It is volume 11 ( 012345678910)
this is a draft... draft.. draft.
I think only ai (or some unhuman autist) can
recognize all the morphemes across all the languages: too large
is the database in both space and time, so I'm only building the
database of keys and try to reconstruct the origins of writing
systems (this task seems to be more attainable)
Малява ~ Mail (and this is how cognates should work, directly,
Халява ~ ? (offficial version of that word is hebrew halav,
milk, as if in Israel repatriants got free milk and since then
everything free is called halava in russian jails, and from there
everywhere, but what would hebrew-speaking people do in jails of
jewish regime and I thought jews don't tolerate milk in the first
place, either way all that story reminds the joke about стибрили
way too much)
Dal's version of halyava is that it's a name for bootleg is not
cognative enough, but it's still better, and not because polish
soldier placed some little presents or loots into their boots, but
because when the boots are dead, the bootleg is still in perfect
condition, so it is free leather for the shoe-makers.
And it is just one of examples that not every word can be
re-cognatized into smaller parts.. but isn't -лява common between
those words? If malyava is mail, isn't halyava from the same
language? Let's dig in there, of course I cannot disassemble the
word when I don't know the lanuguage it is from, some of them are
Let's try to reinvent the writing system from the hight of what we
know so far:
/ is what? 1? i = yea or iie? In japanese some shwas stand for yes
and no: singls shwa is yes, double is no. But maybe it's not
always true, I don't know japanese too much, so why do I speak of
it when I have russian perfectly arranged in my head (perfectly is
not perfect, because I'm only human, but I'm a native speaker and
a mighty poet, and dig into the language field, you cannot find
anyone better than me. Maybe if Iknew ukrainian, укроили выкроили.
Киев от Москвы независимость получил. Всего-то
Memories. I would erase some of my memories, they turn me into
something wrong, into a madman, I get mad because I get angry at
something I cannot change, but probably that's how we learn, we
analize and recognize that the next time we should act in a
different manner. And now, when we learnt, we should erase those
unhappy memories. Have I learnt everything from it. I think about
my brother who's in a worse situation instead of me. Because he
was drunk all the time not to think about what he did badly.
Я хочу умереть от плохих мыслей. От
осознания собственных ошибок. Несчастные мысли долой. Но
невозможно, ведь я повесил на себя пару крестов. И некоторые
ошибки привели к осознанию чего-то, вот оставить бы осознание, а
воспоминания их позволившие сделать долой.
Помню зашёл в церковь молиться (для чего? я верующий? посмотреть
каково это, но может я разозлил церковников своим клоунским
нарядом и тем что ходил по церкви посолонь даже после того как
видел что служка обежал её противосолонь. опоздал на службу,
ходил во время службы, гад и гадски себя вёл. смеюка смеет.
овцой они видеть желают тебя. овцой. или бараном. тупым.
И эти мысли увели меня дивжению рук, которое я совершал там: я
после знамения (перекрещивания себя) поднимал ладони кверху,
чуть выше того места лба, к которому прикасался, и оттого то
была не просто пентаграмма, а пламенеющая. У европейцев же
скромный далет. или что это за буква? Ⰾ ламед глаголический, ламед значит учёба,
(следующие четыре фигуры это вид изнутри и снаружи, крестятся
обычно правой рукой)
the eights or ∞ it was.
So from one perspective both russians and europeans are taught to
draw crosses upon themselves, only some of them do it wrong way,
and because russian church is more provincial, I suspect it to be
in the wrong here, and also because both churches write left to
write, why would they cross themselves in different direction, and
if the prayers work at all, if they matter, it is obvious that
europe is more comfortable for the living than the russia (even
gay prayers are fulfilled there. one of the first things I noticed
in Amsterdam is that sky is lower there, that it's closer. Which
whether was an illusion or caused by the sea being much closer. Is
sea where the clouds are made? Makes perfect sense, perfect sense.
Туман в Сан-Франциско такой, что кораблям гудеть приходится в
That is not necessarily that profane as balls, it could be belly,
живот is жизнь, life in russian.
Какая магия может снять магию крови? (коммунисты не для того
столько крови пролили чтоб сейчас их потомки отдали эту
завоюванную власть просто так)
Магия слова может перевесить магию крови. Об этом Христос и
говорил, если я его правильо понимаю. Логос. Вначале было слово.
Термин «Логос» в словаре древнегреческого языка
Иосифа Дворецкого имеет 34 гнезда значений.
Первый перевод этой строки на славянский язык осуществили Кирилл
и Мефодий, именно они понятием Слово переводили греческое
понятие Логос. Далее под Логосом подразумевали и закон
всемирного развития, и некую Высшую Силу, управляющую миром.
Позднее в трудах ранних христианских мыслителей сам Логос
отождествлялся с Сыном Божиим, Иисусом Христом, «ибо
Логосом-Словом спасал Господь грешный мир».
Понятие о Божественном Логосе восходят к древнегреческим
философам школы Платона.
В большинстве китайских переводов Библии для «Логос»
используется понятие Дао.
Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ
In principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat
Въ нача́лѣ бѣ̀ сло́во, и҆ сло́во бѣ̀ къ
бг҃ꙋ [ᲂу҆ бг҃а], и҆ бг҃ъ бѣ̀ сло́во.
В начале было Слово, и Слово было у Бога,
и Слово было Бог.
Моя расшифровка этой загадки: мама (первое слово, первый бог)
(выдели текст после той строки чтоб увидеть
разгадку, you probably read it before)
Back to that cross sign: am I not drawing logic from something
illogical in principe? If left side is so important that we have
to touch it first, why don't we cross ourselves with the left
hand? Either way, europe lives much better, and thus we can try to
apply their church practices into our life. And if life becomes
better, we can apply it further on. But rotations are some magical
things, not just some formal traditions. If in 1666 something was
approved, maybe we should take it away. If рпц is кгб, then we may
contact this inner structure of the government from the side of
Let's form the reform: church experiments: humiling our pride we
try some other practices to see if they cause something positive
in society. Постижение приворотных и отворотных движений. Т.о. с
1666 года русских отворачивают от церкви (что бне мешали пилить
бабло?: просто чтоб не мешали)
Но если эти движения влияют не только на паству, но и на другие
явления окружающего мира, то может им попробовать другие способы
воздействия на паству. Привороты прихводят,
ходить и водить. х пассивна и глуха (на самом деле нема), в
активна и звонка
отворачивают гайки и болты против часовой, может оттого и/что
отворотным считается хоровод против часовой, а приворотной - по
часовой, потому что и гайки с болтами прикручивают по часовой.
Крутить отворотные хороводы в церквях значит работать на запад,
они-то небо у себя прикручивают. Мы работаем с ними воедино?
Выстраивая систему таким образом, чтоб всё божественное
концентрироваллось у них?
оттого и (следующий текст явялется следствием предыдущего)
оттого что (следующий текст является причиной предыдущего)
схожесть и всхожесть - один предлог каким-то пока непонятным
образом меняет смысл слова на вообще вроде никак не связанный:
схожесть is likeness, всхожесть is germination.
> by lightly closing your eyelids to the
correct distance and staring at a minimal light source like an
LED of your phone charging in pitch darkness, you can actually
refract and examine the surface of your own retina based on the
light patterns seen.
i discovered this when i realized the pattern was consistent
across different light sources and different angles.
I discovered something much more interesting that that in the same
If you raise your hand between your eyes and the sourch of such
light, you will see that the light is covered not from the bottom,
but from the top.
If you close the light from the top, it will be disappearing
beginning from the bottom.
It's whether some optical phenomenon I don't understand, or a
glitch in the matrix.
У хвойных деревьев есть плюс: они вырабатывают кислород и зимой.
У хвойных деревьев есть минус: их иголки впиваются в руки, если
земледелие осуществлять руками, а не инструментами. Кстати, таким
образом это тоже плюс: руками работать западло. приучает
к механизации. Или к толстым
пластиковым перчаткам как у электриков высокого напряжения. но
даже они не спасут от стальной иглы, которые всё более не
I think I should remove all my moaning about weed making me weird.
Because it's very ungrateful of me, so I keep on smoking till I
die, if I die. I just make it more responsibly. Not to let it
damage my social skills. Not to communicate with people when I'm
And let's find the topic before we smoke.
Okay, I have a good one, it came to me earlier today when I was
high in a bathtub:
Отчество. честь. читать. чествовать ~ чтить
The connection between чтить и читать (так мы и будем разбирать их
по слову за раз, или по два, или по много, по целому кластеру,
которых всего пара сотен, т.е. за год можно справиться если
понимать что делаешь. Okay, I will be back in few minutes. will
take a leak and fill the pipe.
Честь чесать (как за ушком, гладить льстить, а чествовать читать.
А отчитывать? от, значит прочь.
причёсывать приглаживать при значит к? не, при значит с. к ~ с. to
причитать is sorta moaning or mourning (gogle translates it as
lament wail keen snivel)
not one of those words seem related to read. So each word is it's
own sentence. Different sentences in different languages. synonyms
are different words, thus different ways to describe the same.
There's a freaky theory, translating russian words into few
russian words. As if ..I disregard this theory, because it uses
some 49-letter set never existing before and the way they
"реставрировали" её is ridiculous. Yet, if they're onto something
in some other piece of their work: maybe that table is not
directly connected to the interpretations of letters.
torch is source? (because of silly typo sourch. source is what
I will talk to the guy But now when I'm high, not now when I'm
bu = no (both are V)
b is also h, and Н is russian N
хуй - значит нет. пизда = peace, yes.
d and b are opposed this way. b is no, d is duh, да. (both
да и нет are known all over indo-european space. Including japan?
Not exactly, they separated from the whites later than some china.
Cbina keeps bu. bu is chinese, actually, europe only knows but,
and но [no] is russian but. (not in butt.
they were so dirty or it's me?)
in japanese it's one huh for yes and two huh's for no. And it'
seems A is D again. japanese хай (yes) is different from russian
хуй (no) by that very vowel. A is D and U is V. сходится.
Ад is actually the дА read the other way around? Is it a way to
say No? Let's check:
Нет будет тень. И это взывает к другому фирк..
фрику, читавшему слова в обратную сторону. Я полистал и
взоржал: очень широкое поле для интерпретаций (т.е. примеры не
сходились напрямую) но моё тень для рая не настолько ли натянуто?
ад это жар, тень это противоположность жары: тень yes? to yes is
to yes is есть
потчествуя, чествуя, есть в честь is to eat. eat is yes? я выделил
ту фразу в качестве почёта.
hon (short for honey. is honey adjective?) honour (honor) honest
(look so much like adjective, adjective+er, adjective+est. and
because hon is a short form of honey (what else? it's hon in
common speech) honey is adjective (only adjectives have short
forms in russian) and thus that theory of honour being honer and
honest being its превосходная степень (хотел уйти в инет искать
как это по английски, но я отключаю теперь интернет на время
сеанса, а то залипательно)
honey is directly relatet to потчествовать. явствами. потчует,
предугадывает желания. оказывать почёт значит угощать. медовухой?
не знаю. мёдом. сладостями. чаем друзей я
угощаю с вкусняшками. молоко многие из них не пьют, а то бы
молоком угощал, предлагаю молоко, сам пью молоко при них же
honest hon ест. (я не говорю, что это
ступудовая этимология, я развлекаюсь и говорю мэйби)
honour hon our.
сладкий sweed (sweet came out like that)
с лад коий
with weed? (not with guns. не обязательно с лавровыми ветвями,
может с конопляными)
sweet is related to weed? sweet weed? сладкие травы вполне себе
горькие травы тоже бывают, но и сладкий происходит от солодкий.
травы (приправы) замена соли или соль замена трав? А что если
использовали травы обоссанные для солёности? дикие древние
наверное и не такое вытворять могли. И сейчас я хочу их обычаи
обнажить в нашем современном языке? Может я потому и не доставил
до сих пор, потому что часть меня считает что не нужно этого
делать. Все эти неприличия являются проявлениями более базовых
понятий, вот на них, на абстрактнейших да/нет и строй всё. даже
если там проскакивает хуй который тоже нет. неприлично так писать,
что я себе вообще позволяют.. кар аул.
позволяет и позволяют отличаются ллишь
гласной. ю вместо е где-нибудь ещё меняет форму единственного
числа на форму будущего?
всё все используют ё для единственного и е для множественного. не
то, но близко. интересно.
мой мои добавляя ы делает форму множественного числа? ю это еы?
позволяете отличается от позволяет одной дополнительной гласной е.
где-нибудь ещё е делает форму множественного числа? весь и
все. весе? в сем пространстве? все т.е. целый мешок? весь мешок.
но все монеты мешка. вс е. е и с встречаются опять (как сколар и
еколант, scriber and ecrivant) and here we se -er and -ant are
synonymous. is r actually nt?
ᚱ could be ᛚᚲ, lc? lг
R is palatalized l? le?
or is ᚱ long form of ᛚ? palatalized consonants are naturally
longer. Burgess even used double letters to
show palatalized forms of them, something not that common in
English for some reason. Were they speaking like that to show
their firmness? It came out
Now I wonder if I should read Burgess as
бёрджесь. жесть indeed.
Back on track. Honour. our hon. hon is good? hon is honest.
честный мёд? чистый мёд.
I have less than on hour before some training for leaders and
So let's see what we can do in that 45 minutes. I will tell when
Давай придумаем другую тему, ту честь честность читать отложи
пока, глубокая тема, хорошая.
нет, сорок минут, давай отвлечёмся, не насилуем мозги. спасибо
мозгам и всем кто рядом.
вся и всё обе имеют все как форму будущего числа.
вся и все как два и две? не. сложная тема. отложи говорю.
Okay, see ya next time. I think I'm already there. I should have
some rest. Tot ziens.
rus as village is known to english too: rustics are villagers.
Now a dilemma. Should I read or should I get high and write.
> "While researching a number of ancient
alphabets, I found symbols chosen to illustrate their letters
were not only mnemonics for sounds to record speech, but also
for an ordered path guiding seed and soul through life.
Promising a return after death, the path eventually morphed into
the 'spell' magic of runes and such alchemeical traditions as
Masonry, the Kabbalah, Celtic Oghams, China's I-Ching, and the
path of Tao, They also included Mysteries of the Golden Fleece"
But in that work:
You further only mention it in the context of
" Assistant Ogham is Talamon (Teilmon). He sailed with the Argos
in search of the Golden Fleece. On the way home in the company
of Hercules, whose own journey took him through the sky, Telamon
stormed the walls of Troy. First over the wall, he took home a
daughter of Troy as prize."
Which is extremely obscure for me.
What is the connection between alphabets and golden fleece?
Among other things, 72 languages were spoken in Colchis (where
Fleece was found). This being an important astronomical number
as noted many times in paper.
According to the Greek myth the Golden Fleece had belonged to a
golden ram that Jason's ancestor Phrixus had flown east from
Greece to the land of Cochlis ....His stepmother is a daughter
of Cadmus (who gave the alphabet and various Mystery traditions
to the Greeks).
"Ogham stories often refer to events around the Black Sea, an
area of early scripts. This was the location of Troy, Militus
(settled by people from Crete), and the tale of the Golden
Fleece. First Bird Ogham, for instance, is Besan, 'pheasant'. A
bird from the Black Sea area: "Pheasant, the phasian bird, the
Phasis, a river of Colchis" (OD). Colchis hosted the adventures
of the Golden Fleece, another story associated with golden
mysteries, metallurgy, great goddesses, and astrological
serpent-trees. 72 languages were spoken in that land. Note:
Ancient Iberia, in addition to Spanish Iberia, is a kingdom
located next to Colchis." ( p. 61, Alchemy of Alphabets paper)
Hope this helps.... myth is a tangled ball of yarn but does have
overt links. Judith
an searching for ogham "black sea" delivers this:
Gaedel mac Ether mac Agnon or Aingin, who,
according to the Auraicept, was one of the inventors of Gaelic
was the son of Feniusa's father's elder brother. He is also said
to be the son of Amergin since Amergin was called both Aingin
and Ether. This sounds as if somebody was trying to cobble
together several bits of information and doing a bad job of it!
Gaedel's genealogy is given Gaedel mac Ether mac Toa mac
Barachan and he is described as 'a Scythian Greek'. 'Scythian'
was the collective term the Greeks gave to the tribes of the
area north of the Black Sea. 'Scythian Greek' might mean a
native of Miletus. The other authors of the Gaelic language were
Feniusa Farsaidh and Iar n-Ilberla (of the many languages) mac
There have been other suggestions; Robert Graves
suggested that it might have originated between 1600-1400 BC,
somewhere on the southern coast of the Black Sea. It has even
been suggested that it was derived from Hittite cuneiform,
although this seems very dubious. I have even seen fairly wild
suggestions that it originated in Atlantis and was subsequently
spread by the Atlanteans to both the Americas and Europe. As you
see, it has been the subject of some wild speculation!
getting high it is.
talk and tell.. is that k к? to with? to talk is to tell with
somebody? because in the context it's not tell but talk. told and
talked are different only in that k.
tell is toll is call is
I think I smoke too much. Previous lines were written after one
toke. Why would I need more. I take at least three, and what I'm
looking for can lay much closer to the surface.
Okay, I'll learn. next time I smoke just one hit, will make it
better. just one hit and we will be alright
Just one hit will make it better Just one hit and we'll be
Let's see how far I may thnk.
What do I want?
Sufficient knowledge to build immortality so I can have time to
acquire the absolute knowledge.
I wanted to go on about why I want that and why is that other
thing is important, okay let's plya this game and see how far it
goes (but I'm here reporting that it is one of those
hyper-importance delirium (like calling your mom telling to keep
the pine's root in some soil so it grows. a stupid phonecall.
since then it all may wait until I'm sober.
Drawing on my whiteboard I occasionally draw 8 as ꙋ and I look at
it from the alphabetic point of view. (look = took?)
then 10 is obviously T and Х and it makes 9 not only gевядь
двд is дэ ю дэ. д = 3
thus 9 is p (the labial is needed between vowel and lingual. and 9
does look like p in a way, and thus 9 is פ
and let's try to find the first 10 or 8 (I wanted to say 10 or 9,
but my hand typed 8 instead of 9 and I thought whij 9 if there's
T? is S ~ T? And S does look like 9 too. an again 8 came instead
of 9 and S does look like 8.
is S also P? W as Ш and P as W? Ш and Ф? Ш as open form of Ф? С
& П? П and C as b and d.
final row is old age and thus unhappy? lmn ломан? опрст sounds as
у(to) parasite (to become parasite or to feed some worm)
Прионы в мозгу как неразрушаемые части нас? Изучай прионы, их
резистентность ближе всего к бессмертию чем я знаю. и почему во
множественном числе? Может они записи видеомысленной информации,
которые могут звучать как память. И тогда возможно закопанные
трупы родственников хранят всю память в черепах. если черви их не
растащили. может они песок шишковидки и не интересуют. В любом
случае, этот песок должен быть сохранён у мумифицированных, и
тогда со временм можно будет оживить личность умершую тысячелетия
назад. Это очень заманчиво. Очень многообещающе. У меня столько
направлений для исследования, надо бы давать консультации тем, у
кого тем для исследования нет.
Прионы Прут? Прионы куру вызывают, мозги поэтому есть ен
рекомендуют. (that ен is obviously не)
ен as un-
to as оf? obviously no. but of is от and thus to and ot are
the opposites, not synonyms.
что в лоб что по лбу (я думал что об лоб что по лбу, потому что по
и об синонимы или почти)
в and об (об более упруг, в более вязко)
об is also obo, about. о самая простая форма. эти предлоги
прилагательны? предлоги предлагательные? прилагательные
прикладываются. какой какая кокое кокие
к потому что приКладывается?
лаг в прилагательном ис клад клад ис лаг плюс предлог к. а не этот
же предлог ли г в лаг ложи г ~ ж. and ж in russian is under г
(which is c in latin, but sounds as g)
ё could be в (under б and today next to it) because her is её
turns into ев (eve,
or semantically in russian grammar it's eves's, belonging to
many eves) then.
в под б, ж под г, з под д. видишь паттерн? е под а, вторая строчка
долгая (мяхкая) форма первой.
оп и уф говорят, что и следом такое же было. Русский более древний чем латынь? Чёрное море
полно анаэробов, в них наверное кладов до кучи. Надо найти
способ запустить поискового робота в эту гущу анаэробов чтоб
посмотреть какие клады море там хранит.
уфх как opt?
уфс более чёткое смяхчение (удвоение?) от opt
но если там изначально было не опт, а опс, то уфш является более
протяжным отражением ея.
тогда АБД было отражено в ЕВЗ и если Д звучало не как d, а как ð,
как в греческом например, то вторая строка была не ЕВЗ, а ЕВЖ.
но абгд говорит что четыре элемента, тогда и о-строка должна быть
уфхц (х как ш опять и снова)
и-ряд чужероден? лмн как ломан ритм. aa=e? I thought aa=o. (ee =
i, so why not aa=e? так а ис эй, е is i. lmn-row took I by their
l? is lmn efg? l and e look very similar in cursive, maybe more
similar than l and I, and e and i look the same, and e sounds as
i, it's name is literally [i:] and
42 as meaning of life makes sense because it's multiplication of
good and evil simbolized by 7 and 6.
and you can meet 42 again in this math madness:
6 has 2 множителя, которые не являются ни им самим ни единицей, 4
оnly had 1: 2.
so does 8 (2, 4) and 10 (2, 5)
12 has 4 множителя, которые не являются ни им самим ни единицей: 2
3 4 6 (and it's a powerful record, because numbers before it only
had 2 tops)
so does 18 (2 3 6 9)
and further 24 has 6 (2 3 4 6 8 12)
and so does only 42 (2 3 6 7 13 21)
is there third with 4 and 6 between them, I don't know and have no
time to count, have to run doing business, yesteday seminar works.
Either way, that is where we meet 42, and again it is in the same
sense 6*7, so it's not a coincidence, but some semantic connection
between both meanings of them. 6 is the first most divisible
(there's a mathematic term for it, I even mentioned it in previous
volume.. hold on.. it's some of these two: Superior highly
composite number. Colossally abundant number.
But no. even 24 is neither: colossally abundant
numbers: 2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520,
Superior highly composite numbers: 2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520,
What's going on here? Are this terms synonymous? Ah, yeah..
The first 15 superior highly composite numbers, 2,
6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520, 5040, 55440, 720720, 1441440,
4324320, 21621600, 367567200, 6983776800 (sequence A002201 in
the OEIS) are also the first 15 colossally abundant numbers,
which meet a similar condition based on the sum-of-divisors
function rather than the number of divisors.
24 is the smallest number with exactly eight
positive divisors: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24.
so why is it not in those categories I wonder..
okay, I found it. 24 is superabundant number, one of these: 1, 2,
4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 120,
грозить и поразить случайно сходны или нет. грозящий разящий..
грозит грохочет как гроза и гром громыхает. гро это гор? кто
знает, кто знает.. Если так, то Гор Гавриил, а Ра кто? Рафаил? Я
думал Михаил. Ра лечит или калечит?
I was enjoying that second day of that own your future virtual
conference or whatever it was. And I got high in the end and I
completely lost interest to that thing. That thing makes me think
that capsules (and not this book) is what I have to focus on.
Focus is the key to success and this Dean teaches about it as
about the dot where you have to specialize on your goodness, on
what I'm good at. I'm good at this language book, but it's still
in the process of discovery. I think I should finish it first, not
to lose the momentum about it. So I think I have to get high
until I finish this book. It's a responsible (and less selfish
thing to do. To finish it and to
If Jesus is god, there are many gods in the world: jesus as an
avatar of g.o.d.
good old dog. somehow it came obvious to me.
a round round is o what are r,nd nd as in and and in sound and
found and find and mind and behind, hind, wind,
bind din't? nd is not?
bind bin't who is bind don't be by themselves, they're more like
bind find mind first three in the alphabet which came (and which
is clear in modern orthography) are labials to that and or not.
find fin't didn't finish? din't fall?
dill I missed. Most of foreigners don't know dill. It's some local
blin, prichem sdes dill? dind would be the example.
Was it my subconsciousness подсказывает что ind is ill. ill is
isn't? well. went. I want what is well.
Mind is mill? It's on hill? but hill is more hand than dead. or is
it head? is ead also ill? яд? едом?
dead is a typo of head I didn't even notice, so beware of some
typos liike that uncorrected. why d intsead of k? instead of h?
d and h are even on different hands. hand hanh рука ruka end ka?
kanchatt, to cunt;
t.o. thee around
m.e. my end
these words were the first associations to the letters. And to the
context probably because to wouldn't make sense in the sense of
some other sentence: apply the nut to the bolt. what is thee? thee
apply? maybe I apply the nut to the bolt. t is that, the. The is
the simplest T-word. Not thou. Не выпендривайся словами которые
иностранцы не понимают.
А is A?
Will see in the process of this experiment I start today.
Start So to are this or is to which came to my mind which forgot
of what I just said, let's spread if further:
if is it there, okay, start
so this around are to, are this n. o is around or on? around is
not from a to b, it's on and on.
around R and D? to the right and dexter. всё время направо
это по кругу
и я этого не осознавал столь очевидно до того, как я предыдущую
RounD or R and.. and on was supposed. rounding
i.n.g. I on Go.. ng is on go. in go! ing is in go. and that is its
(ing adds "in progress" to any verb, which this gerund thing
means. in go is much better term for ing.
ОПРСТ is опадание и R и просто shit. упрост, упорост. не на
погост, а в погост.
четвёртая строка это четвёртое время года. зима? наверное. пятая
строка это безумие сатанинское, 5 вместо 4 это 10 вместо 8. 666
я думал е=и.. тогда
у как уинтер отлично подходит
o как осень? AUtumn. отлично подходит
e лето. l'ete.
a весна? спринг? нифига не подходит. Если только вдруг по какой-то
случайности бB не первая буква.
