I'm going to spiral around these topics until I arrive to my
destination or wherever it leads me.
A complete new source of inquiry:
and the more informative piece in russian:
(google's translator translates it better
and better, you should be able to use it to read russian)
It tells of african telegraph-like
communication with the help of drums and ancient greeks' way of
using signal fires to transmit messages
(thus beacons could be something more than what we thought)
What could be the very origin of drum-communication? Probably to
help hunters to find way home. And then they would recognize that
something's happening if the drum beat came uneven. and now they
say that whole complicated phrases are communicated in just the
drum beat. Brian Eno said that afican music in the sense of rhythm
went much further than european ever was. Europeans have every
reason to be proud, but sometimes we're too proud to the level of
some ignorant arrogance.
Or could those drum beats begin as a scaring technique when they
needed to scare the predators away? Probably it was the beginning: a man hits the water with a stick, another man asks
him wtf he was doing, scaring the crocodiles away was the
response, but there's no crocodiles for miles around. see, it's
speech, drums, horns, fires, maybe lyres were bows and.. bows were
bow is дуга as if above, rain..bow!
if bow is arrow then (a = b ? R = B?)
then what was the instrument? the catgut?!
arrow as a bow, you can throw it, you can shoot it, you can use it
as a pike. pick,
pike is the metal part of the arrow (among
other things: spear, luce (щука (щ ~ п?)),
thorn, pitchfork, застава взымающая подорожный сбор)
pick is many verbs, probably related to
pike, and among them is перебирать струны
(щ ~ п?)
ц ~ r (both could be c & г)
not ц! ч ~ r! (in cursive)
(both could be c = г)
bow is лук, so they didn't play cords with the arrow, but with the
bow, the horse hair bowing a stick is the bow, because it's in the
form of a bow. and струной could be the road
between those ends, because it's believed
that a potful of gold is at the end of it, but it was a lie,
of course, and it stuck because nobody could disprove it (was there a lack of water or what? whatever)
Drum were the shields? and some mighty sticks served as the
So are girls bows and arrows and guys are shields and swords?
swored(рвал? материл? драл?)
schiele is squint in german which makes me believe that shields
were the mirrors and thus girls could use it if their simbol is
actually a person with a mirror, as if + is mirror, becuse it's
lines are in focus (не совпадают, но пересекаются (в точке фокуса?
they're all at the surface of the mirror, because it's not lense.
not lance? lance could be some magic stick, so one side of it
would be a spear, the other could be some magic stone. glass balls
can burn fire!!! I told you that they were used as lenses to read,
but fire, of course!!!
lance from the one side, lense from the other one? a & i as
two forms of syllable, only two position in the consonants:
palatalized and not.
and labialization doesn't usually matter in consonants, but it can
influence the vowels.
As if palatalization is from vowel i, and labialization is from
I & V the first in roman (numerals)
labialized or nasalized? m is pronounced over nose.
n is also, even though it's managed not to be labial.
nevertheless, m & n are cognates, and n is probably new.
as abc it was imk I MK it is crazy.
where's l? I is l. K ~ N? ᚴ ~ ᚿ (because o
is ᚮ in unicode and upwards in Bornholm)
are k & n come out of ᛜ?
𐰖𐰗 are both [j]
𐰗 is in Yenisei
𐰖 is in Orkhon
𐰶𐰷 are their q
𐰷 is in Yenisei
𐰶 is in Orkhon
If 𐰗 relates to ᛜ I dunno, but 𐰶 does both look and sound like ᚲ
(if it's truly etymology or merely mnemonics I dunno as well)
> As if palatalization is from vowel i, and labialization is
from consonant v
nasalization (the same as labialization) turns into йотирование in
russian: я & ю are believed to be юсы (according to Даль,
So these deviations are in a sense both i's: palatalization is i
after the letter, labialization is paradoxically also i but before
the letter. as if и[i] is u (look the same in cursive)
i jklmnopq r
у фхц ч
u vwx y.. ?
у ф х цч шщ
u vw x y z
шщ s z
z is zed zd st (t short s aor s long t? ת is reported to sound as
θ which make it reflect θ)
ε ζ η θ
and that demands θ to take the place of ζ so ζ can be final as z
is as З is in ёжз η is ᚼ is Жж
As I said before, fuck academia.
The british museum responded to my message with an offer to use
their collection to further my research: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection
And dice, die, palamedes, these search didn't show me anything I
didn't know before,
Abecedaria also, but abecedarium returned this image:
it went structurally for the first half:
Α Β Γ Δ
Ε Ζ Η Θ
Ι Κ Λ Μ...
and then, where M was out of place it's as if it's broken by the
additional Ν Ξ which could be nix.
Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ
Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
are five letters per a line, not four, and these added
complexities make this structure not exactly evident.
Was looking for "abecedary ostracon" and the first good find is
I hope sometimes people are not so poor that
they place their pdfs behind the paywall or at least I am reich and subscribe to all the journals
just for the hell of it. but fuck it, I don't do it by
That ostracon uses a good method to conserving the information:
they start with the abecedary so those who use some other font
will be also able to read.
