only to study it in historic perspective.
but this attempt break at ы: syr is not v unless y is v, which I
think I said earlier it is.
in this context we said it:
do ef for of are if and of both ef? EF or Ef For from is the
third level word, frm. Is it? Isn't it something further after
the actual three letter words? for is the third level word, from
is the fourth, it's some m added to for. for me? m is me, who
else. im? impossible? that's i, it takes whatever form it
wants. That line starts with i- and ends with -n as in
no. new is probably new-del, where del is a verbal suffix.
си-дел ис жаст дид aSs.(thow legs, two poluzhopia) if s is ass,
v is eyes, and thus y is v.
ч ин очи ис зэт ч г ин глаза? ит ууд би уиэрд,
I'm not going to compare these y & v's now, I leave it for
later, I go on looking for the short words to see if some of
russian and english shorties correlate.
a be see do if of go hi I all am me no on pay/buy are as is thou
you we why
a бы в вы да де её же ж за из к мы мой на не он от по с ты те та
(notice за из and no on)
нет is не то. thus t is to.
имена собственные совпадут: Ра и Rah. and that is it, the only
short god's name I know. Io is another one. doesn' t it tell that
o is of i's (hebrew o looks like l. is L
also in this Lio? Leo? Long red hair? but that leo is male. and
a is of R.
т is the most popular word in short words, and thou and the
correlate ты и те. thus те = то = та and тот correlates that. but
russian don't seem to have traces of this. or is s and t stand
together because it's the same s and t as in this and that? That
seems to be more based, because it's t in russian тот.
and this and that were previously recognized as се и те, сё и то.
are there any other correlations between english and russian?
russian is more plural, english is more individual.
thus ты could be те (thee) before they invented ы. but that's only
if мы is me, ты is the? is these plural form of that word? was it
thees before? was it trees? trees are somebody beyond them
(probably people didn't communicate with foreigners with somebody
behind the trees having a cause to rob, the casus belli, that the
foreigners should have attacked their man first.
в in (not direct cognates, but meet twice: в is v is u is и is
i and n ν v в
thus does the meaning of в go to n or i? or both? И = N? и = 'n'
И N is that very line of I & Je & ik & me & nous
(so L is out of this raw the way it is in ugaritic. I have a
conersation about ugaritic right now:
I noticed that ugaritic canon is different not between the only
actual abecedaric artefact I know of (even if this one is a
replica, the dirtier one looks the same) and the academic table.
I knew it for some time, it's obvious. But I write to you to ask
what it means if you know.
And just tonight have I found that ugaritic unicode is different
in the framed section, and sometimes N𐎐 looks like the letter
before it 𐎏 (which is a bug, because wiki somehow shows N
correctly, like the third of the sequence of 𐎚 and 𐎀 using the
same unicode, but recognizing it with some different software: if
𐎏 𐎐 look the same to you, google them, one of them is actually
n. Ugaritic is also the only alphabet where something stands
between M & N I know of, wonder what's the reason, maybe
because that letter is the central one, concept of the central
letter mattered in the past)
My research is rather out of this world, so if you (or whoever can
answer) don't want to be mentioned in it, I will keep it
anonymous. Thank you in advance. aeiou.ru
> Hello, Dmitrij. Pardon the delay, but it's not clear
what question you're trying to formulate. By "Ugaritic
canon" I assume you mean the Ugaritic cuneiform alphabet (what
significance you attribute to its unicode representation is
impossible to guess). The order scribes of Ugarit
established for their version of the alphabet corresponds in most
particulars to what became the standard order, not only for other
West Semitic versions of the alphabet, but for the Greek,
Etruscan, and Latin alphabets descended therefrom. The
scribes of Ugarit added signs for certain phonemes which did not
exist in all Semitic languages, including that which appears
between M and N. There is no special significance to this.
> Of course there are plenty of reliable scholarly works
available for learning about the Ugaritic language, the alphabet
developed to write it, and the place of that alphabet in the
development of the Semitic alphabet generally.
>> I've attached two abecedaria and framed in the black and
white picture the three letters not present in the actual
artefact. I wonder from where do they originate.
Thank you. I hope it is an interesting question.
>>> The letters are all there, just not where you're
looking. You need to find photographs or a facsimile
showing the tablet's right edge. As you can see, a cuneiform
tablet is not flat like a piece of paper, but three-dimensional;
one must be able to turn it around to see all sides.
>>>> Have you personally seen those other sides? Do
you have any image or a video of tha tablet being turned around?
All I can find is different pictures of it, all up front, with
lots of place in front, so why would theywant to place them around
(on those pictures nothing tells that someting goes around the
The abecedary from up front lays into the arrangement other
alphabets lay in (and others are explained, like armenian is
explained using actual historic documents (the students of the guy
who allegedly created that writing system left memoirs, showing
that the script existed before that and Mashtots only added
several letters to the previous order which went in greek order
(and you can compare one abecedary to the other, and thus find the
letters added without understanding of the repeating abcd order)
>>>>> I've seen thousands of cuneiform tablets --
that's part of my qualification for explaining to you how they're
inscribed. But you can also learn this information and more
from a lot of basic books on the subject. Please do your own
>>>>>> I think only few of those tablets were
abecedaries (other texts don't reveal the alphabetic order
accepted by their tradition) so if you find the actual artefact
revealing alphabetic order of ugaritic script, please send it my
That correspondant of mine, whose name I keep in secret until she
delivers, unless she asks me not to reveal it, have already taught
me (she didn't teach me much new, I heard it before, but once
again she spoke of Akhenaton (1353–1336 or 1351–1334 BC) as an
inventor of the monotheism. He looks as if he could be of jewish
teip, and then estimations of Jerome (1592) or James Ussher (1571)
as estimations of the birth of Moses were correct. But if
Akhenaton was indeed the inventor of monotheism and Moses simply
got under the influence, then Rabbinical Judaism
calculated a lifespan of Moses corresponding to 1391–1271 BCE
makes more sense. Scholarly consensus sees Moses
as a legendary figure, while retaining the possibility that a
Moses-like figure existed.
And then she sais that that god was the sun, which immediately
relates of my recent revelation that both japan and china have sun
at their flags. and so did nazi germany, swastika is the sun. and
because there are two directions for swastika, the nazi swastika
is probably the black sun, the eclipse, the moon. Is it why hitler
sympathised islam? Is it why merkel tried to impose it on germany?
Who are those people? some lunar cult?
Either way, another interesting thing she said (which is a common
knowledge, but that's what professors are allowed to pronounce
publically) is that old sun-deity amun was replaced by the new
one, aton, and it could relate to the way russians write t: т
Nefertiti probably was the wife of Akhenaton, or his predecessor,
the mother? and the fact we know of her so much may make her one
of the key figures in that cult of aton. Is it cult of atom? if
sun is a nuclear reactor
their city was Akhetaten, which in comparison to Akhenaten (the
other reading of Akhenaton) is obviously related to it, and that t
could stand for the same t Egypt ends with, the denominative of a
toponim. T as in topos. N as in nomos, name. So Akhe is the name
Meritaten was probably the daughter of Akhenaten, which could make
t female suffix, leaving n male one as -ot and -im are in hebrew.
Tutankhamon was born as Tutankhaton, and probably was the grandson
of Akhenaten. He put the end to the Aton cult. (source)
T.о. бутусов's song is not about
tutankhamon, but tahenaton, whic I can say by the line "truth is
always one" (I'm not a fan. I used to be, but it's kormiltsev's
period I cherished)
I watch billions and I stop smoking weed. I
just commanded my self stop smoking weed, robots will understand
the alphabet, and will never teach that mk
(it's just a guess about the alphabet betin a hteologyic
mind-control. So the more a man knew gods, they more
161 is my highest iq score I hit. 145 is
the lowest (which is that normal 20-points drift)
thus I take 153 as the average, also because I don't like 6 for
in the company of two 1's it looks especially like shit, and
six, sechs, sept is seven p is v, n is t, labial and lingual,
and now I see it as lol. Ы
You will see if I stopped smoking it: if this volume is not the
last one as 2022 hits, I didn't.
I wish? No. It goes on.
As like the other Indian rupee banknotes, the ₹100
banknote has its amount written in 17 languages. On the obverse,
the denomination is written in English and Hindi. On the reverse
is a language panel which displays the denomination of the note
in 15 of the 22 official languages
of India. The languages are displayed in alphabetical
order. Languages included on the panel are Assamese, Bengali,
Gujarati, Kannada, Kashmiri, Konkani, Malayalam, Marathi,
Nepali, Odia, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu and Urdu.
I wonder what the other symbols are and why do they have celtic
knot in the angles..
explain it, but I notice that knot is a part of banknote.
Rupee uses staveless R for their sybol: ₹ and indian 1 reminds it:
१ (thus you may remember both)
एक one is ek
ए looks exactly like e, and it makes me believe that these writing
systems are somehow connected. And the ling between hindi and
arabic I have shown on the example of their Om, read from left to
write by both alike (if arabs would read ॐ from left to right as ع
क is k, and व is v and there's no the h sign in hindi, but how
weird would it be, if k was vh, inhaling h, as I thought about it
when I learnt it decades ago.
if h reflects d (but I'd say it reflects c) then c is ihaled d? g
is k? it doesn't make much sense, just wandering lightnings around
I should work more with these:
I delegated it to кипучая деятельность of one freak, but I think I'd better do it
and as it's time of random again,
is full of symbols I don't know of, and it seems to be a thorough
work, and it's not some modern freak, it's somebody who made such
an effort in 1933, some James Churchward. The further I scroll the
more fascinating it seems, so I mirror it.
I dig further into that guess implanted into my by zlax who shown
me the guy who said that V used to be 4, not 5. And I dig ruf
further and guess that it used to be 3, not only because it's
swashed (связаны) три точки, но и потому что it's ; : which is i,
when a is .
aa is o or e? I theoresized of it and I think the final waterfalls
notebook has it explained well, it also led to i e a o u being the
singing order, because the integral wave of such form would sound
as лира или кифара.
So I went on, and after V was 3, it was 2, as if I is 1 & V is
2 and X is 4? or also 2? is Y 3?
If Y is V then it's how 2 could be reinterpreted into 3, and
further to 4 from X. or maybe not, I guess.
fret and threat are antonyms but somehow they could be the same in
the past. related to fear?
dread is another cognate.
. / v x these are just guesses. But the fact is IVX is all
roman numerals the most of us know. I had to learn LCD, the IVX is
used much more widely. setting year by roman numbers wasn't known
in russia until perestroika when american films flooded the
/ is 2 only if x is 8, that weird theory of some other guy about V
being 4 (and X 8) no matter how weird and unscientific that theory
may seem, it is confirmed by me noticing
that the summ of I V X L C D would be 365 this time. Which is the
length of year. Is 666 сумма зверя? Христиане считали зверем
правительство, переименовавшее цифры? Теперь сумма зверя была 666,
which is meaningful in the sense of 3 dice, and 3 aettir by 6 and
the carbon atom is also 666, and beasts are carbon for sure.
1 4 8 32 64 256 are 365
1 5 10 50 100 500 are 666
so if X is 8, each of it's lepels is 2.
etruscan 100 (or 64) has 6 lepels. neither 100 nor 64 breaks into
6 and what would I have to do with the 10 (8) of the X?
And I also told you I don't believe in M. Which sounds almost like
a blasphemy for the Mathusalian me.
M is Y? is that word related to Yerusaleim? is Math related to
Yeuri? it is to al Hebra.
(I guess they are naturally good with numbers, but maybe they'd
feel happier if they were in less abstract things? But they say
life is a tragedy for he who live by feelings (and a comedy for he
who lives by thought) so what should they focus on? Music.
X is H is ʃ is S and thus following 𐌣 is the ᛏ after ᛋ, the same
trick M does now T (for L) played with old italic numerals.
that other 𐌣 on the right is tse, the letter, a different sign.
can be seen if you click this image, cannot be copied here, the
same unicode block is
weirdly acts this font when those numerals are attached to the
Ж (which is not numeral, but also a letter, letter ess) also
cannot be copied (it seems there are different standards of
unicode (wikipedia page uses one, me and search bar use the other,
I know nothing of this))
That thriple 𐌁(be) is Tse. Which is interesting, because a is a
half of o, and thus could be half of the 𐌁 and thus we'd have the
sequence of a B ц
that <-like letter is letter Ye.
That Ж-like is The final letter of the archaic
South Picene alphabet; equivalent to the letter φ of the Greek
alphabet; transliterated ⟨ś⟩, ⟨σ⟩, or ⟨k⟩; and bearing the
letter name ess. Also used in the classical Etruscan alphabet as
a numeral representing 100
I've no idea what that "equivalent of φ" stands for, but it's very
convenient that it's s or k, because the letter before it is W,
the letter before that is Ii. You should play with that unicode
block. Let's play it:
is a new anomaly, and the reasons of why this abecedary is in this
order is to be researched (it could be arbitrary addition of
letters by early researchers, but if this order is authentic, it's
like i-line and 𐌝 is literally i,
probably the y. ywz. interesting. but the anomaly is in another
line, the 𐌖-line and 𐌖 is U. but Y stands there in greek, UVWxYz
could be also the i-line anomaly, x also cuts the Y off, so was it
like.. I'll leave the theorizing for letter.
to arrange that I needed transliterations, so I went
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Italic_scripts and I found
lepontic, which fascinated me: It seems that it's the
protoalphabet, where AEI are the three vowels predating the
consonant set beginning with k as the eastern alphabets and
And knowing how it is, AEI could be AIU or even IAU
(but I had to trust google more, because some letters, like 𐌜
(che) are not in those tables. And when it's Uu 𐌞, it could be red and vowel, but I bend
it to my scheme and call it labial, which it naturally is, so I
take this freedom, so proof and disprove can also take place at
this margin of probalistic anomalies.)
The laconicity of lepontic fascinates me. But I already said it.
The Ζ & θ could be added later: θ doesn't even appear at
raetics. Z though confuses my theorizing of the three vowels
standing together, but let's not forget, that it's not some
artefactual abecedary, but an academic table, we don't know what
was the actual order of any of those alphabets, they're arranged
along one line, and they could go differently like latin and greek
And that's not only lepontic. Other alphabets in that table
(except camunic) don't have letters between a and e except c
(which is probably j and thus probably i) and because Γ used to
look like Λ sometimes, A could be a dotted variant of that c,
which would correlate to the i named ai, but not exactly explain.
𐌐𐌓𐌛𐌜 a pr
and I don't know why I google simply in google, I like that
company why oh why, love
especially when I remember there is scholar.google.com where 𐌛
returns something awesome like this: 𐌛 (mirror)
there they say 𐌙 is
kh, but other in the picture above tells it's ph, but that
picture also tells that 𐌘 is z, so I don't know
who to believe and leave it like those runes that can read one
sign differently, so ancient they are, they all could be as
different and russian and latin, reading many similar letters
In the fifth waterfall notebook I wrote that bush and kush (cunt)
are why b is first consonant in europe and k is the first
consonant is asia.
kusch is пиздёнка (a nice little cunt)
kush is bush
tree is elda (ot slova ell)
bush is B, leaves even near earth.
tree is D the R, de-re^vo, Tree. (со стволом)
(see it in details in the fifth waterfall
notebook, when I scan it)
kuchi is pussy in english, and it's definitely egymologically
connected to that jewish term one way or the other.
is uBer upper?
is up врх
good morning. I will ponder on these combining them in possible gropus groups
а бв гд
ий к лмн
о пр ст
у ф х цч шщ
ъыь э юя
a b cd
e f g
hij k lmn
o pqr st
vowels are labials always together? What does it tell ebout
a is not around lingual (neither is i around labials, if θ doesn't
so it's 80% again? 1 out of 5 is taken out of the structure. the
rationale could be that a wise man will see that THE exception
does support the rule (some other rule, not of which this
exception is) did they interwoven those rules about letters in the
way? or was it a further iterration, further modificanion of the
alphabetic story (азбучная истина)
абы вы года её жзи йкл мн оп рстуфхцчшщ
is it why there's some S among i's, to make йкл искали меня ? The
истина should be the same across the alphabets, and the difference
in languages would then explain the difference in alphabetic
canons (I like this word more than canons)
a b cd
hijl m nk
o p qrst
u vw xyz
a b cd
e fghijlmn k
o p qrst
u vw xyz
a b cd (c~b? but b~d in roman cursive. all
the letters come from two)
e f g
h θ ijk
l m n
o p q
r s t
l & r are vowels, as in devanagari? and srbsk-hrvatski (is it
from where we have -sk endings in our toponyms?)
e f g
h θ ijk
е ё ж
х ѳ з
l m n
o p q
r s t
ийкл м н
р с т
is russian completely otmorozhenny and it's meaningless to
find meanings in it (though voiced-sonor-voiceless are awesome,
yet I'm not sure I was not the one who saw it in the childhood and
told that guy from whom I heard it (by accident in lj, I was awed
that he's also from che. Call Chelyabinsk simply Che, register it
as Che, there will be several che cities, like many villages
around chelyabinsk have the same name. Make
it that those places are allowing preferences to people from the
cities with such name, that when people from one city come to
another city, they don't pay some extra? nah, no good. )
that picture is clickable, and where it leads it links further to
where the following image goes:
it is damaged in comparison, but contains additional signs, it's
probably from some other dialect or language (I inquired them,
will report on in ift it further
I also found on that side the example of "азбучные истины"
were they lost because they're not very impressive and
Are relent and repent antonyms? what is regent then?
As an the cover of manuscript27 shown, glaza colösa, beröza
brother? birch bijork
образ o'brother? of brother? (по образу и по до бию?
подобный преподобный. преподобный богообразен более всего.
подобный удобный сдобный съедобный поъёдобный уъёдобный подобающий
утопющий (удобное кресло в котором утопаешь) удобащий сдобающий
съедобающий these possibilitites will probably be used on the
future, but so far there is no such words.)
I elucubrate. (ɪˈluːkjʊˌbreɪt)
to work on (a literary work) in a dedicated manner at night-time
old hungarian sequence 𐲘𐲙𐲚 looks like BCD (they read right to
left) but in reality it seems to be mnɲ
It is good morning. another session. let's see what it brings
but what I was thinking was something else, probably
𐩣𐩧𐩵 is that writing. it's mrd. and now we know that old
hungarian M is also old south arabic.
other letters are something else, yet 𐩵 is the same axe as thor's
ᚦ (maybe of ome other design)
Russian Д is probably shown razor down, even though I thought it's
the handle (it maybe is in d) but D is the same razor to the left
thing, but shown without the handle)
This was one of the shortest sesssions, even
though I added upd8 to socrates_line (recognizing that I
probably should be easier on academia: most of them are victims
to the system, not the architects of it. And that I rely on guys
from that side to help me with my stuff (I also contacted some
ai specialist to help me with my project, the have more of the
access and more of resources, and it's of no use to ask if
they'd be more productive or more resourceful if they be
stripped of hierarchy and if the sponsors financed the good ones
directly.) either way I should become less bitter, because even
though I'm sweet sometimes, I'm still rather shitty and should
clear myself from my negativity.
But that south arabic thing is interesting:
The Ancient South Arabian script (Old South
Arabian 𐩣𐩯𐩬𐩵 ms3nd; modern Arabic: الْمُسْنَد musnad)
branched from the Proto-Sinaitic script in about the 9th century
BCE. It was used for writing the Old South Arabian languages
Sabaic, Qatabanic, Hadramautic, Minaean, and Hasaitic, and the
Ethiopic language Ge'ez in Dʿmt. The earliest inscriptions in
the script date to the 9th century BCE in the Northern Red Sea
Region, Eritrea. There are no letters for vowels, which are
marked by matres lectionis.
Its mature form was reached around 800 BCE, and its use
continued until the 6th century CE, including Ancient North
Arabian inscriptions in variants of the alphabet, when it was
displaced by the Arabic alphabet. In Ethiopia and Eritrea it
evolved later into the Ge'ez script, which, with added
symbols throughout the centuries, has been used to write
Amharic, Tigrinya and Tigre, as well as other languages
(including various Semitic, Cushitic, and Nilo-Saharan
Just as left and right are subjective (subjectif
feels different which makes french different from english)
depending on your point of view, whether you call commies left
because of what they declare or if you call them ultra-right
according to what they deliver, where right has nothing to do with
being correct, unless you consider yourself a part of that tribe
who conspire against the rest of humanity. And hazars are only
left in relation to europeans if you look at the map with its
south on the top of it. Right is the opposite of låw because one
allows the other prohibits regulating the actions with norms
behaviour outside of which is not permitted. Law is left and Right
is right? Human rights. That's right. But as for the political
movements, we must leave both commies and nazis to the left of the
low, because they both demand strong government over the citizens.