У последняя перекликается с тем что тетвёртая строка в иврите
начинается с ע
но предыдущая строка начинаясь с י перекликается с i-line that I
cannot deny it. פ is p, нот ф, ф is literally doubel double p. but yet פ is both. thus
ꙋ is оу (ou) ע is both o & u and even y, and in this Z in
english alphabet resonates with greek Ζ
ΑΒΓΔΕΖ like UVWXYZ?
only Γ doesn't reflect W well, second worst is Δ which reflects X
only if they both reflect T in their own ways. so let's put them
next to each other
UVWX or wouldn't it be УФХЦ? the voiceless all
along. Am I going between unrelated sequences? Or do these
comparisons show, that there's a glitch from when they went from
three mothers to four whatever, four elements. I know that it
happened in plato times, but it could be earlier (at first I
wanted to say that it happened in medieval times, until I
understood that plato already spoke of four elements. Probably
here he plagiarized Demokritos's writings, bt more likely
Demokritos didn't connect those atomic elements to the abstract
planar figures. It was Plato's invention so to say, he
united unrelated concepts and imposed his contribution to be
monopolic school with the help of christian gay mafia.
And the only sense I see in which he created science is that his
philosophy was some philosophy alright, but it was so false, that
all the scientists understood, that it could be philosophy, but it
definitely wasn't science. Materialistic science is the science
that develops technologies wherever it is applied. Idealistic
philosophy is, plainly put, religion. And it uses dialectics
instead of logics, so if Aristotle was a student of Plato, it is
high chances of Logics as a part of scientific method being
classified, theorized, written even by somebody else. Just as I
believe that Master and Margarita is written not by Bulgakov, but
by his wife, so I believe that Aristotle just authorized the book
on Logic which Plato didn't burn, and it was some secret book, the
first edition taken out of the circulation before it was copied.
And in this Aristotle made some service to the culture. But yet
this alone could give their school some undeserved authority. Or I
could be tripping all along. It's either way, I don't really care,
I deliver what I can. Both good and bad are intertwined here in
some eternal 42 (it's 42 whether you
multiply 6 by 7 or 7 by 6)
So, more simplistic 4-line of hebrew:
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז
י כ ל מ
ע פ צ
ק ר ש ת
ל מ נ ר probably appeared later, when the alphabet was
simple sequence of vocied and voiceless consonants as it is still
pretty much in russian, if we don't include there these sonors as
they call it, common people don't know any sonors, but they do
know voiced and voiceless, so this sonor shit is some academic
so where would hebrew split into voiced and voiceless if we remove
these sonors, these are the only sonors hebrew has, because י is
vowels and they don't have any other й. and so because l is also a
candidate for I, because of M mostly, so are these sonors some
I-fluke? is I added later? Were there only 3 vowels? Of course!
Before they figured out 4 times of the year, they had 3 times? or
even 2? But back to our hebrew, let's remove those anomalic sonors
and see where it breaks then. k is the key, but it's all the klmn
is the key. Italian doesn't have k, that kaf is C in their one,
I'm still unaware of the details, let's look at the sonorless
א ב ג ד ה ו ז
ח ט י כ ס ע פ צ ק ש
Honestly, such division makes me want to go all
the way greek and colour ח vowel and ט labial.
Then י is sonor й and has to go too. Let's go crazy and consider
ט θ and f.
and ח is our И now. Let's assume Ben Yehuda was wrong in these
א ב ג
ד ה ו
כ ס ע פ
צ ק ש ת
Now כ perfectly reflects ג and ס probably indicates that ד was
pronounced in greek ð-manner.
and if ט is f, then ב is v.
or is that ח line opqs?
and the next and fourth line is even further into the winter of
losing it? neither voice nor distinction?
where's h? they have both voiced and voiceless h, but because ה
reflects ע in here, how can I consider this vowel some voiced h,
it's some semitic misconception, or whatever snake traditions
they have, their phonology is alien to us, but they still use a
to write abjad into russian, if they consider that a consonant,
too bad for them, we consider it vowel.
ה line is so short and basic now and it ends with z just
like russian does. And it tells that the verbose or lettrose
fourth line is in comparison should have been ע פ צ ק ש
ת and thus each of those halves were some 7-tone octaves and
then that fourth line just had to add some thee more voiceless
letters to balance out those 4
sonors and י.
So lets compare those sonors and י and these extra voiceless we
don't need for this newfound symmetry.
י ל מ נ.... צ ק ר ש ת
and I notice that any of those voiceless past פ
(which reflects ו) can reflect ז: if it is צ the ts,then ז, is
dz, which is very close to how it's interpreted today and works
well with russian з (and ж is a variant of it) and if it's ק,
then ז is G, which it well could be. then what about ג or is ג
hard G and ז is smooth g, the джи, which makes perfect sense,
but then ק is ч. but I thought ר reflected ч more.. They all
could. It's truly weird and very polling, but I work out of a
hypothesis and just see that there are too much of place for
this hypothesis, so it must be true. It well could happen and it
could happen in more than just one way. So we show it for those
other letters: if ש reflects ז, then ז is Ж which it well may
be, because of russian Ж, because of G, because of few other
reasons maybe, and if it's ת then ת is θ and ז is ð which is not
all that far from z we see in it today. But if that's so, what
is ס we talked about before? It should have been t then. and ט
as п is even more weird, than ט being f.
ט is t if anything. Also how dare I consider ח vowel, it's
unheard of. And if it's a false part, it doesn't damage that
part about reflections of z much.
I placed myself in a bathtub, and there I used pencil to go to
suffixes of pronouns first (pronouns are probably proto-nouns)
что имеет приставку к то, и последующие суффиксы показывают, что
его ему - это всё падежные формы не столько место-имения
(вместо-имени-а? pro-noun, за-имя(существительное) pronoun is thus
is also proto-prilagatelnoe, because имя прилагательное и имя
числительное are also names and thus nouns. huh?
(вин.пад совпадает с им.пад)
ч-ем (им?) E = И
о чём (о нём. и таким образом им содержит ту н of он! него (от
него - белого имеет такой суффикс, но не человека у человека ека
может быть искажённым его, но скорей всего это просто совпало что
там ек у человек. мужика тоже совпадение карнавала крана -
никакого его, а тольок а, совсем другой суффикс вроде бы. А потому
вместо-имениА это вместо Adjactive. Adjective.
И именно этот суффикс пишется через г, а звучит через в, чем очень
близит русский с японским (где пишется ха, а звучит ва, причём то
же в какой-то очень распространённой частице. и лишь одной
из многих. постфиксы в японском, какой-то советский умник или
умница называли их на русский манер гаонимами, но было бы больше
толку, называй они их просто гаони, и ещё больше толку перечисли
они в этом названии их все: гаони ваено and so on.
кого (его) О = Е
кому (ему) О = E? qu+(уму)ему (ис он = ум? ис она = wah! ей!
(вин.пад совпадает с род.пад: ругают по матери, матерят. а вещи по
имени, ибо сироты они)
кем (им) Е = И
о ком (о нём) это о перед им порождаем проявляться носовую суть
этого это э как ה, the, артикль определённый, хотя просто то вроде
не менее определённый, хотя и менее, если это, то он это уже взял,
это как ко in kore & koko and other japanese words kokoni is
here. и таким образом здесь это падежная форма от это, ни is место
in this case.
dare is who
doko is where
dono is which. and that is literally the no of genetivus. thus
these postfixes are suffixes of russians? Russians and Japanese
share the grammatic part of their language.
It most likely means that japanese and russians were one empire
and lived together in the same culture as tatars and bashkirs
somehow live with russians peacefully for several centuries. So
those japanese were russians no more than tatars are russians,
even though we speak the same language and our children often
interbreed, enriching our genomes slightly and peacefully, only
some few percentage of our populations want to have some exotic
prince or princess, and the children usually come out well, so as
some lucky notes we accord nicely. But I do want russia to be
influenced by both Japan and Europe, and I can have it if altaic
nations gravitate towards Japan and caucasoids gravitate towards
Europe. And as a result we have two great russian nations instead
of an obsolete old one. It will very much look like division of
cells, with borders or not, with pores between the wall anyway.
Чего чьего (это из тех картонок из ванной)
Но там на картонках ещё курсив который здесь только фотом можно
передать, но сканы следующей партии будут позже. там где я писала
о=е, я поместил курсивный ههه ,ه, не знаю правда это или нет, но
А ещё там сравнение А и О строк
А Б В Г Д
О П RS T
R reflects V? as in runes? This I came to myself in here. There I
OPST (seeing that there's no R's in A-line, and even Q (being less
common) can reflect C, but only cursive r reflects cursive ч,
which is how c is read in Italy. And etruscans as russian
predecessors become very probable again, like planets approaching
and running away this national concepts are, now it seems to me
that russians are quite european nation, smeared and oppressed by
those who took the Italy from us. The Romans. Так что борьба между
народами это в совсем недавнем прошлом по сути борьба между
городами, полисами, между силами полиции разных подразделений,
разных муниципалитетов, разными policies and polities.
Ane so R & L could be added later in time to something like
d e f
g h i j k
m n o p q
and then alphabet did come through phase of Pythagoras' tetraktis
from which I found that axial symmetry.
d e f
g h i k
m n o p t
or maybe, that k and the sonors go all away as I thought of it
yesterday, and then the actual tetraktis emerge:
d e f
g h p t
and we remember of that voiced-voiceless thing and I see how only
c & g break this thing and I rearrange them in greek manner:
Δ Ε Ϝ
Κ Τ Υ Χ
and I botched the final line, leaving the letters past T by
intuition or nothing at all (the letters before them I've chosen
so that they reflect the first half.
And I realize that to reconstruct this tetraktis, we need five
letters in the first half. And that is how russian goes. two
labials and two linguals. and then two vowels multiply those
consonants into this vowel two (duo) and it is in russian this
voiced-voiceless thing was found, thus it's only natural to
despise the official history completely and only to look at the
structure of the alphabets and the stories they may tell. not some
professors, we know how cheap their words go.
Г Д Ё
П Р С Т
The final line here is the meme of ёпрст, the other one is ёклмн,
but it's A-line and O-line, the only lines of russian 5-4-6-5-7-6
alphabet. And уеt as й-к-л-м-н is some new addition, o-п-р-с-т
could be the first form of that spell, to which й-line tried thus
to rhyme to seem legit, or.. what? Why doesn't опрст reflect абвгд
better? Let's see which of them is in wrong. Let's first try to
work with the voiceless half:
Г Д Х
П Ф К Т
And here it's obvious that k before T is c, the с, the s. or maybe
it is q? after пэй и фэй!? that probably caused some dispute in
different scholars schools. But let's try
to arrange АБВГД aligned to more memetic ёпрст:
З Д Ё
П Р С Т
ну, такое.. it looks like both ёпрст and ёклмн were some memes
from the same period.
If sounds can cause rain or end of rain, and I think vibrations
may do this, then spells are tones added to the drum, and thus
their sounds are important mostly in vowels. And vowels were
excluded from semitic mind. I wonder when and why.
That idea of comparing russian and japanese suffixes is awesome.
Especially in the context of pronouns' suffixes. его ему where -го
is literally no, as it is vo phonetically, and actually japanese
has that ga too: waga is my, where wa is the morphere for me, and
ware is a full form of that wa, or more normalized one.
Подиум = подъём.
if T is 10, 11 is U, and that is what
ᚢ is that demonstration of the new staff attached to the previous
one, this is the longes stroke at the staff and thus it is really
something. and ᛆ is the 1 and ᛚ could have reflected it, mirrored
it, as some central letter? As some final letter of the first half
maybe. If MN are the central letter, L does end the previous half.
a b c d e f g h
i j k l
o p q r s t u v w
x y z
perfect match. and o as doube a, and z as double л
л это галочка а z это перечёркнуто? да и нет.
f reflecting t is very beautiful symmetry, especially because it
is near the centre of the composition. And that central position
is not exactly central. and this alone make me ask the second
half, all those ij's and vw's
Й has brevis and called i-short. such is the J and it is not
longer (as it is in i & j) but J is just swashed half of I,
the י. And half of who or what the is? of ו. and ו is labial
which is perfect to lay next to that half. But וי is not the
order, not the actual alphabetic order. it's 16 ten six. and also
iv, eve in modern orthography)
a b c d e f g h
i j k l
o p q r s t u v w
x y z
is much more symmetric until that very ft. what goes further makes
almost no sense. h~v kinda does, суффикс го (его is the go)
читается как во, большой палец ввекрх ис во
ин рашн энд go in english.
это ид1т = это катит (грузчик катит пускай) ha читается
как ва, г and v are essentially the same tick.
butg bug жук ~ v, г and that is also
c is of b not of d. c of d, but was burnt born
born ~ burn ~ испечён. писять печь но ведь писять течь. п is
digamma, c is gamma, t is trigamma. гпт is спт
which is pretty much the same (г is officially c,
what were the chances.. less than ten percent. 4%)
26 is a funny number that when you work with some letter, the
chance of it's meeting the other pair is 4% per symmetry, and I
havemany symmetries, so is it or is it not a good number? It could
be or be not, those p evaluations in math and science I wonder
what it is all about and how do they count it. Ah, you see you had
to learn the fourth and fifth course to know that. But previous
three were disgusting.
l reflects z (never before were they together, I don't remember
that. But I will see all the pairs постепенно, по мере открывания
y would be reflected better by the h. it could be i, j, h, g l
next to l, and it is k, the worst possible reflection, so I do
what? I see symmetry where there's none. But isn't chaotic
information influencing people? Like face on the moon, whatever
the images are in it in different cultures. карикатура про борьбу
утки с кроликом может быть вызвана подобными разночтениям.
Humour distracts, so I have to scroll this image up to keep on
Humour is probably some tool in the language development. Funny
words stick, dull don't, unless they're made official by some
some state-legitimazed words, but cia is see I a(ll)
and fbi is cheff be I. f as some boss is like faraoh maybe,
natural to me, and cheff does sound as ef, bet chief would fit
more this role, it's in the chief meaning I used it. have is not
worse f, and have is own, is what boss does. boss is just is, ust
be, just B. F is who gives a fuck. F is some fuck.
nypd is naturally new york park dead is the first and thus
simplest words that came to me for pd. and park is in more simple
form is put. and d is death, dead, die, do to, but die is more
simple, ай is less tense than U.
U is like ᚢ if they're just two staffs. The second staff, after
the T is done? Why would we need new staff? New aicme, the
additional symbols. maybe even digits.
T as I? if V is what follows it? YVX would be great additioanl
symbols after T. And that is exactly how they're in greeK: ΥυΦφΧχΨψΩω
That YVX sequence (UFH is voiceless as it should. So is it greek,
not russian preserved that voiced-voiceless thing? Let's see:
ILMN is how italian alphabet has it. And no fucking Ξ's.
Ρ[r] is also a deviation from the voiceless character of the
second row. and if it goes, it goes with Λ and it makes M go after
the I, which it should, so let's draw it again:
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Ι Μ Ν
Ο Π Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
I didn't expect them to be equal halves, or did I? I did not.
M (for Mind) next to Ψ is greater that E next to Y (not next,
opposing, opposing is the word)
Z next.. across,,, I don't like neither of
these words. Next is not.. what. I like this word next, but it's
not exact enough, which way next, where is the line with you
Z reflects Ф and it's great, because of how it used to be F after
E in greek, so they say. And then Z faces X as initial X
sound as Z. X is just some voiceless form of Z then, X is S then,
and it makes Ψ some voiceless form of I and Ω is the voiceless
form of M. Are these consonantism coming up? I'm jsut surching, it
That ending messes the system. Let's rehash the facts so that
Α Β Γ Δ Ε F Ζ (F[w])
Ο Π Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ
I remove all the problematic I line (I is a numeral, IVX is YФХ, I
line made by those who remembered of vowel-labial-lingual, and
then distorted by those who didn't. Ψ and Ω are sme local memes,
and that is their excuse to go.
The only problematic piece is different quantity of notes in A
& O lines and in E and Y lines (Y is I? or is Y O? it is U. u
is и in russian cursive, so nations probably had different views
about what the new letter should be. Probably russians had low
tone, they needed i because they pronounced о as u already? I'm
simply speculating, looking for the perspective to see something
line of 7 is awesome and if we unite ГД and СТ in clastes, we can,
but what does it tell us? That different dialects шепелявили more
If Σ is shin, Г is ж as G is дж
but if X is shin, then Z is ж.
The rows 1 & 2 are found to be reflecting itself in the short
and hard and long and soft forms.
Thus B is not Vita, but Beta, as they say it was. They read it in
some play where rams said ΒΗ so I was told that Goethe wrote. I
could be wrong, no reference here.
and so do 3&4, and this guess allows us to work with those 7's
further into 6's:
Α Β ΓΔ Ε F Ζ (F[w])
Ο Π ΣΤ Υ Φ Χ
seing how Γ and Σ dont reflect each other much, but meet in the C,
I go for
Α Β Δ Ε F Ζ (F[w])
Ο Π Τ Υ Φ Χ
or, could it be
Α Β Γ Ε F Ζ (F[w])
Ο Π Ϲ Υ Φ Χ (Ϲ [k])
Х cannot be S (never saw it as S, Z is the closest to S it can do,
even though it does contain S when it's kS?
X is rather Sh in some portugese or something, I hav shown it
before, when I (or ai) combine these pieces in few specific
chapters, there it will be.
a is a half of B. It is from
new bath pagaes a b c D e f g h i j k l m n o p
q r s t u v w x y z
I need to use some fantasy to see the ɔ-crescent in h and j and
who knows what am I supposed to be with letters after k? l
reflects j and thus even though k includes c, the order is broken
at l looking exactly where c does, being c-crescent too. and m
(just as n) consistss of many ɔ-crescents
c and ɔ would only lay next to each other if b was ɔ because it is
also v, which is u, which is oo, ω, o.
or there were only two lines then, a and o lines. single and
double. and then it could be
I would like to see ɔpst he, but I've never seen c as z.
s (probably as ш in the u-line) reflects z in the second row. So
greek is authentic? Of course it is, just different culture's view
on some fundamental thing as alphabet, and voice strong enough to
stand its grounds and to spread even to India.
Древние греки обнаружили письменность брахми в Индии в
использовании, кгда приехали туда. И лишь потому считается, что
брахми - древнейшая письменность востока. На самом деле она всего
лишь древнейшая из известных европейцам. Но там просто море всяких
письменностей, большинство вообще почти никому не известные
пылятся или скрываются.
ɔpqT was to follow that ɔcɔc sequence. it doesn't. p looks where ɔ
does, but we saw it in d looking where c did. and p doesn't have
this excuse. Unless both D and P are some special moon. between c
and ɔ is newmoon. d could be dark, p rings no bells though. because p is ɔ-crescent, it's full moon, see
ɔpqt (t as l, thus as c, just as q was just a moment ago)
so ɔp and qt are two ɔ-crescents and qt are c-crescents (thus p is
probably full moon, p~f, polnaya in russian, polnaya is cognatic
to full. if it sounds as a duck, if it looks like a duck, if it
walks like a duck or a rabbit.
С is старость, T is тьма
Там = на том свете?
s & t walk together through different european languages:
this and that is сё и то. ещё немножко, и с для сие в русском мы
бы не застали. или через лет триста она была бы столь же архаичной
как сегодня какое-нибудь аз есмь непонятно даже простым любителям
было оно или нет, будь эти формы выдумкой лингвистов, как бы я
Word sequences to learn languages:
hear (here there where - давать ли здесь или
это запутает?) слово слуховой
пишется через ухо.
hears (здесь даём понятие единственного суффикса наст. времени)
heared (здесь даём понятие единственного суффикса прош. времени)
heart (здесь даём им понятие неправильных глаголов)
hearts (здесь даём им понятие суффикса
hearth (очаг, даже я это слово пытался выучить раза три как
минимум, но сейчас пришлось в словарь смотреть, т.е. я его за всю
жизнь встречал всего несколько раз)
probably was aer and is air and aether. Is it still a lesson for
those who want to learn english? No, it's some advanced enquiry
into the essence of letters, that lessons is only a sub-product.
ear ~ ухъ or уши, ушами
hear ~ слухъ or слушай
ear ~ их? их оно конечно фонетически между ир и ух, но причём
юнец youngптенец пт енец ц & g share the attribute of
being c.c is for child, ko the 子
венец тогда что такое? little win? венками победителей увенчивают,
но я никогда не проводил параллели между венком и win. венок тоже
содержит уменьшительно-ласкательный суффикс.
or is юн that young in юнец, and -ец stands for something else?
but these are just rhymes and there's nothing to that.
Слово עברי [иври́] происходит от существительного עבר [э́вер]
— «та сторона»,
чужестранцы везде и всегда, так страшны что за родную нацию
это моя интерпретация этой этимологии (которая может быть и не
верна, не только интерпретация, но и этимология может быть от
480 минут = 60 минут * 8 часов
- это (лучше заменить в грамматике этим =, чтоб не путать с
минусом, тогда можно будет использовать математическую пунктуацию
(знаки) в грамматическом тексте, в буквенном тексте.
граммата значит буква.
почему минуты * час в итоге дают минуты? лишь в этом уникальном
случае? 61*8 тоже в минутах, потому что 1 час = 60 минут, час и
минута одноразмерные? но час = 60 минут, час это просто
Не только час ~ раз, но и ч ~ k.
раз ~ часть ~ час
До начала XX века манси не имели своей
письменности. До 1930-х годов охотники пользовались зачатками
картинного письма, позволявшими описать размеры добычи и
обстоятельства охоты. Достаточно хорошо была разработана системы
записи чисел. Так, числа от одного до четырёх обозначались
вертикальными палочками Ӏ, число 5 — наклонной палочкой /, 10 —
крестом ╳, 100 — звёздочкой ✱.
thus they used etruscan signs for 1 10 100
Whether they're etruscan or early roman I don't know, but these
three are common in all three, so I think it's really common. I
wonder why would mansi witness numeals and not letters. Because
numbers were invented before letters! And the period between two
events could be the moment old-roman or etruscan numerals existed,
and that is actually 800 BC, the times when greeks acquired
alphabet, and hypothetically the moment roman and mansi cultures
met (maybe not by romans travelling as far as Tyumen, but some
nation from whom Italians borrowed those numerals travelled there.
and it was not phoenicians: 𐤖 𐤚 𐤛 𐤗 𐤘 𐤙
I read that mansi are ugaritic people, and I know immediately
where to find:
Old-hungarian rovas. And because Mansi had only 1 10 and 100
signs, and this makes me believe that Taiga is where numerals were
invented, in solitude. And once this invention reached the
populated territories of Europe, it probably made a revolution
there. Those three signs, 3 mothers, 1 10 and 100
bubble water and stone. сто и стоун. потрясающее совпадение. вода
и десять.. тен ис скорее небо в японском, но tan in english, taina
secret? слишком натянута. сто и стоун скорее всего совпадение.
воздух один? одним воздухом дышим, десять рек перешли, сто дорог,
𐲂 𐳂 is B in hungarian, as
was expected from the second sign. That's connected with both a)
roman reading X as ks; b) romans having V
Hungarian rovas have V sign too. Is it where russian abvgd order
go, that double labial.?
Mansi numerals also had 5 in the tilted |: / and that sign is
included in the roman and etruscan and hungarian, but all of them
added additional lign to it. Only romans and hungarians added the
stroke at the left side of it, and etruscan - at the right. Are
etruscans the only nation writing left to right at the time? incredible, unbelievable, kkkkkkk not
𐲥 is s in hungarian. What order is this S B .. and hungarian
rovas don't have 𐳾 in phonetic part.
But turkic do have it.. or no, they don't it's nordic runes have ᚼ
hungarian has 𐲈 (literally letter and)
𐰓 is orkhon oed. 𐰾 is aes in old-turkic, 𐰓 is durcik aed. 𐰓 is
d in both orkhon and enisei.
𐰂 is yenisei a. d and a meet again. 𐰾 is s, 𐰓 is d.
turok is an euphemism for durak in russian, we don't find
eachother worthy of mixing with and we stay apart and think of
each-other poorly, we don't think about each other much. We call
them чурки (another, more dirty form of turks. we consider them
dirty because their skin seem darker to us: their hair is darker,
their eyes are darker, but that is a stereotype I'm seeing before
me. There are some tatars looking more white than more russians,
but me as russian I consider those white tatars russians, even
though they flowed into tatar population intermixing from meryans
or kalmyks, why this politics here again, hysh, hsh.
both old hungarian and turkic go right to left, so it's not only
hebrew and arabic. These directions are like direction of the
traffic. Nationalistic, but I don't trust anything with suffix al
after suffix an.
The numbers are almost the same as the Roman,
Etruscan, and Chuvash numerals.
Х is the basic number (along with I & Ж)
Before I looked into these numerals I found
something wild, but not too freaky, or not freaky at all,
something about Vinca, I don't know vinca, so I only wonder how
would they decypher the months.
I began to read, and I saw хуй within january, and I see the
other two signs. er. huiver.
and I understand that the freak here is me. Even though I don't
know where they got that cid is росток in anglosaxon. I'm a such
lazy internet-scientist, I only dig this deep:
I don't study anglosaxon. I find their dictionary just not to be
so lazy.. but there cid is strife, and I don't know how good
that dictionary is or how you can look for it yourself and why
would you, this book is not about this that image was rather
random. back to the previous, numerals, please.
Those Chuvash signs for 50 and 500 seem to be dubious because of
Numbers of livestock were carved on tally sticks
and the sticks were then cut in two lengthwise to avoid later
But that is said about Hungarian numerals, and hungarians drew
that 50 and 500 differently, and there it could be, but just
because they drew those 50 and 500 differently, those 50 and 500
are local memes, played differently in different territories, and
thus distinguishing between those numeral systems, by changing it
they made it their own, like kanye took from Aphex Twin.
Here comes some more weird stuff from some more obscure or rather
less reliable sources, some facebook link undet this image, I
collect it all,
Picture: Top left; Merya tribal letters, top
right; Mokshan tally marks, central left; Livonian tribal
letters, bottom; Komi pasami.