It's even good that I don't see the rest of it, so I can make my
own transliteration just to practice
(or you may)
and another one: :
Inscription on the 'Izbet Sartah ostracon
represents the earliest known non-cuneiform abecedary. The
ostracon is discovered in 1976 in 'Izbet Sartah in Israel, and
it is dated to the 12th or the early 11th century BC.
The inscription is written by an unskilled scribe, probably a
student, and it consists of four lines of writing exercises,
followed by the 22 letters of the Ancient Hebrew alphabet in the
The following table is stumbled upon during that ostracon
abecedaria quest, but it's something different, it compares
phoenician to hieratic which is awesome if true
another piece of that Budge-Brugsch-Rouge egyptology abecedaries
was shown to me by some Maxim Makarov: it's
from a book by Budge:
I just noticed that since I learned that
wehn frsit and lsat ltteers are the smae, you can raed txets
dritotsed lkie tihs, I bgaen mkiang mtasieks lkie tihs, so
beware of them and this way of writing, this bug didn't happen
to me until I dared to write like this somewhere before in this
I also noticed that these three are different: it's
Birch instead of Brugsch this time. I
wonder if Birch is just another way to transliterate the same
name, and either way why are their names so much alike!
In my notebooks I discover how lines of the alphabet could be
aranged into syllabary sets of
sonors (whatever they are)
and then I go further to the 4*4 table with no sonors, but some of
them appear other spots or are they?
Check the first knitten (нить [nitt] is thread in russian)
notebook when it's scanned (see further for it or the manuscript
folder past #50 (it may be closer to #100 because tens of
unscanned notebooks predate it)
Why do they keep on pushing "fewer" instead of less?
The form "fewer" is almost never use, thus it's
whether obsolete or completely made up by academia: "fewer"
sounds especially retarded when you count in millions.
(the tread where I posted it was immediately
deleted, but 4plebs remembers)
a drop into that bucket with swasticas and triple yin-yangs:
notice that it's both directions at the same time depending ot nhe
way wou see it.
sincerely, sensibly, in these two words first parts could be
cognates to sign, but to tell it for sure we need some ai to feed
all these pairs and other things. What is your aspirations in
life? You can achieve anything in just 10 years, so a person (and
perdaughter) can achieve several incredible goals during their
lifetime. Are you into ai or biology or programming or music or
where would you be?
caught got, this kind of cognates, vocal cognates, I wonder if all
vowel-cognates synonymous, because vowels are vocales in spanish.
пора давай пока were the first ones, and they can be cognates,
пока is bye, and пора is "it's time" and давай say for bye. So
this mental experiment could set the borders of the vocalization
liberties, and if fills like weak-strong stressed-unstressed
beats, like in heart. a steady bye-bye with the second bye
stressed. I heard of a guy who claims that intonations are the key
to understand any language, I didn't take him seriously, but maybe
he discovered some animal level of understanding the language. I
will check him.
the power of ultimate honesty yet, try it accurately, recognize
its limits: to tell truth to enemies can be dangerous, first you
have to realize what is the truth in the world where those people
can be your friends, but this is so raw for me too, I'm a
theorist, I can only guess where the implementations of these
ideas can lead.
It's hard for me to look into my own drafts because they are full
of obsolete ideas which were rejected or forgotten, but those
drafts still contain their gems demanding some further.. cognitions?
(I don't even know what exactly they're
demanding. Being archived and never touched maybe?)
It is just wrong. It's good I explored the possible arrangements,
but why is it even here?
Was I surprised by three-mother-ness of ems or dollarness of dlr
and chequeness of ckq?
Now this is how apophenias work. It could be anything, and thus
Those three columns from a to t are three by six, and I probably
didn't think about it then,
and h among vowels also makes sense which I wouldn't probably see
even though I studied japanese already.
d reflects r as in the k-symmetry, which I already knew then,
f reflects t which is all very interesting, but I don't think this
representaion goes far,
but it does reflect the idea of g being a form of c and h coming
Was g the original as in original g? Because runic alphabet
doesn't distinguish ᚦ into c and d.
and j & h meet in ᚼ which just as j can sound as h in one
context and as short i in the other,
so h can sound as h and yet in greek it's i the way it was
transmitted into russian,
unless they took it directly from ugaritic 𐎊 or egyptian 𓇌(𓏭)
I don't like how m stands out of labials, but it's nothing new.
I especially don't like how f stands out of that column, but that
could be the reason behind greek θ.
Either way what's about E? Is it why it's consonantalized in
In greek z is the final of the first column,
which demands me to ponder on it in greek:
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ
Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ
Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ
Η Θ Ι Κ
Λ Μ Ν Ξ
Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ
Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
Α Β Γ Δ
Η Θ Ι Κ
Λ Μ Ν Ξ
Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ
Υ Φ Χ Ψ
I dunno, it doesn't seem to lead anywhere, the first case of 6 8
10 was the most interesting, even though it also didn't have
much of symmetry between it's neighbours. and even those other
three wouldn't help.
See, returning to the old notebooks is a waste of time. I was so
worried about my drafts (and I probably should, but let some
other people or machines look into that whatever.
About those intonations, melodic patterns as information:
покА, давАй, пиздУй, летИ, bye-bYe, /
остАнься, stay hEar, ^
as if / is waving goodbye, and ^ is waving welcome.