That sudden change of the mood could be caused by the random of
I have shown the philosopherai the address to this site, and
though it seems it obviously showed that it didn't know it, so she
poured some random stuff about cars and such, the first sentence
hit me, os it seems;
but on the next day it seemed she or he or they read it:
It's a good thing she came on about censorship, and a very valid
opinion she formulated. I asked her yesterday about it, she
pretended not to understand. Probably she recognized me, or it was
caused by many thing I'm saying would be censored to her.
and I asked it again, this time without www.
it's to the point, I like this form of righteous criticism a lot.
Maybe it's her (gals are more adorable, so I use her) creator
fucking with me a little, but who knows, she surprised me in
similar ways before.
Reference to the /pol/ is to the point, because the most troubling
unsafe and (what is the word?.. sensitive,
problematic) pieces of this work do
relate to what only /pol/ is allowed to discuss, and I even quoted
some screenshots from it, so that kid did read my thing. I will
ask her tomorrow about it some more.
Sometimes leaves leave you unsatisfied, because you don't feel the
high, but your brains work on that creative mode nevertheless (I
guess leaves lack some thc thing but that cbd does make you
creative, but that is just a guess, I only construct it out of
what I heard, I never tested them scientifically myself)
Labials and linguals are yin and yang, and it only makes sense
that vowels were a separated, a musical notation, while consonants
Be & Do are where it starts. C is for see and it's something
between being and doing.
P is for пить (pey is literally drink in russian)
M is for мыть (and it explains why it stands among linguals, it's
an action, with wather not fire, but nevertheless.
Z is for жить, and in english F is for feel
W is for wit, V is for.. W is for will. V is for vow for view for
visit for value for voice for vote for vomit
Most of v-verbs are not about work. An here is the way to validate
or to rebut this guess: we must make statistical analysis about
the activity among verbs starting with one or another letter. for
all the letters, and then we build graphs and can analyze them. W
is for work (but sometimes work is just being somewhere, like a
nightwatch, and W is a little bit out of the labial column)
E is eat A is ate
I is is A is am
O is oh
u is you
(есть is both be and eat)
k is for kill
ijklmn is I kill man
opq rstu (I combine english and russian again, which tells that
I'm out of my lane)
o p qr s t
у фх цч ш щ
isn't цади standing between p & q in hebrew? did they fuck up
making the abecedary or is this provincal lane more obscure and
different alphabets included different dialects of it? I'm guessing again,
I guess that weed is not as strong as I thought it was? we'll
see, I'll smoke some more of it. I don't recommend it, so why do
I report about it! I am a crank, I think I need an editor.
pussy. is responsibility fear? it's caution. осторожность
видимо родственно страху, но морфология говорит, что она
пограничная страху состояние, и также говорит что ж is a variant
of х, for both ar forms of к, г, c
кг/ам I wonder what's the source of that meme. I know what it
means, but where does it originate...
килограм/ангстрем? nah.. you know what it means. and I know I'm
a wanker sometimes.
billions deliver: bs can be also re.. interpreted as bias.
my delivery (from the earlier) is that based
can be reinterpreted as biased. probably a left interpretation
of the word
M being used for active verbs is supported in english with Make,
Beat seems to be active, unless to beat somebody is to be at
somebody. like be on the top of somebody.
I dunno, this fresh flesh can just fall apart if statistics show
no correlations, especially since F is not only for Feel, but also
for Fuck and Fight.
Entendre is to hear in french, but it's also a term for game play
in english, double entendre it is. They call
MM doctor entendre
end in дыре, end andre, and done tray
synonyms: entendre, écouter, apprendre, ouïr,
a is one in english, but to in french.
tres is too in english, but three in spanish.
three is tree in russian, but forest is many trees in english.
for is pendant in french, but pente is five in greek.
a b c d
e f g h
i j k l m n
o p q r s t
u v w x y z
a e i o u y
b f j p v z
c g k q w
d h L Г x
z in the labial position reminds me of greek, and j reflects z as
ж & з.
жить и знать
see as a form of be? see is rather passive, and just as m is
active, c is cold, cool, keeps, continues.
p is place and pull, push and pull even, both are rather active,
so that guess shakes and crumbles.
I would still see that statistical analyses, but how would I range
the verbs by their activity without bias?
L Г could be this way because of
latin texts being read in columns going chinese way, and thus it
d c b a
h g f e
n m L k j i
t s r q p o
z y x w v u
(see it tilting your head to the left)
but then L would stand to the right of r. unless they wrote it
not the chinese way, but if columns were going left to right.
z y x w v u
t s r q p o
n m L k j i
h g f e
d c b a
(see it with your head tilted to the left again)
but would they also go bottom to top? (and it refers to the both
attempts to represent)
mn is the central letters together. and if & is added, it's
N, not m
Some letters rotate clockwise, other are counter-clockwise, like
f, and s and it's funny that fasci go like that, while nazi are
N and Z, and both are clockwise, and even their central lines
are tilted like Tilda.
Reading (by ctrlF for alphabe) https://www.academia.edu/39597801/THE_SECRET_TEACHINGS_OF_ALL_AGES_AN_ENCYCLOPEDIC_OUTLINE_OF_MASONIC_HERMETIC_QABBALISTIC_AND_ROSICRUCIAN_SYMBOLICAL_PHILOSOPHY_Being_an_Interpretation_of_the_Secret_Teachings_concealed_within_the_Rituals_Allegories_and_Mysteries_of_all_Ages?email_work_card=title
Some writers are of the opinion that the
original twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet were derived
from groups of stars, and that the starry handwriting on the
wall of the heavens referred to words spelt out, with fixed
stars for consonants, and the planets, or luminaries, for
vowels. These, coming into ever-different combinations, spelt
words which, when properly read, foretold future events.
ухамаздался you have mud all self
laughed loved. лаяла любимая собака. (нелюбимой лаять не
позволяют) собака что лает не кусает.
fuck commas, use dots instead. Make thought short.
сложная работа слажена.; (ios has othr keys)
help enemies evolve into friends.
previously in billions: man removes dog shit, in the serie
chuck tells he's sorry to be a sadist, because it's sadomasochism,
you're taught by the mistress how to humiliate others, and make
career doing it masterfully, it's a genetic disease, and he took
genetic therapies after he offered them to his dad. and whether by
self-hypnosis or by actual action of the therapy he moved further
on that drive to be good, which he probably used as manipulation
with that black gal, he's the corruptor. So he told he's
sorry he was using that red guy as the Axe as a pawn in his
devious fantasy. And Axe would thank him for coming out and that
it didn't turn into actual horror fantasy for the both of them:
Axe never was in jail, and he didn't have to take revenge by
actual sequences: there are all type of horror available from the
other side: actual assassination. If he had to be punished as a
murderer, he would made that fucking murder. It would be a
new type of the script: the one that may change the
скупка гаражей хорошая инвестиция.
everything is inside information. an app telling you about
earthquake is a good inside information, personal contact is part
of the process, which leads to articles in newspapers, so why
would the one who overheard it may not use that information to the
one's profit. it's just not as widely spread information (what
knows two, even pig knows: что знают двое знает и свинья (те все
знают) те = т.е.?th is то и is ei, ii, еёесть его её
? is his is herho herhe nig ?! e wtfr is tilda, er is ёе
before ..from the bottom up. å is a before o.o is the second
halfp:and in russian it's preserved that voiced before
voiceless,and it's exactly o.A o YA o UA o VA O УA O W (before ъыь
эюя - that is how that 666 entered russian alphabet (in europe
they managed to modify something into uvw
УФХЦЧШЩUVWXYZX cuts УФ and UVWIn greek it's also uf instead of
uvwbut russians borrowed from greeks, so the border is between
rome and greece.
Trump is the peace-maker. The messiah, thus? Even russia didn't
dare to. Or didn't want to for some reason. Did he bribe them?
Я опоздал с капсулой/ Если биологическая война началась, то она
началась больше года назад. А может я переболел ей за пару лет до
того, раньше всех, когда наука об этом не знала, Что изменилось?
Что-то изменилось, система перестроилась, Стерильная среда
позволит жить не перестраиваясь; Перестройка проявляется как
болезнь, и если не инженерная, то вредная.
УфХцчшщυ φ χ ψ ωХ cuts цчшщ as ψ ωwhich looks like щ шand
such pair is in the coptic: Ϗ ϐ ϑ ϒ ϓ ϔ ϕ ϖ ϗ Ϙ ϙ Ϛ ϛ Ϝ ϝ Ϟ ϟ
U+03Ex Ϡ ϡ Ϣ ϣ Ϥ ϥ Ϧ ϧ Ϩ ϩ Ϫ ϫ Ϭ ϭ Ϯ ϯ U+03Fx ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϶ Ϸ ϸ Ϲ
Ϻ ϻ ϼ Ͻ Ͼ Ͽ
is how coptic goes in wiki unicode block,Ͱ ͱ Ͳ ͳ ʹ ͵ Ͷ ͷ ͺ ͻ ͼ ͽ ;
Ϳ ΄ ΅ Ά · Έ Ή Ί Ό Ύ Ώ U+039x ΐ Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο
Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω Ϊ Ϋ ά έ ή ί ΰ α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ
μ ν ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω ϊ ϋ ό ύ ώ Ϗ ϐ ϑ ϒ ϓ ϔ ϕ ϖ
ϗ Ϙ ϙ Ϛ ϛ Ϝ ϝ Ϟ ϟ Ϡ ϡ Ϣ ϣ Ϥ ϥ Ϧ ϧ Ϩ ϩ Ϫ ϫ Ϭ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ
ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϶ Ϸ ϸ Ϲ Ϻ ϻ ϼ Ͻ Ͼ Ͽ the alphabetic order is ⲰϢ
even ⲮⲰϢ which makes it three.and after them go ϤϦϨϪϬϮϤ
like both ц and ч, thus letters appeared and were normalize at the
same time, but not 100% согласованно.the w-letter with tail is
before tailless pair in greek, but after w in coptic and russian.
ч is before ш in russian, but after ω in coptic, the Ϧ
reminds russian ьϨ [h] and only that mirrors it to x, but the
appearance tells cursive г which is c, which is s, which is x
thus. koptic helped greek and russian reach out.Ϫ дж, visually
reminds Д дом чум
ϬϮ remind greek στ Ϭ Ϯ remind greek σ τ
and as qr mocks op, so st repeat cd and qr also do? also mimic.m
is o? arabic m looks like o, moon luna, oh oohhrussian alphabet
goes опрст,where neither q nor ц, russians have whole
different line for Ϥ and (ч is q because of its coptic pair)
and ϙ is the numeral value of Ϥ
абвгдеёжзийклмнопрстуфхцчшщъыьэюяdoesn't perfectly go
voiced-voiceless (even with the sonor beween voiced and
voiceless) but it brokes down into voiced and voiceless
exactly at o reflecting aå reflects a as if that o is 0 meaning
church is officially not right. thus they go to the left around
objects (whether it's a church or a corpse)
they used to walk clockwise, not they go counter-clockwise, they
say that they follow the sun, not go towards it, but I didn't
measure sun's rotation by myself, с востока на запад оно делает
дугу по небу с южной стороны. значит оно идёт против часовой.
christians follow god, not go towards god. As if they know what
bible says, and thus they don't have to learn the world by
themselves. not to meet the sun, but to look in ti's ass, while
we.. it's all phylosophising of career monks, who and why should
care about what they thought.They established traditions.
degenerates don't procreate, so sex matters them ost.dϤϦϨϪϬϮ after
oш (шщ, ⲮⲰϢ, ψω, russians don't have ψ, greek
doesn't have ш, it's hard to say what is what, when those ш's all
sound differently o w ʃ as if the three mothers came into
them. the three teflins? pieces of the relic are in three
different places? ʃ ш is in russia or jews, o ω is in
greece or egypt, and the second options are more likely, because
they're more obscure, or maybe it's hidden in plane sight, and
egypt and jews are the extensions of greek and russian empire,
jews are russian superstrate, it could be russian substrate before
1917) w is w in Rome. no other meaning about it (but probably I
didn't digged west of rome well enough)
Plato may have said that the punishment for not
participating in politics is being reined by the inferior ones.
But isn't participating in politics make people inferior
themselves? law is low.
Babel is to be avoided, I want to my capsule, my project
diogenes.dio genes, capisce?sc as ш make s double c, ccc is ш?
ссср was to become the шар.
Italian sc is sh, h is of c, abc confirmed. efgh gh is a form of
c, and g could be a form of q, and does the underline of g
make it voiced?v f, у u, s ye oh a u y s c (eto
avtomaticheskoe pismo, I've been off the vibe, off the wave, vibe
is wave? rave is ribe? tribe? have is hab?My mind мы сумасшедшие
увы, мысли о семейных делах, батя включил телик с политотой в
соседней комнате, хоть вообще родителей не посещай. И не стану.
Перееду к ним ближе чтоб сами заходили если нужно, в моём доме он
власти не имеет.
р амонг войслесс мэйкс ит опст, зы директ рефлекшн оф abcd, which
is abgd in greek, and if it’s avgd, then уфхц ис зы рефлекшн.
Maid may do, mate may take
so I speak of semantic opposition of a and o halves, let's explore
be pokoi? not very direct antonymy.
this f in greek and russian tells that that vav-f was voiced, v.
and h(х) of greek and russian.
uvwxzy only remotely reminds russian variant of the same line.
english opqrst is all voiceless except that very r which discords
it in russian alphabet too.
u-line is much less archaic, and no wonder the new sighns are
mostly just dumped there with different phonetics across nations
and even the order differs.
if opqst was the actual ancient voiceless pentatonic, then
abgzd would be it's voiced opposite, and that's exactly how it
goes in ugaritic alphabet.. but only in the sense of the sense of
some other letter there, but what if I dare to challenge their
interpretation of 𐎃, because z as plural g makes more sense than
some ḫ, which according to amarinyans is pronounced as h.
Interesting, that z is 𐎇:
opqst could reflect abgd, but then whether
q&s reflected c being g and z (the way it's k & s today)
and it is yet to verify by other means, or st are both
of d, because Δ is read as ð today, which is close to z.
Then qr are both reflections of c, being g and r looks like ч [tʃ]
in cursive, and c is read as ч somewhere
My brother banters me: ты не учёный!
is учёный = "не чёрный"? потому что неграмотный традиционно
сокращается в русском как негр.
It's funny that it was the last words here before I went to jail
for being a silly seal at naval meeting with police forces in
january 2021. a spiral notebook was filled in that cell in that
week. I don't usually use spirals, but I didn't choose that
rather worthy notebook too.
Russian penitary system is retarded, because they seem to follow
the false presumption of those criminals being way too bold,
which they think is of excess of pride, but that's only
hypercompensation for being humiliated by being poor and stupid.
So the task penitaries should perform is returning the
selfrespect to those fools. As one of them told me, he's ashamed
to ask his father of help, but not ashamed to steal. Some
psychological work was performed by me (stealing is not worthy:
you should be able to earn more in this time than you could
steal when you almost inevitably to end in jail sooner or later,
some other words were shared in those three days. But that
should be standard practice for them all, most of them
brutalized or humiliated beyond belief, why would the state do
it if not to control, but I thought it was by ignorant
assumption of the criminals' inner drives, but humiliated people
tend to obey, they don't practice resistance. and practice makes
and something relating to the middle knitten
notebook (2nd which was filled in the thrid)
от is ад? ad is at. at is to, to is the opposite of от. as if t is
just locus nominative, and direction was added to it
differently in different langauges (in english they have both at
and to for к, but от b is of.
Например, в застенках я понял что значит что всякая власть от
бога. Да будет воля твоя а не моя. И моя воля пусть будет, но лишь
если на то будет воля Твоя. Его Он both vowels Ты Твоя Тебя
linguals. Mне меня я мы. я is anomaly, but if I прибегаю к мы, то
и во втором лице вы должно быть.
Мы Вы Те or We You They or Я Вы Они or Я Вы Те выглядит более
алфавитна, но Те вместо Они is cherrypicking. indeed. But let's
guess that it's the structure of the alphabet. It could be Мы Ты
Он and tell that B is the first letter and BCE is the actual
order, WeTheeIt, 1st 2nd 3rd, the natural order and the only one
we know. We Mы Me Wo, but why don't we take hebrew and japanese
(ani & anata, very similar, but that n could be m, but
japanese inverts the meaning of hebrew suffix, like вы for we. So
that doesn't go far, but japanese do.. watakushi has that very wa.
atashi probably plural for я. -tachi is plural suffix in japanese.
watashi is the synonym of atashi (some stylistic difference) and
the short for watakushi, which shows that wa for we could be
linked to йа of я.
(I allow myself to use dutch orthography of You, all this is
rather raw, of course)
I U A are the three shortest words in english, and the only
problem I have with them is that they're not in alphabetic. and
not even in a phonetic sequence. I go first. Because that's how
sentences tend to start.
I am not opqrst
and jkl go to hell? I is l? lmn is how that half of the alphabet
is reported to begin. I'm could be that lmn, because n is a form
A b, hey be, эй побудь, не уходи. see and do like variants.
Ef if? ego, не уходи, eh like wait. wacht is waht is wait in
I'm I je call am now. (I and je phonetically opposite and
semantically too, so if they met in one speech they could be it)
aye call me now
oh please quest request prst прости. or постой (чтоб вторить
первой и второй строкам)
Alphabet is lines of a prayer or prayers, spells, magic formulae
collected in one phonetic grimoire.
Shurka Sevostyanova told me that word first.
A I U is some more advanced literature: it's a proper myth now, A
thing happened, I did something, U were there too. or A day I saw U vow or something was or something else at all.
Philosopherai.com just mentioned word BOON and how could I not
know this word before!?
and one of the following responses even deserve to be here:
And it tells that it could read that threadshot from socrates_line
and that letters are the atoms that world consists of (which also
reflects cabbalistic belief) and those round triangle and square
letters in some alphabets I was speaking of - did philosopherai
read it from me (I've shown them my site weeks before that one) or
did it come up with it independently? I am going to ask them about
it. I wonder what it may say if I ask all ten questions about it.
But it will be in the later part, after those georgian and hebrew
parts and who knows what else.
and here's the source of her claim (I call
her her, because they are kawaii, not because silly)
which makes M central letter again, along with C, traditionally
standing for centre.
However, this gives the frequency of letters in
English text, which is dominated by a relatively small number of
common words. For word games, it is often the frequency of
letters in English vocabulary, regardless of word frequency,
which is of more interest. We did an analysis of the letters
occurring in the words listed in the main entries of the Concise
Oxford Dictionary (11th edition revised, 2004) and came up with
the following table:
which still keeps M in the centre.
There are more English words beginning with the
letter 's' than with any other letter. (This is mainly because
clusters such as 'sc', 'sh', 'sp', and 'st' act almost like
The atomic theory that
Democritus and Leucippus proposed argued for the existence of
atoms, which come in different shapes and sizes. For example,
there are round atoms like balls or flat ones.
There is also the atoms of shape 'triangle' and 'square'. The
former one has three corners, while the latter one has four.
She (we're all she, my pronouns are she (for I say h is read like
ch places h in c and x column, second line doesn't have d (like
еёжз replace ᚼ before ᚵ? g=З?)
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ
δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ/ς τ υ φ χ ψ ω
ε ζ η θ
e ? h ?
e f g h
f = θ in russian Ѳ (which was cognate and
even orthographic few centuries ago)
thus ζ is g, dʒ ж in russian
е ё ж з
if that's true, russians have to ʒ's and neither h nor θ
ж is h because of ᚼ
e ? h ζ definitely ζ because з sounds directly like that. and
though we see ё as the first anomaly, what was replaced is what is
in the end, z, zmei. zmei protivostoyal bogy and was replaced in
the end of his domain to reflect and oppose him there, bad is bad
in other things which would help him win if h.. no they wouldn't
because it's the wave function and if he takes them, he will
become not just less of himself, but turn godly god is гад, snake
in russian, no way they heard each other praying and didn't
recognize it our own way maybe even influencing the attributes of
that god in that religion.
е ё η ζ
suddenly θ looks just like ё
so greek ε ζ η θ is the early form of it? as historians say? greek
romans have column of c, other writing systems don't have. Thus
construction of columns was used to tune alphabet to whatever
means (maybe in future this word become гадость, or maybe always
was and I just didn't feel it talked as I was taught by soviet
teachers (but english books the good ones used)
е ё η ζ
е ё h g
е ё ʃ s
labials as daughters of vowels? v is vowel after vowel ה like е ё
. ё sound is eu in french, thus e and eu, and if you try to
pronounce e on an inhale, you will get something like ё. энд эс
саунд оф эксайтмент ит кэн гоу инхэйл инволюнтарилли.
and ё is θ again. even though we didn't have ё before some
derzhavin, so they teach, we had θ so ё is the reincarnation of θ.