Among many ancient peoples, such as Romans, the earliest numeral
system was tally marks, something resembling was used among also
Finno-Ugrians, ancient Moksha also had developed unique tally
mark system probably till second half of first millenia, and it
stayed in use among Moksha continuously even after getting under
Russian rule, while it became more rare it was in some cases
still in use in 19th century.
Before development of later writing systems, many ancient
peoples used different levels of proto-writing, which wasn't
fully developed writing system yet, there are traces of these
kind of systems among certain Finno-Ugric peoples.
Most Finno-Ugric peoples used many kinds of different symbols,
most notably house sign like markings were in use among most
Finno-Ugric peoples, a way to mark belongings, also personal
signatures and clan symbols.
Among some peoples such as Livonians and now completely extinct
Merya there are finds of ancient letters, but the finds are
scarce, especially those of Merya, and haven't been able to be
The Meryan signs carry most enigma and have for example rare
claims of also other Volga-Finnic origin such as Mari, but are
overall generally considered Meryan.
The significant Livonian finds are mainly from sacred site of
Livonian chieftain Ako, there are also some possible traces in
Turaida as well as from the pre christian sites of Riga which
before crusades was Livonian settlement.
Presumed from the Turaida finds Livonians possibly also possibly
used in some cases Latin script already before crusades or
addopted Latin script very fast.
The finds are scarce and it's possible that some Meryan letters
had foreign influence, but it's difficult to estimate if there
is any and if there is, where is it from and how much of it,
Germanic influence in some tribal letters is possible but
equally it's possible there aren't any.
Generally, however, findings are very scarce and it's to be
presumed that despite writing was known, in light of recent
finds it could be presumed that the bigger half of ancient
Finno-Ugric peoples how ever were illiterate, and it could be
that, aside Komi maybe, literacy was mostly tied to upper class
or people of more important social status.
Among many Finnic peoples there are also traces of writing in
foreign systems such as Cyrillic or Scandinavian runes, Latin
script as well as some possible Turkic tamgas, most notable find
like these is letter found from Karelian, in which Cyrillic is
used to write ancient Karelian and possible very early use of
Latin script in some cases in finds from Turaida.
From Mari El there are also findings of which nature aren't
completely certain, some of which might be basic Mari house
signs that in some cases might or other might not have Turkic
influence, while there are also findings that might be Turkic
tamgas used by Mari.
Then there are Komi Pasami. It's not completely sure what was
exactly nature of these letters, they might've been in use for
house signs as well as clan symbols and ancient letter system,
or possible umbrella term for Komi symbols for different uses.
Similar name, Rӧdvuzhpas is also used of Komi calendars,
Komi-Zyrian calendar consisting of nine months and Komi-Permian
calendar consisting of five, both having animal symbol for every
month of the year.
When Komi people became christinized Stephen of Perm presumably
of Komi ancestry, created a new writing system using Pasami,
Cyrillic and Greeck letters combination to create a new writing
system, which from that point on was used to write medieval
Komi, he then created a new calendars too, possibly also using
ancient Komi calendars for the creation.
After christinization, there are traces of Karelians and
possibly also Finns in some areas also using similar calendars
with those used among Komi after Christinization, created by
Stephen of Perm, resembling calendar staffs were also used among
Estonians but some symbols were loans from Scandinavian runes.
(that smaller font is a copy+paste)
- stands for both = & +, maybe because both of them have - i
How many hyeroglyphs do russians have?
? question, in japanese itis preserved not only in intonation, but
also as a postfix, ne? in russian ли? in chinese ма? in japanese
ka? (ne is "isn't it", ka is "is it")
ne is "isn't it"
ka is "is it"
no of ne and in isn't_it.
yea of "is it" or "it is"? but it's "is it?" why is it ka? que?
чё? да? (пример: "народ, да?")
so ? is all these postfixes. and now when japanese have it (their
？ looks like they borrowed it from europeans.
。 doesn't look like that, that look ingenious. (that split since
japanese dot to the following text is in the screept, vydeli it
blue by mouse.
desu is yes, да и yes in one flesh. действенно, являетсья, есть.
ес in есть is es in desu and yes. and thus yes is is. Is yes yea
+ is plus, and, to is both 10 and "and" in japanese, and this very
hieroglyph is used. And isn't it very related to the X for ten?
ten is with capital t. X is how they used to draw t.
and if there were only IVX, voiced before voiceless too. pure
voice of vowel, labial V[u], lingual X.
AMT would they bee. Even though X is Ш in portuguese. Xx xis /ʃiʃ/ xis /ʃis/ /ʃ/, /ks/, /z/, /s/, /gz/
yet there's it's also not far from Z: Zz zê /ze/
zê /ze/ /z/, /s/, /ʃ/ ~ [ʒ]
(there's first name and it's reading is european, the other name
V is five and vijf. and it sounds as wife and vrouw it could be,
because vcoul be pussy mark. t is ז?
I is what? I. I am.
I V X in such a sequence: first save yourself, then save your
wife, then hold all the others. It is wisdom in this order.
But isn't it just fantasy? Isn't it fiction.
- has different meanings in grammatic and in mathematic.
in grammatic it's whether is or and (usually is, but in copy-paste
it's and. in где-то is just empty place, the spacebar between
"some where" or is it somewhere, so where russians have -,
englishmen have nothing. in math those things are =, + and maybe
0. and - is "gives" in math.
/ is also translated as over. прикончил тушу разрубая? нереально,
пикой скорей всего кололи.
% percent, 1/100
: which is, such as.
; and in the same sentence something else.
. that's it. that's what it probably means, and there are more
hieroglyphs in europe:
? deus ka desu
ka ka, ma, li.
! wow, yes, yo, усиление значение, эмоциональность.
Can I really consider the punctuation marks some graphic system
. is the simplest, but it's the final, t, that's it, the end. It
is semantically is supposed to stand last. and dot is c as centre,
dot is t or x, dot is a spot, o, japanese。
b is B and I htink it's :
then . is a! c~d~a? only a & b and their itterations? if d~a,
then only b can stend before it. And is E eё? is F for father and
phallus? Z is zain. I wonder how they both are 6 and how much 6
looks like an erected penis. p is pisa, looking down. b is be, p
is pee. it's better to be, to еби. b is ben. benis.
or is it bagina? богиня is goddess in russian.
In my system b is female form between a and d, and in comparison
with a and d, c wants to remind B.
c is also she? in some ancient past? b is
probably вы. why is it probable? because it came to my mind? it
isn't science enough, it's some poetry, but only robots will be
able to understand it, or some augmented people from some recent
if . is t, then , is s? or is it i? because semantically it is
и[i] which is russian "and" and "and" is "add".
. t (tod dot is like thethe theth)
? a (huh?, а?)
! o (o!) ё (yo! - in american and japanese at the same time, who
knows who borrowed from whom)
: is, s? 's?
, and, n. N = И? who knows, who knows..
: could also be B. (which is can be substituted with "be it")
if ? is a, it reminds ʔ which they use to transcribe א.
and thus the more alphabetic order is probably
=∫, (, was
accidental here, and maybe it is divine, exposure of H as a
form of I (as it was in russian)
,.. I used , for g because it came naturally, but % is more
g than ,, but, the faces, those emoticons..
first is child with the question mark in the head and the
mouth wide open, then the curious face exploring the world.
I wish I did it all the way yet.. okay ! will be the
beginning of the fourth line, lets' continue.
=∫ (, is also i because
, (, is both i & n, the alpha and omega, the
!pi,Q, I think I've lost the whateve. I lost it at י
Also why ∫ is f when it's sh? It
is an interesting picture, but ∫ has nothing to do among punctuation
marks. So colour this all thing yellow. greay. lf да
серым засерь. засру засеру заgray.. gray and ceрый are
probably cognates, because they have common R in the second
syllble, and с & g meet in c.
It was only first approach to this guess. orthographic symbols
could predate some letters, some of those symbols, I wonder which.
Arythmetic ones: + to, T, ten, the most common thing. But 4 blocks
between the sides tell that it could be 4 befre it became 10. but
it is as if it was f before it was t, немыслимо.
It's weird how so many people considered X 10 and not 4 or 2. two
were II. three was III (it looks like both Ш but my first though
was T in cursive, because Три begins so, Three begins so. Tree
Three is Tree. Four is Flow? Five is FIre? To.. Two is what? Тьма?
Дым? One is what? Or is One and Two are Yang and Yin, and Three is
the next level of xehagrams, the trigrams. That's not the next
level, some bigrams or digrams are there too, I think I gave it in
the ending of some previous volume.
That image lead me to Bagua, when I fed it to google, and Bagua is
what I found some years ago, and lost, and mourned the loss. I've
found it again.
I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagua is where I should
start learing the chinese from. But I began it with Hello, I love
you. and it is interestig where they begin to teach us. English
begins with Hello, my name is.. Maybe that's why China is over a
billion.. English is more indidvidualistic, not I love you,
but I am me.
The corean variant of Taiji (a.k.a. Yin Yang) is Taegeuk
I brought this taegeuk here to show that in such representation
those two entities are fire and water.
涴 is dirty, sounds as вон! sounds as one even more. transliterated
Ух (jokig form of ушей, ухо, and just as х mutates into ш so does
it mutate in slyshatt which is related to sluh. other sluh is
rumour. And these meanings of the same word maybe should be given
at the same lesson, at the same cardboard. I should publish this
pictures of ear-hear-hears-heart-hearts-hearth-hearths and for
russian it would be ух-уши слух-слышать (фтв руку ыши ис ухи, эс
if russian х is similar to portuguese x, which can be both h and
sh. and here we meet h, h is х in russian, but sometimes the same
letter should be transliterated differently because it sounds
ухo-уши слух-слышать-слушать слухи (and english variant of this
claster is much more interesting)
h = сл? not a single other pair so far, not a single h-word reture return сл-word.
but from the other way.. след ~ ход, слепой ~ ?, сложный hard,
сложен ~ hard (сформирован, утверждён) слово.. слюда.. so no, that
слух ~ hear is derived from ух ~ ear, but the morphemes used for
such словообразование are different.
These are such interesting systems of thought, and those too links
have such interesting tables, I copied ony few of them, let me
give you more, I found them the most fascinating.
Basic Pentatonic Scale pitch
Basic Pentatonic Scale pitch pinyin
mi or E
sol or G
do or C
re or D
la or A
Sometimes I almost believe f and fa added
simultaneously, later. But isn't F necessary in the second row
to mak this sistem? Was this system there before they added f
and p? I'm way too provokotive, I provoke myself now.
That solfege pentatonic mode doesn't even have B, so what
system. But it isn't even european mode.
It is only another reason for me to understand
And I still don't play music instruments. Should I? The common
belief tells that brahmans don't play musical instruments,
shudras do. Am I falling for that bs? I don't play musical
instruments, and I look for knowledge, but isn't it
I hope you were entertained. I give up weed, and it means no more
Why do I give up weed? To build, not to be some lazy philosopher
under the tree, extracting knowledge for the knowledge itself and
not for some action. I should act. I should be active, so this
life doesn't fuck me up. I go to sinagogue in few days so this
volume will probably edit the ending of the first one whether with
some correction, some plot-twist, or some more bitterness.
I think I want to begin believing again. I think I must find some
more firm religious group than christians. With christians I
always feel their faith is so unsteady that with my smartass
questions I can destroy it in them. One muslim asked me not to
challenge his faith, because he build it for so long. I said I was
sorry and I was surprised by such open honesty and I excuse
myself. What makes me feel that jews are any different? Why would
I come to talk to them? I need correct the hebrew or I have to
remove the transctiptions altogether.
I will probably return as if there was nothing, but I roll it over
more and more: I already stopped drawing in the notebooks. I draw
on cardboard when I'm high in the bath though, and huge collection
of very interesting thoughts is collected on them. And I bought 40
more cardboard leaves for such states, and we'll see how long I
will smoke more. I must stop. I really must stop. I should allow
myself to smoke only in the end of the week if the week was good
And then, in a week or so I will come and tell you how was my week
and what have I built and I will be dead for this book all the
other days. I will work somewhere else. This journey is probably
eternal, I have to prepare the basis for eternity first. The
bathes for eternity. I see how I should live, I should live like I
see. It is the final step: I saw the world better than it is. And
now I"m pushing for that brighter future.
The next morning. Still smoking. Have to stop, because measure is
necessary in intoxications, but I am a researcher of such calibre
that coming to and through the edge is my duty of a sort. I have
smoked three tokes from one tiny tube (large plastic bottle makes
me smoke more than I would if she didn't collect so much precious
smoke in it's нутро. жерло, нутро, дышло. Three tokes are enough
and I'm still high af. and I now did so that it doesn't smell in
It is absurd to argue if c of b or d, because children are of both
mom and dad, B is mother, it gave birth to something which
inherited from d the c. I would argue if c or d more ancient, but
ᚦ looks like D much more than Г. and g is Г, it's the second row.
F & H? Father and Haha? I pull it so wildly. Who will believe
that japanese form was in use! haha is of mama as papa is of dada.
f and h are the reflection of b and d, and thus I must take them
as mother and father of some other generation. girl and huy. and
ᚼ and ᚴ, even though ᚵ is g in the academic reading, they are both
ᚴ's and Г is just ᚴ, while K has additional stroke under it. Let's
Unite the stroked: K R Q h m n X x? I don't know, but K has the
same stroke as R, and because binderunen exist,
Is it this вычёсывание блох I waste my life for? Leave it to ai,
only my human satanic pride makes me want to reveal the structure
I have detected in alphabets and grammatic pieces and maybe some
other pieces I dig here and there. I don't dig deep, because I
sometimes dig to deep for you: and here I see that my two
interests are down and up: my mother prefers to listen to the
alphabetic things, because they almost never deviate into speaking
of something gross. I usually wave around english to teach her at
the same time. And when I discuss immortality, I often go into
some gross detail as blood and sorcery.
And such separation of interests may be of my decission to serve
noone and respect them all. There's not just two forces such as
god and devil (which is a source of cognitive dissonance, and
cognitive dissonances are used in religions to make their holy
books incomprehensible in principle) but all the other forces of
this world in it and god himself is a noun in plural form or is it
rather a pronoun in plural form. these.
Hud has sometimes been identified with Eber, an
ancestor of the Israelites who is mentioned in the Old
The Aramaic/Hebrew root עבר (ʕ-b-r) is connected with crossing
over and the beyond. Considering that other names for
descendants of Shem also stand for places, Eber can also be
considered the name of an area, perhaps near Assyria.
13th century Muslim historian Abu al-Fida relates a story,
noting that the patriarch Eber (great-grandson of Shem) refused
to help with the building of the Tower of Babel, so his language
was not confused when it was abandoned. He and his family alone
retained the original human language (a concept referred to as
lingua humana in Latin), Hebrew, a language named after Eber.
(There are different religious positions on this issue; see also
[Genesis 10:21] Also to Shem, the father of
all the Children of Eber, and the older brother of Japheth,
children were born. (NASB)
So that H in the Hud could be the ᚼ(or
ᛡ) or J, read as dʒ in english and as h in spanish.
Eber is sometimes referred to in classical Islamic
writings as the "father" of the "prehistoric, original Arabs"
(the ʿArab al-ʿĀriba), who lived in the Arabian Peninsula after
the Deluge. Eber was also identified with the Quranic prophet
Hud by some of the early Muslim authorities. Other sources
identify the prophet Hud as Eber's son.
See also Habiru
Habiru (sometimes written as Hapiru, and more accurately as
ʿApiru, meaning "dusty, dirty") is a term used in
2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for
people variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders,
mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and
The biblical word "Hebrew", like Habiru, began as a social
category, and evolved into an ethnic one.  Since the
discovery of the 2nd millennium BCE inscriptions mentioning the
Habiru, there have been many theories linking these to the
Hebrews of the Bible.
As pointed out by Moore and Kelle, while the ʿApiru/Habiru may
be related to the biblical Hebrews, they also appear to be
composed of many different peoples, including nomadic Shasu and
Shutu, the biblical Midianites, Kenites, and Amalekites, as well
as displaced peasants and pastoralists.
Scholars such as Anson Rainey have noted, however, that while
ʿApiru covered the regions from Nuzi to Anatolia as well as
Northern Syria, Canaan and Egypt, they were never confused with
Shutu (Sutu) or Shasu (Shosu), Syrian pastoral nomads in the
Amarna letters or other texts of the time.
and then I digged some deeper and I found that daily
prayers begin with the letters of 3 mothers.
Вопрос 24. Сколько молитв в будний день? Назовите
Рекомендуемый ответ: Три. Шахарит, Минха, Арвит [=Маарив].
Шахарит - утренняя молитва
Минха - полуденная молитва
Арвит - вечерняя молитва
ещё есть Неила - предзакатная молитва, но
чем она отличается от Арвит? Согласно Талмуду
(трактат Таанит) молитва читалась в дни общественных постов. В
современном иудаизме молитва читается только один раз в году,
на исходе йом-кипура.
т.о. названия молитв составляют слово ШМА. что три матери, но в
обратном порядке. Интересно не сатанизм ли это, не досаждание ли
господу, чтоб он исполнял маолитвы..
I read some more on giyur and all those 613 wild things. Some of
that are reasonable, but most of them are just insane. Nazarene Nazarite
Nazirite shouldn't cut hair. It's good to know.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazirite tells even more interesting
things about it:
Samuel and Rabbi Eleazar ha-Kappar, focusing on
the sin offering of the nazirite, regarded nazirites, as well as
anyone who fasted when not obligated to or took any vow
whatsoever, as a sinner.
and all of the sudden, in vino veritas, knowing the
intoxication and knowing the hangover:
A midrashic rabbinical interpretation in this regard indicates
that the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is
precisely the grape.
In describing the obligations of their religion,
Rastafari make reference to the nazirite vow taken by Samson.
Part of this vow, as adopted by the Rastafari, is to avoid the
cutting of one's hair. This is inspired by the text of Leviticus
21:5 "They shall not make baldness upon their head, neither
shall they shave off the corner of their beard nor make any
cuttings in their flesh." The visible sign of this vow is the
Rastafarian's dreadlocks. Some Rastafari have concluded
that Samson had dreadlocks, as suggested by the description
stating that he had seven locks upon his head.
All this vownesses make me feel like some dirty hippy, because I
never took these things so seriously, and the pledge I gave was of
truthfullness, which was the first and the most obvious pledge
once you realize that god indeed exists. And I don't promise you
he or she exists, but then I thought of him as of him, and now I
think that it could easily be her, but for men it's more healthy
to idetify with her male counterpart. which is rather weird.
Either way, I stopped believing (because I confused the parishes
with my wild questions and went insane believing outside of the
society) and soon after that I started lying again, because why
not ease one's life if one can.
Tuesday 15:08, I got high irrationally, out of a habit, because I
feel like this is the most predictive time I have. I have only 10
thousand rubles left. rupie of India is naturally connected to
Introvert but extravert. if the prefixes are in and ex, why would
the next morpheme change?
is o in because in is v in russian, в.
is a ex because a is how out actually start.
out has a good cognate in russian: от.
cognate = узнать (слово, которое в другом языке (или в другом
слове того же языка) узнать)
wisdom is of wiz.
How much of my personality stays within these we's is debated,
t in doubt is ed? or is it duo bet? is t in bet ed? bet
поставленное, заложенное, put. be with ed.
put is set does it make fu she of the final line sillabary? u
turns h into f, e turns h into she. i makes it he?
and if it is, all the other lines are sillabaries too.
у ф х ц ч ш
that uniting factors of them (voiceless, fricative) and the way
the same sounds in japanese changes pretty much within those
borders with different sounds: wа хи фу (хе хо) e & o were
added later, and that's why they just follow hi. that same row
also gives ba bi bu be bo and pa pi pu pe po, which tells that it
is the source of all the labials. H is the bother of B? Only in
japan? Or not only in Japan?
I cannot attribute between ха and ши or хи and ша (and then ш meet
w again, in comparison to japanese three) I knew u should be with
f, because both are labial. And it's the key, ш is more
palatalized than h, and thus i comes with щ or ш whatever you call
b c d make me look differently at it. Bu & Да are the
opposites, brits also know da in duh. bu is chinese no, but also
boo is фу in russian [fu] which is pretty much no, the next to no,
some primal feral no.
c is more palatalized than d? unless it's δ [ð]
u a i seems chromatic, from the lowest to the highest. Or was it
supposed to be in a wave, low high low? A I U is this way. And
maybe A I U is how vowel go, but to balance this order out, the
syllabic vowels went the other way, U I A because B C D go better
in such order.
Bu See Da
Fu Gee Ha
Mu Kee La or Kee Mu Na
Pee Que aRe or Pu Qui Ta
these syllables soud more chinese than english. And english,
english can deliver the words and thus we'll reconstruct this
Be and Do come first.
As it is in bornholm runic alphabet, Be and Do and nothing in
between. Only a A the first, complementing the U and I in Do and
complementing.. how did I even know this word, just listening to
english speech I've got it by the contexts I suppose.
Complimenting is some other word, and is it not le but li because
it is a lie?
A Be Do
I Me No (o in no is the same o in do, nou. I comes with A again,
Me comes with I. It is as if they're complementing eachother and
labial consonant get lingual vowel and lingual consonant gets
U Pee Too.
These three rows are universal, and I was confused by E. Ex? E?
what? so I lost it for the reason I mentioned in japanese lines
before that, e and o are later additions.
Up could be the U-word. In could be the I-word. or is it dutch Ik?
Ef is if? On is the first short word with O which came to my mind,
there are more. Of, Oh, Ok, Ol', Ohm, Or, Oi.
If and Or are a powerful pair. And does it say, that E line was
before I line? is I actually E?
Was it I F H? If for who? nah, I Me No are more primal words so
Is it even legit research? You pee too.
N for No explains L for Lo as the local jewish meme, the way they
pronounced N was L.. interesting..
Ik J L could be the same claster? И ~ N? What am I talking about?
Л is known in arabic, while N is some U with a dot above, as if it
reflects dot with a dot below, which is B, as if N reflects V, but
gaphically I only see N could reflect п [p] but because n
is N, I"m confused.
They do reflect eachother around O
A B C
D E F G H I J K L M N
Z Y X W V U T S R Q P
some good correlation, but I really wonder if I am not imagining
How much is hebrew russian?
דבר говори, энд бикос ב ис в ин рашн, and because ד looks like Г,
and because БВ is one letter or something, and because ГД is one
letter in that bornholm runic alphabet.
Whether it's etymologic or just mnemonic,
this is how I learn this word, and I will keep this in mind.
Имаш is you have in bulgarian in russian it's Имеешь, видишь is
you see in both.
in both those words you is sh. is it zie? is it ш which is w? what
is shto in russian,
который коий некоторый некий, это от que, вопросительное морфемко,
which is also in questioning porpheme garned which is what's?
whose? whose is of who. o matters thatee.
иду бегу лечу делаю это У было I. Я.
ю is the closest to я (in both meanings) and probably from that io
did humans share this pronoun with italians, and further mutation
to je makes us related to france, geographically it makes perfect
sense, we are connected to the roman french via roman italian and
spanish (spane also speaks jo, which sounds very close to russian
Европа это противостояние Я и Ай. Двух каких-то древних понятий,
разных отношений к жизни.
Ай это All before I. Я is literally
"and all" io as in и остальное.
Some prehistoric quarrel about what is ego turned nations bordered
by the language matter. Legislature of in which language should
the legal dispute be.
Hebrew uses -it where english uses -ish.
Ш and Щ in russian reflect S and T, and hebrew has both S and Ш in
that S place. S and T are one. as C and D. two halves of one
kinder-surprise, two halves of one egg,
чада и дети. children and kids, I don't see d other than teen in
english for kids. ST is snake on the cross, whatever it
S is Snake. T is Tree.
O is obruch, P is puss. the first
association, no other since, QR are probably big kitties, with a
whip. or a nail. with a tooth, with a RRR.
MN My Name
KL Kill ? I don't know I just give you the first which cam to my
mind. Call was the fist, actually.
GH ~ F
DE~abey.. I don'tk now I broke or overheated.
bets are бесы. могут помочь в небольшой перспективе, но слишком
много бешенства приводит в бешенство тех, кто проигрывают. А если
я проигрываю? Я делаю своих оппонентов приманкой для шулеров.
Азарт губит, избегай азарта, understand your азарт. азарт is
S is Snake. T is Tree.
and then all of the sudden..
I didn't look for it, it was some random
find, that's why it's here. This book is random, I am randon.
T is Terra. (Tott go earth) s is starostt, I
looked at it this way, I wonder how dare I use letters of the
different languages. I should leave that ambition to understand
all the morphemes, I understand some of them first in some
languages, Then I grow from there to wherever it leads me, but
that will be when I'm with some extra-neocortex, when I'm
extraneocortexed extra-text. What am I? I am crazy. Why am I
here? I'm high out of my mind. You're not supposed to read this.
The drafts are not published for a reason, they may be harmful.
My dreams may become your dreams. It is nice when you didn't
have your own ones. Or if you found my dreams better, but choose
them well, I dream all directions. I am insane.
Т is Твердо.
Т is Top
T is True
T is Talk
T is To
T is Take
T is Team
T is Train
T is Tin
T is Tungsten
T is Тепло
Т is Температура
Т is Thank you to all.
To many words, too big words, I cannot come to understand letters
before I understand morphemes.
Some letters are morphemes, but are they always the same morpheme?
В in russian is in, when by itself. And that is ב what is אַבָּא
then? Alpha of the house? What other words have this alpha?
Archierey? Aristocracy? Alexander. Atilla. Arc. Archillery. Arctg.
Females and plurals use a for their suffix. Is it the power of the
crowd? Of the All? Autres. אַחֵר
S is soft
S is smart
S is slow, but why do I look at affricates, soft is s.
S is silk, silk is soft.
S is snake? I should look at these affricates, the combinations of
Slang is Snake. Is Sl = Sn?