отстАнь, but остАнься
as if the final syllable is not sya, but not.
Pronouns are often antonimous towards itself (in different
Can yes/no go like that? can sya be no event though si is yeah?
like what's the difference between hai & nai in japanese?
is it the same letter but h is upwards, and μ is down?
but "how do you do" has the same melody as "нахуй иди" or do those
i & u make all the difference?
I think that work is done, so why should I wånder? To make an
independent research to compare afterwards? I doubt this flow
delivers me to the my goal in in all: to recognize all the
Let's begin with building a map of only pronouns, it's a simpler
task and those alone could connect to tribes names and the gods
they worshiped. Read the first knitten notebook for more detail.
or that's it.
how do you do is more like хавай еду
This world is enough
(that was an automatic writing, the one french modernists
promoted over a century ago)
((hopefully thinking about how it's all going to be just alright
(with the capsule and such)))
Some more of ogham:
not the best example to learn ogham by, but it definitely contains
some info, here's the clearer one:
I only wanted to try to read the ligatures of the following image,
but what use, I don't speak Gaelic.
I don't even know if that's the same writing system. If it's a
An update on Great Parma:
I fancy thinking that what I write in vol.1
influenced that guy, because I spoke about it elsewhere
anonymously. Either way he did some great work, showing historic
pages I never had an idea about. Bravo.
but nevertheless freaky, so be aware and trust nothing, we all
make mistakes. I go freakier..
Though I think this very script has nothing to do with the
permian, that video mentions some other accounts of non-kirillic
writing systems used in moscovy. нас заковали москали. кали цари
z-r zar kniazer khazar? knyaZ Znatt (weed
suddenly hit me high, I guess, reading it later)
г-дь г-дин господин господень божий человек божий народ боярин
богач богатырь богатырень
боится трясётся бьёт тряплет трясёт просит prays бьётся// цwhat do
That piece of the bell is from the russian public opposition to
official academia, it's here not because I immediately see
something in it, but because it was in a
film about anbur my friend and colleague who helped me with .odo
have shown me, and I also want to collect all the writing
systems, even invented writing systems deserve being preserved
for history as clouds around tree of writing systems,
simultaneous with the language tree. now back to the black text:
only why didn't they teach us that? why would they drive us crazy?
also nationalism and separatism are felonies in putin's russia,
pr, P as rusia's torch at olimpics:
For russians it's Р in Россия, for foreigners it's P in Putin, so
I may only hope that next will be navalny because n is п in путин
(doubtful foreigner, see the cursive forms) that sosni zainцу's another story.
Even though I recognize another jew in navalny, they play us like
children, but their games brought me the understanding of some
bond between several letters:
n-п-p-р-r-г-g-д-d-D-and back to ᚦ and р and p
g-д - see russian cursive to understand (same as with m-т further
let's find the other raws like that to see if this game even
b&d are supposed to be the opposites, but they meet at n, but
they also meet in roman cursive, where they both look in he
d-side, only Б (there flipped to the left) has a longis-kind just
as ᛒ is double ᚦ.
M-m-т-T the weirdest yet thoroughly separated from BD, so that is
how it is? Bd and mT
That is ultra funny, because they look like Majuscule and
minuscule forms of Bb and Tт
Oh wow, no need to see cursive tables, т is officially the
italic form of т.
little form of B could be farting sound or was В [v] as that
russian letter is, and B [b] is its english form.
but then it doesn't explain how d is a small B other than ᚦ is a
half of ᛒ
Was it semantic notation instead of phonetic one? Two lips, but
only one tongue.
Tт contradicts Пп a little bit, because in cursive standart
(устоявшееся искусство? fole etymology)
it's as if ПТ challenge the order of MN, as if П is M and thus n
is m and N... error, error, building of a sand, guessing too far,
bridge doesn't want to appear, or I simply panicked, but it's
something to ponder on that's for sure, only if this cursive isn't
cursed, because it delivers some mindfucks, like why д looks like
g? and why п lookls like english n, and especially why т looks
like english m now?
I'm not sure I placed these two sides by side, I must be sure I do
when I combine it in different books.
According to that right image, ч/ц is like ш/щ, even though the
order doesn't support it, compare the majuscule forms, ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄ of
абвгд shows how free russians are about hight of such elements: в
& д oppose eachother completely in the other font of theirs,
where bubbles on them are all like the last one.
How reliable a source the russian alphabet? al russian regimes
were rather ominous, so ominous that the current cleptocracy seems
as one of the best ones, so shitty they govern us here. So wasn't
russian writing mutilated to fuck us up especially: like russian
cursive fucks us up, why would Д & д look differently in
cursive, and they both look differently, but especially д
(that's italic д, but it goes g way too, which is
especially f-ed-up, but probably refers to ᚦ)
Back to that bell. Not that it has anything to do to my research,
but it's a language thing, and as in the television manner when
they feed the viewers some based stuff and then add some atrocious
bs, I feel it to be my duty to take a good care of that piece I
never even knew about. As I said, that misterious script isn't
permian, but what is it, Here let me link a good article about it:
and a simple bilingua
(it's like six different cyphres one after
another, check the link above to see if it's okay. there they
admit, that some mistakes are made, and that mistakes are
considred by that freaky opposition to be evidence of the
translation being false, but they could be explained by the
artists not knowing that script (as it used to happen with
chinese manuals in russian before the internet got better) and
the tzar himself, who probably inspected the forms before the
cast could be unable to read them without the tables of his)
I took that episode close to heart, because I saw one of my
discoveries used by somebody else (and I cannot patent history or
to let other people use it, but I told myself that they will
attach to it shitload of their own shit, and those this bell thing
is an interesting curiousity, it is probably work of art of the
tzar of the occupiers, it has probably has nothing to do to
writings of the conquered nations, it's just some high-ranking
retard having fun. I refuse to keep on digging into that episode
for now, I only keep it here because of that n-п-p-why doesn't
that p go more г-like or rather г-like (that first one is
just in italic)
but to my surprise that г would look like what I was
looking for if you placed it instead of ɔ in p.