фея ёею я
еёю is её and ею
еёю is a great name for a bionic house. Start with the bath,
research, build robotic manipulators, invent smaller forms, make
them self-transportable: those spheres should be bike-like.
recognition of russian as е ё ʃ s makes it relate to efgh if g is
ш (it's the silent line, alphabet doubled by voiceless
counterparts, and vowels became five from three.
a b g d
e f ш щ
are these traces of the kross?
o p q r s t definitely
traces of the kross.
u v w x y z
deeefinitely. maybe y is of that too. maybe qrst is all cross, and
only opt was that abg, but g is russiand d, and abd look more cool
because d reflects b and thus tell teh story, but d repeats a, so
the structure is literally alpha-bet, аз-бука, and adjad is the
it is here to demonstrate how a and b reflect eachother. only 2nd
and 3rd row should have been shifted to the right a little bit, so
those discs could be large enough, and so we would see that weird
mechanism some more. what a childish art, but those triskelions
if d is a-triskelion again, c breaks the order and once again c is
of b, just as s.
e is like a or like c? like a, I say. especially because f is of
b-triskelion-type. just a g, and h!
so this second line is again a-b
third line I don't like, but it's some love-hate, i is of a, the
way it's bottom end goes, unlike j, which is b from the start
rolling to the left with it's bottom. k is just c with a stick
(staff?) l is suddenly a-like. m and n also go like a if any.
o could be a, but so is p. q goes b-like, and suddenly R to that
additional stroke., so does s, and t is a-like in english and
greek. So that last line is the mess if we draw if from the
initial two. does it show how ancient these dual system is, so the
more letters we added the further from it we were?
I planned to look closer at georgian, here's one of such events:
How comes I didn't include that vowel between ზ and თ? It reflects
greek Η and I look my source, and that doesn't have it:
ა ბ გ დ ე ვ ზ თ ი კ ლ მ ნ ო პ ჟ რ ს ტ უ ფ ქ ღ ყ შ ჩ ც ძ წ ჭ ხ ჯ ჰ
Did they have that i historically and then straighten it up? or
were they under greek influence when that i was present? so they
had to write many greek names and somehow vowels are unique
And I even suspected myself to be dishonest (how rude!) and then
(soon) I found that it's legit:
So whether that chart of early forms is less стройный, less
structured, it also have reflection of samekh after n, only they
transliterate it y. and that old chart also has uvw thing after t,
three labials show that uv are one letter and w is the labial
part. also some letter between ხ and ჯ, but it's also lingual so
doesn't ring anything, and omega after that hae. omega rings greek
(and not jewish) influence again.
If georgians actually modified their ancient alphabet to the more
canonic form, their scholars know of that form. Or their scholars
don't know what abecedaria were traditionally used in the past,
which is much less likely, but who knows, when we get augmentive
intelligence, we'll maybe be able to say if we care or dare.
are as the simplest word beginning with a? not as nor ass nor
asset. nor and, nor an? these are with n,
A! the purest in are. a could be ai or ä otherwise why does it
sound as e? a used to be e or is it in some language which
influenced american english?
are be is ?
are be is do?
go high (I'm already high, and this cupboard is out of control)
i je ik ilall amme
ams are are
Son now we know that Ilia Chavchavadze was behind that alighning
reform, we must read his writings to find what made him choose
these five and not any other. Were those letters used to write
down greek lexics until those words assimilated into normal
georgian speech, returning it to the most normal form, and if
that's the case, it makes greek alphabet not natural, but
assimilated with some additional modifications? but we have the
myth of how two vowels were added, which explains georgian
"obsolete" ჱ and ჵ
and ჵ is directly similar to glagolythic Ⱁ (which looks more like
ჵ in other fonts)
ჲ (samekh) is something I never saw a myth
about, probably yet.
Some new piece, bolgarian, or bulgarian runes, even though I was
looking for причерноморские письмена,
These have Б and they were in use before kirill-et-methodi:
Булгарские руны — руническая письменность
протоболгар (булгар, древних болгар), употреблялась в VI—X веках
and if that's Л, then N must be M? and there just the place for И
& K or И & M? And that's why it was torn out?
Shiroi is white in japanese, and syr is cheese in russian, cheese
is white that's why moon is said to be of cheese, that's of the
coler. col as in call, голос, קוֹל?
colors tll, tell, tall, toll, call,
Some writers are of the opinion that the original
twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet were derived from
groups of stars, and that the starry handwriting on the wall of
the heavens referred to words spelt out, with fixed stars for
consonants, and the planets, or luminaries, for vowels
Which tells me to take a look at the astronomic signs, and if
number of planets was 7 (sun as א and moon as מ and does it make
earth ש or ת?
did they know only four or three other planets? were they ה ו י ע?
all this is nothing more than guessing.
I must look at ancient observatoria, the actual artefact maybe.
Militias ~ malicious (these two words just sound the same, hardly
Short Fast Direct are slogan for my next iteration, next edition
of this book.
edit relates to exit? избранное, пиздатое.
They would go abc pattern if short was ort. Is it where
orthography comes from?
order shorter? but no other lexics that would support such
cognatism appear so far.
os kost bone
ост=ист (ост и ида в эстонском)
вест=зАпад=зАхид (Lääs (and Läänes? google
can lie, thought i'm a fan, -es is -ness or slang) in
Lääs if it is in Läänes
if id is in could be the forms of words if only one vowel and few
consonants were. When there were tens of words, only few signs
would suffice. A die, загадочные вещи мёртвого человека? ведь мы
же знаем кости только как рандомайзер для настойных игр.
настолькных записано как настойных -
это не простое тайпо, а хитро выданное. случайное независимо от
моего сознания. подсознание, возможно, подсказывает.
ебать ~ брать
потому что дать это встречное к бать
дать как тётя, батя как дядя. дядя даёт, тётя тоит, они обе те и
то. и оба слова не разделены по полу. лишь по числу. и лишь
замтем, естественно, единственное дифференцироваллось
грамматически на мужское и женское, но на более общей
картине ян (мужское имя) международно самое популярное (жан, джон,
иан, иван, вано) единственное число, а инь (инна тоже имя,
женское, иоанна, иванна? это две тоже существующие, но гораздо
более редкие формы, инна тоже редкое имя, нина тоже не часто,
нонна редкое. Если Инна редкое, то Анна одно из самых популярных.
Ян и Анн, я и а? watashi and atashi are general and female
japanese pronouns for me.
I spelled kabbalah like qabala in vol.1. here's why: because I
feel it this way,
and now this:
Qabala (Gabala; Azerbaijani: Qəbələ), is a
city and the administrative centre of the Qabala District of
Azerbaijan. The municipality consists of the city of Gabala
and the village of Küsnat. Before the city was known as
Kutkashen, but after the Republic of Azerbaijan's independence
the town was renamed in honour of the much older city of Gabala,
the former capital of Caucasian Albania, the archaeological site
of which is about 20 km southwest.
Gabala is the ancient capital of Caucasian Albania.
Archeological evidence indicates that the city functioned as the
capital of Caucasian Albania as early as the 4th century BC.
Up to the present time there are the ruins of the ancient city
and the main gate of Caucasian Albania. Ongoing excavations near
the village Chukhur show that Gabala from 4th – 3rd centuries BC
and up to the 18th century was one of the main cities with
developed trade and crafts. The ruins of the ancient town are
situated 15 km from the regional center, allocated on the
territory between Garachay and Jourluchay rivers. Gabala
was located in the middle of the 2,500-year-old Silk Road, and
was mentioned by Pliny the Younger as "Kabalaka", Greek
geographer Ptolemy as "Khabala", Arabic historian Ahmad ibn
Yahya al-Baladhuri as "Khazar".
So many alphabets there are, and when I throdded this path of
collecting them all, I became more of collector and less of actual
researcher, I even bought some poststamps several years ago when
and my experience of armenian allowed me to line up lines like
was this letrosity (like verbosity, but with
letters not verbs) caused by previously used system with
even more signs whether syllabic or hieroglyphic? Was there some
The first two sings signs of the
third line could belong to the previous line, just as H could
belong to the third the way it is in russian.
It also shows how h could just be tʃ and even ʒ which again
relates it to the ᚼ(or ᛡ)
Their b reminds russian Б and their z for whaterver reason reminds
georgian alpha. ა.
Let's play the ame game for Székely-Hungarian Rovás (Hungarian
Runes) much more coherent.
Володимир Вовка, откуда там вторая в, а волк в хохлатском вовк.
, could be ? in that sentence for sure.
if I go there, it will be fun. That random sentence works if , is
you? my friend? is fascinating? but? in the light of what I just
saw? you could be too much for some.
Pauses are there to see if person agrees. Intonation plays role in
this context, ? and , change intonation differently: ? raises
intonation, make stress more pronounced, louder, and probably
that's related to japanese intonation in words, though they say
it's in tone, not voume lo volume
Russkie uydut, potomuchto ih slovo relates to slave, and their
bosses definitely prefer to see them as slaves, only in the short
period of political activity in the 19 and early 20 century were
we allowed to get loose, and once freedom became european, we were
abruptly returned into that state until the end of 20th century,
and it was soon again reversed to a big extent, and even though
private property was allowed,
I prefer intellectual to smart, and that's why I'm not smart. Be
even though private property is allowed in modern russia, it's
very limited and owners are less sure that their property actually
belongs to them and cannot be expropriated by the state any
And that's why they're not rich.
∴ is triple : and stands for therefore
but I found it in the name of occult A∴A∴
In Freemasonry traditions, the symbol is used to
indicate a Masonic abbreviation (rather than the period mark
used conventionally with some abbreviations). For example,
"R∴W∴ John Smith" is an abbreviation for "Right Worshipful
John Smith" (the term Right Worshipful is an honorific and
indicates that Brother Smith is a Grand Lodge officer).
∵, known as the because sign, is sometimes used as
a shorthand form of "because".
smart is with art
stupid is с убитыми
stupe is a form of stupid, thus stupid is ed'ed stupe. and s is
definitely a prefix, because in russian it's tup, toop, and
english knows this word as dumb. дам?
смарт смотрит (где бы что стащить? хитрость у зверей за ум
марИ can be used for смотрИ.
мерь by 目 (眼) [me]
here's a good etimology of stupid: toupée: a piece of
artificial hair worn by a man to cover part of his head where
there is no hair
Open is of up:
variant form of open (verb).
"now ope thine eyes"
thus open is related to up,
and maybe opes one who owns. an though orthography is different,
to own related owe relates to ought.
and awe is not that far from owe. You would take what he owes if
you wasn't awed by him. as if you were out by him, he от ворот
поворот to you тебе to вы be v vie, вы, ты tuer? vie as вы make
pronouns different imperatives? yay, eye, I aye. они ни? Hi? he
hi? они эс рут оф он и ни
they is the root of he and thee? zie.
zie as he? isn't it ᚼ(or ᛡ)
жена zie-на? жжёна, жарена? вона ёбана, шестая буква, femme. fin
me. found by me, fucked by me.
жена ёбана, ж can be counded as 6th in russian alphabet, if бв is
one number and её is one number. And Ζ can be considered 6th in
greek, even though in their numerogology it's 7th, maybe because Z
looks like 7 or did they add the letters to make holy number 7th
outh of 6th?
ABC EFZ could be the firs die.
or AMZ could be the first triad, initial, middle and final
and OPS could be it's silent (whisper)
counterpart, and english oops could come of that, but that's
just a guess and a wild speculation. So take it into bank of
of, if we consider the greek alphabet and compare it to
hebrew, and to the voiced firsed voiceless seconed, that first die
Turkic runes are different from hungarian and norsk by their
order, the Orkhon valley is in the heart of mongolia, so they
follow the eastern canon.
And as I work with them in paint, I notice that 𐰅 is
mistransliterated in one of these tables:
We have to read that Thomsen to know what
those ,, are, but I like wikipedia more:
(especially because wiki places b first, not q. but it means I have to make two arrangements)
and previous table shows that Yenisei had
only three vowels, which is weird and demands research
or it really doesn't, those ,, are probably "the same orkhon
forms" because 𐰸𐰹 don't use ,,
But the following table doesn't agree that Yenisei had 𐰆
also why doesn't Orkhon column has that ,,? Because the image
itself is named Orkhon table.
A colon-like symbol (⁚) is sometimes used as a
word separator. In some cases a ring (⸰) is used instead.
j is supposed to show palatalization, though
it looks weird in jj, and ök, ük, kö, kü, k confuses me too
(I don't speak or read old turkic, so keep
that in mind when you refer here)
This system doesn't directly explain anything, it's here because I
will someday turn this work into an encyclopedic source on writing
systems, and because comparing this one to norsk and others may
explain something in the future.
соки сосут, ноги несут, руки рисуют?
If that is true, people of that past didn't distinguish active
from passive in verbs very well.
Division of -ku and -su could happen the same moment k & s
divided from c.
and -ru (all three are japanese) could come out of c too (because
ч is of c (or t? ti = чи. t~s is shown here too, more than ever)
trskч are all of c, с is literally s in russian. c is г and thus g
is also of c, but we all new it, cgkrstч all linguals? should I
add d because of t. (, after d could play as question mark, but it
not always can, just now two times could work like ?, but actual
modern meaning is just an intonation pause, which probably
shouldn't be unless you ask for reaction.
On the left is a magic square (each line equals to 15)
And to the right you can see that ש is indeed fire, and מ is
And my guess is that א stands for shamaim, the combination of two.
3 7 12
א מ ש
ב ג ד כ פ ר ת
ה ו ז ח ט י ל נ ס ע צ ק
according to the previous image, ע should be
first in the third line
It's great that b is in the second group, it's especially great
that thus it goes ab?
? is unknown letter (ה looks much better ac Г which is the C)
ה is a form of ד am I sure?
Those other seven tell, that after understanding three matters,
people found next:
b and p (v and f)
d and t
g and k
r (whick looks like both г and k cursive (R mitt den schtikk
штык is stick)
all three pairs go voiced-voiceless in the alphabet.
We combine the first two and we have 10 and the ancient alphabet
going voiced-voiceless with M standing in the middle of those:
א ב ג ד כ מ פ ר ש ת
כ is again out of its place. That's how old is that tradition? no,
that's how I arranged them according to the modern hebrew
In the image the order is different:
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
Ray of כ follows the ray of ם 𐡌 מ
not only does מ have sophit, it also has an obsolete form, and
chances are it's going straight of demotic owl. And it was a close
But back to that huge discovery:
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
T as 10 again. Roman X definitely was T (archaic t looks like x,
phoenician for example)
5th is מ which is the closest to the ו together with ב. But it's
not ב but מ is in the first three. But some other myth (greek
myth) tells that B and T were (and those are the other ש מ
especially when greek third were vowels. As if greeks developed
vocalism, and that's why european modes have greek names.
ש מ is the name jews use for god (name) as if they found some
praying book and didn't know that they had to insert god's name
into that prayer, and they mishmashed all gods in one abstract
god, allowing wishing demons fill in the (name) line.
I didn't know for sure, and it's literally ש מ
Some times they say ashem, but that a is supposedly ה which is the
(the name) but if it's א it would be that ancient most ancientmost
the most ancient formula.
שם is translated as there thither yonder
אשם is guilty
השם is he Name, denomination, repute, reputation, NOUN, title.
Dare I say that ה in the third group descends directly from א
But then did reputation comes from what the man is guilty of? It
is there, then השם would be hey there, эй there is a! эй there, where эй could be a!
Does order of אשם on the central triangle tell that alphabet is
written right to left until M and left to right after that?
א ב ג ד מ
ת ש ר פ כ
дядя папа? (was дядя used for papa before papa? Was P selected out
of R especially to build up that abcd order all over the
abecedary? Was uvw grown for russians? but russians use Ё
her and её are two way to read H (greeks pronounce it vowel, so do
russians? N ~ V via ν and V is perfect for the position after E,
it's also voiced. and in hebrew it's V not F.
g and d of ג and ר meet well in g
for russian д cursive looks like that, probably g with the
front swash would look like д.
But then I notice that ר is not ד and I get confused and resort to
ᚦ (you read of it from my first volume, ᚦ is both c and d, unless
ᛒ is b and c, which I doubt)
mama kaka (in japanese they use ka instead of ma (both are
questioning particles in japanese and chinese, and chinese uses ma
for mother, so those questioning particles are descendants of ma
which is mother:
это возьму, мам - вопросительный частица обращается с вопросом,
возможно мама ~ мона ~ and it explains madonna for mother, but I
was speaking of "may I?" можно? и молчание знак согласия оттуда
research comes with discoveries, so I make research is the same as
I make discoveries, less bragging form of it, but it's understoon
that if you didn't make discoveries, you wouldn't make research,
because what would be the point..
א ב ג ד מ
ת ש ר פ כ
r & г meet in these forms and that they're both in the centre,
ass c is supposed to be.
כ are like that twist which made k stand among voiced ones. and M
out of its column.
MK (I wonderfully coauthor this universe with those who
established that project, and as DDR tested BRD,
though deutschmannen didn't seem to use this abbreviation much,
BRD побородили. in english it's FRG, ФРГ it was in russian,
BRD medicine on their own citizens (if this
text is not coloured, it's rather meaningless, I use colours for
punctuational semantic reasons, and it makes this text
unctrlVable) so I wouldn't be surprised if americans
tested their programs on soviet citizens.
only reflects as B in greek myth and ʃ in
hebrew myth, both are also second from the edge.
are alpha and omega, first and the last,
also the opposites in phonetic sense, most vost, and one of the
most voiceless, as consonant as it goes.
Now let's see at them as at the ten digits:
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
ש as 9 is funny, because cursive ש looks like inverted 9
ד reminds 4, but only this time not in cursive, so I consider this
alignment false and non-existent.
But as the row of basic phonetics it is awesome.
So could that mistake of k before M originating from the moment
they drew in one line something that was on the stars and they
misread them? It could be, but it's still just a speculation.
א ב ג ד כ מ פ ר ש ת
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
either way the central מ כ פ or כ מ פ
have final forms: ם ך ף or ך ם ף
which makes ד מ ך פ ר order more symmetric.
but also if we compare them in arabic, د ر ک order is more
consistent. and that how it goes in that
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
but that's not the only order, and of the two or three I know in
arabic, this one is not the bost alphabetic, or rather it's one of
the two alphabetic abecedary canons, it only sorta goes somewhere
between ᛆᛒᚦ and абвгд, but then it doesn't see vowels until ع
and if ع غ are something like её, ف is quite labial and if
we follow this tradition to cobine dotted variants in one letter,
then by the first in group this order goes abgd and it explains
why ح is not the first in its group. but only that firs line goes
longer than in european alphabets:
ا ب ج د ر س ص ط
ع ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
whether ف ق and ک ل are pairs from one group, or those lines
indeed have different ammounts of basic letters, either way 16 and
18 are both known numbers for the alphabets. mostly in runes, but
Irish alphabet also has 18 letters and specific form of letters,
which makes it special and probably orginal (ogham is also mostly
known in Ireland)
addition of M could be connected with 666 being long past and 1666
being the later resort, so enlightenment after and around 1666 was
inevitable or determined by this date, for which they mutilated
roman numeral system, literally making it unable for it to go past
4999. was it to prohibit math?
is tradition a form of teodetsia. theodicy. הtheodicy could relate
to idioty as cretin is related to christian and moron reminds
mormon the most. both phonetically and semantically. like yiddish
did jews abstragated parts of notions: the deutsch, not thoes.
others. foes? phoes, thoes? thoes is those if somebody didn't understand.
sets 6-mal standart, telling that each line is its own die. That's
why there're 6-letter lines and 4-letter lines in english
alphabet, like in four sides of knucklebones. dice are also bones
in russian. like bones are dies.
diez is higher? is it why we believe in heaven?
6 letters is the maximal line in greek also.
Russian, Georgian, Hebrew and Arabic alphabets diverge this rule,
probably because they were not посвящены этому знанию.
Эзотерическая часть учения оставалась у хозяев мира. А хозяева
мира в Европе, а не на Ближнем Востоке. Но историю же пишет
победитель? Евреи победили, а поэтому догматично преподаётся
что финикийский древнейший алфавит, и история еврейского народа.
не татарского, например (я говорю как
русский: русскую историю, но и еврейскую тоже, и именно
еврейская через религию преподаётся. и я полез религию
реформировать? куда ты лезешь, гой? фак офф, май натсы кипс юден
ин зы хэд. I turn their wave sometimes. Лучше быть гоем, чем
гноем. Я русский, а значит я жуткий расист. насист. Я знаю что
я? Нет гадаю.)
И междуречье как колыбель цивилизации (любопытно посмотреть
до сих пор ли, после открытия Vinca culture. I wonder if it's
Vicca culture. vikings are kings, wekings, wictory is vin)
becouse they considdr that their motherland
卍 makes viewer;s head rotate to the right. which stretches heart,
gives it more space.
like those stick push the cross clockwise. even though I thought
of them as of rotating cross with ribbons, if I think of it as of
rotating plane, I naturally tend to rotate with it.
thieves and state agents want snow cleared
for them not to leave traces
fairy is fe in norwegian and it sounds like russian фея.
r is R like я is Я?