Snow is Slow (Rain is Rapid in comparison)
Snake is Slang
Snake is Sly
Snake is Slick
Snake is sLake? (s is of in russian)
Smetka in russian is close to Smart in english.
Smert is what then? What is Sm? soft mind? Smert is soft mind et
rotten torso? rublen tulovishe
T is tulovische?
T is torso.
In english body is B. interesting.
Body or Trup. Body is living (be) Trup and torso are torn out and
B & Тело. What is B? Body. And in russian? Boy? Bloke? Baby?
Бабушка. Бабочка. ничего лучше не приходит. Бобылёк. Быль, быть,
былец, беглец, бедламец, борец, братик, бантик, бабочка как
бантик. В похоже на бант. Тогда вновь буквы читаться должны на
китайский манер, чтоб B выглядела как Ⱅ но это как раз Т. что
вновь interesting, но снова непонятно.
T тогда будет читаться как Ͱ обращённая в другую сторону. Мой
учитель греческого вроде говорил, что была форма и в обратную
сторону, и тоже вроде как формой H она была, но я не нашёл этому
подтверждения, и может она была во времена бустрофедона. Что в
общем-то не сильно суть меняет. Ͱ read in chinese way (when this
text is turned clockwise for ninety degrees) will look like T, and
what does it matter, since T was just a cross, whichever way.
and when I looked for Ͱ I found this:
1.) archaic non-Ionic
2.) classical Ionic
3.) intermediate (e.g. Delphi)
4.) intermediate (e.g. Tarentum)
5.) late antiquity.
Ира is Гера? Очень интересно.
Ionic thing could be caused by orthography not following orthoepy.
Some assimilation or reduction happened and writing norms saved
not the letter which was preserved in the colloquial speech.
Ͱ correlates with runes: ᚴ and (when Tarentum Ͱ meets Delphi 𐩳)
also to ᚦ.
and also with ogham: ᚆ is h, and it is supposed to be turned 90
Just a coincidence I think? Just a coincidence I may be really
told. But I don't know, it all could be, I grow it and it grows.
And those forms with diagonal bars are almost exactly runic ᚺᚻ
also standing for H.
Смел soft mind and lives (лезет)
лёд l'eau's D, liquid's D (D is hard matter. B is liquid mother. A
is what? Agni? C is what?)
Л ~ M: лить ~ мыть
but мёд isn't лёд.
I know what and why, I don't know how much
(it weighs or costs) I only vaguely imagine how.
I said it about my capsule, and is it applicable to this book!
I konw that I need to recognize all the morpheme, and then to
Because I will make the language learning easier. You'll have to
understand instead of memorizing.
Let's figure out better how I achieve it.
Картотека может помочь. Картотека это
круто. Даёшь картотеку.
Каким образом? Лучше карточки не в столе хранить, а в электронном
виде сделать на виртуальной стене. Перевод этого сайта в Eagle
Mode может помочь.
Подсветка морфем и их перекрёстные ссылки.
Морфемы типа этой:
k = lc? рык рыльца, бок balls (яйца по бокам
look lulz?\ сок сольце к содержит в себе l? liquid? капать
отсюда? кап к up? cad, but p? p as pool? p as pie, p as pond, p
as pound, p as play? pl is an affricat? pay плачь плати
key? clay клей, is клей (and clay) liquid key. кий кидать клей
"включали" животных бросая их? Если спит
побежит, если мёртвое упадёт и валяться будет.
вяленое валеное? оттого кадо и кладо л гладко как ликуид ууд ду.
(это предложение не следует из предыдущего, и оставлено здесь
лишь как разрыв в логике, чтоб показать, что такое возможно на
этих страницах, когда я задумался, отвлёкся, думал в пол-силы,
Do alphabets influence the political affiliations more? So
russians took some greek uncial and became greek christians.
Poland took Roman script and became catholic. All the muzzos use
Military people are insane. They're made
insane in the army. Целенаправленно ломают волю, а с ней и
психику. Воля это часть психики, и направляя манипуляции на слом
воли, на унижение, на подчинение, на готовность исполнять
приказы. Любые, их основная задачу убивать, какие проявления
человеческой деятельности могут быть ужасней (с клиническими
безумцами в обществе часто мирятся вплоть до того, как они
начинают представлять опасность для окружающих. А эти безумцы
сами кого хочешь завоюют.
В моём прекрасном мире военные живут не в казармах, а по домам.
И собираются в банды чтобы пострелять. А кто контролирует банды,
которые не на пэйнтбольных полях, а реально пулями по людям?
Само общество, ведь они живут в обществе? А что будут делать с
пришлыми военными. Стрельба в тире и рукопашный бой денег сами
по себе лишь тренерам приносят, а все могут ли быть тренерами?
Мучинеческая смерть доставляет агнцев к небесам? Принявшие
мученическую смерть праведники считаются святыми (светлыми lik.. light лёхкими) (мученическая is the word)
лёгкий (here г is not в, but х) and light are cognate.
Мученическая значит занимающая время? Мученическая значит от ран.
На вальгаллу доставляют умерших в бою. Таковы, по всей видимости,
представления древних. И сколь точны они можно дикутировать долго.
Проверить правдивость можно лишь изобрети или открой мы что-то
подобное. Например, что люди способны прочувствовать смерть,
занимающую время и уплыть с тонкой вибрацией, но скорей всего даже
если кто-то что-то подобное и испытывает умирая, то как знать что
это не галюцинация. Что заставляет человека умирать от старости? Я
лишь такую смерть наблюдал. Там просто человек чувствует что вот
вот и отъедет. Дед почувствовал за неделю, что какие-то жизненно
важные центры накрылись. И прямо перед отходом дед предупредил что
Вот таким бредом я маюсь, гипотетизирую во все стороны. Сегодня
какая-то дичайшая выпала сторона. Да, я продолжаю дубасить. И
ПРОДОЛЖУ. Нельзя эту тему бросать, даже при том, что как только я
бросил на неделю (дней пять наверное не курил, а может нет, даже
сам не знаю) начала мама помогать с капсулой даже. Надо бросить
курить. Надо. I must. I will.
To build the capsule, please. Smoke only on weekends. Tonigh is
saturday. Only on saturdays I smoke. Deal.
Let's scratch my brians where the alphbaetic things came from. I
told myself not to overwhelm myself with all those writing
systems. Pick few, imagine they were the only ones. As if an alien
visiting this planet millenia later only could find the most
popular let's say four. And he have to make up his mind about
them. Thus let's pick the most obvious few. Latin. Chinese. Only
these two? Others are rather local. The latin is the ultimate
alphabet, also pertaining all four elements in its structure.
Russian doesn't have the structures of latin, but it holds some
other structure: voiced before foiceless.
Top 10 Languages By Total Number Of Speakers
English. 1.132 billion total speakers.
Mandarin Chinese. 1.117 billion total
Hindi. 615 million total speakers.
Spanish. 534 million total speakers.
French. 280 million total speakers.
Standard Arabic. 274 million total speakers.
Bengali. 265 million total speakers.
Russian. 258 million
Portuguese 234 million total speakers.
Indonesian 199 million total speakers.
English, spanish, french, these three all use latin, and thus in
this list latin even more popular than chinese. Latin is literally
the most popular writing system. Very impressive, I didn't know
that. But when we count only native speakers, it's like this:
1. Chinese — 1.3 Billion Native Speakers
2. Spanish — 460 Million Native Speakers
3. English — 379 Million Native Speakers
4. Hindi — 341 Million Native Speakers
5. Arabic — 315 Million Native Speakers
6. Bengali — 228 Million Native Speakers
7. Portuguese — 220 Million Native Speakers
8. Russian — 153 Million Native Speakers
9. Japanese — 128 Million Native Speakers
10. Lahnda (Western Punjabi) — 118 Million Native Speakers
this info is from
Yet if we combine english, spanish, portuguese, we don't reach the
level of chinese, especially, because we have to unite chinese and
japanese in the most of their writing systems. But then why not
unite latin with russian? Don't worry, latin will come the most
popular native script, when we add in other europeans. Either way,
Chinese and Latin are the most popular writing systems. Others are
arabic, bengali, russian and whatever they use in India. Hindi
uses devanagari, a brahmic abugida. Lahnda uses perso-arabic
writing system (they actually used this term on wiki) whether they
used devanagari before or not, doesn't matter in this context, it
is some latin-persian-indian-chinese continuum. And because the
latin and persian share the structures, this continuum is even
more explicit. Brahmic scripts are in the centre of it all. Right
between chinese hieroglyphs and mediteranian alphabets. And
they're syllabic. Which is right between them, so I believe that
chinese was the first, the most clumsy writing system of these
three gigaforms of it. And from there it spawned indian literacy
via tibet maybe. And from there europeans knew first hieroglyphics
(I believe egyptian are some other form of chinese hieroglyphic,
at least they pretty much use the same idea. Only chinese draw
ideograms before (when they need flexias, like in japanese) and
egyptians draw ideogram after the word, thus egyptian is the link
between hieroglyphs to alphabets, and that's how they made it.
Ge'ez is geographically closer to india than the rest of
mediteranian sea, and structurally their writing system reminds
indian devanagary and japanese kanas and indonesian scripts
(especially philippinian) and historically cuneiform existed in
between, and some of it even resembles philippinian scripts in
So here in that overview I saw that I have to compare
ge'ez to devanagari,
egyptian to chinese,
latin to egyptian,
and maybe ge'ez to egyptian too, but I don't know, they're
neighbours, but ge'ez is some local meme, what is it even doing
here. just as egyptian, didn't exist anywhere except egypt. We've
decided to compare only the most popular of modern writing
systems. Because we can be only certain about them, others are
academic enquiries and any of them can be in a way false, and
either way this possibility damages my certainty, so I must
restraint myself within those modern and most popular.
Latin to Persian to Hindu to Chinese.
persian to hindu - begin with that om letters. They're probably
the A and M of AMS. And I'm not sure if it's AMS or AMT because
lingual is some later addition. A and M is the first and the
second halves of the alphabet start so. A is Atets, M is Matt.
Vowel and consonant. Женщине пристало соглашаться с мужем, отсюда
подобный символизм. И это вторит русскому
гласные бефор согласные.. звонкие бифор глухие.
гласные бефор согласные is the A before M.
Bengali is the one I'm not aware of, and though it's also probably
local, let's look at it:
Some short form of indian script, let's begin knowing devanagari
Oh, no, it's vowels and vowelled forms of one letter..
Here's the full set, and it's also enormous:
I took these tables from omniglot they lead to and there I found
which immediately shows how their a reminds cursive א:
This is the typical eastern abecedary in the sense that it begins
its consonant chart with k. c not b.
It is different from european look in the way it compares a and o.
here it seems that a is a longer o. in that graphic additional
element, it looks as if there are two o's one on the top of the
other. but why is it so difficult, so complex in comparison to
european simple signs? Archaic it is. The burden of the tradition.
So, didn't I just say that latin was developed out of devanagary?
Or at least hebrew, some european predecessor? But nah, that could
go parallelly, if indian script is connected to latin, it probably
doesn't go directly, but over ge'ez or independently? no, fuck
independently, they're all connected. But what is ogham? Some
ultimate simplification or some musical pentatonic modes or some
mathematical basis? I can only guess. And this local contribution
doesn' fit our new requirements of being very popular. So I would
even only go as far as comparing ONLY chinese and latin. Whatever
universal forms there are, they both must have preserved them in
some way, and the forms which didn't survive in any of those two,
doesn't deserve our interest.
What is hebrew cursive then? some local meme squared.
Okay, I will keep all then neighbouring alphabets not too far, but
I will do my best to focus just on those two: latin and chinese.
And some of the possible cognates between those writing systems I
have mentioned. i ni mi, ta, maybe me, not too many I still have.
I will keep on collecting them until I have all set and until I
can read chinese. to, te, another to, which is terra, 土
Is 乙 2? Not necessarily, but that's how I remember it. Compare 乙
to 己 (6)
also 己 is ji and stands for yin earth.
The ten Heavenly Stems or Celestial Stems
(Chinese: 天干; pinyin: tiāngān) are a Chinese system of ordinals
that first appear during the Shang dynasty, c. 1250 BC, as the
names of the ten days of the week. They were also used in
Shang-period ritual as names for dead family members, who were
offered sacrifices on the corresponding day of the Shang week.
The Heavenly Stems were used in combination with the Earthly
Branches, a similar cycle of twelve days, to produce a compound
cycle of sixty days. Subsequently, the Heavenly Stems lost their
original function as names for days of the week and dead kin,
and acquired many other uses, the most prominent and long
lasting of which was their use together with the Earthly
Branches as a 60-year calendrical cycle. The system is used
throughout East Asia.
イ(ィ)is i, and
it looks somewhat like i, but they say it's a form of 人 and
that's where I & l meet again. い is its hiragana form, and it reminds russian i the и even
That line was written yesterday when I woke
up on sunday and decided that I will only smoke on Saturdays.
Not on weekends, but only one day a week. I hope jews don't get
mad that I celebrate it too. But do I observe it the way they
consider it observation? Because I do light my fire on that day.
And today I woke up thinking that gojuon
resembles russian in the way they also have ten vowels. But they
have only 8 or 9. But brahmi does have 10 vowels, and in
this it does resemble russian:
but I don't know, it could be a coincidence, because those vowels
are not identical, some of them even seem to be diphthongs.
And I smoked almost immediately, in a hour or so. Because my
throat wasn't well, and cannabis is medicinal. The friday I smoked
because my eye wasn't right, than because my ear wasn't right. And
now throa instead of nose. But in reality because the alternative
would be to clean my room.
The best song of AXC is эйксиси sounds almost like экстаси.
войсд энд войслес ар зы сэйм. It appeared in my notebook (in a
sober day) картина гардина.
карта гарда. Общение с детьми, не выговаривающими буквы бывает
Там же, малыша спросили какие слова на г, и он назвал зебра
картина (картина было близко, и это подвигло меня посмотреть на
неё детскими глазами. и сейчас я вижу, что парень должно быть
является огромным источником для исследования: стол, зебра,
картина were his guess for г-words, and if you read this book you
know why it's cool. And that guy was exposed to my tables from the
earliest age, so it could be the reason he only named words
beginning with the green letters)
I pay for it twice (with literal money and
the ideas) and thus I am benefited twice (the biggest revenue
and being the boss)
My workers pay for it once (with their expertise) and thus they
are benefited once (the percents of the revenues)
So if my workers invest into my project not with the money, but
with the sckill, I can have free workers, the helpers are lured
in this way. The previous time I did it was sloppy. половинчато,
спустя рукава. Я не достроил квартиру.
The best song of AXC.. actually it's by Молот Родины, С Нами Бог!
has no rhymes and I didn't find it before listening it for tens of
times. It's so perfect. And now I listen to Reflecting God and I
see it has no rhymes either, it's like that annoying american
poetry without them, but you don't notice it, because the melody
of the song leads it along perfectly. And that is probably the
difference between songs and raps. Songs are melodies and they
don't need rhymes. Poems are dull and rhymy. These are probably
different schools of lyrics. And I must master the rhymeless
Government is half labial. Russian gosudarstvo is almost totally
в этом фунтаментальная разница между женским м и мужским ж. я не
оговорился. или обознался? Если ж жёстко значит женщины жесткие
были? м мяхко потому что мужики могли убить если неаккуратно.
женщина может убить лишь если осознанно того пожелает. таков
стереотип, хотя женщины наверное разной комплекции бывают. но как
среднее, обычно как. большие мужчины. и маленькие хрупкие девочки.
и я не за педофилов. секс до развития туловища кажется жестоким
извращением, очень пагубно для девчат. девочки ебущиеся кулаками,
которых стало так дохуища, может быть о тех больших хуищах всё
мечтают. Лучше бы о наших так мечтали. Но большинство их них о
наших и мечтают: точка джи не глубже пяти сантиметров на передней
стенке влагалища, видимо с другой стороны клитора. Т.е увидев
клитор можно и корень клитора опреддлить.
длить и делить различно. е как et is and. ,.
,. is a very short sentence. shorter than this is only .. Only if
we consider 。smaller than 、
Ignorance is how they control us.
they say aw in awful is also awe, it was in the past and the word
changed the meaning. Maybe because awful sounds like oh fool
thus that awe is oh
orthography doesn't matter I told you.
гтол гебра гардина
стол гдол ибо раздолен? г- = с-? Because I still feel the meaning
cриб? грибы срезают. сород? в городах наверное мусор на улицах
ледал больше чем в лесах.
лес лег? сложно сказать. давай исследуем с- some more.
сроб короб гроб это пример к звонкие = глухие (я раньше
использовал бы слово инвариант, но я отбросил это слово по причине
глух слух? as in "Language!"
глаз слаз? слазил туда и сказал что там?
голова солова? странное слово. гтранное. граное. сраное грязное,
окей, что со странный. аффрикаты возникли позже простых букв.
ср первый аффрикат, потому что на базе него возникли сложные
аффрикаты вроде стр. а что делать с вспл in всплеск. это тоже
самое вспл что и во всплыл. всплыть is literally to vspl.
еск искать? всплеск значит всплывшего искать.
блеск is что искать? бабло? белое? блеск от белое скорее всего.
белая искра? искра к искать как относится. искра иск ра.
иск в искать обращается в ищ в слове ищет. и если бы они
использовали латынь, орфография бы не менялась: ischatt ischet. or would they use sc instead
of sch in the first case. thus h is very similar to Ь not only
graphically, but also functionally.
Do germans only have sch for both ш & щ? If you'renative
german who reads it, please contact me about it. I will remove
this text when I get the answer to bot be burdened
горб сорб? не.. горбатый сорбатый? мор лайкли бат не..
go and so.
gold is sold!
голый sole? как в голый король. sole ~ onle. keep on is keep so.
but isn't it cheating? because keep has this meaning. dance on is
dance so. they're cognates. or at list synonyms.
le~ly, but soly ~ only, and sole ~ one. one ~ onle. e ~ ly?
dance dancly. fake fakly, bake bakly they all have e in there by
standard orhthography. but I said fukcit
it ~ the it ~ that ~ это ~ сие ~ the. е could be of э.
son onn? он indeed. so o is the root of that word, and s is
prefix, and n is suffix? but isn't so =on?
son is both so and on?
dance son is dance so and dance on? son is some yo thing? yang is
young? yin is in? lie in the earth or in a box.
so good is son good? sun good? own good? sow good? saw
good? (only saw it before or whatever)
saint is sained is signed is sunned is освящённый, освещённый,
свет воссиял из тучи на него.
or if it was when they were inside the dome, the light from the
hole went at the face of the magician who knew the line of the sun
in this day on the floor, who predicted the whether better, who
thus was the wisest wizard of them all. свято место пусто не
бывает не поэтому ли.
Возможно, эта традиция была отменена после того как мошенники в
пасмурную погоду могли зеркалом направлять на кого нибудь луч
туда, где никто не толпился, когда солнце туда уже светить не
могло. Для этого нужно было достаточно большое зеркало, и таких
людей с зеркалом на куполе храма люди снаружи увидели бы. А если
бы это было бы замаскировано под ангела? А зеркало под щит его. И
меч не внушал бы желания проверять что за одеяниями четыре мужика
двое худых на плечах у других двух могучих. но четыре ноги бы у
ангела было? Под просторными одеяниями этого могли бы и не
заметить. Rebis такого ангела и представлял? Или двое несли одного
в упряже чтоб не развалиться? Один бы тот нёс щит зеркальный и
мче. А те бы двое может прыгали бы по очереди, изображая реально
ноги мощные под балдахином.
Голова была бы в маске или даже в шлеме, руки за щитом и под
балдахином не видать что малые.
ладони маленькие бы лишь восхищали о ангельской природе персонажа
гово ~ слово. солова гова? кова? сова? сова с такими большими
глазами и маленьким телом считалась одной головой? The body is
such that with some fantasy one can see wing as a nose and tail as
a lower jaw. (mirror)
I made that video a link, and there, to my total surprise the girl
calls her bolshaya golova (big head)
how weird would it be the top of that "head" rolling.
Wasn't I lied to when told that "hornless" owls are symbalizing
not wisdom but death? There are different cultures, and what one
nation could consider natural, the other would consider false.
So yang and yin in europe sounds differently it's son and..
daughter? if son is so on, then daughter should be stop. and I see
it in .. in dot.
And I was told or read that : used to be . or was it
word-dividers? or were words just sentence made of such short
words as letters?
and so on is ... three dots, only programmers use two, but they're
some newer fashion.
. and ... are both horizontal and odd. Could it be that they were
male so on.
Is female word stop ! which is :?
is ; archaic ,? then : is archaic ..
I also read and heard that , and ? are connected in some way, I
don't remember in which.
daughter ~ dotter. dottir in some other nation's orthography.
dotter puts dots. докладывает. а сын задаёт вопросы? или, если
точка двойной была, то вопросы она же задаёт? мужчины использовали
... ? едва ли, никогда об этом не слыхал, сейчас сам выдумал, это
совсем не хорошо, а сколько у меня такого... что я слышал (читал_)
это что шизики палятся по обилию ...'s.
Here the same gil calls her large head again (and that's the
second video of her I saw, so she probably call her that all the
time, so I could have been onto something there)
and there she explains how owls use those feather horns. she calls
them feather ears. and the way the owl answered to her in
comparison to the previous video it makes me guess what if угу is
yes and угугу is no. It would repeat the japanese forms of ye (or
u) for yes and yie for no.
yin dolgoe yang? g shows the shortness, and
that is how г & с meet in ж & ш.
ee dolgoe e?
Total Plot Size: 0 B
O is zero there, B is bite. piece. bit.. bit and bite.. the poetry
of this is already noticed in the computer terms. is b always bit?
bit is be'ed? bee'ed? living be'ing.
пчела почала? (просто ближайшее слово из головы ывнял. они походу
как нейроны записаны. сколько нейронов столько и идей? сколько
нейронов определённого типа по крайней ее.
мере. Хорошая гипотеза, хорошо что её теоретически можно
Я начинаю продолжение т до того как
знаю чем оно закончится. Такое плющево наверное многих заставляло
думать что бог говорит за них. Ведь информация котора выходит
из-под их пера.. нова.
Некоторые предлоежения я знаю до того как начинаю. И это вроде
противопоставляются тому божественному способу письма. Называю его
божественным. Но какой именно способ письма более божествен? Тот,
который фиксирует процесс мышления в процессе написания, и я
отслеживаю этот процесс в своей голове по мере того как выстраиваю
предложение грамматически правильно. Одна мысль вытекает из
другой, но эта спонтанно возникла, но на основании предыдущего
предложения. или нет.. Тот способ, при котором мысль приходит
когда я не пишу, так что я её фиксирую
позже, наверное затрагивает другие алгоритмы восстановления,
память. Тогда как мысль новая, неожиданная, в процессе текста
появившуюся, вот как эту, я просто фиксирую в настоящем времени.
Это как кино, только здесь процесс искажает мысли, затормаживает
их. Когда в ванной приходят вспышками это самое крутое, и наверное
третий способ познания. Но не создаётся ли эта мысль в подсозании
чтоб выплеснуться в момент расслабления (и для того надо строить
капсулу, чтоб расслабляться полностью и постоянно)
The one-letter English words in Wiktionary
Some two-letter English words in Wiktionary
ad am an as at be by do go ha he hi id if in is it me my
no of ok on or pi so to up us we
Some three-letter English words in Wiktionary
A ace act add aft age ago aha aid ail aim air ale ala all alp
amp and any ape apt arc are arf ark arm art ash ask ass ate awl
B bad bag bah bar bat bay bed bee beg bet bib bid big bin bit
boa bog boo bow box boy bra bro bub bud bug bum bun bus but buy
C cab cad can cap car cat cob cod cog con cop cot cow cub cud
cue cul cup cut
D dab dad dam day den did die dig dim din doe dog doo dot dry
dub dud due dug duo dye
E ear eat ebb eek eel eep egg ego elf elk end ere erg eve ewe
F fad fag fan far fat fax fed fee few fez fib fig fir fit fix
flu fly fob foe fog fop for fox fry fun fur
G gab gag gap gas gay gel gem get gig gob god got gun gut guy
H had hag ham has hat haw hay hem hen her hex hey hid hie him
hip his hit hoe hop hot how hub hue huh hum hun hut
I ice ilk ill imp ink inn ion ire irk its ivy inc
J jab jam jar jaw jet jib jig job jot joy
K keg key kid kin kit
L lab lad lag lam lap law lay led leg lei let ley lid lie lip
lit lob log lop lot low lug lux lye
M mad man map mat maw may men met mew mit mix moo mop mow mud
N nag nah nap nay nee net new nil nip nit nix nod nor not now
O oaf oak oar oat odd ode off oft ohm oil old one orb orc ore
our out owe owl own
P pad pal pan pat paw pay pea pee peg pen per pet pew pie pig
pin pip pit ply pod pom poo pop pot pow pry pub pug pun put
R rag rap rat raw ray red rev rib rid rim rip rob roc rod roe
rot row rub rue rum run rut rye
S sad sag sap sat saw sax say sea see set sew sex she shy sic
sin sip sir sit six ska ski sky sly sod sol son sop sow soy spa
spy sty sub sue sum sun
T tad tag tam tan tap tar tax tea tee ten the thy tic tie tin
tip tit toe ton too top tot tow toy try tut tux two
U use uni
V vat vet via vie vis viz vow
W wag wan war was wax way web wed wee wet wey who why wig wit
woe won woo wow wry
Y yak yam yap yea yen yep yes yet yip yon you yum
Z zag zap zig zit zoo
More complete ist of the two-letter words
A aa ad ae ah ai am an Ao ar as at aw ax ay
B ba be bi bo by
D da do
E ea ee eh el em en er es ex
F fa fy
G gi go gu
H ha he hi ho
I id if in io is it
K ka ko ky
L la li lo
M ma me mi mo mu my
N na ne no nu ny
O ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox oy (in this list, more complete ok is missing)
P pa pi po
S se sh si SJ so st
T ta te ti to
U uA ug uK um un up ur us ut
W we wo
X xi xu
Y ye yo yu
this full list of biliteral words is full of non-words: SJ is an
abbreviation, so I yet have to clean it before exploring. ka ko
ky.. wtf is those.
some words are so awesome I never knew
them: ny is an obsolete spelling of nigh. is it some kabbalah made
them respell the ny? NY took this word over? NY is nigh?