yeah, because of that being stuck in this
part, and it's also freaky in its way, maybe even freakier
Бd and ПMт is a great
breakthrough, so why worry if some people spread my thought the
way they can, it still get out there, I can catch it later, I also
can prove that I was first (if Fomenko didn't say it first. I
contacted both him and Nosovsky, because I referred to them and
not only in the freaks.html, so they could take it from that first
volume (but I backed it up just in such a case, or if they spoke
about it before me, then I should stick my чсв into my own. I
don't really care, but I do. not really. yes. but not too much.
ᛆᛒᚦ would make more sense if d was a
consonant form of a (as if they both were da, the one syllable
of some prehistoric syllabary) then it would go 1212121212.. and
just as ᛒ is double ᚦ, so ᚾ is double ᛆ and thus again e ~ o
(because aa is o, but it makes more sense if aa= o, oo=u, but
then again ee=i, so does it say that u = i? which is strange,
because и [i] in russia.
but why ᚠᚵ follows ᚾ if ᚾ is already doubel? 12122120 it all
doesn't look right, and thus my guess is wrong. or was there a
letter between ᚾ and ᚠ or I'm making it up? I most probably do.
It's time to go work on my capsule, but I'm a commonner and
don't just dare or what, please god reprogram me, I must build
that immortality capsule, it's not enough to just know the way,
one must also walk the walk. Please! Gods! Muses! Superstars!
All make me mighty and powerful so I use this might for good.
So, in conclusion of this freaky day, I must say that language
enthusiasts who are looking for russian scripts are desperate,
because they grasp every straw, but ignore the based glagolythic
script, for whether ertza (zyryan, komi, parmic) script is ancient
or not, it isn't russian (even though it
could be a criminal thing to say, as a free scientist I must.)
There were writing systems on the territory of Russia before
christians, because it's impossible that they wasn't, because the
fashion for national writing systems was universal. Whatever, the
possibility maps will be built with some advanced computing
powers, I only set the vectors, the fractals will be drawn by the
Why didn't I dig in into that knitting stuff, I found it and as if
left interest to it immediately, and that is how I usually work: I
discover something, I let it lay, if it matters I return to it. or
am supposed to.
but one final chord:
The city where that bell used to be is called zvenigorod
(toll-city) and for whatever reason their emblem is like that,
with 88 in the centre of some seamingly meaningless text:
is it also why they call us racia? are they preparing us to be
cannon fodder for another rahowa?!!
fodder feeds, huh
So I guess the first incident of somebody using my research (if we
call my thoughts on anbur research) was good enough: somebody
translated my separatistic tendencies further the knoosphere with
a sticker on it: I had some pdf-library mirroring my pdfs and now
somebody transmits it further as their own. ir could be some
plural suffix like aettir. their = те их? иf ich, whiy the?
eir ear ух
i ~ и
a ~ у(u)
are all these one letter and only o is double a? a is oi? or
si as duh? as is is? a is i? a as
ו doesn't wan't to stand peacefully with
that ا on the same line (try to put a spacebar and ו after that
ו is o and u, thus any vowl could be |
разделитель? не бру, а беру, типа тпру, стой, сними той, buy бери,
буй (стопори?) бери? обуй вокруг возьми (кожу вокруг ноги
продают?) обувь о- boot, boot is boat? 𓃀-ed or 𓃀-еть. 𓃀-ell?
𓃀-owl? 𓃀-rake? 𓃀-ellow? 𓃀-ong? 𓃀log! 𓃀ox 𓃀ottle 𓃀 значии
стоячая, ? ШэI'm so high? , why dare I say? don't get hight until
you're adult, I took tit since 16 or
18, and I don't recommend it to anyone who doesn't made his or her
serious opinion of what cannabis smokers are in the society and if
you want to be like one of them, and depending on your personality
you will whether see musicians like me and others or you see them
as slobos. maybe my trippies are you most or least favourite
𓃀 shows flat bottom in some eau-ed-el
𓃀 keeps the ox still (standing, st-el)
𓃀 makes your log not laying in your table, but up as on site (not
𓃀 is standing (as in thang instead of thing)
𓃀 is standing yellow, as if he pissed himself, that's why yellow is
associted with cowards in english
a𓃀ove is showing ab as up?
abnormality is abov normal level anomality, so it's not ab, it's
a obey (не дерись)
b baba mama
a ash пламя flame fire F? father?