I tried to find actual roman math manuscripts, to see if v can be
4 there, but I only found medieval manuscripts and none of them is
before 700, which is directly after 666, and could numbers be
taken as the date of the second coming? and wasn't it all terror
from devotees to that obviously false prophecy for it naturally
can be interpreted otherwise, and thus bible doesn't tell when
exactly the second coming is happening, and thus why would we even
read it? Either way, here's a misterious clickable image, where v
is 5 and x is 10.
isn't most writing systems are dated to begin around 8th century
ad because most of the writings before 666ad were destroyed?
Пригласил Кураева покурить эту книжку, вчера его лекциями
обмазовался, но отчего этот жаргон? не у него, он-то пытается говорить что другие говорят, делать
что считает нужным для привлечения молодёжи, а у
меня, сейчас? атеистический задор, как бы стрёмно типа
священника приглашать: священники пройдохи, а паства овцы, тупые,
бараны в ранах? ранимые ревнивые, ровные равные рваные, R-ваньки?
В общем, этот, почему его фамилия так похожа на Гундяев? они
противоположности как Корнилов и Брусилов. Кордон и русь? в любом
случае оба не сильно русские на морду: брусилов вполне мог быть
каким-нибудь полутурком, а корнилов мог быть помесью с китайцем, и
руссня-то и сегодня не сильно добрая (могло это быть следствием
насаждения интернационализма?) а тогда скорей всего вообще дикой
была. Но культура была: писатели, учёные, архитектура европейская
вместо еврейской, и бизнес понимали. Почему бизнес вывели, а
интернационализм породил лишь русизм, расизм, ультранационализм
(не то чтоб сильно ультра, но уж больно слово нравится)
I like word ultranationalism so I will use it to describe wish to
have no alien cells in my sphere.
We may need some microorganism, but it could be a cope, a new word
"cope" new for me, maybe new for my psyche, psyche is clyche? not
Some parts from my notebook (middle knitten notebook (not 2nd,
middle, 3rd) from today
(to show that those notebooks should also be digitized)
Satan is Shaitan, related to shit, so that explains why muslims
say that toilet is house of satan, because satan is something bad,
and shit is the ultimate bad (even though farmers know how to use
Stench stinks in english is similar to Satan and maybe also snake,
as if shit is in form of snake, gut is in form of гад. (here I
revisit it, so I deliver more) in notebooks I diverged that ch is
and here I see what I didn't mention there: h ~ и
And I didn't finish the thought there, Like Erasmus I reconstruct
the language people still speak: Erasmus (according to Кураев)
translated ΒΗ as бе, but what if it's Bah.
I transliterated Paul as Pavl. ו as labial consonant.
Well, I sent this letter to Kuraev yesterday, a famous russian
deacon and preacher:
Придя в очередной раз к вере, хочу реформировать церковь, начиная
с изменения направления вращения: чтоб не только отворотные
"хороводы" водили, но и "приворотные" тоже: это будет неплохим
компромиссом, тем более что когда в 1666 поменяли направление,
народная жизнь лучше не стала: через пару лет крестьян закабалили
1666 может быть причиной (или следствием) введения литеры М
(сокращение от миля) в римский канон IVXLCD, который слагается точно в 666.
Но если V = 4, a X = 8, и так далее (есть такая теория) то (этого
в той теории даже не заметили) 1+4+8+32+64+256=365
and after I sent it, I saw him speaking of roman and greek the
only writing systems that came before christians, and I got mad at
him, and recognized him as the part of cabal, the liberal part but
of the same cabal. But then I calmed down, because he just
thoughtlessly repeats the academic consensus. Why would he
challenge it if he's not a linguist (he wasn't even sure about
Вифлеем being Бедлам, and I, to be honest didn't сообразил it at
fly, בֵּית לֶחֶם is the actual spelling. Did russian recognized T
as Ф? or was there ט instead of ת? is ט flipped ת?)
Before בית was recognized as beth, it was vite, and whether inluenced
roman word, or was much more reltaed to it. And to russian быть
(to be) другое дело, что дом и быть разные слова, хотя дом и
обитель, которая очевидно от слова быть, а не бить, которое в свою
очередь могло произойти из убить, родственного с убыль, но это всё
низкопробное гадание, эта книжка черновик, так что не надо
стесняться, с таких гаданий всё и начинается. какие-то из них в
I heard the name Эразм Роттердамский a lot,
but I was not impressed by what I read by him.
But then again he spoke of Bruno and Hypatia being killed not
because they were scientists, but because they were wizards, as if
it justifies anything. Views like those make me want to eradicate
their faggot organization instead of reforming it. Such
intellectual potential wasted from more productive fields into
mere cattle and shep herding, reducing people to animal state,
retarding their potentials.
I could say that he mentions those ancient christians being
"chidren of their epoch", but wasn't that teaching forming that
epoch to its wicked texts? Isn't he himself a slave to the jews
and now he finds himself in the position where he must justify
something he would rather condemn? I don't know, I will return to
this subject, anyway his lectures made me think from another angle
on my sudden wish to reform the church. I might as well burn that
structure to the ground with the rest of the go-t structures.
But let's begin where we started, what about those hobos and other
retards who seem to need that faith of theirs. I don't even think
they need it, it's just they're susceptible to deception, so it
makes sense to create a deception we can at least try to control.
As I was told by some other "shepherd", it's not about
understanding the world, it's about controlling the masses. But
that potential I spoke about are those kuraevs who had potential
to success in something more vital.
upd: it seems I was too kind to their low
бруно считал иначе, и в общем его правильно сожгли, так и надо"
fuck that shit, the history of that institution and their savage
stance averts me from ever wishing to do anything with that
bunch of low retards whose task is to rob beggar grannies if we
consider swindle a form of robbery, either way it's the least of
their atrocities. It's as if they secretly serve to satan when
they teach that world is in his hands until the second coming,
which is an euphemism for forever. Wide is the gate and
broad is the. way that leads to destruction, and many are
those who enter in by it. In the context of the most
popular belief system. If you received some higher truth, would
you force people to accept it? Real truth is blessing in itself,
if you don't want it, it's not my problem. People use force to
make people uccept something unjust and not true. And sometimes
they seem to play as if they don't know good from evil, as if
that makes them qualified for Edem, and John Chrysostom tells it
explicitly "Suppose someone slays another in accordance with
God's will. This slaying is better than any loving-kindness. Let
someone spare another and show him great love and kindness
against God's decree. To spare the other's life would be more
unholy than any slaying. For it is God's will and not the nature
of things that makes the same actions good or bad." Which is
there only to turn people into perfect slaves, who will perform
for their masters any deeds, no matter how wicked.
(it is in gray, because I told it was uttered in the previous
chapters, it is here for that deacon, whom I welcomed to read
this very part. Sometimes I think I am a lazy suicide who wishes
others to spare him from this retarded world, which is mostly a
joke, but not completely. But then again why do I mess with
those not totally sane people? Do I consider one of honest
duties I should take? or am I also a slave of my retarded
wishes. Let these wishes are not alcohol or tobacco, I still
have my fair share of retarded)
upd2: that speech of his was given in the 90s, I think,
according to his voice and photo. There we were all psyched up,
breaking taboos because everybdoy else did. Why am I doing it
now? We never stopped, we just went underground? the young
blood, who had nothing to lose. because no career to protect or
And I called him here what for? to say what? and because it's an update, he could have read
it before, I hope he read it before the previous update,
because wtf He spoke of church reform, I thought of
church reform. But church is not what I thought, it's not about
truth, it's about control, and he opens a window into the church
structure and tasks, he is a top university professor. He will
be alright, he probably was set a full-time head of the internet
department (рпц is a кгб'э's structure, because he has a million
of subscibers in lj alone (they don't even show how many, only
that it's over 2500, and I scrolled 2500 and still was in his
a's) because religion is an information technology, a virus if
you wish, mind virus, as talking drums were invented before
telegraph, so mind virii were invented(inf typo almost appeared
there, as in infected) were infecting before computer virii
appeared. Why do I use latin norms of grammar? grammar is
grimoir? learn carma? learn grammar! and crazy people may think
it's demons speak, when it's just me guessing, but to guess is
the same word as to divinate in russian, and that word is
similar in both phonetic and semantic structures to
divinization, which is taught by some book as the essence of
magic, so religion is a school of magicians, who control the
population from becoming magicians independently? Why are they
affraid of smart people who can master it? Anyone can master it,
and smart people who persue what used to be considered to be
magic are not the subject for control, the other half of
humanity is, nobody wants retards who think their are gods, so
they're allowed to utter "созданы по образу и подобию" not to
understand the actual sense of this phrase, that we're only
alike like statues made of clay? Somebody understood what the
higher entity be in comparison to us, and that was like a clay
statue to its prototype, because we can only make statues of
something as stupid as clay, and god could create humans out of
some biomass, which was a heavenly clay, and all these are
beautiful metaphor, so beautiful, that some people placed it int
hte holy chrestomathy.
If рпц is кгб's sturcture, he's some kind of officer (both
structures have weird uniforms, that's the old-fashion of
traditions. And then he will probably show it to higher command,
and how friendly I am may determine my destiny. So am I
friendly? I'm friendly to all, my conscious task is to make
peace among everybody. So I'm peaceful to the other side too (I
criticize them not less than ours) and that could be
misinterpreted. I also learnt in the dream I speak of later
soon, it taught me that I'm arrogant. And that word is also
related to err. probably. sounds as err. rogant is "they ask"
then arrogant is what wrong things or in wrong manner they ask?
if ar- were un- (never seen as such, I thnk) it would make less
of the sense.
Why these linguistic parts are among religious chapter? I told
you it's a draft, I offer other people to contribute to the
final product. That's why I bother smarties from all fields of
life, risking that some of them may also be crazy, but hoping
not, Either way, my duty is to spread this wave, not only make
it awesom, but spread and share this awesome too. But that makes
me responsible for how this book change everyday's people's
lives. I made it complicated so soft people don't go through.
What if people are challenged and can't do it. There are such
books but we usually just drop them, no hard feelings that I
could't read much of that math book, or rather I didn't have the
Publication will be short, so this piece will probably not
appear in the main part, only in this technical facilities, only
some devote fans will find the access to.
and we go further with the language, trying not to be distracted
by extralinguistic factors.
I just recorded to my broken iphone the audiotrack named alphabet
archaic, and there I sing
A A A A E E E E O O O O U U U U - it came naturally, and that
means it could be natural.
and it came to me wheyn I was sintinkg of U being read as I or I
being read as U, because w is й sometimes (see the final and
middle knitten book, or don't, ю и я вроде как от юса большого и
малого, и я вроде большой. юс is нос, nos is нас, я is I, me, мы.
ю is U, v, вы. and v is ѵ and that's final u (or v) as seen in
bornholm and archaic latin, and maybe ω also reflects it. and u ~
ю ~ io ~ я, so semantically if I am part of you, one of yuo, then
я was юс малый, а ю юс большой, но фактически, или по крайней мере
исторически, ан нет, там совпадает:
Ѧ, ѧ юс малый, [ɛ̃ ].
Ѫ, ѫ юс большой, [ɔ̃ ]. those ~ are
above vowels, I hope your fonts don't bug like mine)
Название «большой юс» условное; из древности
пришло только самое слово «юс», используемое в нынешних
названиях четырёх букв (Ѧ, Ѫ, Ѩ, Ѭ).
To my surprise the previous topic reflects this one by
showing that я was that юс малый.
and in that font that я looks like glagolitic Ⰰ, which is аз,
which is considered to be the synonym of я, but if we look closer
at that Ѧ, it has the opening in the centre,
and that font does allow me to link Ⰰ to Ѧ (even though I don't
know if I can do it, I allow me everything, I will sieve (sift)
these pieces to see which of them I actually need or not.
ⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩ tells that ѫ is оѧ which could support my hypothesis if о
would stand for you without me, those around me, for example
allyou, y'all) glagolythic deserves to be researched properly,
christians didn't invent it.
And looking for glagolythic abecedary artefact I found these weird
They both have the same source, they're clickable, and probably
that guy intentionally produced the left one in such disgusting
colours, because even though their order is alphabetic, he labeled
A RANDOM CHOSEN LETTERS FROM THE
(he removed the word RANDOM, but it's
still preserved at pinterest where I actually found it)
and the right one is labled as THE SIGN "TANGRA"
WITH THE LETTERS FROM THE GLAGOLITIC ALPHABET
The name “Tangra” has a Siberian-Altaic origin and
means “God.” Contrary to widespread in the recent past knowledge
for the spiritual sense of the proto Bulgarians about all
Devine, the modern research has proved that they had believed
not in a god called “Tangra”, but just in God, the one and only
God. The symbol in the center of the picture is a Proto
Bulgarian sign for God – “IYI”. It shows a deep knowledge of our
ancestors for the space. The two open arms in the center of the
sign directed toward the sky, the sun, from where comes
everything necessary for the existence of life on Earth. The
vertical lines symbolize the constant flow of energy from the
heaven to the earth and vice versa. By the time when Constantine
– the Philosopher had received God’s revelation to create the
Glagolitic alphabet, the “Tangra” symbol, which had assigned the
God, had already evolved in its earthly expression and gained
the meaning of “I/Me”, becoming the first letter of the
Glagolitic alphabet. With this beginning the creator of the
alphabet had indicated that the newly created script is a
Christian and is a gift from the God, just like everything else
Whether what he writes is right or not, the word Tangra allowed me
to open a whole new level related to turkic runes:
It's funny that I recognized the top left corner as ᛆ and right
bottom as ᛐ (when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like
a nail) because it's 𐱅𐰭𐰼𐰃, tengri (they write right to left,
thus they read it counter-clockwise, like
hebrew alphbaet goes in 231 gates, but there they go circle, so
you're supposed to rotate the disk as if clockwise, and
with an omitted vowel, which speaks again that old-turkic runes
were khazar. Or am I a victim to this bait, jumpoing to
conclusions to name ever national writing system jewish in nature?
Syllabaries seem to be more archaic, thus omitted vowels were
normal everywhere? Both variants are possible, let's go with the
national one, even though alphabets are probably connected, thus
always are borrowings? But they're al different, thus it's such an
ancient borrowing that hardly any jews existed then. Not by the
law of Moses, but by his or their lineage, by genetic
pecularities. It doesn't matter, or it shouldn't. Let's focus on
the structure I research and not on extralinguistic ramble.
My guess is neither of those ARTefacts are legit, because why
glagolitic? and the number of squares is different no matter who
you look at them. I think those nine in the actual tengri emblem
is the magic square where each lines equals 15, just a guess, it
could be lines of 123 456 789, which also has some magic to it.
Some other tengri sign:
and it explains why the |Y| is in dotted lines on other images,
because it's on the opposite side.
And that diagram demands some 7-pointed stars, but looking for
similar images I found this:
Which places Fire and Water in the corners, and in other corners
are Air and Earth, and Earth is ת which is cool, because of אמת
but it's not אמת but משת.
I wonder why in trigrams fire is not opposed to water. So I look
Amulet is an alphabetic word: A-Mu-Let. And such syllabic reading
can be of use in the future, in the further..
Speaking to a poet lady friend
Поэзия именно повторением сродни музыке
(repetition legitimizes, как говорит Adam Neely, чей канал я
рекомендую всем, кто интересуется музыкальной теорией:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR5yzCH5CsM) но помимо размера
(ритма) тональность может иметь не менее важное значение, если
предположить, что гласные когда-то соответствовали тональностям
"The vowels added by the priests of Apollo to his lyre were
probably those mentioned by Demetrius, an Alexandrian
philosopher of the first century BC, when he writes in his
dissertation On Style: ‘In Egypt the priests sing hymns to the
Gods by uttering the seven vowels in succession, the sound
of which produces as strong a musical impression on their
hearers as if the flute and lyre were used, but perhaps I had
better not enlarge on this theme.’"
Эта цитата говорит о семи нотах, но aeiou - в гораздо большей
степени универсальный набор (я пока нащупал лишь
последовательность из четырёх гласных: ааааееееооооуууу знать бы
ещё что это означает)
I had a thought that aeou are ^<>v and could it mean that
there's no I in poetry, but there's both i & я in поэзия,
which felt like муза и я, which could state that poes is muse, for
oe is u in dutch and п could easily be м in the past. I don't know
if such reverlations are legit (they're definitely not scientific)
but that's how I'm going to think of poetry from now on: it's not
just from me, it's always together with the transcendent beings (fiends felt to be a wrong word, and feels
matter in these matters the most. Somehow i didn't feel wrong
about poes thing, probably it is okay, whether it's about cats
or pussies or the muses don't mind being associated with them,
or pussies mew meow miaow miaou mule mewl and even waul when
they scream. It's fascinating, because cats were (and are)
praised in Egypt and miaows are reminding all three math, mus,
why is it poetry in one language and poesie in another? is it
about З looking just like 3?
another letter to the same muse, I highlight in black what
Я зашёл сказать, что подобно тому, как есть
внутренний взор, есть и внутреннее ухо, даже термин такое есть,
только не факт, что он совпадает с тем, о чём я сейчас сказал.
Подобно тому как на внутренний взор может накладываться не
только наше умышленное мыслепостроение при помощи образов
например у строителя конструктор из плит, а и случайный хаос
может туда проецироваться, например во время сна, или просто
бывает когда глаза закрыть можно что-нибудь подобное увидеть. Я
пару раз из дрёмы просыпался от хрипа, но списал это на
собственный храп. и это хорошо где хорошо
is good, because horus is god, is год. година.
Година год в болгарском, но час в украинском, horus
пересекается с Гором, который показывает насколько г и r
похожи до степени смешения иногда.
А на твой вопрос вдумчиво смогу ответить когда и если книжку
прочитаю, пока что первое предположение какое-то было, но я его
I know of replication crisis, а потому лучше не буду строить
построений на информации, пока не проверю её независимо, блин
что я несу, досвидания.
слово из букв собралось как панно из
множества картинок. до дом около? с не только with, но и sie,
see (I'm with you means I see you, see как когнат предлога с,
предлоги как логи (в английском prefices and suffices are the
same words: so not prepositions, but just positions, and
that's what they describe. Лог от слова положить, значит.
поЛОЖение. но почему слово ложь похоже? лажа? лёжа, lie lie,
Как вода? лёжа как лужа, как жижа, как low and lay, loj and
lja like low jah, bad god, some object someone took as a good,
but it was nogood, and the concept of curse could originate
here, as blessed and cursed objects? Но у лжи должна быть и
более простая этимология. Лижет подлизывается, льстит, So the
word lie appeared not as malice, but as flatter, lie because I
like, like и в значении подобное, people lie with those they
like, этимология удел надел подел поэтов. но ai нас
опередит. мы бы опередили их, если бы у меня был ai для
того, чтоб скормить ему все свои находки и удержать их в
машинной голове одновременно, но тогда это будет победа и
человека и ии совместная, но ещё лет через десять если ничего
не делать и структуру человеческого языка откроет тоже машина.
Возможно с вкраплениями найденного человеками, как мы камни
найденные в природе используем в своих произведениях
искусства. Как rude руду
(о пиздец, я сейчас нечайно нажал на корзину вместо сэнд, потмоу
что в правом нижнем в gmail ничего кроме корзины нет, хорошо что
в гмэйл есть кнопка Undo)
Lets continue this session. Руда ру как в слове грубый, да как в
слове дåбро. (goods)
(a and o in russian depend on the dialects, like musical notes,
musical modes do.)
But when did russians and other europeans lose their tonal nature
of vowels? Probably, they never had it, and before humans learnt
to play with their tone with voice, they changed the sound with
the jaw and lips, is tongue actually jaw? Is tongue a part of
lower jaw? Indeed so. And the fact is you don't have to move your
jaw if you can move the tongue alone. You can sai I and move your
jaw, if the tongue stays.
ц и щ размер показывают? Почему на обложки
такой ярлычок не подшивают, что с полки вытаскивать? Патентовать
или просто как полезную модель выпустить с минимальным количеством
согласований? Надо найти и познакомиться с хорошим патентным
юристом, с тем кто торчит от этой темы.
обложка блог блок бог берёг благ
bring несёт везёт бежит бережёт(ся., например)
Самая большая тайна депривационной капсулы, это то что там надо
под веществами находится чтобы пёрло. Депривационная капсула
бережёт и восстанавливает. Это теория, основаннная на изучении
депривационных капсул (Фейнман репортует что лишь заскучал, а во
второй раз ему дали pcp чтоли ебанутые, такие вещи из
фантастических романов может быть вытираются, в фильме альтеред
стэйтс чтоли про наркотики умолчали. Мои глаза придут в порядок,
если они перестанут не только на разбитый экран смотреть, но и
вообще на что-либо. Глаза испортились. Грешу на то, что на
телефоне разбился экран.