Looking at those words will take me some time, and I предвкушаю
lots of tidbits:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ho#English is awesome. purely
awesome. four etymologies for four completely different meanings.
These two-letter words will probably be my key to what I'm wanting
to deliver: ho is the root of hello and to such shorter forms more
long forms like zdravstvuite go, ze as in salve.
Back to those two-letter words, from which all the others
supposedly merged or emerged from:
am an as at be bi by do eh el go ha he hi ho id
if in is it ma me my no ny of oh
ok on or ox pi so to up us we
not too many. Let's try to work with them fro
for ~ to? r is reverse? tor is fo? force is torrce? торс))) ор.. oh shit man..
ah am an as at (an = 1. is -n の?
graphically it's very yes) a = 1 to, so a is more basic.
I if in is it (haha! those fake j k l are
not in this league. but i would consider low and law)
Ma me my
Oh of on or ok all
Because pee is a three-letter word, and zoo too (and it's not even
english, it's some greek) I want to reconstruct it like this:
a ah am an as at
I if in is it (haha! those fake j k l are
not in this league. but i would consider low and law)
Ma me my
Oh of on or ok all us (os, nos)
There are two canons of Old-Persian:
𐎠a 𐎡i 𐎢u 𐎣k 𐎤ku 𐎥g 𐎦gu 𐎧x 𐎨c 𐎩j 𐎪ji 𐎫t 𐎬tu 𐎭d 𐎮di
𐎯du 𐎰θ 𐎱p 𐎲b 𐎳f 𐎴n 𐎵nu 𐎶m 𐎷mi 𐎸mu 𐎹y 𐎺v 𐎻vi 𐎼r 𐎽ru
𐎾l 𐎿s 𐏀z 𐏁š 𐏂ç 𐏃h
𐎠a 𐎣k 𐎧x 𐎥g 𐎨c 𐏂ç 𐎩j 𐎫t 𐎰θ 𐎭d 𐎱p 𐎳f 𐎲b 𐎴n 𐎶m 𐎹y
𐎺v 𐎼r 𐎾l 𐎿s 𐏀z 𐏁š 𐏃h 𐎡i 𐎪ji 𐎮di 𐎷mi 𐎻vi 𐎢u 𐎤ku
𐎦gu 𐎬tu 𐎯du 𐎵nu 𐎸mu 𐎽ru
Both canons share the set of signs, which may be an evidence of
their coplecety. completeness, but
I'm not sure of that. But luckily I have another set of
old-persian. from vol.1!
this one repeats (but adds to it) one of the previous canons, it
explains why it has -i and -u syllables, but not -a syllables
(they had only three vowels, isn't it awesome!) but I was looking
for another one:
and this one is the ultimate. and I begin noticing some
differences between them.
𐎧x is probably some h, ḫ~χ?
okay, I'm very tired. See you on some other
day. but I'm still here.
I don't know how it happened so, that paleohispanic semi-syllabary
is also in some eastern order, with c before b
𐎶 could easily be the source of our -M
and something new on paleohispanic:
Sound values of the Southwestern script proposed
by Valerio (2008) (link) (mirror)
but here's Southwestern to compare:
paleohispanic still doesn't seem to have its unicode block
(because the field is very fresh) so I use similar signs from
other block in this context. Here's the context: that ᛏ is
transliterated so differently that it makes
me wonder why and make me want to read that pdf I linked
and mirrorred. so is ᚻ
These two systems, paleohispanic and paleopersian are here because
they're the only semi-syllabaries I know of and both geographic
regions were named iberia in the past. Of
hebrews? or do jews pretend to be everybody (egyptian slaves,
phoenicians, berberians, and who knows what else,
japanese-hebraic link was sawn by me few days ago.. you know of
goyim and gaijin, there are some more similar traditions:
https://is3.livejournal.com/279524.html even though that
comparison of hebrew with kana is really freaky and some forms
are just I dunno, even if it wasn't some pulling even much worse
than my mnemonic table of comparing hiragana and katakana to
latin and others.
and while we're here sharing some lj links,
here's a couple more:
wata is cotton in japanese (cotton is вата in russian, to wad is
набиватть ватой, вата и ватин is wadding)
isn't it repeating b & cc in euroepe an asia? that cotton is
isn't it by any chance related to gonna & wanna?
my subconsciousness seems to mistake gonna
and at the next day, all out of sudden:
and look how I name this file, never thinking of the previous
line. How is it to say that ods have nothing do do with it. to is
verb to is do. to stands before a verb to tell it's a verb. unlike
a, telling it's a noun. And I expect M for the third what..
pronoun? me? just me? I don't know any M prefix in english. In
dutch it's om- (around)
I know that kgb or whoever they're now, fsb (fs is similar to фас,
the command to a dog to attack) фас это лицо по французски. Но не
факт что это этимологически связано. but then again fsb is sorta
the face of the country now. Their leader became the head of
I know that fsb reads that site. And maybe I write it to them
first. To show the discoveries of modern ideologics, ideology as a
science, as biology. Was ideology (the study of ideas) so
successful that it uniquely means the practice of that field. They
don't theorize in books, they probably do it in some secret books.
They don't look, they show. They know how to lead nations, and now
they lead them without asking, as a bull with a ring in his mouse.
bull and cow, is it how b and c are connected. but how is it male
person is labial again. as male, mule.
mole? mile? but not mele. mail though. but that's probably male.
was it because gals were more curious, more nosy? or were they
robbed and letters taken away by their lovers? who knows now, it
will проступит другими чертами, которые мне предстоит провести на
ткани пространства этой концепции.
I must read of chia and instead I write this because I'm high, and
I fuile obliged (ful.. fuile is a weird way
to write feel. as if it's also guilt)
bull and cow came today as b and c
bitcoin and chia could be those very b and c. the golden bull and
the golden cow.
bitcoin shares fame with etherium, and if b is the first letter of
the first line, two as the first number (1 is not a number, it's
an article or in russian they don't even use numerals of any sort
before solitary fucks. b reflects e in the diagonal symmetry,
which I didn't takeseriously, butit could be a thing if this
bitcoin-etherium thing is a magic and not just a
coincindence. chia after bitcoin, what were the chances, I
have to monitor this field to see that I didn't just stumbled upon
in first for no other reason than my friend occasionally reading
робин пут. путин путы. эх до чего же злая магия. и я знаю кто
против нас колдует. и что я буду делать, ха? Ай эм э писмэйкар Ай
уил мэйк пис. Хау? Ай уилл оффер зэм самсынг бэтта.
Про зеркало вчера говорил, и увидел сегодня церковь за много
километров от меня светит ярче солнца куполом, являющимся натёртым
до блеска зеркальным шаром (таким образом солнце отражается в нём
где бы оно ни находилось на небе. Такое ощущение, что такое
линзированное солнце ослепляет даже больше, чем настоящее. Может
потому храмы и взрывали, что они ослепляли своим сиянием людей.
Магия, но бестолковая. Но может такой свет лечит глаза? Но с чего
с ~ d, if in ᛆᛒᚦ (s ~ t, satan ~ teufel, c ~ d, сатана ~ devil)
b better.. но не подгоняю ли я под ответ... b is bad, g is good. g
is god, b is bes. Are they national differences in the positions
of whose god is good and whose bes is better. I spoke about asura
and the way this name is understood in india and persia.
слава джа! oh jah jah, jah-jah-joe. And I understand that when I
praise Jah, I praise Joe too.
Is judaism joe'deism? Is Vatican working for Joes? Are Joes
secretly Jews? Европейцы евреи? Иудеи? Христианства сионистская
секта олрайт, но такие широкие мазки, даже не знаю.
Миром правит английская корона? Американцы разве под короной? Но
разве они правят? Но не они ли обеспечивают универсальность
английского? Если бы не америка, чем бы бриташка мощнее францушки
была бы? австралией? индией? Они уже тогда были мощней остальных,
заборов испанцев даже, которые не меньшии территории захватить
умудрились, и это ведь в прямой пропорции к количеству построенных
судов. Не потому ли сахара пустынна?
Somebody speaks on the deliberate meanings shift:
Usually when people do this they pick something
that is already relatively safe and known to the public and
blatantly redefine it to trick stupid public into thinking two
separate things are the same thing.
For instance the COVID shot is not a vaccine. A vaccine has
meant 1 thing for the past 140 years but suddenly it now means
"any serum that builds immunity" or whatever bullshit.
They did the same thing with "pasteurization". For over 100
years pasteurization meant heating something to the point it
kills bacteria. At some point they updated the definition to
allow irradiation of food to be called "pasteurization" because
people don't like the idea of giving their children milk that
has been riddled with nuclear radiation.
So just rename nuclear power to something the public is already
familiar with and is too stupid to understand the difference.
Maybe call it a "heavy metal heat plant" or something since
uranium is a heavy metal and produces heat at criticality.
few is like.. maybe two, maybe four, few.
(yep, the thought I got when I got high)
yesterday before I went to sleep I had a thought I was lazy to
write down, but I actually managed to memorize it. I memorize
worse when I'm high on weed and this one was memorized so well I
immediatelly picked it up from my mind why
once Ithought of what was that:
in this sequence ди дя де ы а э added to yotirovannoe d? why
didn't it go into labials? дуда is dead? tott. Is thoth some dead?
German people would undertand it like that, but were egyptians
german enough? Book of the dead is their book, so it all is
aligned. But were they so dead when the living found them? Wasn't
that book named "book of the dead" (just as some other, tibetan,
book of the dead) how many books of the dead there are? the texts
actually recognized as texts of the exterminated people. Egyptians
concealed their texts for some decoration, and what was that? Were
people knowing that the letters exist, were they confused by the
forms of the letters, because they used some scratches to draw.
Makes natural sense: simple forms are the first, even if some
fluctuations in complexity appeared (as the simplification of
grammar.. but that is such a complex discussion, choosing the
direction of the development, I don't have enough data or powers
to operate it into concluding that rnh..english
is the epitome of human culture. Russian culture is obviously
inferior (they're almost russians, almost) (they're almost
europeans, almost) I was speaking of europeans, but.. I was
speaking of russians, but for me it's more natural to see the
world from the russian position, so they are europeans for
russians. они, oni da. т.е. японцы европейцев сначала даже не
видели, лишь слышали что есть ещё какие-то они, то есть японцы с
русскими контактировали издревле? Интересно. Они шарят слишком
много общего: -i -no -ru could be -ть рука и те в другую сторону
отражает. потому что это один звук, и если в одном контексте
выбрали одну его форму, то в другой естественным образом осталась
вторая. такова судьба всех дифференцировавшихся букв, как с is k
& s. and ch, and ts,
c: k s ts tch isn't it a ka sa ta na.. the
unity of al the k's all the forms of k, all the things before the
labials. cbd is chinese order? china first? b britain? belige?
бельгия от слова белые, кто-то описывал бельгийцев как
блондинистых одуванчиков, они очень сообразительные, кто-то их
даже боится наверное. У русских неблагодарная задача тащить
чуркобесов в цивилизацию: строить университеты в афганистане и
плотины в египте.
Совки готовы были за бесплатно строить плотину в египте чисто из
политических соображений, а на самом деле всё это их желание быть
лучшими из худших лишь крик обиженной души "и я, ведь и я тоже
классный" они все з равенство ратуют, что их за равных-то не
признают. Может таков строй мира, что линия проведена посреди
белой рассы, чтоб не проихошло рассовой войны, что во главе чёрных
всё равно стоит самый белый из них. И то, что русских официально
признали цветными, это именно об этом и говорит (какая-то смешная
организация официальная признала русских цветным меньшинством. Как
там у нас анекдот: есть две новости, одна плохая другая хорошая: досталось одно говно, но его дохуя!
до и о
д there, to, then, dan, тогда(когда)
осталось = вокруг валялось. остаётся (во)круг (в)стаёт са(ма)
губные были добавлены позже как украшения? причмокивания губами?
паузы? потому бя от себя и отваливается в той са(ма) что это конец
слова или даже предложения.
and here I thought that those m's then were in script sometimes,
like the : for a dot or comma. and the word comma is so labial, as
if it tells "it's me" and one dot is so lingual,
Catholicism is mediterranean aggression against the north. They
wrote the history in a way such that even though we know some
pelasgians (беляши?) brought them the alphabets, they believe that
nordic writing systems were only seen since 17 cenuries ago, but
Tacitus even 20 centuries ago reported that germans had some signs
for divinations. some signs they placed on sticks, and those are
runes. So because runes mean secrets, it's only natural that they
were kept in secret. But I could be biased here: I was triggered
by the line Руны — это
вытянутые и угловатые буквы древних германцев, предков
современных англичан, голландцев, немцев, датчан, норвежцев и
шведов. Runes are letters of ancient germans,
ancestors of modern englishmen, dutchmen, germen, norwegemen and
swenska men. which composed all the best nations of
Europe, all the most impressive achievements of humans come from
these ones. So whether mediterraneans were so much admixtured by
the further southerners from such a middle east in these 20
centuries, that they were much more related to nordids before or
what, it's hard for me to believe that somebody looking like
azerbaijanians were successful in arts and science when today
russians have much more strive towards progress, southerners seem
to be more prone to religion, to admission,
to submission. Probably their fathers fight better (or in that sense they fight worse) so
they are less likely to learn to fight back, to challenge the way
we see the things, to move our towards the absolute knowledge.
That small font grey in russian text
leads to the site where many interesting pictures can be found, I
will deliver some of them here with my comments. It tells it's
taken information from some academic source, some Мельникова
Е. Скандинавские рунические надписи. Новые находки и
интерпретации: Тексты. Перевод. Комментарий. М., 2001.
Изучение начертания рун показывает их
происхождение от латинского алфавита
I came to the other direction of development (after all, Odin is
said to creat runes in 3 aettir, which could be vowels, labials,
linguals. If you want to disasemble speech into simplest pieces,
these three are the categories you place sounds of the language.
and he didn't have a writing system to put this discovery down, so
he invented it in the process of trying to conceptualize the
speech. Why did he do it? Maybe because he had nothing better to
do, pretending to be dead on a high tree until the enemies left
the region and he could descend.
and if we almost all have five vowels, were they fifteen 3*5 or
3*4+1 ending in U? but that would be 13, a special number, and
without U, ending in T as in hebrew and in some other archaic
scripts, it would be 12. also a very powerful letter. and because
before dice there were four-sided knucklebones, it makes sense,
and 12 months could originate here. And 12 13 would be lunar
calendar, and U does look like a crescent. so four vowels, four
labials, four linguals? Let's reconstruct them:
efh (because c is the g, and it explains the unity of g & d in
imn (because k is c, l is I, j is i. or, if n is a form of m, some
samekh, or maybe even san could be here)
opt (and labials lack v and u and that is the 13th some scripts
have. and without it M is W. or is f both v and f? v sounds as f
sometimes, do f sound as v? It's literally vav in hebrew and they
same that's how digamma sounded, w. And just as g is d in
russian, so is Н their N. So there probably were only 3*3, three
vowels, as in the old-persian and philippinians.
abg efh opt
öпрст could be the initial raw, and a is o wtih a line above it,
and e is the o with the line below i.
then f is the p with the line below it, which you can see, if you
know how p used to look sometimes, something like ſ. And yet H
doesn't look like T with a low below, but if we actually put the
line below T we get I which is what H used to be in russian, now
б is p with a hat, just as a is not with books, but the head. the hat. g though has the line
below it, not that the line above it would help me to compare it
with t. only if.. Г is some djed. and because ᚦ is probably an
axe, so could djed be some staff-like weapon. The
djed (Ancient Egyptian: ḏd 𓊽, Coptic ϫⲱⲧ jōt "pillar",
CtrlFing for 𓊽 I immediately found the sign I was looking for: 𓊼
so is g 𓊼? either way,
a б 𓊼
o D T
I could tolerate p as f, but what is with D what is D? is it ᚦ the
θ? what is to b & p as o is to a and e?
but knucklebones had four sides! one slot could be used empty.
which could explain 15 letters of the first dice period.
O ם n of some amen could be a good o-line, or omt of some amt.
И это могла быть молитвой. Что ещё бы он там делал на дереве
девять (или три ли) дней.
(some e p I)
amn i m n amen, or something меня.
междометия могли быть этой молитвой. является ли слово боже
междометием? разве fuck me is междометие? восклицания. что за
слово для них, что за термин?..
I fourgot what I was going to critique, the most official point of
view, the most academic point of view up to date, yet it's
hopelessly wrong because modern linguistics as all humanities
isn't a science. It didn't have time to come out of some alchemy
stage when it was occupied with emansipated ladies too dubm for
Рунами пользовалось большинство германских
народов, но постепенно их вытеснил латинский алфавит.
Correct, but why wouldn't they take latin alphabet from the very
start if they knew forms of some letters? So I claim here that
they grew out of the same source latin alphabet came from, and
were established independently. It's yet to prove, but there are
worse mistakes in her text, the pieces I came here to do this
unusual work for me. But here a good and useful piece. Or maybe
I'm just not qualified to speak on turkic runes yet, so it's not
worse than what I say:
Германским словом «руны» также называют внешне
схожую древнетюркскую, или орхоно-енисейскую, письменность,
бытовавшую в Центральной Азии в VIII–X веках н. э. Самые важные
памятники орхоно-енисейской письменности — это каменные стелы,
установленные в Монголии, Южной Сибири и в Семиречье (в районе
озер Балхаш и Иссык-Куль). Надписи донесли до нас уникальные
сведения по истории тюркских каганатов и, что не менее важно,
язык той эпохи. Тюркский рунический алфавит был дешифрован в
1893 году великим датским лингвистом Вильгельмом Томсеном.
«Книга гаданий» («Irk Bitig»). Предположительно,
IX векНаписана тюркским руническим письмом. Найдена в 1907 году
в китайской провинции Ганьсу.Or. 8212/161 / The International
Dunhuang Project / British Library
here comes the wrong piece, but because it concerns magic, it
could be intentional disinformation:
Традиционное представление о тесной связи рун с
магией появилось в Новое время. К тому моменту руны уже были
вытеснены из практической сферы латинским алфавитом и продолжали
использоваться в Скандинавии лишь для гадания и тайнописи.
which is a funny thing to say, because the first discription of
runes was given in the context of divinations. For some people it
may seem quite a stretch, through inferences on the top of some
other inferences: signs were runes? how do I know? nordic signs
for divinations are runes and no others I know of. Is it a proof
good enough? Define enough. No proof is absolute. Not truth is
absolute. It could be the way it could be on some peer review
committee, but I didn't participate in one, so I needed an inner
criticist, and the questions are valid. How do I know that the
signs Tacitus described were runes? Because we have runic
artefacts from few centuries after that? Well, few centuries are
not too large of a stretch, but here I only take it on faith what
academia tells me, I have some doubts about their methods, I just
recently called them non-science, so why would I lean on them. I
think I was going to compare signs independently of what is told
about them. And I believe that the graphic side itself can be
sufficient to recognize what is what. But I continue to look at
that reference, реферат, ссылающийся на ту тётю. and to my
surprise I see that she knows of Tacitus, here it is in her
«Срубленную с плодового дерева ветку они нарезают
плашками и, нанеся на них особые знаки, высыпают затем как
придется на белоснежную ткань. После этого, если гадание
производится в общественных целях, жрец племени, если частным
образом — глава семьи, вознеся молитвы богам и устремив взор в
небо, трижды вынимает по одной плашке и толкует предрекаемое в
соответствии с выскобленными на них заранее знаками».
плашки значит плоские. не уверен, что этак можно перевести тот
латинский текст, но это подтверждает моё представление, что это
были не прутики, а кубики. И далее она приводит довольно
жуткий кусок, в сущости текст обучающий проклятиям, и дотошные
сами найдут, а я запомнил его и лишь использую если пригодится,
нет смысла распространять заразу понапрасну.
Т.е. она дала необходимое вступление Традиционное
представление о тесной связи рун с магией появилось в Новое
время. но повинуясь научным идеалам дополнила
противоречащими этой догме свидетельствами о применении рун в
магии, известное и до нового времени. Так что зря я на девочек
наехал холостяк он их боитса.
Here an interesting piece:
Древнейшие старшерунические надписи
концентрируются на севере Германии, на Ютландском полуострове и
в Скандинавии, а затем распространяются по Европе вместе с
разными германскими племенами, доходя до территории современной
Украины и Боснии.
which contradicts the belief that it was latin that influenced
them, because it's pretty much the opposite side of the map. But
that could be the closest of the capitals, closest to the Rome.
who knows, but I doubt it. I am still declaring that the Yirminsul
the christcucks cut was where the alphabets were invented by Odin,
but that evidence is now destroyed.
It's funny that it's Wednesday, Odin's day. Wedn is Odin as if O
is so labial it's recognize by some as We O as All? We'all? dn is
deinь? The same de as in deus? we-день 's-day, two dimes d? Z?
tuesday of two though it's believed to be of some tiw, but then
that tiw is the two, because in russian it's also вторник, т.е.
второй. T as I again. it ~ то. (it ~ id)
водин водин, лидер, authority,
watan walks? for christian it's a water walk. ведёт по воде
волнорез водорез. водоаздел. воды не смешиваются потому что
между ними волнорезы? но между ними обычно нет волнорезов, и то
что океаны не смешиваются это исламская байка, х.з. имеет ли она
х.з. значит кто знает. к ~ х. т ~ y. again. is it that very b ~ c
thing? (but l ~ g is something else. now my asssociation was l is
when you make it, g is when you made. г for гавно, l for laino.
украинцы тянутся, а русские уже лежат. алко голь (я не голь я
алкоголь - could be a coping mechanism of drunkards
subconsciousness. And once russians are not that much of голь,
they drink much less.
Теплород это фотон. Кусок льда абсорбирует фотоны из атмосферы,
увеличивая трясучесть молекул воды, так что они отрываются от
кристалла и сплавляются.
Теплород придуман ни кем нибудь, а самим великим Лавуазье.
Гипотеза флогистона-теплорода была отвергнута в
результате испытаний, что послужило опорой для принятия
молекулярно-кинетической теории в середине XIX века. ага,
не удивительно, что почти никто её не понимает, она столь
абстрагирована, даже при том, что с тех пор успели открыть фотон,
который даже по форме максимально похож на сокращённое название
Флогисто́н (от греч. φλογιστός — горючий,
воспламеняемый) — в истории химии — гипотетическая
«сверхтонкая материя» — «огненная субстанция», якобы наполняющая
все горючие вещества и высвобождающаяся из них при горении.
хаха, это называется сегодня фотон, долбобобы. излучается в самых
разных спектрах, особенно в инфракрасном.
Т.о. абсолютный ноль - это полное отсутствие фотонов в среде!? PV
~ T which means that абсолютно разряженная среда будет и абсолютно
нулевой справа, по температуре, ведь объём-то не изменится. Т.е.
вакуум только и может быть абсолютно холодным, ведь атомы переходя
на уровень ниже испускают фотоны. Протоны даже электронов не
имеющие испускают ли фотоны? А нейтроны? Я понятия не имею, это
снова пределы веры.
Флогисто́н (от греч. φλογιστός — горючий,
воспламеняемый) — в истории химии — гипотетическая
«сверхтонкая материя» — «огненная субстанция», якобы наполняющая
все горючие вещества и высвобождающаяся из них при горении.
Термин введён в 1667 году Иоганном Бехером и в 1703 году Георгом
Шталем для объяснения процессов горения. Флогистон представляли
как невесомый флюид, улетучивавшийся из вещества при сжигании. В
то время считалось, что металл — это соединение «земли» (оксида
металла) с флогистоном, и при горении металл разлагается на
«землю» и флогистон, который смешивается с воздухом и не может
быть отделён от него. Открытое позже увеличение массы металла
при прокаливании стали объяснять отрицательной массой
флогистона. Способность выделять флогистон из воздуха
So what am I saying about увеличение массы металла при
прокаливании? Что металл впитывает в себя флогистон? Но там же
скорей всего углерод из атмосферы, а может и углей, впитывает. Я
не знаю, ололо. Какое это теперь имеет значение, раз фотон на
самом деле существует, и отвечает тому, что Лавуазье про него
сказал. Говорил Лавуазье об отрицательной массе флогистона или что
металл это земля и флогистон? Может и говорил. Сжигание металла,
что это за хрень ещё. Я викиучёный, что это за бешенство. Это же
черновик, я имею полную свободу, ворочу что хочу. Но не, я
стараюсь быть как можно лучше. Просто демонстрирую содержимое вео своей черепной коробки достаточно
продробно. Для каких-то других исследователей или же даже для себя
же ~ yo ~ ge-
y ~ g in way ~ weg
й ~ г
В 1770-х годах теория флогистона была опровергнута
благодаря работам Антуана Лавуазье, после которых её сменила
другая — кислородная теория горения.
ага, то я спутол понятия флогистон и теплород:
Теплоро́д — по распространённым в XVIII — начале
XIX века воззрениям, невесомый флюид, присутствующий в каждом
теле и являющийся причиной тепловых явлений. Введён в 1783 году
Лавуазье. Гипотеза флогистона-теплорода была отвергнута в
результате испытаний, что послужило опорой для принятия
молекулярно-кинетической теории в середине XIX века.