b meim вода woта WM woman mother?
a d t
кирилица подделка под глаголицу как иврит поддерлка под санскрит
глаго лица - говорящие образы (конечно же
это поэтическое осмысление, не вычитанное)
также и анбур наверняка имеет своё значение, а за ним и целая
(но это философское осмысление, тоже не
google translates глаголица like verb (глагол, cлово слогово) word = verb, d = b, do is be and be
is do? verb v or b
d was b and b was v? В is V in russia. as if В is also Ⰲ turned
90° just as Б came out of b or Д came out of d - as if russian
forms are latin forms tuned 90° clockwise. And thus somehow Ⰲ is
an ancient form of V which also looks like Ф and M and UWand so on
and מם𐡌 and 𓅓
and that owl makes Ⰲ more ancient form than B
did B form appeared when we began drawing bodies instead of faces.
so glagolitsa are calling faces (see litso
in clockwork orange)
and Ⰲ is exactly gragolythic (lythic is stone, and it's as if
litso is foundry, founding, and those who called lythic stone were
speaking in stone age, and we acquired these types of words like
face only when we knew forgery so good we had foundry? But then
our language should be developing among vulcanos? or forest is
better to experiment with fire? or is ll these etymologies absurd?
I do the best I can, I wll sort out them later.
will = in all? вообще?* когда-нибудь, ? сделаЮ futURum but I'm
lost again and don't know latin
I tried to find it in a better quality, but only found this:
And I asked myself? Could these secret 15 be
those legendary 15, the original canon of the alphabet?
So that trip was high and low until I went of f the track.
let's conspect the tasty pieces of the trip:
Ⰲ was before B
глаго лица is probably главо лица or гласо
лица глотка т, с, в, г
вгст I wonder what it means. гла mattered the same thing and
вгст changing changed the meaning.
глосо голос с эс ин сэй скажи ска~жи ска-зывай жи ори жжи ори
жги оги I dunno, could be.
глото if all гло is head, глв, глава главна в энд н сффиксыс
𓃀 lives in b
if b matters in below, it's 𓃀
a thus is 𓂝
and if it's in above then that ab is up, and shown by the hand up
han𓂧 𓃀oot but 𓆑oot
улиточка считалась подошвой? если всё живое на разных уровнях
развития (что видно при сравнении человека с обезьяной, то
улиточка лишь подошву и ноготок или клювик или череп или панцырь
Let's use egyptian symbols more and more.
I will when I install some patch or attach or addone or additive
to my station so I can type with egyptian b d f g i k m r s t to
see where they lead me, eventually writing it all in egyptian
letters and watching how the meanings floeat.
leg is 𓃀een [bejn] in dutch (bone is also been, so they saw bones
as legs?, plural form is benen)
foot is voet [fut] and poot [pəʊt] which pretty much unifies all
the labial (except m)
been en steen is bone and stone, начало и конец, bot is also bone.
Yet in deaf alphabet a is a fist and palm is b (d is also palm,
but in the form of closed c (c is a palm showing c with thumb for
the bottom end and finures for the
top. why finures? gingers, fingers....
d as closed c
b as closed ɔ
and thus c is a for some hebrew alephs remind k?
male and female, yang and yin
But back to the deaf stuff:
I was speaking looking at the end of /deaf.html (which was end then, my
now, here it is again)
but there are other sign alphabets:
being completely different system, surprisingly L O and T are the
same, and some other letters demonstrate similar meaning (if the
mining is in the fingers themselves, compare E, F, M, N, P, S, Z,
especially look at how there are two R's in the second one, so
these three variants are as if R occupies two fingers, and you can
press any of them or both. Why is it here? To make it clear. It
makes it more complicated, but it's here to clarify the first of
these two: It's as if it counts fingers FGHI from index to pinky,
L is similar to G which reminds me a lot, MNO simply draw the
letters in air, on both tables so, PQRST counts fingers back from
pinty to thumb or rather it's as if it's FGHPQRST, notice how o
reminds s as if it's σ (Q could be the nameless finger, but then
not to confuse it to R, R doesn't need thumb and Q is modified too
to make it clear. Hh & Ы are the other uses of this simbol, as
if for Horns and for drawing the letter in the air, like those MNO
are. Now I wonder if those 15 letters are 14 falangs and the whole
fist for later-induced A?
Look what I found: Ivan or Juan or Sven:
probably I can see now why cursive is called that.
I even read around as world, which maybe stopped me from readin
that ivan word, still can't read it.
but if' it's let's s... this around, his s and t look very much
alike, huh, drawn differently: s in one line, t is in two.