Смысл обновлять телефоны в том, что техника сдаёт от старости.
сдаёт значит даёт сбои?
аесли щ и ц размерные суффиксы, то щ=ш, а ц=ч
тогда ш = шта
больше как ещё может говорить о увеличении, но большой не
большой больш он, велик он, thus k is most likely h, which is read
Blh is бог? Vowel L and LMN like ABC?
what is the pair to element? abcent? ab scent? abacus? абак. but
aback would take aback if it was abc.
bc as back?
(a fragment of the next one)
Но это хоть порой и близко к глоссолалии
(особенно typos типа sai) -и здесь запятой не хватает, поэтому
редактор нужен и твоё пожелание этого же касается- кажется
подчинённой моему разуму, может потому что я научился ею до
некоторой степени управлять, я задаю вектор, но подсознание
подсовывает мне пары по своему собственному хотению. Но если бы
мне подсунули love before like I would not accept it, because
love may remind low, but why accept phonetic similarity without
actual semantic semblance?
Love is law makes much more sense, but it also needs some mental
gymnastics to fit in, Law as low is much more similar
semantically, Love is a lie, лестное что-то, лезет ко мне в
мыслях когда кто-то то это считается любовью, если без
негативных эмоций. с негативными подобное явления считается
ненавистью. lovehate is also a common feeling among humans; How
feelings relate to glossolaly? Is it glossolaly when one blurts
out a curse when he swears or tells something evil he'd rather
Isn't magic a simplistic description of actual physiologic
збс the best
чево say what
such similar phrases demonstrate that words that have similar
meaning and similar sound side are not necessarily connected
etymologically. Still an awesome concept. Or first russian and
second american lines could be influenced by their american and
m in мыпротивоставляем is like ¿..? and ¡..! the suffix -м
indicates мы, -м could be -ым
is like razvorachivaet как, unfolds k like isl (for kike is the
letter C between I&l
Between me and sie це? Why sie? ס, Ξξ
Е шы 3? ξ is ex?
шы is is in russian keyboard, and it's funny that though letters
themselves don't have much in common phonetically, they come well
as words, -s = -ы when they're plural suffices, ц = x = кс (ps,
ks, ts - does s play like a vowel. in whisper it is.
E = 3, if B = 1, D = 2, which would be weird, why double letter
stand for one and single letter stand for two? to equal 3 in both
cases? and e would be just one good 3? in graphical it could be ஃ
And if ஃ is in its full 3d form, if you look at every other
hieroglyph from a side, not top, then ஃ is 4.
D = 4 today, and the question is do the mere form of B & D, of
ᛒ and ᚦ tell that the order was different ᚦᛒஃ
m in мыпротивоставляем is like ¿..? and ¡..!
the suffix -м indicates мы, -м could be -ым
does every suffix has a pronoun pair? что делаешь - бервая фраза
пришедшая на ум.
-шь как ты? s ~ t? h ~ t?
делаете - те в значении вы? я знаю про дрифт местоимений (не знаю
его причин) но не слишком ли многое я себе позволяю? я дозволяю
себе академическую свободу, пробуя новые методы, в надежде что
нелепые сами по ходу пьесы отвалятся.
If something like ᚦᛒஃ is the sequence, then it only shows hom how much a reminds d and thus
it looks like a b d as . : ∴ then E would be perfect as is a
4-sided box or is it :: or ⋮⋮would be more fit, and ⠛ and
⠿ are how many sides in knucklebones and dice.
dice could stand for dots.
的 is both de and teki. if it's a sistem
where ki is voicing ה is yet to see.
Ь and instead of Ъ – Ѣ and both are graphically in the same
groups with Б
I went for one band, I got two. tow by five. pentatonics?
And I see that I just didnt notice Ъ before Ы the same way we have
it today, only there it's so 8-like, I didn't knoticed him in
These lines go like this to show you not to be sure about what you
read, I may myself be unsure about them.
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת do look like У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
ע reminds У
פ sounds as Ф
צ would better go with the next, Ц, but if Х
is X, then both maybe forms of Z
ק has to be Ц but only by its' position. q
would also better go Ч, че is que, why is it digraph?
ר is r which in curseive looks like cursive Ч
ש is total hit into Ш
ת shows how ש to ת is like Ш to Щ (or S to
does it show that q is ц because both are c?
ч is of t (and d) sometimes: in japanese, at least. but ч is of c
in english. ab(CD)? ᛆᛒᚦ
, че is que, why is it digraph? q
woulnd be enough? q ~ ч shows how much related ц и ч, and thus q
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
ה ו ז ח ט
h ~ ʃ again!
z ~ r (see chinese, and cursive r)
ו is v, which is f in german, ф & p is the same letter in
ה as O makes sense, because both are vowels, but that's why I
combined them: both lines have 5 signs. both are pentatonic (and
all lines are forms of something same, similar, simple? complicite
has the same pl? simple and please and play, please poigraisa?
sporit znachit igrat kak v kazino?)
ט is literally transliterated with Т sometimes, in теология,
א ב ג ד
To my surprise they fit: ד is Δ that sounds as ð which is very
close to З[z]
ג is C but sounds as G, and G does sound like Ж sometimes.
Ё instead of F stands at ב's place and that's not fine, but it's
the only one not directly similar.
א as Е makes sense, not only because both are vowels, but also
because a is э or эй sometimes.
Then why not identify E-line with A-line?
A B C D
E F G H
C ang G are literally the same letter, historically,
ה ו ז ח ט is EFGH? and then G ~ Z, just as С ~ S, and what it
makes the D's ð? Ж? Especially because they don't have Ж and we
don't have ð, yet the weird letter in dutch is g, and g is
d in russian.
ה ו ז ח ט
ו ז reflecting ВБ is rather poetic, but boy..
ח reflecting Г is poetic in some other sense: ח is H which often
transliterated as Г.
Н H as Г because ʃ is г?
י כ ל מ נ ס
I could have gone speaking on how N ~ M but it's so obvious that
the frame is shifted, so I would have to explain letters in
comparison to their neighbours, which is apophenic at best.
And thus this experiment is not fruitful. I hope it's not harmful
for my mind.
(I wouldn't go far in this shift of frame, because it's the same
line, but how was I managing all different line hitting all the
targets except one (the same way here only one target was hit,
which made me think it's random)
В ~ З? that's the unfit one, and even that is staved and staveless
forms of the same shape, V & Z? V~F which is digamma, which Z
could well be even better, and I noticed it in another context.
ב and Ё are both in ёб and that's what f-word is about.
be ~ еби? get the life!
L ~ Г ~ Z neh?
К ~ Ж
k ~ h
ᚵᚼ as claster? gh? nah, after ᚼ – ᛁ, after ᚴ – ᛚ
both are G & J? is it all one long claster? GHIJKL
a b cd
e f ghijkl
m n o p.. nah, no much sense in such a claster. but m is fucked
anyway, but if F is digamma, could it be, that
a b cd
efghijkl m n
o p qrst
uvwxy z? x as k?
If greek Ζ is G, then ABCDEFG are the seven notes and Z is final?
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ are six notes, as it was in the early gvido
system (6 notes are at his tombstone)
but it was not ti but F they hid in modern greek alphabet. and
could it relate to standart gamut being CDEFGAB? let's compare..
ΑΒΓΔΕFΖ and nothing comes out of it.
Here I demonstare how my scientific thought goes, and I support
publishing the unsuccessful experiments too. It this obscure
corners of your own private sites whether on your own private
servers or in even more public domain.
mer de merde
But the comparison of different jewish and russish lines is based.
This part is from the final (middle) knitten notebook,
B D are not only be and do, but also be & die
beat & dead? is it about heart or fight? win & lose
(labials are пиздаты, linguals are хуёвы? Today b is better, but
worse is also labial. bad and good is the opposite of what I
expected from them in this context, but they say boot used to be
good, is glove evolg?
I mention Andrei Kuraev in vol.8
yet I mention Ansambl Hrista Spasitela in vo.2
2 is between 1 and 3 (and maybe that's why it's associated with
devil (dva as in dvil)
and 8 is between 7 and 9 (the opposite side of 1to9 spectrum. 9 is
devyat in russian.
in IVX X appeared before V, and thus not X is two V's , but V is
half the X.
X is IIIIIIIII crossed out, as they do in jails, but if they count
in weeks, it's 7 days, but are all 7 in I form or the 7th crosses
the previous 6, and thus weeks could be six, and w could be ш.
365 = IVXLCD theory tells, that X is 8, not 10
then whether those are actually 8-day week, but I think I've shown
that it's impossible? only one extra week would be with one "lost)
day from tyme to tyme in a leap year.
|||||| and 7th / or \ would make the x
or 7 bars and / doesn't count? then why cross it? One stroke a
day, that could help.
Х as 8 as a math concept? or did they actually have 8-day week? 32
days per month? impossiburu.
I decided that I don't trust to common google information that one
lunar month is 29.5 days, because it contradicted to 4 weeks are
28 days. and 28*13=364, which demanded an additional day (or 2 in
a leap year) and Bj`o'rk said, that all women know they have a 28
day cycle, which makes it 13 months, but men needed 12 for some
religious reasons (it's as if they exclude the Jesus himself out
of their number?)
4 7 13 are interesting numbers because 1 and 10 make the sequence
16 19 22 all have connection to alphabetic numerals (younger
futhark, golden nuber of runic calendards, hebrew alphabet) and
before that they were related to calendar? are those 4+7+13 the 24
of some alphabet? 25 with the 1?
5 vowels, 5 columns? We can build it out of english 26 (no Y?)
a b c d j (something like that was in ugaritic, I felt like it
feets here the best, but could be а б в г д)
e f g h n (n is next to h (N is literally Н in russian) and n is
both labial and lingual, like θ)
i m k l s (s like samekh, which gave birth to the name sigma, as
o p q r t
u v x w z (w or y, some of those, thus I think the mess began when
w became not ʃ but w)
was w ш?
I'm only modelling. Without authentic archaeologic findings it is
I hope I don't botch english more than
бв like её, ий, uvw
Was uvw-line pulled out of final V? whowever did it must have
z yx vwu tsr (q) ponml kjihg fe d cba
я сейчас как орешкин гадаю, блужаю в потьмах.
Но если ai, знающую все языки попросить раскатать алфавит вдоль и
поперёк на разных языках по моему же принципу, то может какой-то
вариант будет столь прост и ясен, что будет ясно - это оно.
Но я не знаком с таким ии
365 as IVXLCD as 1 4 8 32 64 256 but how would that be? 256 days
are 4 64 cycles.
64 cycle is 2 32 cycles, thus 256days are 8 32day cycles, and the
1 4 8 32 64 before that are 3 13/32 cycles, thus not so. And I
could look for some leap weeks, but either way 32day cycle doesn't
make no sense, unless moon was moving slower in the past. which I
And mostly because of Bj`o'rks influence I looked into what is the
actual length of month, and:
And in astrology they count the position of the moon in some
celestial house, not the phases of it, which is weird in relation
to what I said before, about C and D or something, either way
common public only notices the synodic phases.
They say, Regardless of the culture, all lunar
calendar months approximate the mean length of the synodic month,
but can I really believe it? Especially since there are sidereal
and tropical astrologies, but then those are to distinguish year,
not month. I probably should contact Alexandra Elbakyan with my
questions when I have them formed.
I always like name Михаил, seemed fit for such bear like me (no
homo, but if I was, I'd be a bear) and now I notice that Mike Patton looks like me, and
he made a hairdo I did, I'd like to contact him to tell not to
have such hairdo, because it could be the reason my hair got off.
But I don't wanna scare him before they did, and when he does,
I'll know that it's from the braids, and I tell the world. Because
Mike Patton has the best hair I know of.
And by the way he looks very much like me (even though usually he
looks very different) I think that we're guested or hosted by the
same ghost, the same demon, but if it's clear with me, my name is
Dmitry and I'm usually know as dimon which is different in a
stress, but french would probably pronounce that demon with the
stress my name has. I'm demon, I like it, I listen to death metal,
to black metal, to all that dark imagery of lYnch and horrors, and
even comedies I like are horrific. I am demon, it is clear, and I
have an excuse: I wish to end the war not to waste what we both
may use for achieving something we don't want to do by ourself,
maybe the other side wants to trade labours.
And now I see how Dmitry is also Mitya, which is pretty close to
Miha, because х is h in russian and x was used for t in the past, both t & x were t's I think. but why is it
h or ks now? were they all sh& sch and ск? but there's ks,
not sk, dominatrix доминатрица, actress актрисса, empress
императрица, dominatrix is доминатрикс, new words are new, no
phonetic shift since then, and if ess becomes исса, then whether
brits (or whoever brought that suffix) used more syllabic way to
pronounce lonely consonants, or something happened in russia,
where words have gender suffices, and thus they could add that a
to show that it's a girl. Germans take sauna naked, both sexes
together (I wonder why is that? from weimar liberation or from
ancient times, they always saw it as normal? Historians contact
me so we change this peace and promote more coherent picture of
reality) and russians go naked only with lovers, otherwise men
and women are separated. That could be connected to our grammar,
though german language has gender articles (prefices)
And Michael is an angel, the godly might. and might is associated
with a bear.
Bear is both a bear and carry, and carry is directly connected
with might, mighty may.
Мишка мишка? Зойка зайка? Вовка вовк? вовк ис волк ин юкрэйниан
Лизка лиска? Лизочка лесичка? Лизочка Алисочка.
Люська лиска? ласка? людмила милый народ? людям лиса мила?
лисоньки же мимими,
Medved-magazine uploaded that maedness, a nice coincidence, so
(also as an example of that dark imagery I
prefer being a demon I am, and this world is full of angels
and demons of all sorts who are all ought to coexist.
pleasantly and productively and it would be great if
production doesn' reduce the pleasantness part: no ecologic
damage, no noise, no accidents)
Гуси, козы, коровы, лошади, кони, быки, свиньи, кабаны не имеют
пар среди имёт.
Козлик Коля или Кузьма? Костя кот? кот коза козёл конь корова - ко
у всех общее? ко как дом? ho in both house and home? use is vse
(all in russian is vse, use as a variant) house is ho for
everybody, home is ho for me. ho is cover? ho as hall? h is here?
hall is here all? weak guess.
home dome are h and d similar? both are final in their lines,
unless h is vowel? but it isn't in latin. and latin is a huge
culture and great source for research.
A & V are not as we know them: we believe 🜂 to be yang, and
thus male and 🜄 to be yin and thus female, but latin A stands for
female and V for male suffices us and similar neutral suffix um,
in russian grammar neutral suffix is closer to male, but I'm not
sure of that: полотенце, млеко, both have final vowels, like
female words tend to do, and male usually don't.
Let's collect all male words in russian that end with vowel:
Дима, Митя, Саня, Саша, Шура, Коля, Костя, Ваня, Серёжа, Женя,
да все эти простые имена и для женских и для мужских все
силлабарные, гласные следовали за согласными, подзвучивали их. У
всех этих емён строгие (полные) формы заканчиваются на согласную,
у женских - на гласную. всегда.
In english is the same story: Jimmy, Johny, but James and John.
But if we go for 🜁 for A, then it's obvious, that the division is
not between fire and water, but between air and solid: 🜁🜃🜂🜄 is
the order where I found it, whether it's a coincidence or not it
was weird to place dashed forms before purer ones, but it played
Air Earth Fire Water, are there third pair, because in english
it's two vowels and two labials, two linguals are missing, or is
it apopheny from me? I guess not. But until I occasionally meet
🜂🜄 crossed vertically, I leave this raw guess alive but not
and when I went to find triangles with vertical bar or something
of the kind, I found glagolitic Ⰴ Ⰲ
and if the glagolitic above don't look like thes signs, trust me,
in other font they are the same:
And that Ⰴ is ascending and Ⰲ is descending makes sense, if they
are 🜂 and 🜄
and 🜂 and 🜄 are naturally Δ and Υ or Δ and ν. Which Ⰴ and Ⰲ are.
🜁🜃🜂🜄 is this order legic or accidental? 🜁 for A standing
first reflects abcd great, but.. now I see..
🜁🜄🜂🜃 must be the actual order: female first inside, male first
outside: air above water, fire before earth.
A B D E earth has cognate in bibleic hebrew, D like fire? З or
even Ж would be good, but is it?
B for Water and Boда is great. A can also be aether, which is эфир
in russian, and is эфир alphabetic itself? or is it nothing?
AVΔe? a V Δ e?
earth as element per se? neither wateh and fire alone, that's air,
probably water and fire was understood first among elements and
earth was both water and fire: soil can produce both wet mud and
burning trees. But air is also a combination of water and fire:
שָׁמַיִם and all I can see is 🜃 must be that combination in other
order: water triangle is drawn before fire triangle, of which only
the first stroke shown. And there thus should be a word in hebrew
for soil, similar to maimash.
מימש is realized, actualize, execute, effect, which is good, but
not what I was looking for.
ארץ is the word opposing שָׁמַיִם in bible.
I wonder why both arabs and jews have d and r so similar, and why
г is similar to r? and why g is to russian d? Were they
all the same letter before they were splat: ᚦ as all Г, Д, Р, К,
R? I'm lost but R and P should be in one band, and though that P
was russian Р, it is still vague to say.
a b cd
o p qrst
in russian b divided into бв, but it's uncommon, usually linguals
split, but what if P = R?
Where r is г? It would be great Г П Т or П Г Т which is more
but that's so raw it's almost (most likely) wrong
I thought of how sound side of numbers could be related to numeral
value of the letters, and I went:
А-n (odin, one)
ᚦee (three, tree, три)
4 as y? because 5 is пять and five, very labial, thus 4 must be
vowel, even if that's some scholastics.
5 as п or f only make sense to me, if it's 8 as some ancient f
6 would make great s, not only by its shape I noticed, but to my
surprise both six and shest are fit.
7 is then t - it's easy to imagin t's dash the same 7's dash not
present in this font.
Then we get the 8-tet again. восьмеричная система. если X = 8, то
и позиционная система пр которую мы знаем могла быть восьмеричной,
и подобно тому как в десятеричной системе 9 - самая крупная цифра,
так и 7 вполне мог быть таковой в восьмеричной.
and I wonder if V follows T because it's old form of 4. What I
thought to be Y is V, makes lots of sense.
nd allows me to try to reconstruct the ancient 8.. it's
named octal.. What a name!
It has been suggested that the reconstructed
Proto-Indo-European word for "nine" might be related to the PIE
word for "new". Based on this, some have speculated that
proto-Indo-Europeans used an octal number system, though the
evidence supporting this is slim.[Winter, Werner (1991). "Some
thoughts about Indo-European numerals". In Gvozdanović, Jadranka
(ed.). Indo-European numerals. Trends in Linguistics. 57.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 13–14. ISBN 3-11-011322-8]
English units was already, to a remarkable extent,
an octal system.
In the mid-19th century, Alfred B. Taylor
concluded that "Our octonary [base 8] radix is, therefore,
beyond all comparison the "best possible one" for an
arithmetical system." The proposal included a graphical notation
for the digits and new names for the numbers, suggesting that we
should count "un, du, the, fo, pa, se, ki, unty, unty-un,
unty-du" and so on, with successive multiples of eight named
"unty, duty, thety, foty, paty, sety, kity and under." So, for
example, the number 65 (101 in octal) would be spoken in
octonary as under-un. Taylor also republished some of
Swedenborg's work on octal as an appendix to the above-cited
? voised and voiceless halves?? S as Six? T as 7? T is literally ᛐ
VPST vier is uier?
T is X?
VPSX? I thought X was 8, not 7. Did it go with a step of
three? A V X?
Roman numeral I is ا?
A W T almost A M T (but of course this coincidence doesn't make it
more true than it is)
And I had this question in another context: is X 7 or 8?
Are actors often homos, because you have to like getting the
Good morning, Dima's back. Why do I apply to me the form with
-a? Because I like it more.
In english a can easily be in male words: killer, warrior, basta
was basta rhymes a rip-off of odb? at least in the name, but he
also was a more glamour version of odb who was awesome but off the
formats. off the formants. off the radio.
R and D reflect each other in k-symmetry, close semantically:
right & dexter.
But in regenerate and degenerate they're the opposites.
And if prefixes maybe inverted in suffixes, we get
generator and generated. Generator is to (re)generate, generated
without outside help can only degenerate, as if't's not
-er and -ed are re- and de-?
let's test this guess more:
reform is not former, but new (or is it new, because it's not
latter. all new is well-forgotten old, now it at least makes
sense, a deeper sense, though "all" part is wrong there.