..in the 1770s. In his paper "Réflexions sur le phlogistique"
(1783), Lavoisier argued that phlogiston theory was inconsistent
with his experimental results, and proposed a 'subtle fluid'
called caloric as the substance of heat.
caloric is probably the term
Lavoisier used instead of modern term
but let's dig deeper and see why caloric was also not a
And it was substituted by mechanic theory of temperature, the
thermodynamics, which I don't know, so why do I even dare saying
what I say now here. I need to understand how the ancient people
thought of things, so I dig into the history of science more than
into its modern state. But yet I apply modern discoveries into
supporting the more old theories. Caloric as a prototerm for
photone is a great point of view as I think. At least applying
this elementary point of view at quantum mechanic is very
productive in the form of understanding of what's going on. I
didn't know what was going on there before today. I imagined how a
fridge work by taking heat to something cold. And how is that
freon cold all the time or what's going on, how is it eating the
photones away. I am still confused, but I imagined it in some
ancient form, in the form of pumping air from some iceroom
underground, but then I thought that water pump would make much
better job, because water transmits heat better, and then I
imagined fridge as a smaller volume to get cold. And then I didn't
think of freone. And I read how it's condensed by compressor at
the back, and that when something becomes liquid out of gaseous
phase, it becomes hot or gives the heat away, and when liquid i
released to become a gas, it takes heat out of the atmosphere. It
is a new piece of information for me and I wasn't a bad student.
It was always a mistery to me, and it came out that I didn't know
this fundamental feature of the matter.
Why is it here? Because of the caloric. How comes I never heard of
caloric, but knew of phlogistone? In russian we seem to believe
that флогистон is теплород (we kow both the words, we don't know
what's the difference between them, maybe specialisets do, I'm not
the one in this field.
And the way fridge works makes perfect sense to me: PV ~ T and
thus when you compress it (I wonder how, but rowing it into the
field mechanically so the air is pumped, the gas, and the pressure
make it turn into liquid there and it makes it release photons,
easily transpassing the limitaions of matter, coming through
objects and into the atmosphere. And the way it moves through
obects also inside of the fridge, it is pumped into expanding
matter, and here I really wonder how, because no pumps are there,
other than the elements themselves are working as such pump,
pulling the elements as by the strings, and hence could the string
theory appear from. I wonder if it's true, it's bashed as having
no practical value, not a single confirming experiment, I wonder
if it's true, but maybe because it's a mathematica theory, not
physical, because my phather who taught me physics called it that
and was surprised of me saying that it's a physical theory, he
could be just unaware, it's too modern for his oldschool. Photons
are probably in connection between eachother and that connection
is like a net, nect, the nest is maybe related to net thus, but
let's not distract ourselves. When the photon at your side goes
into some object and your resonate with that photone, wouldn't it
разрядит пространство между вами так, что те фотоны что с другой
стороны просто выпихнут меня в это пустое пространство. вот так
absorbing the particles we make other particles refill that empty
place atnd that allows us absorb some more of them. Thus making
the concentration of the photones more or less, thus making the
temperature go higher or lower, and back to my guess that absolute
zero is vacuum. I heard of liquid helium they used to get the
absolute zero temperature, but was helium just absorbing all the
elementarier particles? It's quite a different field of research.
Is it? Fuck your language, let's dig into this. And, well, Суть третьего начала термодинамики состоит в том, что
абсолютного нуля температуры, равного минус 273,15 градуса по
шкале Цельсия, невозможно. is it because matter radiates
photones? That fabric of the matter is integral and they are all
connected and the source of photones is immense or even infinite.
Or does it follow from what absolute is? Any absolute is
unreachable, for even when it's reached for some small ammount of
time, or even if forever, you will not have the devices measuring
it with absolute certainty.
И объяснение разницы между флогистоном и теплородом: Теплород (флюид тепла, в отличие от флогистона —
флюида горения) видимо Лавуазье понял, что фотоны
приходят в движение не только при горении, но и при любом движении
температуры. Но вам следует понимать, что я даже не алхимик, я
просто проходил мимо и заинтересовался тем а что же это за слова и
как люди понимали природу вещей в те времена, которые ближе к
периоду изобретения алфавита. И, кстати, эта эпоха - время великих
потрясений, например открытия того, что вода это не первоэлемент,
а распадается на два различных по свойствам газа.
and not for something completely different:
«Системами» (др.-греч. συστήματα) греки называли
всякие звукоряды, объединяющие более чем 2 звука (трихорды,
тетрахорды, пентахорды и шире, вплоть до 2 октав).
Структурообразующей «системой» теоретики полагали тетрахорд.
which tells us that system is when at least three elements align,
because any two dots can give a line, but only if three dots lay
on it, it is some line indeed.
knight night k? night kill or night key? do killers have the keys?
is it the same k in key and kill. is kill related to ill? is it
some key ill. kill is the key evil. ill ~ evil. is eagle evil?
eagle is a predator, not good.
Is owl so wise it unites being a predator and being a prey? Or
does it kill some mice, who could be considered vermin. Yep, that
is wisdom, to kill the rat, not the lamb.
lamb gives wool, mice steal weat. So owls were good, and in this
sense eagle is more evil than an owl. He's no good for the humans.
And the small bird is evil again? It steal grain too and it steals
it even from the
ророна борона is harrow, борозда is
plane and polosa.
n is 2-meren, s is 1-meren?
s is space? s is space, and I thought that ᛋ is not exactly
S ~ N, and place and plane are.. I wanted to tell that
polosa is a different language than plain, планарный знают и там,
a place это просто спот, точка. place plane and between them is
some line, polosa maybe, and after plane comes.. not planet, platen planet is believed to be
egymologically from plane, as if we thought that planets were
planes. Because we saw plane and sun around us. little did we
know. S and N.. So and No are quite opposite. So is yes in japan.
sa is so, and semantically these words are almost the same. да и
так тоже фонетически близки.
борозда in urkeinian is борозна, что заставило меня понять, что
борозда и борона изначально когнаты. борозда это след от пороны
бороны.. борона у украинцев тоже борона.
Дать россии статуса заповедника, и внешнее управление. Потому что
поставленные для вида наместники, поместники, помещики, не
справляются ни с сохранением нетронутой природы, ни с обогащением
жителей этих многострадальных территорий.
добрый бодрый? бодр добр бодр разбужен добр раздружен? раздушевен.
до в добр душа?дух? добр духобор? духов (пороков, дурных желаний)
забарывает. работа боротьба? борется берётся арбайтен работать арб
раб и бар интересная парочка, какой-то фрик об этом рассуждал, я
сумасшедший что его вообще вспоминаю, он табу, что уже само по
себе интересно. Но что может быть интересного в
раб бар барин может побороть, он хорошо кормлен и крепко сложён.
раб раболепен раб работает раб ропчет. ропчет раб чё-т топчет то
поче-то. то почёт? топчет значит любит? топ чет. топотоп. то потом
то потоп, потом хоть потоп, не славянскую ли присказку французы
передрали? то потоп топо топ. топа топ. воля высшая всевышнего.
величие возвеличее. великие в ликах. лики святых лики. свет ло
свет ел. свет ает свет так тает.. это вс1 поэтизирование, не
таять течь так так так как кап кап кап. tap tap tap, течёт течь
сечь (порез истекает) т и с когнатичны? talk sulk, take seek, or
seek and take after that. sulk until you talk. don't sulk, talk.
woden wooden walk? wooden vodkъ. wooden vodker. wooden
vodkr. shops will not accept this misleading product. When you
confuse, you lose. I'm yet to become a business person.
stolen stalk? stalkers steal?
sulk = дуться, sullen = угрюмый
stalk = идти украткой, stollen = украденый
sullen is made sulk tho.. so. thus.
stolen thing has made thief stalk?
I don't know if grammmars of previous excembles..
examplesn is the same
-es and -en are congnates because both are suffixes of plurality.
is folk what comes out of empire when it
and empires are just gangs of some cool cats? Some family would
make more sense as a gang. Some clan. Some tape.
place is platz it is plane. s and n meet again. and they're closer
to the end, thus probably they're some plural form of some simpler
word. play is the word? platz is for plays? to play ~ плясать.
пляс ~ plays? танцы ~ пьесы? игры? platz ~ palace. place ~ palace.
place ~ palace?
smile ~ samuel? somelie? смел ~ smile. he who dares, smiles; he
who dared would smile.
dare ~ stare,
dear ~ stear? steer ~ stir, во это горздо интересней.
fear ~ fir? холка дыбом, воласы дыбом встают.
wear ~ wore?
hear ~ her? whore? whore ~ her? wh перекликается с
whear.. -r like japanese -ru?
w- опционально, а выходит у- в ухо является приставкой, а хо -
голова, head, ибо ухо у хо. и оно у головы. у холки? у щёк? голова
большая. у hair. hair тоже могут в первую очередь ассоциироваться
с головой, потому что на головах в основном они произрастают. у
животных шерсть. где шер может быть телъ или ещё типа такого.
head and hair,, ha-ed and ha-er. ha is high thus. that is what
head is, it's high, up there. legs are lowest thus. leg ~ low, lex
~ legis ~ law.
low and law ~ legs and lex. how related are german and roman? they
were related before they met again? indo-european those languages
are united under that umbrella for a reason.
голова is go lower.. which is weird but could be a part of that
волосы are fallen? они мёртвая ткань и они падают с головы время
от времени тоже. Волосы на стольок павшие (выпавшие) клетки,что
если их отрезать, то не факт что вообще какая-то разница для
остального организма произойдёт, даже при том, что мы с ними вроде
как макромолекула. с зубами я ещё больше макромолекула, но уже
ставлю вопрос или я или они. teeth are so overrated, I don't want
to have a hollywood smile, I don't wat to chew, I don't want to
bite my cheek, or to cut my moustaches, I want to close my jaw all
the way up.
high again. It's friday. I'm high everyday. I didn't give up weed,
because this time it makes me work on this book. And when I made
it before, I had nothing to lose but two loose notebooks. And I
began to build my apartment, it motivated me very much. And thus I
got myself busy. I am busy already. Let's stop moaning and write
this book. It's my true way, I see it has no end. And I must build
my capsule quick so it doesn't stop me.
просечка прочка конечно, но просечку просекли
hell heal heel
well weal weel
to connect is to commit? in a few narrow contexts only. con is com
alright, so that's why they're similar and nect ~ net, mit is
meet? or meat? in to commit suicide it's meat. come meat. давай
мясо, ком ит.
come meat and go meat are so close and -me could be a postfix like
russian has -cя.
call on me
go ~ co ~ call? зови, т.е. зови в гости и вали? go, call, call on
me, but in the future?
hello ~ call on us?
hi ~ hello ~ hell, I'm low? quite a way to greet someone. Whether
because of as a politest subugation
some asian etiquette traditions recommend. Or as a natural moaning
calling fro a conversation or ask for help. Hello ~ Help. Hell in the process?
hell procedes,,, process and procedes are similar in both meanings
and soundings, so they are porbably pormably pormaybe bably maybe?
baby my? poesie nog mal. That is why russian normal, нормально
sounded so weird to dutchmen: why do you say normal all the time.
only now I see that nog mal is still crazy, nogmaal is once again,
nog is ещё, more, mal is раз, time.
here now (these could be what.. of some
other period, older or younger I donlt know)
nog mal and nog maal is perfectly cognate in the processs of
training, learning, tutoring, ect.
et ce tera
и так далее
there ~ дале?
daar ~ даль?
So they normalized their forms so much, to recognize the neigbour
speaking the same language by the way they speak it, so with times
they became diferent languages, and dutch and english difference
is only the first or closest or more recent step of that path of
That diagonal symmetries I got from multiplying the first digits
of the numbers, they give chaotic patterns, but those patterns are
given by completely rational mathematics. So can any chaos be
recognized as a pattern? That chaotic structure (симметричная
вокруг главной диагонали, но так любой хаос может, это издержки
нашей психики) could lead to recognizing the pattern in pi and
others? It would be oh so awesome. some oh it would be. will it?
who knows if by me, I don't want to share with math sector with
brain power. But I must. It doesn't take much and it can lead me
somewhere. Like to dodecahedron? why would I make my bath with
more concrete than needed? to do what? to make it firm and fancy.
the other table, the prime umbers detector. interesting, but I
cannot apply it to other forms of my something. ANd what if I
could see some complex patterns as interference of two or more
other factors when I saw such table for those numbers? It would be
nice, so excuse math its primality, it's not bug, but a mighty
feature. So we love math? We love math.
math could be the first mother, like зарубки на копье.
myth or muse were the number 2? letters or musical notations? I
believe music is the final mother, because we as humans know music
the least. It seems to be the hardest of those two concepts. of
those three concepts, I probably was thinking of whether myth or
muth, because math is numero uno.
aiu is alphabetic and syllabic pattern (only ogham and some other
rare something go a u i, but I believe they were messed with.
ogham used to be 125, 3&4 are newer additions.
It used to be be lo ng (today less than an hour ago I understood
that n is ng, gun is gung, bang,
i-lne is m ng (th? about samekh I'm not sure)
if i-line is nasal, then i must be nose?
and then U is smile.
what are A, aye, eye? ⴰ of a? were they drawing it in profile?
double ⴰ is o in where I took it: ⵓ
this a has that encloser why makes it quite an eye, and eagle is
that eye too. That is the best they can do. They see it all.
I is also for Israel and Ivri.
U is we? U & We. U, Vы & We. I is I, very individualistic.
0 is a, some, none, никакой. I is one. You didn't think that
yes/no-ness of 1/0 was invented just recently? It is just so big
the modern understanding of that thing that it completerly
overshowdoes the previous conceptualization of zero.
U is 2, or is it 5? or 4? it began as 2. double staff, ᚢ.
Why were vikings smiling so poorly? stimulators went down.
Nah, those are moustaches. усы первичней чм уста? чмо это чемпион
мира, олимпиец. на самом деле это какой-то идиш замаскированный
под похожий по смыслу русский аббревиатуръ.
I wonder what happened to the previous volume, because it
seriously lagged there already, and here I only noticed that it
lags at all. But it does, so next volume will appear here soon.
This crucifix at the beginning of this volume isn't helping, I was
affraid of number 11 as if it's 9/11 which is sick, did I cross
myself because of that? Am I a slave of the god's tricks? No. So
why did I make that ritual with those retards? I shouldn't bother
them. I must become a scientist. I must research this world of
satans, I must speak poorly about masons? Why would I look that
way at them? Because I have chosen 4chan forces, so I go along
with the policy of that party. And Leo Tolstoi, and old russian
church, fuck its ass. Oh, satans in me do't like old russian
church. It was bought and stolen from the beginning. It was a good
dream which turned out a catastrophy.
Г looks like goose head with a neck and г looks like a
duck (or a goose too) floating on a water.
goose & гусь, очень древнее слово судя по всему, и первая
ассоциация по крайней мере у русскоговорящих на слово на букву г
говно ~ gone? they made quite a picture out of that g.
gangsters are quite some shit.
в ин говно лишь какой-то грамматологический суффикс или реально о
том что это ушло изнутри говорит?
duck is more common association for г, and g is d
in russian. It makes me wonder.
And now I see that both г, and g are italic,
because they're some other forms in normal font.
c is as duck only when it looks back, which is not very common,
but I immediately recognize it as
so when we complare г and c, the
lower stroke seems to be a swasy, a link to the nex tellter letter.
pare ~ place?
Letter lets?, I asked. Letter Tells. let ~ tell. take ~ hide. give
wake?nah, here it ost me.
I am giving all my weed today, it's not friday, it's thursday. But
anyway, saturday is soon and I will take a sober friday. And
evenry other week. I will return here mostly on saturdays.
and I knew I saw a goose with such a neck..
I wonder what it is about, because 𓃿 is quite a sign, but
nah, it's just a coincidence
they're all ideograms, of course some of them maybe drawn
explicitly, as a picture. I'm pretty sure such figure is somewhere
in unicode too, here it is: 𓀔 but does it mean it is a hieroglyph
𓇳 figures, I thought they were some tasty titties, who knows what
they ate, now what.. I still think so, but I think, I don't know.
𓇳 is a sign for sun. it is as if they directly placed it in the
centre with our orbit around it. Or is it just a primitive circle,
to show how it goes round the earth? when you have some fork, or
an arc, you can draw a circle by pressing one tip harder than the
other, so that the other dance around it drawing a circle, And
that is what the sun is, the most perfect circle we ever saw.
and obviously that sign is somehow related to ☉
Next day. Friday. I don't smoke. I gave away
all my weed to my friends. I probably have some extra if I
collect all the cannabis dust from the jar, but that's for some
extreme situation like when I suddenly eat too much sugary stuff
of who knows what happens, weed heals many disorders.
I think that I shouldn't focus on the languages I know the best,
but find all the shortest words across all the languages, to
compare them or what. or something.
a = to (just as in french)
o = or
e=y=and [e] (just as in french et)
al = a + el (see further)
la = the (feminine)
el = the (masculine)
él = he
en = on or in (depending on the context)
ir = to go (which resembles russian idti, idi, idu, and resembles
that latin -re, japanese -ru, russian -ть
are some form of do)
Example in a sentence: Quiero ir al cine (I want to go to the
me = me (even though linguistic explanation
is much more complicated: This is used to make
a verb reflexive in the I form. You would use it when you want
to indicate that a verb is being acted to you (by someone
else) or to yourself
Example in a sentence: Hola, me llamo Juan. (Hello, my name is
Juan – literally, “I call myself” Juan.)
no = no (sometimes, not)
de = of (or from)
si = whether (or if)
sí = yes (most of these words are the same in french, you're
It seems that when sober I look more on the outside, not the
inside, so I copy more than bring out anew.
Which is also good, we need both to make science. And that is also
why I must return to that shamanic weed at least once a week to
keep this fire burning.
The shortest English word with the five vowels in
alphabetical order is AERIOUS (meaning airy). I personally like
FACETIOUS, which is a bit longer. Note that FACETIOUSLY has all
six vowels (Y is both a vowel and a consonant in English).
город ~ град
молоко ~ млеко
корова ~ крава ~ cow
хоробрый ~ храбрый
хоромы ~ храм
passive as a pussy
active and acute
please, god, make me better.
pleare, God, help me be better.
Please, God, help me be much better.
Isn't be more important than much in the sense, how can grammar
change like that?
The comparison will be more clear if I use the same verb:
Please, God, make me better
Please, God, make me be better.
Please, God, help me better
Please, God, help me be better.
wy ol dis preyin olovsudden? Was staying away from weed for five
days. And nothing appeared in here in that period but this wild
wooga booga. from the comparison of old russian to new russian a
friend brought to me. I amd reporting it because this book also
contains this report on staying away from weed and what it brings
and then again..
but distractions will be happening from time to time. .
I was walking with a friend, talking and some crazy guy (real cool
guy actually crazy because drunk, a little. liked us, and gave me
present of weed, which I immediately smoked, because I even took a
tube to my walk, ) met us and gave me four pieces of wood.
That was the reason why I am high today, but I only understood few
new things so far, all my energy went to take me home from there.
Maybe because I felt that it was torture. After I got high, I
panicked that who he was (actually I was bantering him before
softly a time or twice, so I was asocial even then, and when he
told that we had to go to kurchatove monument, I said I got
arrested there last time I was there, so I'm not going there. Why
do I tell you this? Because I keep on reporting, maybe some other
book was trying to read itself here. Abotu weed this time. I know
a lot of weed, I'm pretty sure I've said of thc extract as cure
for cancer, but there's a link which s worth thousand books,
spanish en (both in and on) tells what is n. I noticed that
thinking of guy and gal I thought that it was how those genders
pronounce the same term. and thaty term could be y'all, you ~ all.
and that stunned me why aL and Ya? is it because y is vowel, but I
saw that that is the same fenomenon, where ll turned out as y,
which is funny, because y is ij, and thus ijkl somehow a claster
with k never playing as i or any of others is obviously some
xenos, and because it breaks the symmetry in M. And why the
symmetry is broken? is it because it was IMN or, if N is M as in-
is im-, but it's also il- and ir- I is ill, that's why i- doesn't
come with any other letters, not not ippossible, but impossible,
not iccorect, but incorect, n comes with linguals, m goes with
labials, l and r only go with l and r. thus what? is in and that
in from before the same thing? N is it? N is no, neh? But that is
what in- in incorrect tells, it's no correct, and that in = no
tells im = mo, and thus no is moo, oh yeah, I was walking the road
hoam along some dirty industrial city river and some frog or duck,
I thought of a duch first, said бля бля бля бля бля, and I hope it
is not some spell it pronounced before it turned into a frog and
now wants to turn human again, but the spell doesn't work, and we
even listen some ква or га, which is rather similar, btw, duck and
frog, toad and duck, утка жабка, никакого сходства, not similar in
words at all, but why would they be, if they're completerly
different, only live by water. but that final a whether it's га or
ква or бля is all open (as water) and female (as water) and dogs
and cats are different, but their sayings end with labial: w in
baw and miau, and гав и мяу. that у is probably the only w in
Йож legitimized this orthography avoiding Ёб,
so now we can insert W there, to make мяw a legitimate russian
orthography, that will make us taught from hebrews.
A Б Г Д (the common canon)
E B Ж З (this line alwasy was weird, it is still weird. That В is
extra in the previous line, so it.. later)
И М Н К or rather И М К Н or K is in the next line and here we
have samekh or N is lingual enough)
О П К Р С Т (the K is Q,
as King and Queen maybe, different ways to write the same)
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
Р reflects Ч because their cursive minuscules are the same.
Х reflects К
That B is extra in the A line (Б is B, В is V) so that В takes the
place I preferred for W. What if we stop выкать, and speak w
instead of v? мяв is a rare, but still understandable form of мяу.
we only don't recognize o as wav, but because of w or who knows
why we recognize в and у [u] as something similar. maybe because
we transliterate W as both В[v] or У[u] v and u are well-known
invariants, I return to this weird word, so misleading maybe,
because as inflammable is flammable, so invarian is varian, in
this case that i- is in, not no. weird. why in ~ en ~ on ~ N would
be both this and No, because when something is in (the ground) it
is not here. not seen, it is not.
not is in terra? maybe this case was the origin of the word, the
hunter's language, baby. Aha, it seems I
came on working in the diretion I'm supposed to, because I
switch the music off. It distracted me, it always did, I made
weird experiment on me, writing a poem only by some songs, I
mentioned songs, it's in those embarrassing blue poem books some
pages I will scan some day, but only half of them (or maybe even
none, as they're tutorial or.. what's the word.. amateur, I only
began writing poems later, and the good ones are now saved by
Alex Glukhoff. why is it here? I don't want the good ones to be
lost. It took me four to five years to learn how to write good
poetry, and it ended in another five, so in ten years I made
myself a great poet, practicing just once a month or so,
producing good pieces once a month. And I had another flash of
the interest to poetry when some guy started a poetry thread and
I jumped win to be a superstar, and oh did I deliver. Only I
repeated the next thread with my own poem in the op-pic and it
went much more sour than before, even though I delivered twice
there too, I think, but pride comes before the fall, and because
I was bragging in the op-pic, not many dared to compete. Why is
it here? I plan to copy all my brains in here, but text cannot
transliterate some images which appear before my eyes when I
wake up and eyes are closed.
So walk on your own risk, some shocking pieces are going to yet
appear before your eyes in such offtopic loci.
maybe these offtopic pieces are needed to turn you away from this
thing so it doesn' t burn a hole in your head if you look too long
for into it.
I mean this music is so great, how can you write about something
else instead of actually listening to it.
and the followin pieces made me think of something related to one
of the recurring topics of this thing whatever it is: (attention
at the figure on the right of that gloryhallastoopid cover)
That nose thing, if you fake the funk your nose will grow, could
easily trigger hebrews, because their noses are sometimes big, and
even though parliament didn't mean them, they were probably
speaking of pinoccio, whose nose grew when he lied, but then it
probably re.. pinochio, why does that k is written as ch? It seems
that was one huge c and they disagreed about how which form of it
should be indicated.. Either way, jews are in our culture in some
unpleasant images, and that is mostly their own culture's fault,
but what are we going to do about in now, we're still going to
offer them some genetic therapies to remove their damaged genes,
but naturally some weird fellows will refuse cure if it makes them
something else. What are we going to those who will be changing
their genes to be more jewish? We'll expose them of course,
everybody will be exposed by the facial structures, so what's the
point to fight any personal choice, we all carry the sequences of
our own karma, so how do we know maybe some people need to be
hated, maybe it's their way to suffer in this world so whatever
god they pray will then help them some better.
So that funk thing probably triggered them o much that there is no
funk anymore. They destroyed it with disco and who know what other
dirty tricks. The horns seem to annoy them so much that they
destroyed the imposed standart of bass drums guitars and voice
that no doubt's horn section is not in the band for some reason.
I'm wondering why did the funk didn't take root and actually hard
to find, why people think of some other musics, some jamiroquai
and fucking rhcp when they hear this term. It's the way the p-funk
was destroyed, that only few played it, some parliament-funkadelic
and that party for some time. Until the 80s came. The One Giveth
was one of the last great records in that wild stream. There were
some other bands, but, whatever, why is it here? To blame the jews
again? They're azazel alright, many fell for cocaine trick, and
that was fbi, so the opposite party, the racists. Are they? Ain't
jews control them too. I don't know. Why do I care? Why is it
here? Do I want to get killed this much? Not much enough. I don't
know what I am doing. I'm going to sleep, but another wild thing I
understood in that walk: my friend used мы when he didn't mean
himself (or maybe he did, maybe he thought taht way he discussed
before, in the upbringing, or did he speak of the civilization
itself, but there I found that мы (we) could be even more polite
form of вы, as if teh sequence was ты вы Вы мы.
it would explain why we is closer to вы than to мы. Me is close to
мы. Which is natural, because both are of first person, but what
if the second person is just a form of the first? Nah, it seems to
crazy, too wild, they are almost antonyms. Some evolution of the
concepts of the first and second person from some common form of
we~вы? me~мы? Me is common first person (and Thee is the common
what.. common second person. But when it's plural it does include
me, but only when it does, otherwise it's вы, also you, but plural
you, english doesn't have plural you? So if I say singuar forms
are later than singular? But ..what? Me-мы, me~we, вы is also
labial, so did вы come out of мы? ты is separating the opponent
from the we, thus it's not polite, and ты is closer to те, то,
та. as if there were onl we and them, and second person came
out of both of them, some forms are from the third person, thee,
thou, ты, and plural forms are from the first. And there lays the
distinguishing between M & T, labial we and lingual they. мы
I think I spoke about it before, that second person unites m &
t forms, when first person is never t, and the third one is never
m, and now I looked deeper into it, I told you I make rounds to
return to topics I looked into before, to see them better. Now I
see that russian forms он она они are un- added to we, ны is мы,
and thus (if this guess is correct) plural form is the basis for
all the other forms again.