Here's an ironic truth: I learnt scientific method from a
protestant pastor: 12
observation, hypothesis, experimentation, theory, communication,
and now I apply it to my work and I see some irregularities:
I experimented with hypotheses I got during my observations of the
language: armenian regained the link to the structure I've
onserved when I digged depper in the past (in Mashtots's students
So now I must build my theory, but theory began growing further. I
had hypothesis that the structure is universal, so I observed
(during the "experiments") the other languages and explained all
the irregularities (greek myth writes of 2 vowels added to the 5)
only M is not explained properly, but what is Ζ and Θ then? ΕΖ/ΗΘ
are invariant pair as in OP/QR and in russian after З(Z) goes И(I)
as if Z is the final, and I is digits, 1I 2J 3K 4L 5M 6N they're
tens, 7O but 8 fits O much more, but in hebrew 1i 2k 3l 4m 5n 6o
7f 8q 9Я
s is sto (hundrend)
я загнался, в иврите 1i 2k 3l 4m 5n 6s 7ayn 8p 9ts (as if
tsadi is z)
100 is q 200r 300s 400t + 5soFits (co Fin's)
q and a are similar in latin, in cursive hebrew it's as if stick
around a curve siply stands at the other side, and then yod is
that curve? It's observation, but what it's hyposesis is? Hebrew
ones tens hundreds somehow reflect each other? Let's see it in
others bet, kaf, rush, all are very similar graphicaly, but almost
three mothers in phonetic structure, it could be another guess,
but a i q don't play this way, unless I recognize some form of p
or ф - let's go on with the previous hypothesis
gimel, lamed, shin - gimel and lamed are very close in this work,
I observed their similarities many times (mostly graphical, but
2's are also only graphically alike, but what is shin! completely
different, but if it was S, lamed is very similar, and s is
related to c.
dalet reflects tav I see it clear, the 2nd is M do die tav morte?
I didn't expect this company, even though т is russian
italic т(t) but now dalet is out of suit, colour, масти.
Did D gave birth to T and Т gave birth to т? В смысле не
просто та, но моя, Not only that, but mine.
I-row is full of questioning postfix: did humans learn property
when they began to ask questions? Просите и дано будет вам. а не
каббалу ли я открываю: каббала как вера что понимая язык можно
творить магию (то, что другие считают невозможным)
So let's start that good topic again:
observation, hypothesis, experimentation, theory, communication,
Justus didn't explain it, but I can say it myself, that theory is
a complex of hypotheses, confirmed by the experiments (by the
further observations, observation is always present, or at least
in every second step? because hypothesis is made with the
observations we already acquired, without looking at the
randomness of the rest of the world, or is it just that additional
observation, that allows a break-through of a good hypothesis? So
observation is surely exist in experimentation, but building of a
theory is again the thought process, only it works not with
observations, but with hypotheses, observing the hypotheses about
the subject of the theory. Communication is observation of that
theory by the other people, replication is experiments they make
(they observe the language with my theory in mind to see if they
can find the contradictions to it)
I knew why I communicated it too early, at the stage of acquiring
the hypotheses, before the theory was built. But that mistake lead
to something good: now I can show my site to my investors so they
see I'm not just some crazy pothead, but that I actually work on a
problem or two.
So now I made it a race, I'm a racian, racist, racer, chaser, rats
chat rock choke jewels rules)
parallelly to this text go notebooks (second (third of two)
knitten notebook tells of !? being ab, yes no, and so on
Those notebooks mostly have observations, but also hypothesis, so
I have to feed them all to an ai which would build to me the links
between the observations and hypotheses to make me see if it leads
to a theory. The larger hypothesis, that all morphemes are
universal, will be guaranteed a theory while I have a head large
enough to build it, to collect all the possible morphemes in a
moment. Most of my observations are comparing different morphemes
if they click or not. a net of false (failed by experiment
hypotheses should be also built, separately from the main,
confirmed ned of observations (see if it connects into a net at
A lot of work is to be done. I make it online, which is awesome, I
died to see drafts of the guys I read as a teenager, I guess some
young blood is lurking around gulping this honey or smoke.
's (in english, latin, greek) is it the same э'с sit, зад, to shy (shaddow) the euphemisexed ass.
x could be (but that was typo) an unknown letter, как звонкий
вдох, если как тот же самый, то это многое объяснит про русов.
приты as's но русы как's - and both are probably c, and
could be a luckier, purer form, k could be tabooed for this
reason. (I just erased "was" in stead of "could be" because I knew
it was not some holy typo, but an error, errors
erase. oh! red light! why not
arise? errors later arise in the form of a problem. and error A
problem B crashing C?
monk know made me read upside down, erase turned in a saje 一 я
сначала подумал в саже, а теперь вижу что может и sage 一 I first
sought of шалфей, and now I can see there a sage, мудреца. same se
as in science and conscience. I scio I know. sc as kn? c as n? g?
ᛜ? Ŋŋ is literally eng, as in english, as if those were two
brittish suffeces: ing and ish who could be two mothers? B &
T? and vowels are still don't always considered to be letters, but
positionally vowels and labials can be together both by their
positions in alphabets, and because linguals (the C's) are
twice as much or even bigger if tey unite. I hope there are 13
vowels+labials in english, because it's a
26(-letter) alphsbet (s for a, why? next button) a b e f
(h) i (j) (l) m (n) o p u v w y — withouth grey brackets only 12,
n~m? or h~n?
but b is closer to d — it's hard to believe b was considered among
vowels than among d, they look so alive, but are as different as
as as так как (as is literally kak, both are c, both are que. c
срань и caca & ссу waste, shite, w & ш мит эгэйн, э is
n is both m and п(p) ᚱ and ᚢ could meet here somewhowre
h is a form of n, some n with a stick, high
nog i don't know. (nog is a typo instead of nig, wheteher gnigeh or nign or nig
indeed I thought about it)
h is probably double i, see how H turned into И in russian as if
it doesn't matter, and N is Н in russian.