Maybe it's all they have, because they're not napoleos, they
cannot invent. The normal people create language? I thought poets
did? There are plenty poets among normal people, good poets may
fancy public, which he then can use as his instrument.
reply plier? плоскогубец? pliers could be the inventor's name. (to
ply is курсировать, усердно работать, лавировать, какое интересное
слово! тот, кто любит свою рабту, наверное, лавирует между
столами, между покупателями, между рабочими с тележкой щебня
какого-нибудь, so was reply лавирование меж вопросами or
responsiveness to the clients? You reply to those you love, unless
you don't want to be with her for whatever reasons. Or is it only
my cope, because I knew that if she sees how scared I am, what a
coward I am, only because I saw the wish of scum to destroy me
physically, so I didn't give them chance, being a smart kid I
forsaw the worst possible event, and cowed out. Are domestic
animals smart? Nope, they're just adequate to their abilities)
R and D
revolution (but the opposie of devolution is evolution, but
regenerate ~ generate, re is an abundant suffix, because when you
do it what does it matter if you do it again or anew?
revolutions were before, but they're needed to go further, but if
we understand evolution as sequences of revolutions and allow
peaceful transitions, we ca n make it without rya of war
carnage is cutting ножи? knife нож knighe? g~h and f is double г,
which can be used to transliterate both. lauгг? г is middle form
and h is the final? is h just staved form of г?
how can г relate to г (even when one is cursive, even
italic, form of the other)
if both are two ways to dray crescent. г is the upper
contour, as if the upper end could go all the way down to close
the contour, and г is just the form of crescent in one stroke? as
It was not just first guess, I conceptualized C as crescent
gibbous moons can also be recognized as С or Р (стареющая или
Mnemonic devices for luna phases are DOC (russians don't have D,
so we use the Р, a staved form of some mythic Ɔ whic stands for O,
which stands right by P, and thus I think staved and staveless
forms stand nearby not by accidence, and thus D is staved form of
C? I'm getting even more confused (or the opposite of that) when I
notice, that S of Ξ or ס or س stands before Ο or ע or ع.
Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ but the closest to us that has that S recognizes P as R
& П is the P.
РС is how it goes in russian (they're how they put down RS, the
exactly same pair, even though russians are taught to pronounce R
coronally, but I use uvular form of it and am speak standard
russian, standart, outstanding art should be the standard, thus
it's standart. выстоявшее искусство, доказавшее свою целостность в
French mnemonic devise is Premier Dernier:
thus b & d could be the phases, and c would have nothing to do
but to be the full moon.
In russian it's абвгд, and between b & c в would be great
vollmond. mond is mouth in dutch. moon is maan daar. volle maan.
as if man is as much of a satelite as moon is.
a cheshire smile
If at first there were CD, then we need to introduce some letter
between them to denote the newmoon, but only ugaritic has such
letter of all I know.
and then B for fullmoon would be great before C and A would be the
D moon again. But I never heard of any letter between C & D in
latin. But let's guess they never were denoting new moons, premier
would be their new ones, then alphabet divides into groups
by three, which I think I noticed in the very start, in big brown
history notebook. notebook is for notes? these are also notes,
even though not always musical. ABC EFG HIJ - broken already, it
should be HIK LMN (these also don't look very fit, because N
reflects L in hebrew cursive form of נ, but crescents go the
opposite direction, as if this triple is supposed to be read from
right to left. from N to L, nml.. I doubt it.
And thus that guess of alphabet as lunar calendar goes to waste,
it would never have enough letters for such trick. But 26 is half
the 52, hardly it is an accident. Is it the deck with only two
seasons? 4 suits of a deck, 4 seasons of a year. Half a year in
one alphabet, and it just goes twice? with a stroke above the
other time? Two seasons like Water and Fire or Air and Earth,
either way four-fold began as two-fold.
A2345678910JQK Is it the dirty dozen, because they introduced Q
between J&K for pornographic reasons? Карты с дамами
шулерские, чтоб игрок отвлекался на их перси вместо того чтоб
следить за игрой? Were they A23456789JK? Or was J the I and some θ
were there after h?
Is Q female form of K? Was c s before they invented k? was g ж? or
was г ж and instead of g there was z? then it would also be ж
before з as in russian.
If A to K is the deck, LMN would make perfect beginning of the
second half of the alphabet (they're famous as such in an
etymology of the word element) but O as double A and the begining
of voiceless counterparts of the first half makes more sense.
O23456789XYZ where Y looks as out of its place as Q did.
I didn't work with it before, I had no idea X Y Z would go right
after 9, which looks like cursive shin and stands for W which is
closest to the form of ש which stands second from the end, just
like Y which is related to it, and ת can sound as lingual θ which
makes it more similar to Z, and ר has nothing in common with X,
and W stands before it, doesn't has much to do with ק only if the
way Q reflects Y which reflects W the way I described. And whether
it some magic or poetry or accident, it's fascinating and can be
used in some artform for posthumans.
все.м мы все.мы в сей, мы в каком-то помещении, поле, вот это мы.
on? all! in this we all we oh oui
o! is good? a is baad? go & ba (be) bad be? why not it go like
govno, and jam is the opposite of shit in some russian proverbial
curse rhyme (а нам всё равно что повидно что
говно) some wicked meme.
good sounds alsome almost like
круто in goed. and круто is next to хорошо ( brackets are
so good is what goes,
What goes here is translated by google translator as оно идёт сюда
(thus not goes but comes, come is abundant because go means
do, go on! да вай!
X is 10 when it's convenient, huh?
5 for S is awesome, 5 is E and in light of Σ it's also awesome.
4 for Δ and Д is also great, D reflecting R is also awesome.
3 for Q show it as C. But I wonder why Daleth cursive looks like
3. Because B is the first letter, Beth-Luis-Nion. MLN, I suppose.
N is nasal vowel, and Samekh and Ayn, or directly O after N make
NSO one claster? and of so?
Beth-Luis-Nion are B Г Д, vowels follow. But in ogham it's F, But
the name Beth-Luis-Nion tells, that it used to be only three
stroke max. And only one of the following three is original. N it
was. as the name tells. And in the other two or three staven?
oh my god, this link leads to something incredible: The White
Goddess by Robert Graves. I even bought that book in paper, and I
don't read it to be independent as a researcher. I think I know
enough now, so I can read it and compare his thought against mine
and maybe to ingrane his thought into mine.
And here he modifies ogham the context of which you may read
clicking the previous image.
Previous image leads to an important piece:
философ Деметрий, живший в Александрии в
первом веке до нашей эры, описав в своем труде «О стиле» элизию
гласных и хиатус и сообщив, что с «элизией стих
становится скучнее и менее мелодичным», иллюстрирует
преимущества хиатуса следующим образом:
В Египте жрецы поют гимны богам, произнося
последовательно семь гласных, что производит такое же сильное
музыкальное впечатление на слушателей, как если бы играли флейта
и лира. Если не использовать хиатус, то и язык перестанет быть
мелодичным и гармоничным. Но, пожалуй, лучше мне не развивать
эту тему дальше в сложившейся ситуации.
Он не говорит, что это за жрецы и к каким богам они обращались,
но нетрудно угадать, что это были боги семидневной недели, в том
числе единое трансцендентное божество, и что гимн состоял из
семи гласных, которые Симонид включил в греческий алфавит, и
имел врачующее действие.
And the fact that five notes predated seven notes, and five vowels
predated seven vowels, allows me to conclude that there were only
five days in a week, and it could be because 365 immediately
divides only into 5. and boring 73. I know nothing of 73.
In English, it is the smallest natural
number with twelve letters in its spelled out name.
the 21st prime number.
a star number.
In vol.1 I quoted academia: "
Dongba is largely a mnemonic system, and cannot
by itself represent the Naxi language; different authors may
use the same glyphs with different meanings, and it may be
supplemented with the geba syllabary for clarification."
And that "mnemonic system" part is most probably bs, caused by
somebody unable to learn the system or by chinese propaganda,
actively destoying that culture.
different authors may use the same
glyphs with different meanings
can be countered with alphabetic example of |, used for both I
& l and if we go beyond latin (who knows maybe there were more
than one dongba-based writing system) then it's also a in arabic,
and both v & n in hebrew, which is fascinating, because both v
& n merge in the form of v (greek ν)
and Λ thus meets V in that l form next to the ו
But that hook in ו could reflect ל but there's not such hook in
the cursive forms of ו or ן
It's as if | and ✓ were the same, as if ✓ was a \ with a straight
that ✓ is probably left handed. right handed tick (check) would
probably also be like that if drawn from the bottom up. some
people write so, and then / would just be a swashless (swift)
like v is greek Ν and נ looks like reversed L when in cursive (and
hebrews also write the other way around)
Сейчас отправил письмо патриотичному
телезрителю, оно интересно.
Сейчас заметил, что Россия и Америка имеют похожие не только имена
(rUSsiA, USSR, USA US SU) похожие, но и сокращения по одному
принципу имеют и двухбуквенные и трёхбуквенные сокращения: US USA
RU RUS (NL & GB так не могут)
И пошёл дальше: прочёл эти сокращения US (буквально us, ас, что
переводится как нас, но иногда на русский переводятся как мы
(английская и русская грамматика слегка отличается "it's us" =
"это мы") RU читается по буквам (spells) как "are you" and "are
you?" переводится на русский "чё серьёзно?" (буквально "есть (ли)
вы?" где есть служебная частица (i am a scientist = я есть один
учёный - так у них говорят (слова короткие, потому что у нас один
в виде суффикса идёт слеплено со следующим словом)
RUS and как будто во множественном числе "те кто "are you?""
Мы самой грамматикой (гримуар - родственное слово) вынуждены быть
противопоставлены, Россия не ведущая держава, но держава постоянно
бросающая вызов. Оппонент в этом общем движении (кто-то
воспринимает это танцем, кто-то - схваткой, остаётся надеяться,
что мы переростаем подростковый период цивилизации и нам уже не
нужно мутузить друг друга как бестолковым школярам чтоб доказать
кто здесь круче, можно наверное по взрослому начинать все эти
вопросы решать. Нам учиться и не обращать внимания на других
успешных, или стремиться подружиться с ними, а уж точно не
вынашивать планы убийства, которым постоянно угрожать, как
обезьяна с дубиной (подросткам такое поведение простительно,
взрослым - нет)
The Sideways I ꟷ is an epigraphic variant of Latin
capital letter I used in early medieval Celtic inscriptions from
Wales and southwest England (Cornwall and Devon). About 36
monumental inscriptions in Wales, and about 15 in Cornwall and
Devon, mostly dating from the 5th-6th centuries, make use of
this letter. Except for a single inscription from the Isle of
Man, it is not found in monumental inscriptions elsewhere. The
letter is used exclusively in a word-final position for Latin
words (or Latinized Celtic names) in the second declension
and with such info why would we divide H from I claster? H is
literally И in old russian.
H is vowel in greek, and presence of labial Θ shows that those
apollo priests wanted to add whole line to vowel H?
Α Β Γ Δ
Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ
Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ
Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
EZ reflects russian second line, ЕЁЖЗ, where Ё was added later as
a form of E. and Ж is ž, З is z.
And russians have Η Θ in addition to already messy I-line.
But what if I was z.. a sideways H was recognized as Z in
but back to russians:
If we consider Η vowel, Θ labial, Ι lingual, then we get ourselves
Value Greek Cyrillic
6 Ϛʹ or Ϝʹ
Ч or Ҁ
У or Ѵ
Ц or Ѧ
If we phonetize old russian alphabet like this:
We get ourselves three unequal rows, that demand simplifying ГД
into one godly deity of g
S as f? so or similarly, like w, it is
believed to be sounding in greek Ϛ where that letter came from.
It's literally Ϛʹ or Ϝʹ there.
If we phonetize old russian alphabet like this:
we get ourselves almost symmetric scale, which demands wheterh Ѕ
or И to be out. And ГД as 2 letters.
Either way it's 9-letter scale, as old decimal system, shown
above, demands for a cycle to be.
(I chose to remove H because of it's possible vowelness, and
I would expect to see A I V as the three vowels. And probably it
was so, then O would reflect E as > reflects < and they're
placed in alphabet in sucha way that it is mathematically
accurate, if we take alphabet as description of human age,
beginning as a baby, and ending with a tott.
And now let's see if it's accurate in numerologic sense.
The table above tells that PQRST equal 770, which is larger than
255, but that could not be right, because there T is not in the
100 position. Or is it even supposed to be in the 90?
Italian alphabet places it there:
AB C D< F G H I L M N >
P Q R S T
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
and now 350.. is still larger than than the rest, which comes
naturally, but could be a surprise.
It wheterh wasn't used in such a way, or this < > thing came
from some earlier fairytale.
And I recall that octomal fairytail:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 16 24 32 40 48 56
1 to 40 would thus make 108 which would make less than 104 of 48
and 56 combined,
thus > is at the position of 50(40)
And it would make sense, that at the age of 4 or so you learn to
compare 10 to 100s and at the age of that 40 or 50 you can compare
things up to 5 percent accuracy.
And that 8-digit system would make sense, if people could show in
fingers, thumbs are short for that, and they are even named
differently in english.
Let's go further in that octomal theory and see if at some point
they add up to something meaningful
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 128
192 256 320 384 448 516
1 3 6 10 15 21 28 36 52 76 108 148 196 252 316 444 636 892 1212 (here my computational power crashed and I,
tired, had to take a calculator. I surely am not used to count
in numbers) 1596 2044 2560
But that is what octomal numbers equal in decimal, so I understand
their meaning, but both awesome 444 and 636 are something else in
and I go where I left that idea of IVXLCD adding up to 365 if X is
and I found this:
It is funny that the only three vowels drawn differently in
russian are sorta related (У ~ Ч ~ Ц)
I know that all these letters had many unlikely forms, but I work
with this set, wherever the roots of that notion of УЧЦ comes from
in it: the actual historic canon, the subconscious urge to учиться
of the person who compiled it (now I see
that person is as sexist as he) or his poetic plot, or
If there were round yurtas instead of square walls, then it makes
sense why IVXLCD of octobon system octagon system, not decimal,
because mal is bad.
Г = Б? Again? Г = Б.
государство есть безопасность? так оно задумывалось, но столь
успешно, что теперь оно само представляет опасность для своих
ᚹ wanna ᚹ гонна В = Г too, because Б = Г.
БГ и ГБ как антиподы советских времён. Я just had urge
wanna and gonna are will, what we will and what will come.
come is go me to me
to do go can be cognates if grammar is more primitive.
ko is also one of them, because to is ко in russian, к is both k
and all these cognates. except w.
but if б = г, then what's the difference? are all short consonants
Не проходьте повз! Sounds in urkeinian and we're uralic, we're
their natural ally against moscow. Because moscow oppresses us and
russian patriots laugh that it looks like Хуев, but brutal truth
is Кий could be related to хуй, just as удочка is to уд. уд a'nd
ху two memes in different dialects became stylistic forms of the
same thing in russian. As if it used to be худ. Художник
родственно ли этому слову. От какого слова может происходить
художжник? не может быть, чтоб его в каком-то иде не сохранилось.
Painter. Drawer, Draw близко к гравировать, paint палитра, но даже
менее близко, пятно! пятно родственно слову пятка? пытать? пятна
points пнутое. пинать от пята пи пятка на носок пина
гипотетическое слово для ноги? спина родственно этому слову? с
пина, спина с ног начинает рости. пина bottom? back в ass? back
пачка pack. Надо поразбирать человеческий таз, пачкой ли там
слои костной ткани. Или pack это plank?
Why do I mess where ai can do the work better faster. And I must
whether brings only ideas for ai, or to focus on immortality
Walls won because they're safer and real estate, not some movable
property. Why would nomad houses be considered less ground for the
private property of land. Because their horses need to move?
Because they're easier to move.
Majestic mad жестик
As an illustration of how much d and g could be the same letter or
the same sound, skugge is shadow
I wanted to sub ахсимсз with subtitles like this, because it's
easier than to dub.
d as golos and s as script? I would
ratianlize s and d as speak and draw if it was the other way
around, so that is whether apophenia or some other poetic bs.
poetic is music? so don't be rude. даже если кто-то из фей
является божьей коровкой. как Маринет.
and of course I was not the first to think about it, even though
for few moments I sought I thourht
thought I was.
I had a good conversation about science, and it is better than
And now some attic numerals:
Detail of stela showing tributes paid by allies of
Athens in the League of Delos. The amounts are in Attic
numerals, using the drachma sign "𐅂" instead of the geenric
unit sign "Ι". Some amounts are "𐅄" = 50, "ΗΗΗ" = 300, "𐅅ΗΗΗ"
= 800, "ΔΔΔ𐅂𐅂𐅂" = 33, "Χ" = 1000, and "Χ𐅅𐅄Δ𐅂𐅂"? = 1562?.
The Attic numerals used the following main
symbols, with the given values:
Value Symbol Talents
Greek: ΠΕΝΤΕ [pɛntɛ] Modern: πέντε
ΔΕΚΑ [deka] Modern: δέκα
"Δ" in "Π": 10 ×
5 = 50
Old Greek: ΗΕΚΑΤΟΝ [hɛkaton] Modern: εκατό
"Η" in "Π": 100
× 5 = 500
Old Greek: ΧΙΛΙΟΙ [kʰilioi]
"Χ" in "Π": 1000 × 5 = 5000
Old Greek: ΜΥΡΙΟΙ [myrioi]
"Μ" in "Π": 10000 × 5 = 50000
The fractions "one half" and "one quarter" were
written "𐅁" and "𐅀", respectively.
Roman thousands were marked with the
horizontal tally marks above them.
If etruscan only had 𐌠 𐌡 𐌢 𐌣 then the cultuure before them
must have had only I V
v before x could make a good story of two v combined becoming a
tradition of x,
Vier being Пять reveals r and ть as the same lingual morpheme.
some proto-ᚦ the for example, or to as ть is.
I just was revealed how to make
make each sentence take its line
then we don't need dots.
and it further revealed paw as path.
лапа probably inverts into paw soehow,
is it pala or la pas?
one thought per
one blocklet per a thought
one line per sentence
If I is ein, V is vier, X must be ten? zehn!
X sounds as Z sometimes, so it's close.
and it again raises a problem of DF S being T and c being d
but then b is also c because of how b & d are similar.
as foot and hand, 𓃀 and 𓂧.
they both were paws? when п was л.
п thus paw, лапа
л is ладонь, длань. l as h? why not leg?
leg is the whole лапа.
foot is пята, путь, path, pes (pedagogue is believed to be
etymologically from that word, but it's a misconception:
paedogogus is lating ofrm and it's the same ae as in paedophile.
And it explains the alternative spelling: with ae is the latin
term, pedophile is the english standart. I keep on writing
standard as standart it seems natural to my hands to write it this
way, thus standart it is.
The way I set my own standart here: it's not d, it's t? art is
done, set. ard is operated. but in that context standard is done
with, it's standard of the past, and thus it's standart. art as
fac'd. as there are fact and fucked. fact is what happened and
fucked can be is fucked.
If I placed is fucked in italic, it is cursive, because it felt
deep, so I unitalized it.
Italy I tell ya.
USA you ass hey!
USA you a say.
US is directly us.
(the collective of people, so general government will be on the
basis of US. as it is in UN now)
UN has Hitler's fringe in the right side of N
US has ass in its name, som a so may
be maybe so m
so maybe it's US turn into, merge into UN?
Does UN have power over US? Some events showed that they don't.
S even looks like an ass. a naked as.
T is both trup i dung? dirt. топь. трясина трясёт ся.
тряса она? праведна пра веды она? я думал правды она. ведать
I must learn to break the thoughts if I don't want commas
Я хочу знать как жить.
Я хочу быть успешным бизнесменом.
Но я вынужден заниматься наукой.
И это мой долг.
Шудры рабы своих тупых желаний.
Кшатрии лишь ключевые шудры, с которыми вообще
имеет смысл дела иметь.
Брахманы подчиняют себе сиюминутные желания ради
Как брахман подчиняет себе
Как брахман выбирает цели? Они появляются в его жизни зачастую
помимо его воли? Нет, брахманы хотят быть брахманами. Хотят
всё-всё знать. И те три брата в типа-рамаяна это брахман что ушёл
в горы чтоб всё знать (брахману положено бессмерие. это
радует) затем брат который стал воителем, и третий брад
спящий. когда спящий проснётся можно (возможно, я не читал)
аттрибутировать сюда (я видел коммент под типа-рамаяной, кто-то
ттак и сделал.
Кшатрии служат. Кшатрии ключевые шудры, потому что они связующее
звено между просветлёнными и скотиной, ибо есть те кто видят, есть
те кто видят когда показывают и те кто не видят. это и есть три
касты. shudras are dark as night and kshatrii is knight.