I think I could deliver more, but it's 18 minutes past 4:20 and I
really want to sleep, there are tears in my eyes so much I yawn. I
will smoke on saturday though, don't know about friday. I should
smoke only one day. If I like fridays more, let it be friday. On
saturdays I am needed by my mom more. I warn her that friday I'm
in love, and she doesn't bother me on this day. Only so we'll have
something in common with muzzos, and they probably don't have that
prohibition for goyim to observe fridays.
..and only if for some reason I cannot get high on friday will I
have two more days to fix it.
That thing, weed, doesn't let me sleep, so here we come again at
5:29, to speak about Я & I, both are drawn similarly in
cursive. in some cursive forms they are. in some -like form.
a interesting (and potentially very useful when I study chinese)
site I found:
where you can see cursive chinese, and it's funy that some forms
of 人 look like い and other
are pretty much the mirrored forms of 入, play with it, it's funny.
here's the broken form of man, which resembles kana i. Here, I
copied some of the forms, first the most similar to book form,
which is also, but, then the reverse form of the enter sign and
then some unexpected form resembling L more than Λ, which is
weird, because Ren could be R which is not far from L and then the
form resembling R, which is super weird, I never knew of such
form, it seems to be archaic, and then that "kana i" form:
could these Λ and L and R be the origins of those letters? Even
when they pronounce it as Ж now? For whatever reason they
transliterate it as R, and that is what that obsoleter or whatever
it is form.
I offered my soul for absolute knowledge, thinking that I will be
able to solve any problem with that very knowledge, even the
problem of that soul being stolen, but I never sold it, because
whenever I really thought about it, I always went nah, I'm not
making deals details of which I do not understand, I just offered
it for a lease or something, and it seems I do get all the
knowledge I strive for. And yet it is not enought to solve
problems, for that you also need strength, and I ask god, but I
don't ask him to save me from satan, I want to be friends with
satans too, I ask him for the strength to give up weed. Because I
see that as an obstacle for construction of my shell. The shell
which can deliver me the immortality, which doesn't excuse my
lease, because I do some satanic deeds now, only I make them so
well, that all parties benefit, because before I made that offer,
I wanted to be in neutrality with the both parties, I don't know
what their strife is about, and thus I say girls don't quarrel.
So my actual task is to change the world in such a way, that both
parties benefit, that the new iteration is better for both the
parties than the current one.
And sometimes I look at my life and I ask myself is there anything
I cannot figure out? Was my gift delivered to me? But I was never
asked to sign anything. Even though I shook hands with some crazy
looking being. It was like some hi handhshake. Even Devil doesn't
want me to be shit without soul.
And now I think if I should clean my roon or smoke some weed I got
yesterday. I think I go for the weed. Why? Because that's what I
like. And I start the new day tomorrow. Tomorrow is friday and I
thought I was going to smoke on fridays, but I will miss that
friday, I will spend it to buy the first piece of plywood. I have
money only for one. Or I will buy three thinner ones, and will use
them for some sides on which concrete doesn't push, on the forming
the basis for the sphere and for closing the top of that sphere,
by sphere I speak of the rhombododecahedron, which is spheric on
Okay, good excuse, a promise. Do it, faggot I tell to myself.
Whatbetter thing to do today anyway.
wage slaves.. what is wage? wedge?
19:09 thursday I'm high agayn, high agayn. what a gay word why is
what is soul? soul is probably self, what we consider (or want)
saved after the death is our self, our самое, душа? мы понятия не
имеем что такое душа, разные философы разные мнения, но все
обещания не имеют смысла, если приемственность ощущений нарушена.
Но я бы стёр часть памяти, ту которая доставляет беспокойствао,
дискомфорт. покойство комфорт? покой ство, ком форт. с крепостью?
с силой! покойство вообще какое-то другое слово, может (или даже
значит перевод неправильный, но что если у нас нет слова
когначному слову комфорт. другие слова другой менталитет. значит
надо создавать когнаты к хорошим английским словам и заменять ими
дурные российскише. покой как покойный грязно русно грусно грузно
гузно и так далее.
комфорт спокуха ком и с заставляют нас переводить так.
I consulted online translator but it didn't give me much, yet it
gave me that у- [at] is similar to c-
and many translations of спокойствие comfort
has that prefics, уют is the one I like the most, because it's
great in a way it saved some ют I have no knowledge of. is it юрт?
fort ~ юрт? кроме юрт других фортов у кочевых не появлялось.
Значит горы те естественно возникающие укреплённые позиции,
вершины на которых одна тонкая тропа могли быть очень лакомы в
плане комфорта, но и бои там за эти участки могли совершаться
регулярно и лишь строительство замка могло дать строителю права по
факту знания всех входов и выходов этого изначально замка
пещерного типа, замок и замок are castle and lock. lock is closer
to rock. castle lock. castle rock is some studio. sSo they
delivered stone from the rock they built upon. they learnt to saw
stones after they lost the technology of egyptian pyramids when
they moved to europe. It seems civilization runs from hords of
subhumans. Should we keep on running or towards where thy cannot
get us? Because we realized that murder is monstrous, they didn't
yet. But how can we blame it when we realized it en masse only a
century or two ago. or even did we? So great eascape seems to be a
good option. We can take all the masterpieces with us,
substituting them with replicas? Or with more modern technology we
can build ourself some new world even better than that naturally
Actually, that was a retarded idea above, the one about great
escape, white flight. Which should fight. (wrote which insteadd of
white. I wonder why. Is it because white and witch is cognates?
heathen are witchy for mideterranean kikes. blackies are dark.
they are still in middleages. middleeast, middleages, probably
this choice of lexics fucks them up.
What do I mean fight? not with murders, I told you they're gross
and other reasons why it's foolish.
With propaganda? With speaking out.
Jah gives green light. I am going to call
that gal tomorrow and buy plywood from her.
And I buy 3 meters long and whichever is the width, I take 3.
width depends on the money I have on me minus I thousand to
transport it too.
I will report on that the other time I'm here. Or maybe that
piece will be written sober. I will tell.
Speaking out is how many magic happens.
What is my point. End to secrecies, but not secrecers. End to
secrecies, because they who want to know, easily do now.
Information is so widely available as most of us probably still
don't know how and twenty years ago most of us didn't even expect
them to be this way. If you want to know something, now you can.
So what is the semantic structure of the alphabet? Semantic
structure I'm still looking for. I only guess, and of those
guesses will I align a line.
If I saw the circle pattern and I moved to the left of it, I
probably rotated it counter-clockwise, taht's why clockwise is
considered right, we look at the top first or foremost. and when I
saw that pattern, what happened next tells that it probably was
the case: I saw angel and devil fighting over me. And the reason darkie was the whole
devil and angel wasn't god himself probably because I don't fall
for angel side as much as I fall ow the dark side. In what way? In
listening to death metal, not chorals, to raves and concerts, not
church. My name is demon, after all, these memes fuck russians up
so much, russians calling their sons Dmitriis all again. Why? It
is weird, and we are called demons colloquially. This reasoning
was what made me leave the angel and fly with the devil. demon and
devil are probably cognates, but evil is more general and
architypal than emon. what is emon? Amen? Omen? die man?
angel is what? on hell? хель это рай у викингов. для евреев мир
викингов был бы наверное адом. они хотят хевен, which is probably
oven to vikings. Just like asura is god for iranians and satan for
indians, so their domains should have inversed meanings from one
language to the other.
Two new words: fuckarow and fuckaree. first is low and other is
high, and that reflects their meanings.
So placing w in the end makes sense since the second half of the
alphabet, if it reflects the life, is lower than the first in
several meanings, so now why not in that. The words are from
Dreamcatcher, the best movie based upon Stephen King, and I was
looking for that finger move to show you which is a part of magic
. He also rotated it clockwise. And it works when you need to find
things at your apartment. You look around and by that finger you
sorta look around that around, in some fractalic way. so what I'm
saying is that Stephen could even invented them, but they are in
urbandictionary with 30+ and 60+ likes and that relates to one
word used in the movie once and the other twice. There are almost
a quarter of dislikes on the first one and only 8% of then in the
60+ word, most probably because the 60+ word tells not to confuse
it with the other, so it tells of the reason people could dislike
the shorter discription of the other word less.
N ~ M (nein is mine. at least in some contexts it may mean exactly
N is also in and thus my is what is in the speaker.
I line is even more I line than I thought.
U line is you? U is some final letter, past-t, that low u? I still
don't know, maybe but I don't see how.
T is the opposite of M and M begins the second half of the
alphabet, with I being 10 or something. or is it 8. and those i is
: and then . is 4? what for, I don't know. Maybe vowels are indeed
a later concept, which appeared with individualism of I only
further difined by and distinguishde from U and A.
And before that only M of Me and Мы existed and T of They and Те.
Back to the army. Did I discuss army here. I will see when I sort
all these volumes out.
Watching that Dreamcatcher movie again I ask myself who deals with
shit when it get serious. I certainly won't, all my skills are in
some completely different field, in writing this books mostly. In
figuring things out, but even when I figured out how to become
immortal, it takes me so long to build the thing. Shit is real and
I am lazy. Either way, even though those guys are tough, you don't
have to break them. Because what I wrote of them (if I did) is
that they are drawn through a process of direct psychological
assault. And though I thought that abuse is ust to make some cool
guys obey, that assault could be engineered precisely to make them
effective. If they can obey somebody else, they surely can obey
their own orders. I lack this ability.
Genres of music are probably natural: they grow out of ideas: I
had idea to call rock'n'roll
Happy end in dreamcatcher makes us careles of the possibility of
But at the same time the film itself makes us aware of such
apossibility. So the happyend outbalances.
vertical spaces make text loose, and scroll ineffective.
sometimes it has to be loose because how tight the text itself is.
It's easier to read if text splits like it does in my case. My
vision is not blurry, it's doubling or smearing, hard to explain
as several lenses were added and they give some weaker (greyer)
text around them, as if they had row of that letter only first of
which I saw.
ROtations: when you roll clockwise, you go counter-clockwise if
you touch the wall. so which rotation is which is hard to say,
because of that. But dance around a bonfire. good fire. when dance
around bonfire we rotate the same side around our centre we rotate
around the centre of the fire.
Cities kill the freeman magic? By the walls inverting the irection
of rotation. Сила действия равна силе противодействия, но
И таким образом естественным образом можно вплести всю типа
школьную программу. Новую программу, не школьную, обучающую, но
индивидуальную. Который каждый читал как книжку в подростковом
возрасте когда мозг жаждет читать.
ввп не самый лучшй показатель, misleading. gdp is a misleading
number. I first wondered why tories in the face of Margaret
Thatcher 8 8 letters. that she raised the economy, that her and
Ronald Reagan 6 and 6 letters. probably his middle name is some
George. It's Wilson. so 666 is a good guy? It seems to be so. The
god reigning the world before the second coming is the satan
himself, and church is in this world very powerful, so they are
probably the satan ruling this world. In their mythology, in the
mythology they live in.
spell spiele? spell plays? as if s is placed as prefix or as
suffix giving two synonyms, chosen by different nations through
the time. Maybe because other was very much used by their
neighbour humans in large quantities rarely have good relations.
kali yuga, which ends if the god returns. as they believe. And
whether it's true or not, it can play in this world by playing
through the people who believe it, so it's some metarealities,
interwoven by pretty common culture. But some customs are just
fucke up, I'm not telling on them, but you don't want to see.
Nationalism is natural and normal. Fighting it only confuses the
populace, and whether they know it or don't, in the latter case my
duty is to inform that it damages somewhere else. God returns when
people stop dying, so the believe which I heard by some jew
already, that mochiah is already hear, and how crazy is it that I
called myself mahead before I knew such words as mahdi. Well. I
did invent immortality, but it will be honest to test it first,
because I speak of it more than I build it. I build it.
Every day. I buy plywood tomorrow. I make the first form and then
I buy more plywood.
Donald Trump is Donald John Trump, it's 645, and it's poetic that
he's the 45th president.
Дмитрий is 7 Александр шы 9
Dmitry is 6 Alexander is still 9 Okolnikov is 9
would I prefer 799 or 699. I take both.
I don't use suffixes in second name, because it would be over 9,
which is not digit already. Are first 10 signs digits? At least
first 8 signs? or even 7? Or what/ When do additional, letter
begin. But whay do I thikn that it was as they do it in 16-ричной
-ия is like и я.
-ion is like и он.
ae all -ion words some psy-ops attachin.. attackin
the unsuspecting neighbours?
ae (which was only typo for are few lines ago) could be the
questioning prefix or particle as in russian you can sey ты идёшь
с нами. Но "а ты идёшь с нами" уже требует вопросительного знака.
So are could be that very particle, which was misinterpreted by
the previous researchers.
лох значит лопух: уши как лопухи развесил, на неё лпшу развесистую
навешивают пройдохи проходимцы.
These dice are here actually only to show that 4-sided dice could
be not only in the form of knucklebones, but of these tetraedrs
too, and I saw them in some ancient egyptian game, dice with
meanngful corners. And as you can see, all other dice count sides.
In those egyptian tetraedr dice two corners were dotted, the other
two wasn't, so they were four, but played for two. for yes and
Looking for those dice I stumbled across something beautiful, the
and they say it was numbered by numbers 1 to ten and IA stood for
11. I probably was 10. then on some other side it is IB I suppose.
And it reminds the clock's 1 to 12 thing. and 1 stands for 10 the
way I used to stand for 10. Is roman numerals recognized
correctly? Isn't I 10? what is X? Was it some military trick to
speak in other language even in numbers and in such a way that
when you spoke of units your neighbours using these dice's system
saw tens? But I read it from the links those pictures lead to,
What I saw before I read it was Vowels. H is И and E and Y and U
are the vowels, and the other side probably had O and Ω and there
are five more sides to fill in, and even if the right bottom
corner is IU which would in a sick way stood for 12, and AV would
be the AB order, only how russian (or a greek) read it.
The tetraedr dice I found in this form only:
and it's not egyptian it's mesopotamian. I saw them first in this
wild Brittish Museum tutorials:
and the finds on ancient egyptian dice keeps on delivering:
these are not ancient, I guess they're not, but what is
interesting I can recognize the names of those six gods written
next to them.
This is probably some new stylization. Probably never used in the
past, but then who knows, I have to dig into this to find the
author to figure out his sources and motivations. But the names
seem to be accurate, even though I'm surprised Ra is that simple
sign. And I think I saw that sign for R not far from ther. I was
thinking of tifinagh ⵙ and yet it's S in that west from egypt. and
R is ⵔ there.
Isis is probably Iris then. And it puzzled me when I recognized
that that's probably Isis. and seeing capital Ir at it. Third is
Ptah. I know him as some early imageboards meme, and fourth is
probably Heth and Anubis puzzzles me because it looks as Anpu,
unless it goes round in a way, number six I don't recognize.
𓁏 is told to be ḥḥ in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heh_(god) and
I didn't find Heth god, so I probably read it wrong. But Ra
I understood alright:
Isis spelled at wiki in some other way, only the throne sign is
"𓁹𓊧" doesn't find anything. Neither do "𓁺𓊧", "𓁻𓊧",
yet "𓁼𓊧" finds
http://gflqusu.blogspot.com/2019_12_23_archive.html which is some
fascinating page of weird writings:
I wonder if it's random or some actual text. And 𓎂 is very similar to what I was looking for
yesterday and had to write it by hand.
Ptah I read alright:
Seth. Why did I read or wrot it heth? is he hate?
Nah, just ignorance, me being novice.
I probably recognized Anubis by the picture, but maybe I read
really well now:
Neither 𓆓𓎚𓅱𓏎 notr 𓆓𓎚𓏎𓅱 return anything, nor did 𓁟 nor 𓁣
So long, let that sixth side ot the stide of th die remains
mistery for a while. I am looking for a god's name beginning with
𓆓 because it seems to be J and quite some gods begin with J.
Civil science живильна наука. Civilization шевели зация.
(но я вроде отмечал раньше, что живой и шевелящийся могут быть
(эти-то два предложения так, скорее шутка, поэтический экспромпт,
I wonder when did commies lose that п)
Did I actually offered my soul even if I said I did. I remember ..
One hit and I am crazy high. okay it's friday over 22:00
ne mentes pois. This concept of offer, not selling yet, return
offer never appeared. How never appeared if I achieved something I
considered miracles. How do I know I achieved them if I never
built them. I got the absolute knowledge. Maybe I will be allowed
to stay alive as long as they want so they
What is this project? It is not science the way people understand
science. It's some experiment, but it's more artsy than sciency.
Or it's both. It's too artsy, and sometimes it's fartsy too I
Because I don't edit. In this book I answered myself the question
I had? Why on earth do we need editiors! Because artists love all
their creatures, but from a side people from the public, the
audience, they can say what they like and what they don't. I know
it from a musical producer, actually.
2 × 2 = 4
two times two equals 4
equals can be substituted for is as if is is an abbreviation of
Do × stands for times? in russian it's ю & жды & на and I
wonder what is it in english.
дважды два четыре is translated as two by two is four and twice
two is four and
twice two is equal to four. And I wonder if is there only
to require to similar to ( requiring ).
Interesting fact is that if ( is a waning moon and ) is a waxing
moon, then text between them is not as bright as the rest of the
text, thus symbolizing the full moon. Only here s and t of is and
to are not brackets, but rather hooks or even —'s but is is = in
math notation. but so is —, but to is neither — nor = and what is
to if × is by? × as by makes perfect semantic meaning. = for is
and what is for to? 2? no. 10? lol, no. + is to. so
twy two by to
two is equal to four
2 × 2 = = + 4 which to my surprise is correct.
And what we did in this silly experiment is we recognized some
simple words in the math signs.
- is what word?
4 - 2 = 2
4 without 2 is 2.
- is without? by it's structure of labial, lingual, lingual it
resembles minus. but then why did I ignore u? because out is от in
russian, thus that u is just misorthography of how o is read in
> is more
> is less
equals = is
a is b
a to be is dee
It's interesting that in speech minus is inversed, the word much
less than without is of, and of would be nice among those other
Let's collect all the biliteral words to see if all of them can be
written in math symbols. And I've already collected the words
am an as at be bi by do eh el go ha he hi ho id
if in is it ma me my no ny of oh
ok on or ox pi so to up us we
and it's immediately obvious that some words have no place in
math, while others share the meaning:
am = is, for example.
an = 1
as is maybe ~
at is who konws what..
be = am = is = = and here labial meets lingual, and it's cool,
because we wrote before that first person is labial, third person
is lingual. Thus those verbs are probably related to the pronouns.
be am, but is as in his? him then is what? I am confused so much
now that I hope nobody reads it to this point, I told them I will
go further than I know. So let them enjoy this good mindflow at
by is × which is cool because it consists of two lines as if it's
bi. and turning monodimensional lines of the numbers into
bidimensional plane. and is it why we have ю for some forms of
multiplication and жды for other? We don't know the difference and
use whatever particle we like.
if × turns one number into square, then ж of жды could be of that
form because it multiplied by hight? space here is not space
but area. is place multiplied by another dimension is space? space
like volume, place like plane. sp after pl.. interesting. But only
if it will be supported by some word for a number in this
sequence, I expect it to have vowel at the beginning and ace at
the end. is it just ace?A? nah, It's not what I expected ace as
a's? a as 1 and a's are units? numbers? I don't know, seems too
And english delivers the understanding of what -жды is. дважды is
twice. Thus -жды is -ce and probably it shows how abc is the basal
first line, and c is all s, sh, z, zh and even d.
This came to me the previous night, but what follows is the sober
week. I will mark it when I'm high again. I plan to do it on
friday. It's saturday today.
What I came to say here is rather shallow, I just observe the work
I've done, and I notice that I narrow my circles. I came up to
math notations, to biliteral letters. Even if uniliteral don't
have direct representatives in math, except a as 1, which is
rather lame, to be honest. So no, biliterals they are, syllabaries
as the previous iteration of the system, prior to alphabets.
And links of math between english and russian deliver to me even
in this shallow sober state:
by is pretty much по. But as mathematical sign by is translated as
на. And it is spectacular, because russian cursive п [p] looks
like n: п. And semantically по и на are very similar.
And semantically 2 по 2 makes more sense than 2 на 2, which is a
meme, but hardly any russian can tell really why.
+ is not even to, but also and, and that is how english and
japanese meet, at that ancient level of math.
(to is and in japanese)
another synonym to to and and is with, because if that's how + is
read, semantics won't change.
And isn't it great that - can be read as without? but + is not
within. or is it? no, it's not.
withing and without are surprisingly not antonyms. with and
ны как форма мы, отсюда нас? nos? and forms uns and us tell that
that is some nasal o of we, neither ны nor мы but some our, some
юс, some nasal root of own. and maybe I is a form of it, who
But then again to is not +, it's ÷. 5 to 10 in the sense of
probability is 5/10, 50%.
and 5 of 10 is 1/2 too. so because of how to and of look like one
is a mirrored form of the other, which is correct or are both..
and statistically speaking 5 to 10 is not 1/2, it's 1/3. and in
math terms it's not easy to explain, especially to someone woking
in humanities for so long. Why is this word humanities? Is math
alien? Nah, it probably originated as some human studies.
As you can see, these sober sessions may be interesting, but
they're still not only rare, but also куцы.
(those -t's are definitely -ed's)
-ю in пять ю пять может быть суффиксом: пятью пять.
and that is exactly the way it's written and it's for the first
time I've known this.
And I am a native russian speaker who's actually good in both math
and that ю makes й and л meet again:
После б, п, в, ф, м почти всегда требуется
отделение мягким знаком (бью, пью, вью) или буквой л (люблю,
коплю, ловлю, графлю, кормлю), хотя возможны и редкие исключения
(мягкий знак фонетически практический идентичен й)
Anothr high monyay session. I'm not giving
it up it seems. Not even for fridays only.
The way qrs all reflect c and р is r in russian and greek, I
declare c a form of b again.
And then eastern k beginning the consonant row is the same letter
we pronounce as b.
How can it be? It's kaka for mama in japanese. How can it be? How
could it be? What was the initial sound? What stands between b
^& c? Ψ
Looking so much like ᛘ, how could I never notice it?
ᛘ and ᛉ reflect this B ~ C thing perfectly.
ᛘ and ᛉ as B and C make perfect
beginning of the gymnastics.
And I cannot see how D can follow that. Probably each sign is a
That is whose thing? Von List's thing? I think I call it that
here, but it's von Schemm's. I didn't include that here before,
because I had nothing to take from it or nothing to add to it, now
It is very interesting that I found exactly this rune before I got
drifted away. There's a whole book of them: click further to see
pages from it: here
And that is some ananerbe science, which brings some wonderful
It is so wonderful, that it begins with B and ends with T. What is
even more wonderful. Or not more, but also wonderful, is that it
goes alphabetically. And just alike to russian БВ they go ᛒᚢ.
But then how is it I jump up and down those pairs by numbers.
Because that form of ᚠ I think I saw something like that for
B. Or was it some tolkien talkin I tried to disregard. Or is it
short dansk form linking B to F even more? What if tolkien usurped
some actually existing forms and now because they are so obscure
everybody thinks they are exclusively tolkient's?
Either way, here I found similar diagram with numeration shifted,
I wonder what it is all about, I collect them here:
no better quality I could find. Send it to
me if you do.
And from the same collection I pulled off
these two, other two:
that's it with thise vonSchemm's images for
now, for they go crazier.
I want to return to that ᚠ-like b and where I saw it:
yet I also found some other representation of it, with wigs
looking down. hm.. Well, I said up and down is arbitrary, because
of how A and O look different ways in Bornholm futhark.
that image leads to some good research, as you can see here, with
runic poems and some more.
And What grasped my attention is how birch is in a way reflecting
My eyes are broken by a phone whose screen
was broken and taped by scotch tape few times over.
I will buy the phone with brightest colours I saw to fix them
back up. Reports on it later.
(I saw Friday as Today and Wednesday as Yesterday today that's
how much fucked-up they are. I can see this text, but it's large
and still двоится-троится-четверится-непонятночтоделает.
Thus I also have a reason to work on this book now: my eyes
still allow me do it.
But I cannot wait till I blind to build my capsule. I have to
build it now. Buy me new phone and
Like piter is dmiter and that shows that p stands between b &
c: it's labial, but looks like lingual R, ᚦ.
Voiced form of П is Б. voiced and voiceless are initially all the
same. Letters cannot be mistaken for one another when whistled or
tle like трель?
l = real? before opst (reflecting abzd?) opqt (it's unthinkable,
because greek doesn't have q. But didn't other dialects? Isn't it
gay ionic again?
And even ionian had Q! They all did. It is some modern
Some of them even had Ϻ at the same time they used M! And that Ϻ
obviously reflects Г or C as we know it, but C is lunar sigma,
thus lines are originally one line.
Back to the Ψ as the first letter.
(and I got distracted from whatever was here
Cow is the epitome of fear. It's big and with horns, but is easily
scared. Cows run. Cow go.
Трусливый уходит не предприняв и попытки.
run and go, because r is like гю
and probably that is why говяды и говно столь сходны, и то и
другое's gone (говяда has gone, shit is gone)
Мерзость мерзкое морозкое мороз по коже. кое коже?
лёгкое летит по коже?
мягкое мнётся кожей?
сладкое слизывается с кожи? как и солодкое (см. текилу как пьют)
ломкое ломается кожей? кожа значит не инструмент, руками?