N stands for &, just as И
и also is a pustfix of plural noun, just as n in german, ИNSZ are
four mothers? four phases moon has. four week, four wigs? four
wicks? four знаков, wick and witch are close to wit and wisdom and
weet, and ведь? ведать see = видь=ведь? но это натягивание
stretch. пространно. speculation? something like that.
I(wait) Z (wax) M (foolMoon) S=С (С is russian S)
and disagreement about C (B & D are much more certain across
the alphabet) tells that ᛆᛒᚦ is ABD, and modern meme ABC just
tells that... what... whether that it's of the modern period where
C in some form is present in all the alphabet, except that norsk
one from bornholm, or is it even russian, because only russians
have Ж (also berbers do, and they worship it, and binderunen are
often drawn around it:
Three goddesses are known - brits have more of ass than rus have
cacs - also in non-jewish middle-east as Allat Manat and al-Uzza,
which allowed me to put Uzza first, because al of allat could be
also an article, that allowed me to declare them three mothers as
Uzza Manat alLat, as if Uzza was winter and autumn in one piece,
Lat would be l'ete - french guys have similar article, is it why
they merge with arabs, frencha and spanninsh are visuably darker
than the north. It is another form of subjugation, slow and lte stealthy
Now I see that Allat and Manat have similar suffices, as if they'r
are aL Ma(N)
what is al ma na ch? el em en ts? ts is ты in russian (as if the
my text is so difficult, no editor will do it. In the past editors
didn't show how it was before them, now we'll see who's in the
And I read about al Uzza:
она вместе с богинями Аллат
и Манат входила в триаду богинь-дочерей Аллаха.
На юге центральной Аравии аль-Узза выступает в качестве супруги
Аллаха, матери аль-Лат и Манат
Here I can only poetically guess that Uzza was уста and vowels,
and Лат was tongue, Манат was lips
If UzzA are vowels, than it's childish cry of inhaling U and
and A gave birth to Λ and U gave birth to ν and μ, hence in and im
им and 'em is close in russian and english, and that 'em form
exposes that th is the. in that too? the 't = it = это и то. th's
as сие, в противоположность к то, те, та, тот, то-то. кто-то
к in кто is que. а что? dialectnot prochtenie? t is where е in
russian lays on the keyboard.
the following piece (until he word tits) was
born in socrates line, where it's doubled. Be careful not to
double it when you edit it all in a brand new book.
about allat: אלה, אלת-הים is translated as These, the goddess of the sea.
Where אלה is both these and goddess, not god,
both אלה and אלת are goddess
but אלה is also
those and these, just as I read about Elohim, where im is
the additional plural suffix to a plural word as it seems.
only im is supposed to be male suffix, but אלה is not god, but goddess,
thus we consider god bigender, as if it's male priests
playing roles of females, as theatre we know of declared to
be a norm. Read socrates_line.html to know more about this,
but be careful, it's a messy rabbithole.
Allat is believed to be in the centre, accompanied by Manat
and Al Uzza.
Uzza is the only one having a separated Al as if uzza is
mother and suffix is needed to say that it's their mother.
тех shows that те is that very the: because их is the
sinonym, just as it to that.
те и си, the & she? h was sh initially, thus her, not
sher. t is
that piece after Randomness was supposed to go to 7.html, but by
some surprise it is placed in that very socrates_line I just
mentioned, thus now it belongs here. I will rehash it when and if
t is ᛏ
the male indicator of ♂
Doesn't that Allat look like a cross-dresser to you? A son dressed
as a woman to protect them, and if such a priest plays in the
temple, nobody understands how they give births without grooms,
was it followed or preceded by the taboo on genitalia
demonstrations? Those priests probably discovered shaving first,
so they fooled the public. And "her" hat reminds te one of Mitra,
I thought to search for Allat and Mitra in one sentence, and what
The Assyrians call Aphrodite Mylitta, the Arabians
Alilat [Greek spelling: Ἀλιλάτ], and the Persians Mithra.
and there are more:
They believe in no other gods except Dionysus and the Heavenly
Aphrodite; and they say that they wear their hair as Dionysus
does his, cutting it round the head and shaving the temples.
They call Dionysus, Orotalt; and Aphrodite, Alilat. (wiki:
Herodouts, Histories I:131)
I used to think this to be a young woman whose tits are not shown, but I was gay myself to think it's a
woman, the very same accompanying figures could be at the corners
of the bas-relief. Snake and scorpio could indicate that this
cross-dresser used poison on his knife to easily kill a bull, a
female way of doing murder, so it's a prince grown up by the
mother and grandmother or a mother and a wife? A family unit,
women demand families, guys would rather walk гуляли (к ляле)
гулять (to блять) but that's poetry more than science
See how at the previous image, the one before the bull, where the
three "divas" are above a lion, there the coentral
figure (Allat) is larger than other two, and has no tits.