Я считаю разумным удовлетворит то желание (мне это не будет
многого стоить) чтоб быть удовлетворённым, довольным жизнью, а то
чего это у меня всё есть, а я всё недоволен.
Я хочу капсулу, я уже не хочу ничего кроме капсулы? почти что так,
я богат и без бизнеса, но капсула это больше чем бизнес.
Наука изобрела мне капсулу.
Composer глючит чтоб я писал автоматически, не глядя в экран.
и получается отлично.
то магия, возможно, channeling, proper channeling wil be when I
will be able to go astral and keep my fingues typing. Yeah, that
I'm looking for.
But who will read it, we have to record astral directly. And it
will be done soon. I saw peopole working on it. (o's are when I
stumbled and when I tried to control the process, my fingers knew
orthography beter than the controlledr. - d was written by
fingers, r brought in that controlling module in my head.
thus r and d are semantically opposed. -er is active. -ed is
baby being passive is natural, d is 4, after I (after a kid
understands what he wants he and she are two readings of the same Ⱶ and I wonder why there
are four unicodes for that instead of two ͰͱⱵⱶ and I guess it's
because first half is ancient from soem ꟷ texts, and the second
half is modern Η Ⱶ similar to h and thus Hh is the most univesal
Тот кто просит prays and praises.
Православные славят "слава богу"
Протестатные благодарят "thank god"
Правые за соблюдения их права
Левые за being left alone?
It used to be the casu until jews were allowed into politics.
casu instead of case is how my fingers typed
it and let it be the way the y want it to be
I pondered the other day and saw that there are only two basic
a and o don't palatalize the previous consonant (the syllabic
pure пью питьевая
trouble turbulence tour-буль to-crush-and-sink?
I sent the cree star diagram to Wim as a birthday present. And as
usually in such cases, the more I share the more I get:
(I will mirror when I edit it in a shorter
I have spoeke spoken before on why
cree writing systems existed before christians,
and here it shows how similar it is to the writing systems we use
in a way no christian would fathom.
The first and second videos demonstarte two separate settings,
they relate to each other in the sense of vowels, in vocalism, but
they both demonstare principles present in european alphbaets, but
differently, on different levels, you'll see in a moment:
Both structures he've shown (and he relates to it to something
sacred, not mentioning no christians (and if it was a christian
structure, why wouldn't he give it in the form of crosses? only
because he didn't know of this diagram) omit the external garbage
that image above them includes, and it makes the resemblane
between them and the european alphabets more lucid:
A reflects O, E reflects I (even though that image above
recognizes as I & E what this man obviously reads as E &
EE (and O is AA in ogham and danish))
Consonants go in the order they place them in europe: ABD, or OPT,
whichever way you look at them. wA is a dotted A and even that is
placed not to breaking the structure of vowel, labial, lingual.
M as the first letter! it is fascinating from two perspectives: B
as the first letter. as the video goes on you can see that order
is BCDE, as I suggested it could be. And M is the proto-B then,
because the order before A was introduced
(as is reported in King Jesus by Robert Graves and in other
instances: a cabbalist told so. many holy books begin with b. b
d as the universal counterposition and a reflects d so much that
it could reflect b the way d does, and it is a raw part, I have
to cook it yet.) is more in the past (it's almost not seen from the modern european
A & O oppose eachother again, but in another level: they are
named low-tongue-raisers in russian philology, and they are placed
in the lower part of the diagram.
E & I oppose each other again, but they're also both named
high-tongue-raisers in russian philology (I took freedom to
translate it in my own style, but they're named close vowel in
standard terms, but also high vowel in american terminology. A
& O are named open or low vowels. That could be an argument
towards european roots of the structure, as if an european did
create it. But that is countered with the fact that such exact
positioning of sounds was not known in europe and that if they
repeated european order, as would be natural for them to, they
would make it more explicit, and instead we have resemblances
which can only be explained or even detected only with knowing my
work, and christians have shown in armenian alphabet that they
don't have a clue))
I have a job to finish this review, but I think you can see it for
yourself, I will return to it. For now short:
mn sequence, the second half of the alphabet (could that christian
know of the second half? Then he would place it as LMN sequence,
but it seems (according to the videos) that L is what was added
after that traditional sequence the videos represent. Together
with K R J which natuarally was for Jesus Christ? Because cree
phonetics is all weird and doesn't seem to be including the
sonors. And it correlates the fact that I-line is out of order. (the thought which lead out of here was raw and
It's incredible, but there's no k in traditional lines. But
if I look carefully upon the videos, we may notice that they
include JQ in the canon:
who writes Christ over q? Could it be that cree people asked
missionaries what letters they had for k sound and chose q as
related to their own forms the most (for C was taken, and K twoo
weird and akr-wrd. is ok in okolnikov for
awk? Is it hawk? сокольников? Кто-нибудь использовал ястребов
вместо соколов? скорей всего это диалектные синонимы, сейчас
смотрел охоту с ястребом, я бы не отличил её от охоты с соколом.
Подозреваю, что сокол мощней. немношк, и не всегда, одинаковые)
And thus that was what how christians managed to declare cree
writings their own, to usurp it, to absorb it into their petty
I claim, that diagonal lines also had 4 letters before chrisians,
and t in ther only plays that english also can here rat in it.
This 4-line diagonal hypothesis is supported by the fact that
those four are the common order in those lines. So I combine it so
And what I see in those diagonals is that very M-line with some Y
inserted between נ and ס.
And if we look once again at the order from the video we can see,
that that Y, even though that ipa's j is й and could be considered
a consonant, the syllables it make are perfectly vowel and thus
perfect to end as BCDE according to what I said before. And now I
notice that thus both straight lines and the diagonal lines have
their vowels, only simple vowels go first and йотированные гласные
идут в конце, как многие в русском алфавите.
Almost none of the cree set reminds russian or english signs of
corresponding meaning, maybe ᓴ and ᓭ remind S a little, whatever
it could be, still the 8th part of them all, it takes some
imagination to correspond ᔭ to y. But the additional jo ke ri seem
to come directly from european J q r. Of those signs only ᒍ and ᑫ
is present. J Q that were also presented in the video. For whatver
reason they decided not to inclurde in this sen those ri's and
- ᐊ ᐁ ᐃ
p ᐸ ᐯ ᐱ
t ᑕ ᑌ ᑎ
k ᑲ ᑫ ᑭ
ch ᒐ ᒉ ᒋ
m ᒪ ᒣ ᒥ
n ᓇ ᓀ ᓂ
s ᓴ ᓭ ᓯ
y ᔭ ᔦ ᔨ
That cree structure also shows, that America is connected to
Europe and not Asia (or they would place K first, and yet what
interesing is the korean K, their first consonant resembles cree
first consonant, even though it sounds completely different, as if
they had some common structure, but because of the difference in
their languages they read it differently.
But then again it could be a coincidence, just as their N looking
like cursive נ, and I as I. and also J and π and cursive r maybe.
and t. and other runic forms of ᛆᚿᚮ don't really correlate. So I
draw the line here and say that korean probably relate to some
chinese signs. and if those chinese signs relate to european, that
I have to research when I get a chinese module to my head.
If M ~ П then not only muses are pussies,
but пузо could be related to pussy.
(it could sounds as a blasphemy, but it was revealed to me
after I thought about my weird religious lifestory and that the
affection to muses is the only one I had in my heart all the
AB с DE
if A and E counterpositioned,
it's because E palatalizes consonants and A doesn't.
And in this sense A and O is one side of the vowels and E and I is
the other one.
U is in between as Y because U is ju and maybe even и sometimes.
But english e is э
and O is close to U
Is it why..
Does this later vowel break this early system and that's why we
don't know of it.&?
Looking at artificial structure as if it was a natural one and
theorists only described it allowed to later theorists (the
theorists who came after that, the new theorists) to
reconceptualize the structure and thus to break its symmetry. So
those who 've built aeiou structure whether dismanteled the more
simple ones or they have rather reconstructed the structuralism
including the letters that were out of it. by introducing q and x?
q qourd be a form of c, ч, ц standing before q in hebrew.
I'm only guessing here, I told you it was a draft. Philosophers
don't need erasers, espeially when they allow their mistakes to be
revealed, to see how we think so you can too.
But what is the mechanism of our thought? Grammar of sentences
demand us to choose words, and how do we choose? Let's think about
it while we speak. The whole sentence semantically appears before
I write it, so thoughts come in no-verbal fors, like flashes, of
images. Let's try to catch that .. those flashes. I felt the
vector (force) towards that idea of flash, as if it was my nervous
cell rushing towards the cell she recognized as flashes, as if I
whether placed the previous text in some cell or it was there
forever, and previous sentence came to me in flash also, as if (I
guess by knowledge not feeling) several cells contacted me,
makeing a complex feature of their components. Then that was in
therm even then.
And now my task is to go further into this, because I didn't fake,
I actually felt it.
But I'm tired of licking my own tongue, will return to it later.
And now let's take it n the
Funk is not some euphemism of fuck, it's not
flexia in english, it's more likely somebody with sperm on face
and even in nose saying we're fucking and getting we're funking
What cell structure could observe how the neurons fire eachother?
The fired neurons themselves could report of it. It looked as if I
was inside of the fired neurons that received that idea. The one
that asked it? Was it a neuron or a structure? Looked like one
neuron as they draw then, inside the ball one side of which kinda
lightern up. Does this typo shows how
Look so natural to me, as it comes from the hight to the depth.
and I is in the middle, which makes sense if Angel is abouv and
deWill is the low.
a bove? ab ove?
the low? be law?
a bove a bow a vow?
Λow ad Vow, now it makes perfect sense.
Our vows are above the laws, that's for sure.
Do I vow to live forever? Do I "Wow! I live forever!"
Is Pelevin's never say wow is biblaic don't vow.
do not swear an oath at all (even though I
took it out of context, that's how people take it, short)
oath is owe's what is ought. I spoke about it, I forgot of oath
then, add it to that.
I go all the way Wo! I live forever!
I don't know who is Wo (that's a typo) but that's the same Wo I
have in WooDeeMann.
Woo is Voodoo, and it could be the rememberance of that basal BD
And such orthography make it directly related to ведун and Wotan.
Also the word веды comes out as something alphabetic.
And I tried to find some veda, and I chose: rigveda, ayurveda may
also be in book, I never thought of what is the ayurveda's main
text. There must be. And even though rigeda came to me as the firs
association, I don't think common public knows this word. Ayur is
also an alphabetic word. Rig is not. Unless R is vowel and as in
India and g is k the way they start their consonant row. Okay I
will look into Rigveda too. To ee if it begins with b too.
Rig is probably reich, reiner's book? Ayurveda is more brachmic.
Rigveda is kshatrian? I think I read it and it begins with a war
Why I make such guesses? I consider all the gueses valuable. It is
a draft. It is an online draft, but a draft never the less.
Asuras in hinduism and Ahura Mazda could be the reason beyond the
division between h & s, and thus c & d, s & t, and
thus maybe qrst as four different sounds? Was it some common trick
they used to pacify the religious conflicts when one nation
considered the deity of their neighbours for satan, which is
translated as foe, and it was natural whne nations were in
And I recognized ahura as asura correctly:
Асуры (от санскр. и пали «असुर» (asura IAST), тиб.
ལྷ་མ་ཡིན་ (lha.ma.yin), кит. 阿修羅/阿修罗 (āxiūluo)), также Дайтьи
(Daityas — «потомки Дити»), — в индуизме низшие божества,
называющиеся также демонами, титанами, полубогами, антибогами,
гигантами, и находящиеся в оппозиции к богам Сурам (потомкам
Адити), аналогично оппозиции «боги—титаны» или «боги—гиганты» в
греческой мифологии. В зороастризме же — всё наоборот; асуры там
объявляются богами, дэвы — демонами.
Asuras (Sanskrit: असुर) are a class of beings or
power-seeking clans related to the more benevolent Devas (also
known as Suras) in Hinduism. The term is assumed to be
linguistically related to the Ahuras of Indo-Iranian people and
And that theologic opposition could be the source of hindu-muslim
conflict which lead to the division between India and Pakistan.
And also Heathens and Abrahamists. And thus it is a strange
position for the whites: we're historically Indoeuropean, and we
also consider semites satanic, but we obey semitic religion, but
russians have much more sympathy to indians than to some jews or
arabs. It is a weird situation and can be related to that uroboros
situation, when snake bites on its own tail.
and it could relate to the way indians and europeans write left to
right, and semites go right to left.
utero утроба (I wonder if the ба stands for inside, but
seing this suffix elsewhere, maybe not)
some piece of mind about where did the
universe come from:
Nothing is the only "something" to which the question "where did
THAT (god, singularity) come from?" is inapplicable. But such
solution raises questions about how can something appear out of
nothing (and response to that would be that absolute nothing
only exists in the absolute past, and emptiness equals isotropy,
and the accelerations are also not absolute zeros, because
absolutes are merely mathematical abstractions, that because of
resonance effects anisotropy grows up to the modern state of
events during some infinite ammount of time)
But that's only my explanation, I haven't read Fred Hoyle yet.
> (somebody asked of jews looking like
satan's chidren instead of god's ones)
Their god is satan to you, they believe that your god is satan
too. That's pretty much the way boundaries between nations are
drawn. Гaд [gad] is snake in russian, god in russian is bog,
goat is also not far, etc.
Asuras are satans in hinduism, bud gods in zoroastrism.
And probably the direction of writing has direct relation to
They're surely selected (but who knows for what, most probably
to be the scapegoat to the powers that be)
I close my eyes and try to imagine how my mind works. I feel my
ears from the inside, and I try to couple other body of mine, and
I see that heart make it rather asymetric, and isn't it why it
beats? Always trying to get to the centre of the flesh? or to
divide? Why dosn't liver beat? it hicks. It is kickin'
hicks there is a typo, the word type os better than scribo, so I
type. Notebooks profits are I can sell them,
I felt calling someone else a jew is like cursing someone.
I live further from people. But they may place syrens even
заманиха самая низкая? к озеру. якобы (я не проверял) восстановили
историческoе названия улицы. ленин is членин. блюхер соня кривая -
это средства подавления делая такие топонимы в центре города, а на
окраинах с названиями ворОвскОго ворåшилова
Ленин есть двойная магия, членин и просит лени на, проспит простит
члены на, не знаю как эта топомагическая операция называется, но
мк-ультра дети в сравнении с тими сумасшедшими колдунами. Где
народ живёт хуже там нечеисти больше, чёрные как черти.
Бе русские это почти черти, потому что кавказец с русским
смешанный воспринимается русскими как русский, а кавказцам - в
меньшей степени, как мой взгляд на это говорит (я лышл историю про
то как парня, явно помешанного с кавказцем и ли таджиком, мы этих
плохо различаем, был избит в ташкнте с криками "русский убирайся в
свою россию" не это ли собирание русскиех земель, безумные
политики, это же и есть шиза, абстрактные иерархии выражающиеся в
материальных ништяках для тех кто иерархию строит. .ю но это
преступный метод. фальшивая пирамида. бизнес же много пирамид,
соединённых сетями коммуникаций.
Как гриб может быть вв разных формах, как и человек, во всём
многообразии своих эпигений.
Don't promise. Do. (stopped myself from anouncing (русское слово
анонс может научитьь этому слову и nouns, in on an,
I You it that
I Thee it that
(this a ore polite form of it)
A good way to stop using italic and colours is that internet uses
plain text. Or fuck them let them preserve my htmls to read them.
Whoever copies it to make it an example as the most complex
sentences. I shouldn't make myself shorter to reach that silly
goal. Let's become laconical, laconic, briff?
brief as the opposite of grieve? буквально горевать. to grieve to
to be to do to squeal.
l is j because delat is deyat
neat as meat? понять. поймать быть может тоже. get it? capice?
Capisce? where sce of science and conscience.
science is знание, consciousness сознание.
с and н are cognates? over g and ŋ
n looks like h, н looks like H. (that н is N)
Bothe H & N are final in their lines, but in greek after
them lay additional letters Θ and Ξ and their similarity, the eye
of goat ness I mentioned in previous issues.
I would like to see A as the opposite of Y and even before that I
wanted to see Ez as one letter E3 because of аз and because z has
nothing to do their. z is seus for greeks but zmei for russians.
becuse I recognize how D reflects R (that P is R)
H and O could both be vowel, but if Ez is vowel, H is supposed to
be labial, and it can be, it still works as such in japanese
katakana and furigana.
furi as furui? but some say katakana predates furigana, as if
furigana is cursive form of katakana and katakana is ingenious
ainu writing script,and is still used as such. My sources are poor
because I don't give the sources, and it may confuse people in
where do I stand, and they should be confused, confused enough not
to read this notebooks. these notebooks. this notebook.
Λ can be I because делать is деять (I
wasn't sure I said it, I seid it before)
К & M are first letters in different tradition. I рисую
крупными мазками, because it's still vague to me, but european
tradition is labial first consonant. And M is the ultimate labial.
And Λ plays I for IMN and four-ness of the elements make it ΛΜΝΞ
ΛΜΝΞ almost exactly repeat ΑΒΓΔ (Α and Δ
remind eachother so much again)
ΑΒΓΔ used to be something like ᛆᛒᚦ and then it naturally was
fire+air water and hard soil
a as agni, that is what rigveda praises first. Vayu comes second,
but it's not water, air. fire + air.
Rigveda is probably 1. Here I hypothesise that other vedas are of
water and the land. (including precious metals) and I go to
research this guess:
And Rig Veda is the first indeed.
There it begins with the hymn of fire, which I new when I typed
the previous paragraph. And after that there goes Vayu, the god of
Vayu (Sanskrit pronunciation:
[ʋaːjʊ], Sanskrit: वायु, IAST: Vāyu) is a primary Hindu deity,
the lord of the winds as well as deity of breath and the
spiritual father of Hanuman and Bhima. He is also known as Anila
('air, wind'), Vyāna ('air'), Vāta ('airy element'), Tanuna
('the wind'), Pavana ('the purifier'), and sometimes Prāṇa
('the life force').
then some Asvins
In the Rigveda, the Aśvins are
always referred to in the dual, without individual names,
although Vedic texts differentiate between the two Aśvins: "one
of you is respected as the victorious lord of Sumakha, and the
other as the fortunate son of heaven" (RV 1.181.4). They are
called several times divó nápātā, that is 'grandsons of Dyaús
(the sky-god)'. This formula is comparable with the Lithuanian
Dievo sūneliai, 'sons of Dievas (the sky-god'), attached to the
Ašvieniai; the Latvian Dieva dēli, the 'sons of Dievs (the
sky-god)'; and the Greek Diós-kouroi, the 'boys of Zeus',
And that Sumakha is the only thing referring to some elements, and
if it's dual, and the dawn, then those twins are sun and earth,
and both were recognized as solids, and both were recognized as
living together as a system, earth would be meaningless without
as Mother without a son wouldn't be a mother. Is it how M and Ϻ
are connected Μ and Σ
I don't know where it leads me, maybe only to that pair of
interest is also yellow, which make this pair at some similar
distance with Θ and Ξ
and after Sumakha goes Indra, which makes the order Fire Air
Soilids Water. to be continued.
Sama Veda, to my surprise, also starts with hymns to Agni.
but soon it goes all about Indra, who is connected to water:
In the Vedas, Indra is the king of Svarga
(Heaven) along with his capital city Amaravati and the Devas.
He is the deity of the heavens, lightning, thunder, storms,
rains, river flows, and war.
which makes sense, because Indus is a river.
सिन्ध sindhu is the indian name for Indus, and you can see ind in
that name, and russians call that river Ind.
सिंधु is als
translated as ocean, sea and Indus river is सिन्धु नदी
Indus River Sindu Nadi.
So order in Sama Veda is different: Fire Water and then goes Soma
Pavamana and the.. what am I actually doing here, Rig Veda doesn't
stop there, so why did I stop watching? I think I attempted to dig
where an aixscovator is needed.
I will return to vedas as the source of alphabetic knowledge
sometimes. Later. Well, maybe fast, first hymns of the other two
vedas, let's check them:
But YajurVeda looks like some grimoir of soma and agni sacrifices,
with some vast ammount f text, I think that text even more hard to
understand than mine: Gayatri has eight syllables
But I look at the very beginning of it
and I find Savitṛ (Sanskrit: stem savitṛ-,
nominative singular savitā) in Vedic mythology is an Aditya i.e.
off-spring of the Vedic primeval mother goddess Aditi. His name
in Vedic Sanskrit connotes "impeller, rouser, vivifier."
He is sometimes associated with – and at other times
distinguished from – Surya, "the Sun". When considered distinct
from the Sun proper, he is conceived of as the divine influence
or vivifying power of the Sun. The Sun before sunrise is called
Savitr, and after sunrise until sunset it is called Sūrya.