тонкое звучит от кожи?
Пытался найти что-то что вообще отношения к коже иметь не санет,
но цветов не нашёл на кое.
Терпкое треплет кожу? слизистая тоже кожей называлась? острое и
ноское как кожа носится?
такое той кожи?
мер в мерзком то же что и в мёртвом? мёртвый замер, как от мороза
вода и всё остальное.
Tuesday. High in the morning.
I just managed to imagine the 5-dimensional space:
I had two axes, and the wave went vertically. Wave needed some
fourier analysys, but it went like a tropka up in the time axis
and right and left in the mood. Good thing I imagined it not sin
like in the centre of the time axis, but in some constant mood
boost making it all positive. Just more or less intensive, never
I thought about Peterson: why does he add
some religious crap to something valid? He gives good
psychological advice (to look at people whey you're shy) and
adds some irrelevant religious crap. Why should his students
attach it to the eyes of Tiamat? He gave information
concentrated or does he what, why is it here.. Eye ~ I, those
hundred eyes are hundred names, for he swallowed other gods or
something.. He didn't even tell it, but who cares, All I had to
write i I ~ eye and Аз ~
Russian and english have such basic words common, ike me and it,
one two three, how can they not share the other common words. It's
hard to imagine that they contacted in the animal past and never
meat again until we invented writing.
y ~ k now placed k in the hijl group. -y ~ -ic. ик, ич, идж. ий.
(voiced and voiceless, but then г is also here, so it's all
c-gang. i is c then. on some larger fractal scale hijkl were c.
Then what predated it had to be b.. abcdefg predated it. g could
be in the c thing too then, if k is ther. and then naturally ef
also went there in: e because it looks like c and f because it's
named digamma. But if a ~ d, e~c, what is b? Labials are some
isles in the sea of labiallessness. labia is love? love is labia.
But don't give me no lip is not give me some love, yet when
someone bad tells they love me, I'd rather ignore it. What do you
mean bad? Bad is something not what I want. I don't even need bed,
I need bath. Beth Parrish too.
her cso tells that letters don't have
meaning on their own.
but some letters do: I is the pronoun. But what if it's 1? What if
it's iodine? Electric current intensity?
So not only letters, but words in general get their meaning only
in the context. Like some longer words: am, is it in I am or is it
1am? but nu, new, knew, is orthography to distinguish words in
latin across all the languages? I wish I knew polish. I know
polish. I have google translator full of polish and many others.
And polish orthography seems to be intentionally different from
english. all those y's are there for this.
And that could be the reason why russian is not in latin yet: it
would be too similar for some spanish and portugese: da is give in
portugese, and not only is it very similar to russian datt (tt is
the to particle as in to give. I wonder how give and ga are
connected because davatt is just another form of datt)
can can be can of all sorts. It's some rather abstract word, a
shape, many things (not any thing) can be called that. any and
many mini more. many is not any? more is not all? mighty.. mini..
micro.. melting.. martial not art? when cannots trumpet muses keep
quiet. muse is not to use. muse uses you instead. You do what you
are told. motive.. melody.. mars.. not ares? ..make ..monk ..mask
don't even ask.
a for example. a has one meaning in english but ather
meaning in french, and another in russian.
So what are those meanings? Do having many meanings make you have
What if those meanings are connected? What if they are not? Let's
a is 1 and a is to, a is ah and a is but or and. a is something
between and and but in russian.
I like how they are and and but, as if they are a and b.
a is yes, aye, as in да, standing for both yes and and. as in bu
standing for no in chinese.
an in and is the very a. so these meaning are somewhow intertwined (this typo made the etymology of
a is aye.
a as to in french intertwines with to being yes in japanese. This
indoeuropean agglomeration does include japanese. It was left out
probably because not many scientists knew that or were confused by
the chinese writing system. Chinese itself is not that far away,
maybe one layer further away. that wo of their is awesome. hen and
hao also remind russian ochen and harasho. ni as me? ni is you,
thee, ты, and here it is closer to the first person in chinese but
closer to the third person in the europe. Chinese are more polite,
a to aye да до yes is есть ест eats ate ел all ель fir A
b be bi two. Maybe because syllabary
predated alphabet, singular letters are rarely understood.
be is just be. but b is recognized as be by itself. b4eva is
understood quite well.
b is be
2 is to (is 2 ~ a?)
4 is for
6 is sex? it looks like an erected penis. 9 is a relaxed penis.
8 is ate? these are rarely used if ever.
9 is nein? if penis is not up, there wil be no sex, that's
understood. even though not always true.
10 is ten and io too maybe. to 1 is T? it is in Ⰰ (it has some
forms with side arms much shorter)
c is see, sea, and it's syllabic, it has i after its phonetic
value. all names of the alphabets are.
Let's try to reconstruct the syllabary.
ei bi ci di i gi ai pi ti vi wai zi
ef eych jey key el em en es eks
ou qju ju double-ju
largest group, the -i group has 12 examples, and it makes me think
of the 12 months. and then I see they also go all abc: vwz, apt,
abcdig are naturally two merged lines then. So what happened
abc was the perfect ai-bi-ci, why would vowel have a -i? so let's
take the other part adise.. sai.. aside.
like some spiderweb those dots.
ig.. g is historically c. i is e, and i at the same time, so here
it is; and d is g in russian.
ei bi ci so are all EFГ some forms of c? and then i is c too,
because e and i merge in my syllabics:
ei bi ci
ai pi ti
and that is what I have when I remove the not perfect vwz, v is
not u after all.
If f is if (it can also be of) then we get ourselves the sonor an
we ing or soft e f g
and it probably was all voiced, just the way hebrew wav is.
and then the voiceless pair to it needs to appear underneath:
a b d
e v z
o p t
u f s
That ufs has some example in russian: у ф х ц ч ш щ
(u f h ts ch sh sch)
and because it's sh, not s, z is ж,
but because f is ph, s is th. and thus it's ц. так похожая на
ижицу или что это вообще. џ
Then it makes the second line e v ð
a b d
e v ð
o p t
u f θ
and the fifth element is LMN, where l is [й]
now I wonder what happened that the consonants of the second and
of the fifth lines switched places.
are those vowels also misplaced? I never questioned the order of
the latin vowels. But that' snot how kanas and ogham have it.
Could it be AUIOE? Could it be AUOEI it is AOUEI in ogham. labial
before lingual as they have it in the consonants.
EFS (old russian alphabet has S in this
it seems like this order was introduced to make voiced and
voiceless intersect, because they had sonors, and thus more voiced
than voiceless. And when they didn't have pure i? what was the
and probably EVZ was the prototype or a seed of the IMN
IMN is pure EWZ
or were b~p and d~q? (q~t)
then the alphabet had to be something like this:
if we set ogham as some standart of the primitive.
n as nine is fine, but that is not enough. z~s as six? v as 5! u
as some ч-like forms of 4 too.
now 4 seem to play some Д.
M as double U is also nice.
But am I not imagining things? like Δ for 3 and B for bi? a for 1.
Well, these three are fine, even though since people began
imagining in 3d more than in 2d, we had to introduce c for 3 (si
could be some basis of the alphabet.
Other letters could be just for the sake of variances in
orthographies to distinguish different words.
But then B~V (greeks read their Β both ways)
and then D~Z, because greeks read Δ as ð
So Abc is the formula. labials first, voiced first. All the other
letters are variances of these three. They are whether vowels, or
labials, or linguals. and thus d is in the c realm. the closed c.
closed is short in phonetic terminology.
Abs. Ams. the three mothers from sefer yetzirah.
Ðð tell, that the basis for ð is d. as if it's d-longis. long form
of d. Just as v is the long form of b, but for whatever reason in
russian Б is b, and В is v.
long and short forms are different as shove and hit or beat or
to shove is совать or сувать in russian. and it goes into my to ~
to love любить - this example shows how wide can letters deviate:
english v is b in russian, and because english в is in, and n is
ν, I take it as a continuum. from b to ν, whether it's n or v, is
n m? is v w? is all labials the same thing originally? They
probably are, and we're yet to roll with this probability in mind.
Then what is the LMN thing? where is their lingual? Is it some
samekh? Was samekh released when n was recognized as lingual? But
in.. n is on, but en is both on and in. I dare to unite
neighbouring languges, all this french from english to spanish I
mix in the same megalanguage concept looking at them as merely at
dialects of that.
a boy is to boy as they do in greek.. but I see they translate a
as ένα, which is the cognate an.
I was looking for το, and that to is the in there, also a cognate
of english form of it.
Should I include greek and then russian as dialects to that
They say hebrew is close to both greek and celtic. Those merchants
could live at both sides of the route. Aschkenazi merchants are at
the northern route, and sefards are iberia from spain to georgia.
And probably both routs ended or started at Jerusalem. That
geographic diversity could be the sole reason behind their
n~t? en~the en~de en~het ena~to
it's like n ~ a and t ~ d standing as indefinite and definite
articles. are vowels and sonors indefinite? or are those vowels
and labials, female both of them. Конкретные мужские артикли это
n as new and living
t as olt and truha.
female is alive, male died sooner, because they had to fight? gals
are weak and they survive by this?
female is fu male? not male? I pour japanese and chinese words
into european set. I have to collect all the short words, not only
for english. I should learn all the short words in the world.
made first attempt to solve what I have placed before me:
a, Czech and Vojna a mír: War and peace
a, Danish prep., of, at, to
a, Danish v., imperative of ae, to pet
a, English indef. art. I am a man.
a, French v., 3rd pers. sg. of avoir, to have Il a une voiture: He has a car
a, Hungarian def. art. Éjszaka a
múzeumban: Night at the museum
a, Italian prep., to, at, in Andiamo a
Roma: Let's go to Rome
a, Polish and
a, Portuguese fem. def. art. A mulher de
preto: The woman in black
a, Portuguese prep., to, at
a, Romanian fem. sg. pos. art. O prietenă
de a mea: A friend of mine
a, Romanian marker for inf. verbs A fi
sau a nu fi: To be or not to be
a, Romanian 3rd pers. sg. of modal aux. v. avea (have)
a, Serbo-Croatian and, but
a, Slovak and
a, Slovene but
a, Spanish prep., to, by, at Yo veo a un
hombre: I see a man
à, Dutch prep., per, at, borrowed from French 5 stuks à € 10,-: 5 pieces at €10 each
à, French prep., to, at, per Je vais à
Londres: I'm going to London
à, German See Dutch.
à, Swedish See Dutch.
á, Faroese n., brook, stream, river
á, Faroese prep., on, in, at
á, Icelandic n., river Thames er helsta á
Suður-Englands: Thames is the main river of South England.
á, Icelandic n., ind. acc. sg. of ær, female sheep
á, Icelandic v., 1st and 3rd pers. sg. of eiga, to own Ég á líf: I'm alive
á, Icelandic prep., on, in Ég bý á
Íslandi: I live in Iceland.
å, Danish n., small river, creek
å, Norwegian part., inf. marker Å være
eller ikke være: To be or not to be
å, Swedish n., river, creek
å, Swedish prep., used in certain expressions as on å andra sidan: on the other hand
æ, Icelandic adv., always, forever
e, Hungarian determiner, this
e, Italian and Guerra e pace: War and
e, Portuguese and Guerra e paz: War and
e, Spanish and, when preceding the vowel /i/ Francés e inglés: French and English
è, Italian v., 3rd pers. sg. of essere, to be New York è una città: New York is a city
é, Portuguese v., 3rd pers. sg. of ser, to be Nova York é uma cidade: New York is a city
i, Czech conj., and, even, both Já i ty:
Me and you both
i, Danish prep., in, inside Sport i
Texas: Sports in Texas
I, English 1st pers. sg. I think,
therefore I am
i, Italian m. pl. def. art. I giorni più
belli: The most beautiful days
i, Norwegian prep., in, inside Sport i
Texas: Sports in Texas
i, Polish and Wojna i pokój: War and
i, Serbo-Croatian conj., and, even Rat i
mir: War and peace
i, Slovak and
i, Swedish prep., in, to Sport i Texas:
Sports in Texas
í, Faroese prep., in, into
í, Icelandic prep., in, for Íshokkí er
vaxandi íþrótt í Ungverjalandi: Ice hockey is a growing sport
k, Czech prep., to, towards Běžel k domu:
He ran towards the house
k, Serbo-Croatian prep., to, towards
o, Czech prep., about, for, on Kniha o
tobě: A book about you, O pět let dříve: Five years later
o, Italian or Essere o non essere: To be
or not to be
o, Lithuanian conj., and
o, Polish prep., about, at, for Musimy
porozmawiać o Kevinie: We need to talk about Kevin
o, Portuguese m. def. art. o ditador: the
o, Portuguese pron., him, it as dir. obj.
o, Romanian indef. art. o carte: a book
o, Romanian pron., 3rd p. acc. f. unstressed
o, Serbo-Croatian prep., on, about
o, Slovene prep., about
o, Spanish or Ser o no ser: To be or not
o, Turkish pron., 3rd p., he, she, it
o, Turkish dem. pron., that O gece: That
ö, Swedish n., island Jag är en ö: I am
ø, Danish n., island Pitcairn er en
britisk ø: Pitcairn is a British island
ő, Hungarian pron., 3rd p. sg.
s, Czech with S tebou: With you
u, Afrikaans pron., 2nd p. sg. formal U
het u woorde vervul: You fulfilled your words
u, Czech prep., at, by U moře: At the
u, Dutch pron., 2nd p. sg. formal Bent u
tevreden?: Are you happy?
u, Polish prep., at U kresu dnia: At the
end of the day
u, Serbo-Croatian prep., in, at, to Život
u gradu: Life in the city
u, Spanish or, when preceding the vowel /o/ Con mis padres u otros: With my parents or
v, Czech prep., in, on, for V krabici: Inside a box, V pondělí: On Monday
v, Slovene prep., in, into Življenje v
Evropi: Living in Europe
w, Polish in Noc w muzeum: Night at the
y, French pron., there, to that Nous y
sommes: We are there
y, Spanish conj., and Guerra y paz: War
z, Czech prep., from Z domu: From a
z, Polish prep., from, at Jestem z
Polski: I am from Poland
z, Polish prep., with Z tobą: With you
z, Slovak prep., from
z, Slovene prep., with
а, Bulgarian conj., but, and
а, Macedonian See Bulgarian
а, Russian conj., but, and
а, Serbo-Croatian conj., but, and
а, Ukrainian conj., and, but
в, Bulgarian prep., in, at
в, Russian prep., in, at Спорт в Техасе:
Sports in Texas
в, Ukrainian. See Russian.
е, Bulgarian v., 3rd p. sg. of съм, to be
е, Bulgarian particle for emphasis/questions
е, Macedonian v., 3rd p. sg. of сум, to be
є, Ukrainian v., pres. ind. of бути, to be Життя як воно є: Life as it is
ж, Russian part., after all, very Что ж!:
ж, Ukrainian. See Russian.
з, Belarusian prep., with, since
з, Ukrainian prep., with, from Кімната з
виглядом: A room with a view
и, Russian conj., and, even Война и мир:
War and peace
і, Ukrainian conj., and, even Війна і
мир: War and peace
й, Ukrainian conj., and (after vowels)
Україна й Англія: Ukraine and England
к, Russian prep., to. К новой жизни. To
о, Russian prep., about, against Я читал
о нём: I've read about him
о, Serbo-Croatian prep., about, against
с, Bulgarian prep., with Стая с изглед: A
room with a view
с, Russian prep., with, from Комната с
видом: A room with a view
у, Belarusian prep., in У тумане: In the
у, Russian prep., at, by
у, Serbo-Croatian prep., at, in
у, Ukrainian prep., at, in
ў, Belarusian prep., in (after vowels) Аліса
ў краіне цудаў: Alice in Wonderland
я, Russian 1st pers. pron. Я знаю, куда я
иду: I know where I'm going
я, Ukrainian 1st pers. pron. Люба, я
зменшив дітей: Honey, I shrunk the kids
אַ, Yiddish indef. art.
ε, Greek interj. indicating a wish
η, Greek f. def. art. H Πολυκατοικία: The
Block of Flats
ή, Greek conj., or Να ζει κανείς ή να μη
ζει: To be or not to be
ο, Greek m. def. art. Ο Μαγικός Αυλός:
The Magic Flute
So what I was doing before was only hit and miss. And now, when we
collect all the short words by some computer science, all that
will be at some new level. I asked my friedn for a program that
would return short words out of books fed to it, but before that
program's ready, I can just copy paste some other people research.
Isn't it much better than references? The
Let's first group the ways people look at those letters:
1. and, but
2. of by at to in on (to also as an indecative of indefinite verbs)
3, 1 (indefinite article)
4. 1 (definite article)
5. 1 (per) (actually that per stands next to some at and to, so
thus it unites 2's with 3's & 4's)
7. pet! (verb, imperative)
9. of sheep
always, forever (icelandic)
3. this (which makes e even more similar to a. but then hungarian
is other language family, how dare I)
4. particle for emphasis/questions
5. interjection for a wish
1. and, even, both
2. in, to, for
4. 1's (plural definite article, these)
5 female definite article in greek Η, which
is И which is I
6 or in greek Η, which is И which is I
1. for, at, on, about, against
3. and (lithuanian, compare to hebrew wav)
4. 1 (definite article)
5. 1 (indefinite article)
6. him, it (not far from the previous sense) portuguese
7. her (romanian)
she, it (turkish)
2. in at to by
1. from, since, at
not very many meanings for these shorties across those european
I will figure them out later. My batteries have to recharge
k and v substitute eachother in
like and love
sake and save
but most of the words with these letters don't come in such
pairs, so it's probably nothing
If глсн лшн, what is the diference between
fill and full, feel and fool?
If ones are verbs and the others are adjecives,
what is the difference between fill and fall? feel and fuel?
I don't know. It's time to get high and to look at it from there.
Wednesday, but who is counting.
fail and fuel? Nothing in common, but why are they this close?
Homonyms. We have completer comonyms even when we use vowels.
Without vowels we would simply have more of those.
And I answered that question before I got high. I.. why did I? Why
do I get high each and every day? few times a day too. it's
insane, irresponsible. weak. childish, foolish, insane. Addiction
not addition. What is that c? addicted to some dick. addition
audition, what is that u?
Let's sort those monoliteral words out by the meanings and build
maps for each meaning, for each word, which of them are close, and
which are purely accidental. like that sheep in iceland, nobody
else recognizes a as бе. and it is interesting, because a and b
are the very beginning of the alphabet. (b is the first in one
aicme and a is the first in the other)
Aicme and aet show how runes and ogham related not only
geographically, but also by the ideas.
1. and, but
2. of by at to in on (to also as an indecative of indefinite verbs)
3, 1 (indefinite article)
4. 1 (definite article)
5. 1 (per) (actually that per stands next to some at and to, so
thus it unites 2's with 3's & 4's)
7. pet! (verb, imperative)
9. of sheep
and and but, russian а,
of, by, at, to, in, on, en, let's collect biliteral synonyms for
this from all those languages, and we shall have meanings for many
biliteral words. and only at has the a per se. weird. it's weird.
о is об, about. but not a. But isn't of ~ about? isn't that of
I think so because I know french a
and that a (of, by, at, to, in, on) tells that падежный suffix can
be that very a.
frenchmen place adjectives after nouns, englishmen place them
The same difference in opinions naturally existed before that
(good luck challenging this)
I must continue with computer. To build spectre maps projected
upon the political map.
and is an + ed? attached to the one. to the one mentioned before.
so and is of the same at category.
Or it is a derivative of that category? in english it is
derivative, because and is more complex than an.
в русском: я прошу бессмертия, а ещё я прошу счастья.
а ещё является and в русском, а просто а is more like but.
я пришёл, а ты ушла. It could be translated as and, but it's
actually but. a and b again.
and is yes'ed and but is no'ed?
a is has in french which is very close to yes. h is y indeed. И.
has is very close to и. as if -as is a suffix.
and yet ~ but.
Is yet ~ нет?
yes and yet as aye and bu?
t and b are both noes?
vowels are open, vowels are yAs (as in yazyk. which k shows how
eastern is this word, and more european azbuka also interesting:
az bu ka can be seen as Z B K, where Z is Δ and thus A. it is
weird, I know. I have to get adjusted to it by myself. If air and
fire is the same, B is water, K is rocK. Камень.
АД is Air and Fire? Agni. одни огни? Это фантазия всевозможного
ужаса, для чего она мне? Страх никогда не помогает. Спокойная
уверенность гораздо веселей. Не нервная, спокойная, рациональная,
so thus I united most of the meanings of a into one common "has"
cluster, I only have some local memes where that has came to mean
having a pet and to completely parallel yet structures such as
river and sheep (probably that was what those nations had. but on
the map it will be projected by additional semantic layer. And
colours would be used for extensity of the use. If in english
books 3% of words are a and in french only 1% is, then above
Britain that word would shine more red.
always, forever (icelandic)
Thisone probably connects two words. The previous and the next yo.
3. this (which makes e even more similar to a. but then hungarian
is other language family, how dare I)
4. particle for emphasis/questions
5. interjection for a wish
First three meanings are from the a-group, and should be the local
changes in the pronouncing of that a.
That map will be semantic. And if some longer forms of that river
a and sheep a (and I yet have to recalculate it all by my program)
1. and, even, both
2. in, to, for
4. 1's (plural definite article, these)
5 female definite article in greek Η, which
is И which is I
6 or in greek Η, which is И which is I
It seems that a thing go in all shades and shapes.
Yet here I as in individual is extracted from the mass of a.
It's wonderful how the pronoun antonymy plays between english I
and greek Η.
also greek i is o in the west. I wonder why and if it's connected
to the east - ost or east - west thing.
Those are different things. ost is east.
Some local slavic meme. I wonder in which territory will I find
it. I have to make a program to retransliterate those texts first.
And it won't help either, because semitic languages merge these
shorties to the following words.
1. for, at, on, about, against
3. and (lithuanian, compare to hebrew wav)
4. 1 (definite article)
5. 1 (indefinite article)
6. him, it (not far from the previous sense) portuguese
7. her (romanian)
she, it (turkish)
o island in the a river.
And both are in dannish and swedish.
Not exactly o, ö or ø
another local slavic meme. or global slavic meme if you really
look at it.
both k & s are c. to and with are close semantically to co-
and that very co- is read as so- in russian and is that very s.
2. in at to by
or is that o or, both u and o for or are spanish. but probably not
Is some slavic meme again. probably some wrong way to read greek ν
the same as in i, just different orthography
1. from, since, at
the same as in s, just different orthography
The way to pronounce yo I guess. See way and weg, where й becomes
g, which can be ʒ too. And that сближение is perfectly drawn as g
Russian way to say I. I wonder if ik and ich is yak somewhere.
Yakatt is to say Я a lot.
Я could be some ligatura of i and a. with a long tail, as
they used to draw it in the past, 𐲀.
4chan (I even added the stroke between O
and б) 43606 suddenly I want to open my hospital. free one.
h~n ~ b
this chaotic whatever tells me, speaks to me, h~n~v~b~ (in the
ring. some ring is what's in)
(був хован. хован бавен. убавен
this demands d to keep the rhythm. all bdfh are long. only g is
long but g is below the line, unlike those four. f could be a form
of p, but look at it now. lk mno there this order is non-existant.
But in the musical notes, for whatever reason it is
and if the k-part of the alphabet has any order, it's not this
one. Let's look if there's any:
p and t standing high above low forms, but isn't p low? p is like
f. And because f is so convenienly high, p is probably also high?
пей эс уота. руота жёсткая вода. жёще вообще наверное небывает
(сака менее заметна и возможно более распространена и моча.. моча
как реактивная струя, when people pisses us up.
ᚢ and ᚺᚻ are bistaffed runes, thus are ligatures. Can I say so? Y
is ligature. it's ij, Y is greek U, У is russian U. T is the final
letter of the bible. two thousand year old tradition. I may
think they adopted the best one. Did they know that roman alphabet
ended with V after T?
abcdefghijklmnopqrstv? it's 21. without jk it's only 19. is g c?
is it 18? is q k too? c is enough for them all. 17? then is there
s or is c good enought for it too? russians write s as с. not cs,
гс, their c is voiced, like in greek, that's why they have some
mess in the second line without g. They seem to bother some of
western letters, but not all of them, because they had g in г
already. Did they borrow г? what did they have before it? Or
did they alwas have г but only as what.. гс is half of cs. what!
abc was there. aБg
Like musical triad, rotated as we saw them in the ancient greek
okay, I leave it here, I gaze into this table and I question
myself: how can I trust it? why am I here?
pq reflects bd too good to be a coincidence. and I recognize them
which tells that whether q was t or c, or that d was г actually,
before c somebody had to be г and who could be it better than g
(g is d in russia)
abg before abc and аз бу ка
opд then? this symmetry demands g if it looks like
that. so maybe it looks like д
and if g stands for q, for k, let's return to the basic:
bd [bg], [bd]
pq [pk], [pt]
vowels are some different story, but here we see how voiced are
higer than the line, voiceless are lower than the line.
But what is g? g was asking us about it before.
nah, no such correlation.
but in the prototimes of
it could be. if such times ever existed.
It seems like originally they are just bd or bt pair. Myth tels
about two consonants, not four.
of short words in europe I can see a v k~s (all of them are
preserved in slavic languages, only a is known in others.
if that a is also one, some, it could be 1 then it probably was
aleph. Arabs maybe destroyed their own history for the sake of
muhammadness. What is their writing systems? They probably lived
in these places all the time and egypt was on the west and
mesopotamia was to the east, Indian ocean was at the sourth, Some
Jerusalem was at the north of them. They could have got several
ا ب گ or ا و ق or none of above?
ب reminds v or u indeed, but it's b. but then it could be
dalectal, as greeks name B both beta and vita.
вот это жизнь ~ вот это лучше
Here I am way out of my depth. Let's leave these semitic things to
some semitic researchers, who speak the language and sees theeir