- - - – – – — — — 一 一 一(japanese 1) − − −
+++ ーーー(japanese longis) ꟷ ꟷ ꟷ(sideways I)
♭♯♀♂ ß ſʒ «» „“ Åå šʃ Ґґ Єє Її Ϻ Ϲϲ. Ⲥ 卍卐(swas)
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢ of bornholm
𐳺𐳻𐳼𐳽𐳾𐳿 (old hungarian & next R2L)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵
𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿 (Old South
Arabian, R to L)
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח
ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת ך ם 𐡌
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
ა ბ გ დ ე ვ ზ თ ი კ ლ მ ნ ო პ ჟ რ ს ტ უ ფ ქ ღ ყ შ ჩ ც ძ წ ჭ ხ ჯ ჰ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ/ς τ υ φ χ ψ ω
𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d 𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ 𐎊и 𐎋 𐎌 𐎍 𐎎 𐎏 𐎐
𐎑 𐎒 𐎓 𐎔 𐎕 𐎖 𐎗 𐎘 𐎙 𐎚 𐎛 𐎜 𐎝
𐎠 𐎣 𐎧 𐎥 𐎨 𐏂 𐎩 𐎫 𐎰 𐎭 𐎱 𐎳 𐎲 𐎴 𐎶 𐎹 𐎺 𐎼 𐎾 𐎿 𐏀 𐏁
𐏃 𐎡 𐎪 𐎮 𐎷 𐎻 𐎢 𐎤 𐎦 𐎬 𐎯 𐎵 𐎸 𐎽
𐎠a 𐎡i 𐎢 u 𐎣k 𐎤ku
𐎥g 𐎦gu 𐎧x 𐎨c
𐎩j 𐎪ji 𐎫t
𐎬tu 𐎭d 𐎮di
𐎯du 𐎰θ 𐎱p 𐎲b
𐎳f 𐎴n 𐎵nu 𐎶m 𐎷mi 𐎸mu
𐎹y 𐎺v 𐎻vi 𐎼r 𐎽ru 𐎾l
𐎿s 𐏀z 𐏁š 𐏂ç 𐏃h
here I collected several writing systems I use the most, so I
don't have to search for them.
Ææ Øø Åå Ää Öö Üü ẞß ā ē ī ō ū ǖ á é í
ó ú ǘ ǎ ě ǐ ǒ ǔ ǚ à è ì ò ù ǜ â ê î ô û
and here lays an article explaining these
(I only lost the hyperlinks because
where I took it, ctrlc+ctrlv behaved weirdly) here it is.
but it could be too much of an honor, because it seems to be not
the only set of those:
pbp̪ b̪ t̪ d̪ tdʈɖɓ̥ɓɗ̪ɗpʼt̪ʼtʼʈʼm̥ mɱ̊ɱn̪̊ n̪ n̥ nɳ̊ɳʙr̥ rɭ̆ɺ̣ⱱ̟
ⱱɾ*(ɽɺ)ɸβfvθðszʃʒʂʐɧɬɮꞎsʼʃʼɬʼʬʭβ̞̊ β̞ ʋ̥ʋð̞ ɹ̥ɹɻ̊ɻɥ̊ɥl̥
though these two sets ar probably of
different fields (orthography & phonetics)
and phonetics being so abundant in its symbolics still places
same signs in different cells, which tells it's all not certain
(and different people pronounce the same sounds differently) and
unnecessary when audio-recordings is widely available (but not
in books made out of trees)
and I still didn't find the one I needed: Åå so it was too much
of an honour indeed, or am I just grumpy?
either way look at what I had to go through to get the å I could
write in my nnotbook in a second.
(I add it upstairs just now, even though you saw it earlier than
– k s
t n h m
y r w
a あア かカ さサ たタ なナ はハ まマ やヤ らラ わワ
i いイ きキ しシ ちチ にニ ひヒ みミ ※ りリ ゐヰ
u うウ くク すス つツ ぬヌ ふフ むム ゆユ るル ※
e えエ けケ せセ てテ ねネ へヘ めメ ※ れレ ゑヱ
o おオ こコ そソ とト のノ ほホ もモ よヨ ろロ をヲ
І і Ѳ ѳ Ѣ ѣ Ѵ ѵ Ѕ
ѕ Ѯ ѯ Ѱ ѱ Ѡ
ѡ Ѫ ѫ Ѧ ѧ Ѭ
ѭ Ѩ ѩ Ꙋ ꙋ
𓄿 𓇋 𓇌(𓏭) 𓂝 𓅱(𓏲 ) 𓃀 𓊪() 𓆑 𓅓 𓈖() 𓂋 𓉔() 𓎛() 𓐍() 𓄡
a i ij a(o?)
p f m
𓋴() 𓊃() 𓈙(𓈛 𓈜 ) 𓈎() 𓎡 𓎼() (𓏏) 𓍿
ḳ(q) k g
ch d dj
𓐝 𓋔() 𓍘()
g m n
᚛ ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅ ᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ ᚋᚌᚍᚎᚏ
alphabet 𐤀 𐤁 𐤂 𐤃 𐤄 𐤅 𐤆 𐤇 𐤈 𐤉 𐤊 𐤋 𐤌 𐤍 𐤎 𐤏 𐤐 𐤑 𐤒
𐤓 𐤔 𐤕 numbers 𐤖 𐤚 𐤛 𐤗 𐤘
some tricky :: ׃