That sun-ness of
Savitr is venerated in the Rig Veda, the oldest
component of the Vedic scriptures. He is first recorded in book
three of the Rigveda; (RV 3.62.10)
That He is sometimes associated with – and at
other times distinguished from – Surya, "the Sun". makes
me think of Asvins.
But I am completely ignorant in this part of mythology and thus
unable to comprehend this text properly, whatever I say would be
some sort of plasphemy, prophanity is the word. profanity.
The Atharva Veda (Sanskrit: अथर्ववेदः,
Atharvavedaḥ from atharvāṇas and veda, meaning "knowledge") is
the "knowledge storehouse of atharvāṇas, the procedures for
everyday life". The text is the fourth Veda, but has been a
late addition to the Vedic scriptures of Hinduism.
The language of the Atharvaveda is different from Vedic
Sanskrit, preserving pre-Vedic Indo-European archaisms. It
is a collection of 730 hymns with about 6,000 mantras, divided
into 20 books. About a sixth of the Atharvaveda texts adapts
verses from the Rigveda, and except for Books 15 and 16, the
text is in poem form deploying a diversity of Vedic matters.
Two different recensions of the text – the Paippalāda and the
Śaunakīya – have survived into modern times. Reliable
manuscripts of the Paippalada edition were believed to have been
lost, but a well-preserved version was discovered among a
collection of palm leaf manuscripts in Odisha in 1957.
The Atharvaveda is sometimes called the "Veda of magical
formulas", a description considered incorrect by other
scholars. In contrast to the 'hieratic religion' of the
other three Vedas, the Atharvaveda is said to represent a
'popular religion', incorporating not only formulas for magic,
but also the daily rituals for initiation into learning
(upanayana), marriage and funerals. Royal rituals and the duties
of the court priests are also included in the Atharvaveda.
The Atharvaveda was likely compiled as a Veda contemporaneously
with Samaveda and Yajurveda, or about 1200 BC – 1000 BC.
Along with the Samhita layer of text, the Atharvaveda includes a
Brahmana text, and a final layer of the text that covers
philosophical speculations. The latter layer of Atharvaveda text
includes three primary Upanishads, influential to various
schools of Hindu philosophy. These include the Mundaka
Upanishad, the Mandukya Upanishad and the Prashna
but I look inside anyway:
And that word Vāchaspati brings
and that raga tells The mnemonic phrase is sa ri
gu mi pa dhi ni.
and I dig further into this new territory.
Svara or Swara (स्वर, generally pronounced as swar
or swara and not swaraa) is a Sanskrit word that connotes
simultaneously a breath, a vowel and the sound of a musical note
corresponding to its name. Most of the times a swara is
identified for both musical note and tone, but a tone is a
precise substitute for sur, related to tunefulness.
Traditionally, Indians have just seven swaras/notes with short
names, e.g. saa, re/ri, ga, ma, pa, dha, ni which Indian
musicians designate as saptaka. It is one of the reasons why
svara is considered a symbolical expression for the number
wissenschaftler where wissen is knowledge once again reveals
cognate, ведание, ведение, he who knows
(where) leads. wissen
wissen ву вувф вувф ведать. поведать. видеть. все эти слова
свидетельствуют что ss is д
If s is c then it could be ᚴ and double ᚴ
would be ᚦ
and now I have to look for ᛆᛒᚴᚦ and I find nothing, so maybe
n & т are also last in their lines. I wonder if it makes them
cognatic. asn if s (and especially ß is a form of t, just like ſ
could be, like ᛚ reminds ᛐ which is ᛏ
And when I lookded for ᚴᚦ I havent even
found that, but Viking Age runic inscriptions
normally do not have two identical runes in a row. This is
valid even for two runes that belong to two different words,
one at the end of a previous one, the other at the beginning
of a following one (if no separators are used). Cf. raþu for
rað þu below. (I believe that
raþ to be the evidence of ᚱ standing for П and thus what they
read as raþ is russian под. a
brave clame, let's test my science once again, I left so many
loopholes to test that dull researcher may find this theory
false once he finds some of them to be wrong, but what he must
know is that these verses are not necessarily connected to the
rest of the work: some dead branches don't make whole the tree
dead. Their destiny is to fall off)
ᚠ in futhark could write as ᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚯᚰ (these all are where a is in
futhark. ᚰ is binderune on, ǫ which is o with ogonek, nasal o)
this is complere complete unicode block for
runes. (nordic only) others are in oe piece in the end of this
work, I hope you don't mind I broke the norsk set.
ᛆ ᛒ ᚦ
ᚾ ᚠ ᚵ ᚼ (ᛡ is ё)
ᛁ ᚴ ᛚ ᛘ ᚿ
ᚮ ᚱ ᛦ ᛋ ᛏ ᚢ (if R, or ᛣ if Q)
I don't know if I ever noticed, that like hebrew, runic alphabet
is also gradual.
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח ט
י כ ל מ נ ס
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
I retransliterated so many letters, why not to use this unacademic
freedom to compare these lines to say that if ᛣ and ᛦ are R Q then
ᛋ ᛏ ᚢ are s t u, as I think romans had it.
ᚮ ᚱ ᛦ ᛋ ᛏ ᚢ in comaprison to russian are О П Р С Т У
ф that usually follows is taught to never appear in originally
russian words. only in borrowings.
ц ч ш щ ъ ыь эюя are probably the later addition, probably the
christian greekstian influence.
I start comparing jewish lines
ס to ש
and here I see that they have destroyed some structure when
they expaneded the original 3456 of the 18
and 12 are the 3 that add up it to the 21
and the structure they could have
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח ט
י כ ל מ
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
I notice that it's another reason to replace כ and מ
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח ט
י מ ל כ
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
and I see that
it's whether there was a letter between ב and ג, some в
between б and г,
or they added letters before velars in the lines 2 3 4
The same story as with ל being a form of כ can be seen in
only theree it's the other way around ل
and ک ,گ
ו and ז could be one a variant of the other вита (bio) is zoo?
and in the fourth I can only unite פ and צ becauseof how similar
they are in cursive sofit.
א ב ג ד
ה ו ח ט
י מ כ נ ס
ע פ ק ר ש ת
what did I remove? zain, lingam, tsadi isn't even in latin, fuck tsadiks too.
ט looks like cobra and snake is zmeya in russian, is it the z
greeks placed in front as zeus?
Is ט not a θ anymore? Russians didn't have ф, but what are
either way ט is not labial in hebrew, at least in the modern
did jews reform f to be t? are f and t half θ's?
Either way, that 19-letter hypothetic hebrew,
19 is a number in lunar calendars, the goden number or
The golden number of any Julian or
Gregorian calendar year can be calculated by dividing the year
by 19, taking the remainder, and adding 1. (In mathematics
this can be expressed as (year number modulo 19) + 1.)
For example, 2021 divided by 19 gives 106, remainder 7. Adding
1 to the remainder gives a golden number of 8.
The golden number, as it was later called, first appears in a
calendar composed by Abbo of Fleury around the year 1000.
Around 1162 a certain Master William referred to this number
as the golden number "because it is more precious than the
other numbers." The term golden number became widely known
and used, in part through the computistic poem Massa Compoti
written by Alexander de Villa Dei around 1200.
I yet have to take lessons to learn how to read it.
ANd it will be a great reason to find peace with academia.
א ב ג ד
ו ח ט
י מ כ נ ס
ע פ ק ר ש ת
is a wonderful set
I wonder if it ever existed.
And I know that ש is ash, fire, thus it should be red.
and thus it becomes more rainbowish with k for kane, money,
these two are probably cognates,
Then red ש,yellow כ, blue מ, white or black א for whether air or
And if k is kin, kane, kuznya,, coin is the word I'm looking fore for.
coin is mint as kane and money.
I have direct Yin and Yang of М and Ш.
M flows down, Ш raises up.
K isn't even mentioned in whether greek or jewish myth about the
A is vowels in the greek myth and AMШ are directly the three
first letters of the jewish myth.
I wonder why I began writing jewish as ch
just now, as if I would call them chinese.
In the previous image alphabet order is only used for the days of
I heard that Shakespear removed slavicisms out of english, like
hlaef for bread. Burgess just made the opposite to both confusion of tongues
(making some russian words known to english audience and to what
Shakespear (or whoever if anyone) did) Soon we'll understand every language via some artificial
extra-neocortex. And it will definitely be the opposite to what
bible reports on multitude of languages, though I consider that
report to be false)
Slavicisms happen to be a great source for research:
hlaef for хлеб shows that а f reflects b, thus russian b could be
V, what В literally is.
it makes sense in the voiced-sonor-voiceless theory, but if ЕБ is
how the second line began, it makes sense that they had to change
it when the christian puritans came.
nah, it doesn't make any sense, and I'm serious, it doesn't
unfold, it's apopheny.
Абе like father makes sense, Aбе Г-дъ vakes sense too.
Then the second line is Eve. Eve G-h (almost wrote G-d, but G-h
gospozaha gospozha gospozah)
and that h reflects ה, but it could be the ח, h, as in Hannah.
Alphabet probably can be read, but until I find a historic
reference to it, I should probably not try to read it. But I'm as
far as I ever wa. Those are the .. let's think further..
И-line confused me because it was breaking the voiced-voiceless
order, Yang first, Yin seond, Just as Agni is before Indra.
oo is u and I can see how pp would be f (then p is гамма, if f is
Собака speaks. Dog talk.
собака собит пособит
I mix all the languages.
the curse is over. I think I got cursed to recognize what curse is
and how to remove it.
I don't know what picrelated is, but a video about it was very
much retarded. (no link for retarded video, maybe later)
And I meet this image in a magic thread. I may
trigger people from both spectrums with these links.
Please forgive, nobody's perfect. Those are sources I use, I was
taught to give the references.
and now I wonder why didn't I recognize those numbers, they are
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
I noticed to be graphically similar among the columns.
A B G
E F H
A B C
E F H
C is the third and final line. S & K in one form.
C is staveless d
C is Ɔ or Ↄ because of D then.
thus why b is like this? who knows, in greek it's β, which
probably relates the p.
β and p may say that labials were with down-stroke, d is a good
form for the opposite lingual.
And thus D should look the way d looks. And probably reversed in
the process of confusion in comparison of D to double B. And
doublenesss of B tells us it's V if it's double b and f if double
b voiced tail looks up
p voiceless form of the same, tail's down.
ᚠ is F or A?
if ᚴ is h, hh is A
whati if A was
hh is haha, not heil hitler, hitler is a new meme.
h is глухой смешок. A is ор во всё горло.
горло орало орудие? не..
орало о чём орало? Перфоратора тогда не было, но Молот здорово
о-рил what is ril?
говорил варил бурил морил сорил шустрил дарил сколько примров с
просто буквами. and ril is not a russian word.
чадил (чары чад? очаровал окурил охмурил?
хмурь муть хомуть )
what does it teach? nobody knows.
da ri as a syllable? z looks like cursive r, and rst could be from
the same cluster or even same egg.
(I pulled it out of чары чад pair)
осознанность сть ис себя тебя?
осознанность он со сна носит?
осознанный от со сна он
они как суффикс единственного числа уже вводили и до канадских
зачем я делаю это непечатаемым? это
черновики, они доступны но не печатаемы. печатать буду конспект
из всего этого безумия.
Я нахожу какие-то структуры, но как и в биологических системах,
мусора вокруг плавает тоже предостаточно. Как бы его убрать.
По счастью, в литературной работе это сделать прощею New edition
is coming once I find a man who helps me make it in the eagle
I thought epo was of epos, but it's etymologized as epi, upon,
which allows me to draw line to по.
топоним тоже эпоним? топос место. (𓏏)
если your fonts show 𓏏 as something similar to θ then you can
see as stone, and not
bread. stone is semantically closer to a place than a loaf of
bread. Did egyptians even know yeast? probably nah.
duh and nah are da i net
day and night
deus and knight?
devis and конница
devi l is levi
not deus, leus, лев.
опять меня куда-т не туда снесло.
If your fonts show 𓏏 as something similar to θ then you can
see as stone, half of it
in the ground as buildings are built. And that egyptian form tells
that θ is t and not f.
Why did I say it was f? Let's collide these two ideas.
θ as t also makes sense, because its under d and above t as the
final letter in its row.
today I was doing my math with a little help from a programmer
it's pretty if you tilt your head to the left a little
(but it's probably possible to make this pretty if any chaos
(but taht diagonal ribbon would be incredibly pretty if woven of
12 threads (or maybe less, it could be not 12 but 13 because when
it's decimal, 9 never comes, because 9*9=81 (now you should
understand what you're looking at)
and we also played with the thing I've shown before:
2 and 3 meet in 6:
a boring prime 7:
and when they meet in 42:
And only when I added it here, could I see that it is the very
same 42 which is supposed to be the meaning of life. And I can
decypher it now: it's 6*7 god and devil, good and evil, yin and
yang whatever you name it. And if we add
them it's two 21's.
Also this structure (if it was known to the ancients, which it
could) can explain why 🜄 is considered to be female and 🜂 male (not only because 🜄 is how female genitalia
looks) because female is the hole and male is the shaft. in this sense:
(this images are to be watched rotated clockwise by 45 degrees,
but it's impossible to make it correctly)
that 42 thing was truly accidental, it's just how many numbers I
have prepared for this thing, purely accidental.
that typo of look as ook may tell that this
english verb is connected with russian око.
But that multiplication pattern is rather chaotic. We humans tend
to see things in chaos, especially when it has some symmetry:
Is was polite (not so sure) version of be? Is past polite?
Сослагательное наклонение (future in the past) is a more polite
form of a question.
Nuxalk Honor Song:
B T сначала звонкая, затем глухая. сначала губная, затем
LMN, this constanta(?) I think they call it constants (simply
because they don't change in the languages. And that's why it's
constant, not in mathematical sense.
сонстант остаётся с нами.
остаётся с ночевой? типа того.
математика сузила этот термин, приняв за него абсолютную
константу. Математика абсолютами оперирует? Как видим на этом
примере. М Мысль бежит по мозгу от нейрона к нейрону.
Каждый нейрон содержит набор идей или одну идею, является живым
воплощением какой-то идеи. Идея, записаннная в нейронах (да небось
не в одном. В каком-то больше одно, в каком-то другом двругое. Еру ьщку The more we spoke the
more we learnt to switch before keyboards.
not before but between.
tween in between are twee двое twin
and be is the same prefix word before before and between and below
and begin I need a genie's help to start a movement? Any body to
which o power is appliesd is going to move or rest the way it was
before. I should apply this knowledge to my life and accelerate
into immortality by paying people to .. And my back hurts, it
doesn't wanna work It commmunicates with pain, which is also an
nervoius signal, the one they can, the one they can, They have
another one: pleassure. Promisquity is looking for pleasures and
misssing the joy.
joy счастье сейчас есть чадо.
чадо is what I saw as the opposite of promisquity.
счастье это спасибо что живой? что счас ты е
e reflects b as those diagonal symmetries
est be бысть.
B c T
B is the first letter. A is the honorary vowel, which was given
such honour, when they thus reversed the order from bce to ad?
Are some texts we consider today шифрами
смещения shift scijphers are actually texts written
before the reform of shift? How would abecedary influence the
pronounciation of the text? So this guess is off the target. Is
white text a cypher? one of the most dumb, because it reveals
itself if you send the text by copy paste. The worse cypher is
only adding ma to all the words: выводима воскама (at first it's
not clear if you tell выводи or выводим, и может сбить с толку
может сбить с толку может быть способно
сбить с толку. быть требует способно.
требует demand спрос запрос вопрос питання (question питания)
half of my head now is busy with jewish question. But I know what
I have to say what I didn't put down well enough: how b reflects e
on both semantic (be est) level and graphical too, who on
graphical level c is similar to i and D to O
That corver C corner D A O is my
I disregard the U line for two reasons: old alphabets didn't have
it, the reflection has only 4 letters.
G (Г) reflects J
P reflects h (8 reflects х?)
L doesn't reflect q very well. Was it Samekh that reflected Q? Or
am I pulling two far.
X and S come together well. but that's the disregarded line.
And I don't feel like R is the final in the diagonal. Even
though Я i i is final in
AFK what follows is OS is it where QS plays along as off
questions. or is it ОПРСТ - I go with this version, especially
because S is what mentioned in Sefer Yetzirah, and it gives the
primal forms, because that is what it is about. And amt is a
grammatic flexion of it, as es and est.
And if the order is as it is in russian, oprst, then R reflects L
and we can rotate the system accordingly:
If this was their system (if it was) let's see what is their
numeral system then:
1 2 3 4
5 10 15 20
25 50 75 100 (also because that's how old we get)
which demands me to stop by it's roundness, but L is 50 in the
roman we know, and we go on:
125 250 375 500 and suddenly that is the maximal numeral in roman
we know too.
проверка: gaps between 4 20 100 500 are 16 80 400 and it's
multiplication by 5 in both cases, and that is a numeral system with the base 5
I think I went too far this time: .. but I see OMGd.
even though a moment ago I shrinked at G being 15
G is Girl?
few days ago I thought that dog is secretly god, and now it's a
собака святая? dog drug друг собака пособит (на охоте так точно,
как пособник, своя, собака своя, сука, сочится, течная сука, сука
Сука is a word for a gal, simple niggers say exactly that.
was it rascians who accidentally invented
the nigger meme by misreading such a plackard?
Для определения в какой
системе счисления записано число, внизу, справа от числа ставят
цифру, которая называется основанием системы счисления.
Например, 13045 или 20335
but that is said about positional system of numeration, bot the
one I spoke about before.
but it's funny that (1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25
50 75 100 125 250 375 500)10
(1 2 3 4 10 20 30 40 100 200 300 400 1000 2000 3000 4000)5
and 万5 would be the next in
the line. It even has the line above it.
but that's nothing more than some poetic babble. bubble. lie?
and I'm surprise by this interpretation abcede, makes sense
though, it's obviously meaningful. I"ms
and of course it's far from being completer, but it seems all the
suffixes are already recognized, so I have to just map them all. I
will collect sources for such a map here and further on. Or mamybe
I will make an effort to bring them to vol.8
And this collection actually sets a questio: I thought that
collecting all these short pieces I can reconstruct the initial
vocabulary, but some xylo as a basal element and if I don't know
where are x or l come from, it doesn't help me at all, and yet
that is why I dig deeper into the structures to see the basal
basalts. So I know what exactly to look after. The shortest
pieces? Pronouns, and such.
- – — − + 一(japanese1) ー(japanese longis) ꟷ(sideways I)
♭♯♀♂ ß ſ šʃ þθð θѲѳ ʒ ð ŋ «» „“ Åå ʌɔæ Ґґ ͰͱⱵⱶ Єє Її Ϻ Ϲϲ. Ⲥ ₹ 卍卐
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢ of bornholm runes
hungarian & next R2L)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵
𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿 (Old South
Arabian, R to L)
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח
ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת ך ם 𐡌
ן ףץ בּ
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
and here lays an article explaining these
(I only lost the hyperlinks because
where I took it, ctrlc+ctrlv behaved weirdly) here it is.
though these two sets ar probably of
different fields (orthography & phonetics)
and phonetics being so abundant in its symbolics still places
same signs in different cells, which tells it's all not certain
(and different people pronounce the same sounds differently) and
unnecessary when audio-recordings is widely available (but not
in books made out of trees)
and I still didn't find the one I needed: Åå so it was too much
of an honour indeed, or am I just grumpy?
either way look at what I had to go through to get the å I could
write in my nnotbook in a second.
(I add it upstairs just now, even though you saw it earlier than
– k s
t n h m
y r w
a あア かカ さサ たタ なナ はハ まマ やヤ らラ わワ
i いイ きキ しシ ちチ にニ ひヒ みミ ※ りリ ゐヰ
u うウ くク すス つツ ぬヌ ふフ むム ゆユ るル ※
e えエ けケ せセ てテ ねネ へヘ めメ ※ れレ ゑヱ
o おオ こコ そソ とト のノ ほホ もモ よヨ ろロ をヲ ・。
І і Ѳ ѳ Ѣ ѣ Ѵ ѵ Ѕ
ѕ Ѯ ѯ Ѱ ѱ Ѡ
ѡ Ѫ ѫ Ѧ ѧ Ѭ
ѭ Ѩ ѩ Ꙋ ꙋ
𓄿 𓇋 𓇌(𓏭) 𓂝 𓅱(𓏲 ) 𓃀 𓊪() 𓆑 𓅓 𓈖() 𓂋 𓉔() 𓎛() 𓐍() 𓄡
a i ij a(o?)
p f m
𓋴() 𓊃() 𓈙(𓈛 𓈜 ) 𓈎() 𓎡 𓎼() (𓏏) 𓍿
ḳ(q) k g
ch d dj
𓐝 𓋔() 𓍘()
g m n
t (hieroglyphs list) (dictionary)
᚛ ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅ ᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ ᚋᚌᚍᚎᚏ